Search the Community

If you become alien mind like Leo describes, maybe you can access alien technology too. Maybe there is a universal Internet which you can access with a specific state of mind. There you can communicate with alien species around the whole universe. Maybe there is already an alien meta verse out there

Sure? Jacques Vallée, Passport to Magonia Jacques Vallée, Dimensions. Chapter "Conclusion: Exploring Other Dimensions" https://www.dmtx.org/ Rick Strassmann, Inner Paths to Outer Space: Journeys to Alien Worlds through Psychedelics and Other Spiritual Technologies Selling (imaginary) Alien&ETs by the River

I think going straight to God would be easier than alien hell. Again, haven't done it. But you don't know what my mushroom trips, or my weed trips are like. They're utterly horrifying.

We will never know the yoga practices, psychedelics, or scientific discoveries of the alien species on other planets.

@zazen Yes and no. Yes animals can mimic art by being trained in pattern recognition and most are driven by instincts. No in that I'm arguing that ART is far more bigger, hierarchical, and wider that it includes humans, animals, ghosts, anything with sentience has ART to some degree. The ART of a bird making a nest and bird songs, some birds even mimic sounds perfectly, is art at that form or level. Different level of ART when a human does S.T.E.M shit like airplane design or nuclear bombs and nuclear plants, even drawing and visualizing drawing. ART has degrees and a spectrum to it, just like consciousness has degrees. Human consciousness way different from ant's, or a spirit, or an alien, same with ART. I thought I was clear enough for most users reading my arguments? I'm saying art has levels, and not just saying humans only have ART and no animal cannot have art right? Spectrum right? I have realized this discourse was derailed hard into ART existential bs when it's specifically about music being objective or subjective? Sorry OP, seems my argument points here going above most people's heads so I'm outta this thread. All because some guys are jealous an elephant can paint a tree or birds sing better than they do right?

@OBEler How am I answering this myself that there's no art seen here? Why are you making it like my answer is it's only animal abuse and hard training when I said the animal is capable of ART by it's behaviors, like the bird constructing a hut and nest for it's mate, or the octopus using shells and mimicking it's surroundings, or the fish using a shell, or the elephant using a paint brush to paint a tree? Even a Chimpanzee uses branches and stones is part of ART. Visual capacity, trunk control(limb control in other animals/humans/aliens) and internalizations and mental representations and sense making apparatuses in our minds, consciousness, and external factors have EVERYTHING to do with ART! YES! You are an artist if you draw lines on a number picture, draw using pencils or pens or charcoal on a canvas or other surface mediums. At least when you demonstrate the externalities of ART like marking onto parts of an environment. And when you have consciousness of a human, animal, alien or any sentient life YOU ARE AN ARTIST! Spare me the moral outrage of an elephant being forced to draw this shit for tourists to get rewards. I get and understand that I won't forget that, and I will NEVER FORGET the sacrifices of other artists and the Mangakas that draw beautifully forcing themselves in minimum wages just top draw amazing artwork that FEELS AUTHENTIC! Of course ART will have some sacrifices and sufferings to making ART! I suffer making my own ART having to deal with my health and mental problems trying to draw my own ART! Do you think the birds and the bees and the Elephant and the octopus wants to deal with all that ART to survive and maintain their lives in this world?! Everything based on developmental factors, ART has internal and external factors, is systemic and based on the Spiral Dynamics stages of development, moral and cognitive development, psychology, society, cultural programing, information ecology, one's ideological beliefs indoctrinated.

Once on a mushroom trip I looked at my hands and they seemed strange, alien, twisted, monstrous. Everything I looked at had that same quality, threatening, unfamiliar, hostile, but the hands were the hands of a demon. Fortunately I managed to turn that environment into something, let's say, fluid.

Interestingly the actor r Matthew David McConaughey that is the protagonist in Interstelar is a scientist in Contact the very one who gave a compass to Dr. Eleanor Arroway and she give back saying that could save his life one day. And in Interstelar we have him and the Broken watch that is crucial to send the message inside de blackhole singularity to his child. In Contact she goes to a dangerous uncertaing trip and end up in a holographic beach where she meet her father who actually is an Alien that is showing up like that to not scare her. In Interstellar He also get inside of a place that was suppose to kill him (the blackhole) but actually is a place here he can conect with different time spaces. I feel there is a good possibility that the Director of Interstellar made some conections on purpouse since both movies deal with the same Ideia of the Mistery of Time, Space and Other Inteligent beings out there. And is nice to rememeber that in Interstelar the "Beings" who opened the blackhole were future humans themselfs. I think watching both movies in a row would be interesting and taking notes of the interconections.

