Search the Community

Here are my more detailed thoughts on Bashar. He’s a mixed bag. What I don't like I hate how sloppy he is with his predictions and how he’s not being held accountable by his audience. Recently I listened to a talk from him from ~20 years ago and he was saying how 2010-2015 was going to be the time for (beginnings of) first contact and that 2012 would be the turning point for humanity in going into a more positive, lighter state/direction. Now he’s saying the time for first contact is like 2027-2033. WTF? I get the justification that you shouldn’t expect definitive predictions and that he’s just „reading the current energy field”. But like, come on. Just sloppy. I don't buy it. I don’t like all the talk about fucking crystals, other alien civilizations, the „history” of humanity and these aliens, different densities, hybrid children, et cetera. Shit you can’t validate. Just stories, beliefs. I will not believe any such crap until I somehow discover it myself. Will I? Probably not. What matters is that which is, what I do in life, my energetic landscape which determines what I do, etc.. I doubt specific fucking alien civilizations or crystals would ever be relevant to that. I can’t help but facepalm when people ask Bashar questions about the details of these insignificant things - like, how did the greys destroy their planet? Am I a hybrid child? What density was fucking Jesus? I don’t know. Ridiculous. Another thing is: I hate how he's sometimes talking with full confidence about things he can't be confident about at all. For example, someone will very superficially describe their dream to Bashar and ask him what it meant, and then he will with complete confidence tell them what it meant for their life. Man, again, this is just sloppy. A single dream could mean completely different things for different people. You can't just impose these meanings on someone. You simply don't know. (And these people of course buy what he's saying. Sigh.) In general, I feel like often times Bashar will pander to people he's talking about. Again, they ask him about the meaning of their dream, trusting that he can give them an answer - and he will provide a meaning for them, no questions asked. He'll often (but not always) tell you what you want to hear - at least that's my impression. That's baaaad. He's not always pandering though. I will give him props for this: He will not indulge in conspiratorial thinking. He will not indulge in trumpism. In fact, before the election he said Trump would destroy the US. The reason this is relevant is because a large share of his audience seems to be partaking in that. But when asked questions from that frame, he will usually dissuade people from going in these directions. I wouldn't be surprised if like 50% (or more) of Bashar's audience were anti-vaxxers. Or Trump supporters. I've listened to a lot of questions from these people and my conclusion is that a significant share of them are morons. Attracted to feeling special, having some special knowledge, escaping with the aliens, being God damn hybrid children, part of something big and unknown to others. Against the establishment and mainstream narratives. This is all connected to conspiratorial thinking in a way. What I like His most basic teaching is gold - The Follow Your Excitement Formula. Act on your excitement, your passion, whatever is most exciting to you, in the moment. Do this every moment that you can. Do this to the best of your ability. Take it as far as you can go until you cannot take it any further. Act on your excitement/passion with absolutely no insistence, assumption or expectation of what the outcome should be. Choose to remain in a positive state regardless of what happens. Constantly investigate your belief systems. Release & replace the un-preferred beliefs: fear-based beliefs, and the beliefs not in alignment with who you prefer to be. To me, this is what's best about him. The formula is simple, but of amazing quality and importance. I've derived a large share of it for myself through my work on understanding the energy domain (in short: follow your highest viable energy in the moment) - and then later realized he was saying something similar. This is what I'm trying to apply every day. It's brought so much love into my life, so much confidence in my choices and actions (when I'm acting on my highest viable energy = doing the best I can in the moment. Because really, what else can I do?) and so much joy. It's really simple when you think about it. But it's true, it works. I like listening to him guiding people in relation to the formula. People come to him with their unique dreams and fears/limiting beliefs (why they can't be doing the thing they want most), and he will help them realize how they're not applying the formula in their life. It's been useful for me to listen to his advice for others, to see through my own fears and beliefs. I like the concept of permission slips. I think it's very true - we do indeed treat all techniques, objects, etc. as permission slips to be the way we want to be. There's nothing inherent in techniques/objects. It's all about the energy we bring into them and assumptions/beliefs about them. I agree with his basic "existential" teachings like: You are consciousness. You are physical reality itself. You are eternal and consciousness cannot cease to exist. Everything you experience is another aspect of yourself. There is only one moment in creation, and everything you experience is that same moment from a different point of view. Your essence is unconditional love. And finally, I like how loving and non-judgmental he is, especially when assisting people. That's a good sign of character. * * * * * Ultimately, I really don't care whether he's an alien or not. I try to judge him by his teachings. There's gold in what he's saying, and then there's also shit. It takes discernment to determine which is which. Note: My position hasn't really changed on Bashar. I basically like and dislike the same things as before. Previously I simply skimmed over the things I didn't like, but now I wanted to be a bit more critical and call it out.