In another thread people started to "attack" me, because I was talking rationally. They somehow concluded, that I must not have spiritual experience. I think spiritual experience is about making our mind more open, feeling the harmony and synchronicity. It's a state of mind, where you have a very deep sense of meaning. It's the "mindfulness" thinking, where your mind puts you into a state of wisdom and synchronicity, which arise from emptyness, and turns you into an egoless being. This is the truth of ethics, truth pointing to the higher. The rational, intellectual mind, which creates a "reason", is another power. It's to arise the logic, which is a negative pole on another end of the truth - when you do positive things, "supertruth", which arose from mindfulness, you still have further the negative truth. There is the truth of logic - it's pointing to the lack of the lower. Meditations have two extremes: meditations of non-concentration, like the Zen, and meditations of concentration or focus. When you concentrate on your thoughts, feelings, a mantra or a candle, then in some forms the concentration takes you to lower states. You do not think in terms of the whole, but in terms of the parts. You see how, the ideal meets the logic somewhere, and the ideals get destroyed. To think in the parts, being intellectual instead of mindful, has also another superpower - you think like a part, you work on tiny bit of something grander. Then, your enlightenment becomes the collective enlightenment - when you think intellectually, you think in union with others, and everybody works on their small part. This is the western superpower, and it has been very successful in enforcing it's power in the world - many eastern countries are also civilized in the western way, even if they work hard to integrate this to their own thinking. There is the whole, and it's reasonable to be mindful about this. Mind is capable to work with the wholes. But there are the parts and it's reasonable to be intellectual about them. The intellect is capable to work with the parts. When the mindfulness, the yang, becomes into extreme, it breaks. Maybe you live in a dream, but your dream starts to eat some kind of resources - for a dream to exist, and to exist in a power of civilization, there has to be a lots of logic. You see a dream, your mind is being a whole, but your brain is working like a machine. The second problem is witchcraft. You can be very enlightened and really able to build your dream. But then, in the end, it break logic - logic of mind, of community, of business, politics or physics. For example, people misunderstand your teachings and make mistakes. In this end, not by how the dream-nature goes, but how the logical reality goes, you get some bad karma, and it's slowly going to break you - you are witch in a sense that your karmic connections do not meet end-to-end, but there is some falsehood, where you cannot achieve your good karmic effect. Then, what you promised by your heightened states, becomes a lie, and people, who believed or synchronized subconsciously, become manipulated - because you are not able to give, what you promised and believed. This is a situation to be scientifically analyzed, because there are logical chains of actions, which do not meet together. It's extremely insulting to suggest people to not think rationally, to not use the power of the reason. It's another aspect of the same thing, when a materialist or an atheist is laughing about spirituality and fighting it down. The whole mind is both yin and yang - yin in looking the parts, yin in rationality and reason, and yang in looking the whole, yang in spirituality and belief. The Christianity and the Scientific Thought is working on the parts, and on the bigger wholes, which can be made up of the parts. People are together, and work for the greater whole, which they create or get from the God - one person is a small part of it. The Buddhism or Hinduism works rather with the small wholes, which start feeling the wholistic axes of the Universe, and synchronizing with this; the wholistic view is very personal. Still they cannot think so easily, how the parts work together. The intellectual thought brings the karmic ends together, until every person gets energy from activities, which are good to the system. By this karmic synchronization, it creates a civilization, a church, or a scientific community around the world. In this system, a person puts very little effort into getting their karma together - by following the direct reward and punishment, their karmic effects are already enlightened. They do not have to waste personal energy on this - they follow the easiest way, and in the system, by this non-doing, they behave like good parts. By this, the system starts operating like a machine - nobody is wasting the energy, but they only receive it, and the system is able to carry on with it's karmic responsibility. This creates the miracles of science, development of countries, other economical, political and intellectual miracles. It's able to win wars with personally enlightened beings - not exactly against the enlightened ones, but towards civilizing their cultures, which do not work like machines. The personal, mindful enlightenment, works on personal effort. The karmic thing to understand to behave well is very big, and then, the creative people try to create the civilization or the unity. It does not work like a machine, but takes the effort every day, and can burn out the participants. In civilization, when there is also a personal level of enlightenment - this is the supercivilization. When intellectual people are also mindful, it's a whole new potential. I think this combination of yin and yang is not possible to be beaten - the enlightened people are able to care about their surroundings and to work out the civilization, so that there is no need to civilize and colonize something for the others. It's very important to see that in Christianity and science, a big whole becomes enlightened and a single person thinks like a little part of the system, they think intellectual thoughts, which are never a whole - those thoughts are little parts of the whole. When this becomes enlightened, by big revolutions, like the scientific revolution and the democratic revolutions, it organized a huge brain, where people are tiny cells - and this brain becomes enlightened somehow, even if this is secret. I have always felt that in the big superpowers, there is some enlightened soul, which understands an enlightened person very well. They speak about alien contacts, psychic powers etc., which are somewhere there in the enlightened communities and act on their own. In those, an enlightened soul can see some extreme clear vision and wisdom, which recognizes the enlightened soul and their role in society, as the superpower itself has the same powers and understandings; it has became to be by enforcing the love, brotherhood and friendship, the collective good karma. On the other hand, Buddhists, Hinduists and others have the personal enlightenment - when a part is seeing the whole, it's like a dot on the hologram; from small number of such dots, the complete hologram can be formed - but there is more noise; from many of such dots, the hologram achieves good quality. When you take a little part of the hologram; every part contains the whole, but the whole has better quality, when the part is bigger. The part feels like a whole, but it cannot say it's the final end - the final end is when many parts feel the whole. The process is then creative and not systematic, and it needs a new effort every day, where, in the collective mind, only a system works and does it's thing kind of automatically - an official does not need to meditate every day for the government to exist, he simply does his little part like a machine. To be complete, we need to work for individual, mindful thinking, to have one projection of the hologram of the whole; but we also need to be intellectual and think in terms of the parts of the system or a machine, to combine our collective effort and build something grander than ourselves. This also has to exist inside ourselves - we have a mindful wisdom, but also the intellectual knowledge about the parts of the algorithms our mind sees as the wholes.

Leo you've claimed that you've accessed Alien Superhuman levels of Intelligence.. If an alien were vastly smarter than humans, it would be because they have a much more advanced brain with lots more neurons and connections. So, intelligence is based on biology. This is also why God/Infinite Intelligence must be formless/non-physical because if it had a form it would need to be infinite in order to be Infinitely Intelligent. But how could a psychedelic drug make you that much smarter when it just changes your neurotransmitters? Since it doesn't affect the number of neurons in your limited physical brain.

I feel as though I should not let myself off the hook. That is I feel a compulsion to get my life fixed. I don't really know what this fixing entails, but there is a definite constant nagging anxiety that isn't going away. However, the sensation is complex. I've always been a "fixer". As a kid I loved to take things apart and sometimes put them back together again. I was curious about the mysterious stuff inside mundane objects: TVs, alarm clocks, computers, washing machines and on and on. And of course when stuff broke, I could sometimes fix it, because I wasn't afraid of that complexity inside stuff. What's inside me? Well, it's definitely not cogs and levers and wires and components. The last ten or more years I've had an insatiable appetite to understand people in the same sort of way as I understand a toaster say. Naturally, understanding people is really nothing at all like understanding a toaster. In a way understanding people is completely alien to my way of thinking, and yet I have an itch to scratch. Some of it is the fault of my Dad who has been into the people thing a long time. Early on in my teenage years I started to absorb this stuff by osmosis - NLP and models of behaviour and improving communication and personal development - but I never really cared much for it. Anyway. My modus operandi has always been that if I have a problem, I fix it. Until that problem is fixed I feel a constant nagging anxiety. This is one of the traits that makes me think I'm on the spectrum. It's both a blessing and a curse. When it comes to myself however, it's quite possible that I'm working from the wrong paradigm. It's possible that in fact I don't need to or can't really "fix" my life as I would fix a toaster. No doubt there are low hanging fruit and if I paid enough attention those things, it would be easy enough to resolve in my life: girlfriend, buy a house, live somewhere I want to. Those things are "fixable" even if they're not particularly minor. When it comes to fixing ordinary objects it's really a matter of assessing the problem and then reducing the problem to its components. It's then a matter of identifying which components are faulty and fixing those one-by-one. There are components to my life but the difference is that they're all intimately connected to each other and bleed into each other; changing one thing here affects everything else. So I get this sensation of overwhelm whenever I think about fixing or changing any part of my life, there's too many variables and subtlety going on. One thing I feel strongly about myself is a dissonance between the parts of my life. For example if I were to stop doing the job I do tomorrow, I would not miss it all or the people I work with. That lack of emotion tells me that I am in fact doing the wrong thing. I spend an inordinate amount of time pandering to something I couldn't care less about - and yet it is keeping me alive. I spend a lot of time following my interests which are hugely varied. One reason I'm attracted to this forum and to Leo's stuff in general is because of the polymathic nature of it. I've been the same since I was small. Again my Dad is a bit of a polymath, but I've definitely surpassed him in that department! My sister too. Being this way excites me, there's so much stuff to learn and get to know about. I find very few other people are this way, it's kind of a sad and so I tend to not share my interests, people honestly just don't care. I try on occasion but soon give up. Sometimes people are even suprised by my depth of knowledge on a subject, people that know me well. Another component is precisely the people in my life. I half heartedly maintain a set of friendships. I find inserting myself into their lives difficult, that is to say that they are less flexible than I am. If I give it any thought it's a strange dynamic I have with my friends and my family. I think the source of that strangeness is me (this is another trait which makes me think I'm on the spectrum). I can find people exhausting and difficult to handle, my introvert nature shining through there. And yet a lot of the time I feel most relaxed, happy and connected when I'm with people. I also spend a lot of my idle time watching people via YouTube for example. In that sense I'm fairly extroverted. So there is a constant tension I have to navigate between these two poles. (It's not lost on me that I should do an NLP parts integration process here, as I've suggested to someone else on this forum.) That self imposed lack of connection to people is causing me sadness and it's ridiculous. When I went travelling all I did was spend time with other people, albeit with the odd bit of me time, and I was happy on the whole. I love my friends, but they are super conventional and normal. I've ended up being super conventional, and yet I'm 51 not married, no kids, no pets etc. Again I feel a very strong tension between wanting to be super conventional and not being conventional at all. I blame my parents (why not?). My Mum married a foreigner and moved to another country, my Dad is 78 doesn't want to retire and wants to go live in China (FFS). Anyway, these shenanigans by my parents have rubbed off on to my way of being. In some way, I'm playing pretend at being conventional when my very being is rebelling against this. Some of the reasons I'm standoffish with my family is that their unconventionality irks me (very big LOL here). My sister married an American and lives in Delaware and left her three kids in the UK with their father (grrrr). Another polarity in my life is that between my mental and physical self. I'm very much thought heavy in my being and this is strongly connected to my introversion. I get a lot of enjoyment out of thinking and learning, by myself. But I do also like to use my body, I hike, I play some sports, I play musical instruments - and it gives me a lot of joy too. I feel a strong imbalance however, I'm very much in a sedentary mental space most of the time. The balance needs to be redressed. In an odd way I also associate being physical with my more extroverted side. So. Some of the things I need to fix are all these bloody opposing tensions in my life, they're exhausting and keeping me in limbo. Some of things are to do with purely re-aligning things: the way I earn money should be connected to the things that make me happy: people and polymathy and physicality. But I feel I also need to live somewhere that allows me to express those things more easily, a rainy cold country such as the UK is not conducive to going out and being physical or wanting to go outside the home; it doesn't fit my more extroverted nature. I need to escape this conventionality, lack of alignment and disconnectedness it's killing me slowly inside.

After realizing perfect self love, you become "I" again. So alien consciousness. https://youtu.be/cIxGUAnj46U?si=ooVE_f5i2B4-wyrl

Imagine feeding all of the Leos content for AI and making a custom Alien-God-mind-bot. That would guarantee some interesting convos while tripping for sure.

There many different types of intelligence: there is logical intelligence, emotional intelligence, Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence... There's also philosophical or existential intelligence. The former is what society ranks more in these tests, the latter is what is beneficial for Awakening. Holistic Intelligence would be intelligence in all these domains, Alien Intelligence? It's actually fascinating to contemplate about this. Intelligence is it's own reward; a unique joy.

@mmKay I think that the biggest beliefs I have are that: - I shouldn't feel bad. - I shouldn't have a victim-like mindset even in situations I can't fully control, because this mindset is completely wrong and despicable. - I should't feel like a victim of my mind. - My mind should work better (for exemple, send me hormones that make me feel good when I do something good, like finishing an important task, doing some work, doing some physical exercice). - I should want to have a life purpose. - I should be positive and add value to the word in some way and so I shouldn't have too much negative energy within me. - I should do more and be better. - I should more actively try to change myself, to more actively try to control my thinking and how I feel, and be able to change how I feel however how my life is. - I should be able to change much more quickly. I am waisting time while life is short. - People should not be cruel, mean or stupid, but I should be capable of accepting humanity as it is, so I am the one at fault here too. So my core beliefs are that everything that is wrong is me/within me, and external reality is just as it is/as it should be. Though, I wish I was born on another planet with more advanced beings, and so I wish I was myself one of those more advanced beings on that other planet. But that is a side note, because I know this can't be another way now and it is a bit easier to accept than the rest (or rather, I try to believe that I accept that more easily). As I know the only thing I can do about that here is to reach alien intelligences and stuffs like that, and I get excited about this too (but just slightly because my mind doesn't give me strong "excitment hormones" either). It doesn't make me feel worse to think about those things because I constantly am thinking about them… so they're more conscious than unconscious. But I really struggle about the accepting part. I sometimes really try to accept a situation, something that happened, or just that I am not perfect. But I can spend hours trying, and it still wouldn't work, as if I had extremely strong patterns in my mind that I can't break. It really feels solid, and the part of me that wants to change that or accept things is not strong enough or clever enough. I can't see what I do wrong nor why I can't succeed at that, at accepting and changing. Now, if everything I just wrote above was really untrue, meaning… I should feel bad, my mind should not send me feel good hormones, I shouldn't do more and I shouldn't be better, I shouldn't be able to change quickly, etc. I feel a slight relief, but it is so slight I barely notice it.

Alien Communism confirmed! But seriously, great list.

Other examples of traps here are various kinds of limiting beliefs. When you believe that you can't do something, that can become a self-fulfilling prophecy and it can become true just by virtue of the fact that you believe it, even though it may not be an actual reflection of your limitations. The reality is that you don't really know what you're capable of until you try really hard at it. Or something like telling yourself that it's too late to start. You know, it's too late to colearn art, it's too late to pursue my dream career. Then that can become true for you and then that becomes a trap. Another trap that's very interesting is not taking people's self-reports of their experiences seriously. I see a lot of atheists and scientists doing this, like for example when people give them reports of their psychedelic trips or their spiritual and mystical experiences. What these people do is they just dismiss it as like, "Oh, it's just fantasy, it's hallucination, it's just delusions." That's a mistake, that kind of attitude is a mistake. Really what you want to do there is, of course, people can be deluded about all sorts of mystical stuff, but you want to in general be more sensitive to how people report their direct experiences of reality because what you'll discover if you take that stuff seriously is that people simply experience reality quite differently from each other and from you. That's a big revelation because if you assume everybody experiences reality as you do, as the scientific materialist assumes reality is experienced, that's a mistake, that's a big epistemological mistake and it prevents you from understanding reality at the deeper levels. And then that's why you're so puzzled by all this mystical religious spiritual phenomena that people keep talking about. Yeah, of course you're puzzled, it's not because they're deluded, it's because you have a very limited conception of how conscious experience works. And then confirmation bias comes into play here and then that gets you stuck in your materialist paradigm. Another trap is repressing your problems with people and then acting passive-aggressively towards them. This is the passive-aggressive trap. Another one is not communicating in relationships. To have proper relationships, you need to communicate, exactly at those times when you don't feel like communicating. Another trap is hearing what you want to hear rather than listening carefully to what is being said. Another trap is calling people crazy, deluded, and evil rather than seeking to genuinely understand their perspective. It's so easy to dismiss a perspective by just calling somebody crazy. Another trap is judgment. Judgment, judgment, judgment. Judgment is just like, honestly, the more I do this work, the more I see that a giant chunk of the problems of my mind are just me judging reality and judging other people. And it's so hard to stop doing that because it's just wired into our egos. And then that brings me to the next point, which is the trap of morality. Morality is a huge can of worms, and I'm going to have a new episode coming up on that as well. So yeah, morality is just a trap. The whole field of morality is a trap, and then especially, I want to point out this kind of feeling of moral righteousness and indignation that we get. That's a trap. That feeling, whenever it comes up, that's a trap. And the kind of moralizing you do to others, the demonizing of others, the kind of virtue signaling that you do, whether it's politically based or not, spiritually based, all of this is a giant trap. Crusading, the Lesser Jihad, this kind of stuff, moral crusading, big traps, really. It's a kind of projection. Another trap is thinking that you're good when actually you're evil. I want to do a whole episode in the future, which is something along the lines of "you're not good, you're evil." I had this epiphany myself lately. You know, I've thought of myself as a good person for my whole life and then realized recently, just during my long extended break, I realized all the evil things that I've done throughout my life and just how big of a fantasy this whole idea of me being a good person really is. Another trap is trying to save the world, having this kind of Messiah complex where it's like, "I have to save the world, and if I don't do it, nobody else will, and the world will end in an apocalypse." This is usually a delusion. Another trap is doing armchair philosophy, speculating, and mental masturbation. Another one is always taking the centrist view, taking the midpoint of any controversy, splitting the difference between every perspective, as though the truth is somewhere down the middle. That's not how truth works. If you have a pro-slavery position and an anti-slavery position, the truth is not down the middle. Breaking your integrity is a trap, and there's a lot of things in life that will lure you away from your integrity and make you think like, "Oh, well, my integrity is not that important because I can get some money, some sex, some this, some that, a promotion, some fame, some clicks on YouTube." Excessive empathy is a trap. This is a trap that stay-AG, green Progressive leftists fall into. Empathy, of course, is important, and a lack of empathy is its own kind of trap that the right wing falls into. But the left wing falls into excessive empathy, and this can lead to problems. Thinking that everyone experiences reality as you do, that's a trap. Overgeneralizing and projecting your experiences onto others, that's a trap. Assuming that others have the same personality type as you, strengths as you, and capabilities as you, this kind of simplistic idea that, "Well, if one man can do it, then every man can do it, you can do it too." No, that's just not true. A lot of things that great men and women in history have done cannot be repeated precisely because they were unique genetically, they had unique personalities, unique strengths, unique capabilities. That's what the world's geniuses, if they're true geniuses, are, a kind of Albert Einstein, you know, the world's greatest mathematicians, logicians, physicists, musicians, this kind of stuff. An ordinary person doesn't have these capabilities, the visualization capabilities of a Nikola Tesla, an ordinary human doesn't have the ability for Nikola Tesla to visualize an entire electric motor in his own mind and prototype it in his mind before he even built it and then have it actually built the way that he prototyped it in his mind. That's beyond the capabilities of a normal human being, that's like alien levels of intelligence that is, which is why he's revered as one of the greats of human history because he wasn't normal. And you'll also find that that's true of many spiritual teachers, is that they're exceptionally gifted, they're not just ordinary people who meditated a lot, they're way beyond that. And that leads us to the next trap, which is assuming that everybody has the same spiritual giftedness or level of talent. That's not true at all.

These three words are seemingly quite unrelated in western and eastern terms, but some magic of words has made that they actually have the same underlying concept. In west, the terms are collective and intellectual - intellectuality is the way to think collectively, intellectuals share their thoughts and create something bigger out of it. In east, the same terms are individual and introspective. Meanings of the three words: Meditation. In West, the meditations of Descartes and similar ones, like the ones of Marcus Aurelius, are made to create the philosophical scrunity about the world as the science sees it - the shared, collective world. It starts from "I am", and then proves the existence of the world and the people - when you are philosophical, skeptical about all this, you have reached somewhere with your meditations. The Problems of Philosophy, by Bertrand Russell, is also about the philosophical questions about the world you need to solve to be skeptical and thus, scientific. The common, shared mind is created through those meditations, where you contemplate on intellectual ideas your intellectual mind can reach. The intellectual knowledge is shared. In the Buddhist meditation, you contemplate on your inner world, your mind, and reach the same kind of skeptical attitude about this. The inner and outer world, both solve the whole - as you know your mind, you know also about the objects your mind can see. Enlightenment. In west, this is collective. Emergence of Science, Democracy and other such things are the way out of Dark Ages, and those processes are called enlightenment in western terms. This is where the people come out of darkness. In East, the enlightenment is personal, it happens to each person individually. Superpower. In west, superpowers appear from the collective good karma reached by civilization. Superpowers - for example, when I was born, Soviet Union and United States were called superpowers - appear when the collective work has purified the karma of the people. When the architecture and the common habits are such that people can not easily create bad karma, and when the tax system is making every person to give some money to the poor, the effect of the good karma appear. It's not personal, thus the enlightened being is hidden somewhere in the government corridors, but it's not the government itself - it has connections to aliens, psychic powers etc. Government of US told that they are fighting to get some access to alien data - so the superpower must be a different entity of any person; it appears somewhere in the collective and identifies with all the people together, but it has a typical signature of enlightened person - as the law makers fight for people to be civilized, an individual don't do much to this, but they cannot exercise bad karma so much, as it's effects are neutralized - good karma appears. In east, similar things like connections with aliens and psychic powers appear personally. I think the superpowers are all friends. The governmental superpower is very understanding to the enlightened person, even when the government is not - it can understand the "magic", which comes out of good karma. The miracles come from good karma - it's the basic essential, which gives rise to all the siddhis. I don't think the natural laws are broken, rather they are made stronger - but we see there is a lots of progress achieved from good karma in all the fields; one superpower of a civilization is advanced technology, which inevitably appears where the masses have good karma. They cannot easily exercise the effects of the bad karma. Christianity and the Advanced Civilization are western collective exercises of karma. There is the saviour - either the Church or the God is going to save your soul, or the government is saving you, like educating and protecting from evil; evil itself gets better karma as it's being kept under some control and supervision. The general conception is that people, collectively, are reaching the state, where the individuals are being saved from their bad deeds, and they have much more than would come from their personal efforts. You can say a person is lost in this, and this is bad - but also, they are saved from many things. This is the yin aspect of a person, and the yang aspect of the government. In east, nobody is going to save you, but you have to work up your karma and it's directly having the effects on your life. Here, the state is having somewhat a yin aspect, and the person is being yang about their lives. In China, you can see the buddhism is somewhat mixed with the civilization and they have a different authority - you can see the buddhists are learning the enlightenment in west, for example they are interested in scientific results about their work. From the history of war you can see buddhist countries have been conquered and civilized by the west. I think the true buddhist has not been under attack, but the pagans, which they could not civilize, were civilized by others. This creates some constant feeling in eastern buddhists, who show a lots of respect towards the powers of civilization and science. They cannot win this, unless the science and civilization are corrupt - but the west, also, learns a lot from the buddhist teachings of the personal level, as the personal level of the west was quite underdeveloped. The christ wanted to bring heaven to earth, where all the people get something, whereas the buddhist help people on earth closer to heaven - in first case, you live in a grand reality and unify this under a greater good; in second one, you make yourself a person from who the world can benefit more. Real power is connecting the yin and yang into one unified power. The intellectual knowledge, which leads to science, needs to be connected with the individual wisdom, which leads to personal enlightenment. The power of politicial and financial theories and the systems of many people they create need to be unified with individual goodness. I call the western superpower the "reason". It's not going to better place by personal journey, but it's going to worse places and making them better, it's trying to find solutions outside this personal sphere. The spiritual people in west, lately I see the enlightened people, indigo children and others, who are seeking personal enlightenment or achieved some level or gene, they are very often left on streets, losing jobs, unable to marry and get children, or they are considered insane or mad, or with some psychological problem of community living - they have a lots of personal problems, which are supposed to be solved collectively. The personal enlightenment makes you a better person for everybody, for the collective - but you are not specifically a collective thinker, who "saves" others and guides them to better life with authority; you only want them to understand the reasons and work on themselves. The government and the church make karma of people better not by them understanding this, but by analyzing the actual process of karmic consequence and controlling the environment so that the consequence is better. Thus, the person cannot achieve enlightenment, but the collective soul can - the person does not identify with his better karma, but it appears higher than the sight of the persons, as a collective evidence we can see when we talk about governments having contacts with aliens and entities, which create psychic powers. We can see some grand power is protecting a civilized person quite entirely from witchcraft - they can live in safe, material surroundings. The witchcraft actually becomes a problem for a person out of civilization. The reason is another superpower of the mind, and it's needed by any person with psychic powers as well. They can meditate on better politics, economics etc., but when they do not reason, the normal material causes and effects block their work; you don't win much when you just create good feelings in people of business and politics, or the nation - you have to create good and rational feelings, and those people need to work together. The material process is very real and I do not think that the spiritual process actually breaks the material law - as with any science, spiritual people can reach some effects and consequences, which are not covered easily by theories of physics, economics or politics, but any specialized field does this - it finds something specific not covered by general theories very directly. Once the spiritual people have found this anomaly, it's fixed - there is no effect of psychic powers, which constantly breaks the natural laws and does not become a part of developed science; in terms of modern psychology and quantum theory, the effects of magic and spirituality, or enlightenment, are not exactly outside of theory. With models of enlightenment and spirituality you can reach effective and easy to work with models to make yourself more effective - but when the theories of good karma are applied to scientific work and the material processes, they also invent new technologies, which were not there, and the material knowledge of the world gets "broken". I don't think the reason behind any spiritual theory is to find anomalies in physics, economy and politics - those will not become miraculously different, but still go with their slow progress and definitely develop the sciences further, with the help of spiritual people or without. This is the thinking of naive atheist, who thinks that their science would be debunked in case some spiritual person proves their claims - the usual claims are quite normally expected from science. People get more sensitive, effective, and calm, and they definitely see the life appearing richer than before - this is the way up, but it's not breaking the things we know as science. By this, spiritual theories goind with resonance with science - to be more intellectual, spiritual people need to talk about what they really do in shared, material world; for example, more sensitive girl can be more effective in social relations and they can prove this efficiency by it's material effects; it's stupid to claim that they break the natural law - a good psychologist with good attitude towards people and work would break the same "laws", which appear in the lives of the worse people. A model of mind, which is directed to pure results in something - definitely it leads to better results and sometimes, you can not easily understand, how the science would reach those results. But what is really in effect, is the good karma and the logic, and it creates similar theories and results everywhere - in physical and in mental aspects of the world. What we can all communicate, is the material process, and we can see the material laws are very clearly followed when we are efficient - from having psychic powers, you reach some extra points in efficiency, but to be a social person and enlightened in western way, you need to explain those extra points based on evidence, and you don't need to talk spiritually - with material theories you also reach the claims that you "are in the heaven", when you have much money etc., and in normal communication, you should hide your psychic talk into these normal parts of the sentences nobody would notice much. Otherwise, you are really insisting people that you are doing anomalies in the theory - when a meditative enlightened person meditates on the well-being of the nation, they get some extra feeling and energy finally, you resonate a better thing when you communicate with them, but the natural causes and effects are still there, you cannot explain their better results without considering these. So, really, you need all this collective effort and IQ to do this.

Other examples of traps here are various kinds of limiting beliefs. When you believe that you can't do something, that can become a self-fulfilling prophecy and it can become true just by virtue of the fact that you believe it, even though it may not be an actual reflection of your limitations. The reality is that you don't really know what you're capable of until you try really hard at it. Or something like telling yourself that it's too late to start. You know, it's too late to colearn art, it's too late to pursue my dream career. Then that can become true for you and then that becomes a trap. Another trap that's very interesting is not taking people's self-reports of their experiences seriously. I see a lot of atheists and scientists doing this, like for example when people give them reports of their psychedelic trips or their spiritual and mystical experiences. What these people do is they just dismiss it as like, "Oh, it's just fantasy, it's hallucination, it's just delusions." That's a mistake, that kind of attitude is a mistake. Really what you want to do there is, of course, people can be deluded about all sorts of mystical stuff, but you want to in general be more sensitive to how people report their direct experiences of reality because what you'll discover if you take that stuff seriously is that people simply experience reality quite differently from each other and from you. That's a big revelation because if you assume everybody experiences reality as you do, as the scientific materialist assumes reality is experienced, that's a mistake, that's a big epistemological mistake and it prevents you from understanding reality at the deeper levels. And then that's why you're so puzzled by all this mystical religious spiritual phenomena that people keep talking about. Yeah, of course you're puzzled, it's not because they're deluded, it's because you have a very limited conception of how conscious experience works. And then confirmation bias comes into play here and then that gets you stuck in your materialist paradigm. Another trap is repressing your problems with people and then acting passive-aggressively towards them. This is the passive-aggressive trap. Another one is not communicating in relationships. To have proper relationships, you need to communicate, exactly at those times when you don't feel like communicating. Another trap is hearing what you want to hear rather than listening carefully to what is being said. Another trap is calling people crazy, deluded, and evil rather than seeking to genuinely understand their perspective. It's so easy to dismiss a perspective by just calling somebody crazy. Another trap is judgment. Judgment, judgment, judgment. Judgment is just like, honestly, the more I do this work, the more I see that a giant chunk of the problems of my mind are just me judging reality and judging other people. And it's so hard to stop doing that because it's just wired into our egos. And then that brings me to the next point, which is the trap of morality. Morality is a huge can of worms, and I'm going to have a new episode coming up on that as well. So yeah, morality is just a trap. The whole field of morality is a trap, and then especially, I want to point out this kind of feeling of moral righteousness and indignation that we get. That's a trap. That feeling, whenever it comes up, that's a trap. And the kind of moralizing you do to others, the demonizing of others, the kind of virtue signaling that you do, whether it's politically based or not, spiritually based, all of this is a giant trap. Crusading, the Lesser Jihad, this kind of stuff, moral crusading, big traps, really. It's a kind of projection. Another trap is thinking that you're good when actually you're evil. I want to do a whole episode in the future, which is something along the lines of "you're not good, you're evil." I had this epiphany myself lately. You know, I've thought of myself as a good person for my whole life and then realized recently, just during my long extended break, I realized all the evil things that I've done throughout my life and just how big of a fantasy this whole idea of me being a good person really is. Another trap is trying to save the world, having this kind of Messiah complex where it's like, "I have to save the world, and if I don't do it, nobody else will, and the world will end in an apocalypse." This is usually a delusion. Another trap is doing armchair philosophy, speculating, and mental masturbation. Another one is always taking the centrist view, taking the midpoint of any controversy, splitting the difference between every perspective, as though the truth is somewhere down the middle. That's not how truth works. If you have a pro-slavery position and an anti-slavery position, the truth is not down the middle. Breaking your integrity is a trap, and there's a lot of things in life that will lure you away from your integrity and make you think like, "Oh, well, my integrity is not that important because I can get some money, some sex, some this, some that, a promotion, some fame, some clicks on YouTube." Excessive empathy is a trap. This is a trap that stay-AG, green Progressive leftists fall into. Empathy, of course, is important, and a lack of empathy is its own kind of trap that the right wing falls into. But the left wing falls into excessive empathy, and this can lead to problems. Thinking that everyone experiences reality as you do, that's a trap. Overgeneralizing and projecting your experiences onto others, that's a trap. Assuming that others have the same personality type as you, strengths as you, and capabilities as you, this kind of simplistic idea that, "Well, if one man can do it, then every man can do it, you can do it too." No, that's just not true. A lot of things that great men and women in history have done cannot be repeated precisely because they were unique genetically, they had unique personalities, unique strengths, unique capabilities. That's what the world's geniuses, if they're true geniuses, are, a kind of Albert Einstein, you know, the world's greatest mathematicians, logicians, physicists, musicians, this kind of stuff. An ordinary person doesn't have these capabilities, the visualization capabilities of a Nikola Tesla, an ordinary human doesn't have the ability for Nikola Tesla to visualize an entire electric motor in his own mind and prototype it in his mind before he even built it and then have it actually built the way that he prototyped it in his mind. That's beyond the capabilities of a normal human being, that's like alien levels of intelligence that is, which is why he's revered as one of the greats of human history because he wasn't normal. And you'll also find that that's true of many spiritual teachers, is that they're exceptionally gifted, they're not just ordinary people who meditated a lot, they're way beyond that. And that leads us to the next trap, which is assuming that everybody has the same spiritual giftedness or level of talent. That's not true at all.

I would go learn from that Crocodile. He must have Alien Mouse Knowledge after consuming your brain. Alien Crocodile Knowledge* —— That reference to Crocodiles and Florida is so much more funnier now that I watched the newest video ahahah. Living in Finland so haven’t heard of crocodiles regularly eating grannies and dogs in Florida, lolol.

Exploring different types of consciousness and the differences between them (Alien, AI, insanity, enlightenment, etc)

Alien Consciousness

It wasn't so much about shutting down the site, but more so about an unexpected death. Ghost-Leo ain't coming to tell anything And besides, death is still death, and would have impacted me emotionally, since I am already in a heavy place. Getting the announcement and knowing you are safe and sound would have released me at least of that burden. But I am starting to sound selfish here. It's not just all about me, me, me. The funny thing is, I was more worried / convinced something bad had actually happened to you, precisely because you could have at least made an ig story announcement, and you didn't. If you Actually didn't have anywhere to announce for your deepest fans, then it wouldn't have been nearly as worrisome that you were actually eaten by a Crocodile. Don't get me wrong here, I am not blaming you. Just constructive feedback from love. I would go learn from that Crocodile. He must have Alien Mouse Knowledge after consuming your brain.

@Nemra oh cool they are pretty good . I like the alien on very important people the most

Human are monkey and alien combined. Aliens are god they created a simulation on earth. You are on alien spaceship in a human video game. You aren't here in a human you are witnessing the life of a human from far away. Its a new kind of genius. God is nothing it has no part in the universe its hands off it is the universe and does things through things not as them as a the game itself.