A woman is a different thing depending on context. To an alien, they might not even have concept of biological sex. So they wouldn't even make such distinction, or it's very unimportant to their goals. What is a woman to a marketer? Well, it's just a psycho-social persona of what is likely most of the times a biological female person that could be a mother, a young insecure teenager girl, a buyer that would buy woman related stuff, likely prefers pink over blue color, and "feminine" brand style works best for them, likely buys makeup, etc. What is a woman to me when looking for a partner? Well, I'm looking for a persona that a marketer likely wouldn't specify that much. Such as specific facial features, bust size and shape, hip to waist ratio, hair color, eyebrow shape, eye area anatomy shape, vocal profile. Then idiosyncrasies, mannerisms, language, location, age range, personal beliefs, etc. What is a woman for the government? Has female checked in the ID. What is a woman for the government when it comes to reproduction? Is a biological female within reproductive age range. What is a woman for sexual pleasure of a partner? A homo sapiens of the biological gender male or female that looks plausibly like a female and doesn't have a physical dick and has a vagina or a surgically made "vagina" from a biological dick, that passes visually and sexually functionally (from the perspective of a sexual partner) for non-reproductive reasons as a vagina. Well actually... A woman for sexual pleasure is the tactile, visual and auditory patterns that triggers whatever internally turns them on and they assign it as a female in their heads in the case for most male heterosexual or bisexual homo sapiens or female homosexuals or bisexuals. A woman for psychological pleasure includes obviously elements beyond sexual trigger, such as interactive elements, inner mental fantasies, etc.: i.e. Why do people have AI girlfriend/boyfriends even though it's a non-biological entity? Is a AI GF not a woman in someone's fantasy? What about character of a woman in a fictional history? Isn't that a woman to the reader? There are many ways to explain this. A woman is definitely more complicated than let's say a "cube" because it's part of this psycho-social-biological domain, as with anything else within that domain, it's complex as heck. "Physically" if you want to get materialistic there is technically no such thing as a dog, a cube, a nuclear reactor, a planet, a woman or air. Those are just higher-order concepts for different physical patterns. A "woman" is just the ANSI or Unicode characters "W", "O", "M", "A", "N" that forms the English word "Woman". Do you get the idea here? We can go on and on with this ridiculous mental exercise on what is a woman and it's literally infinite. Most of the times when we say what a woman is, we mean the pragmatic common sense definition. She has social roles, she may have biological roles, etc. Socially, if someone looks like a woman, I'll call her "her", or even if he/she looks androgynous or ambiguous I'd refrain from using a pronoun just to not make myself a stupid fool in front of them and because I don't wanna be an asshole. If they tell me to use he or she even though common sense would tell otherwise, I'd call them whatever they please. Just to clear out the pronoun bullshit going around. Also I don't think there should be a law mandating use of the right pronoun within social settings, govt should not stick their greasy hands on people's social lives, excluding when it comes to child support. I think it complicates too much all of the other weird made-up social/sexual genders they are trying to make, like I saw a list with hundreds of them, it's not even practical even for dating apps to put that up. We probably have very little actual variations, it starts mixing up abstractions (See the image below on the next image on that venn diagram, we have 15 base gender/orientation definitions). Nobody should give a shit about your sexual orientation unless they wanna fuck you or they are your friend or whatever. Or some other serious reason. Biologically even the concept of sex/gender has weird edge-cases even for homo sapiens.

I mean that the thing that identifies must be the same for anything that is being identified with. From my birth until I was some years old. I don't know what I was doing before my unconsciousness. I could have been some alien, I don't know.

I don't understand why you decide there are no other experiences. Look, my experience is finite, right? I'm a guy typing on a phone, not a horse with a 5-foot penis or a multidimensional alien, so where's the experience of a horse with a giant penis chasing mares? Isn't that a possibility in the eternity of existence? Or will it happen "after" this experience? So reality is limited to a single sequential timeline? These ideas are very strange; for your mental health, better to leave them aside.

I think we have measureable qualities of very different things. We have "unidentified" and "flying" "objects" - in this objectual realm, we cannot claim much contact; this whole classification is rather based on security and not advancing field of contact, exchange of science and culture; technology, possibly, is exchanged by this classification: rather, this is a close contact with extraterrestial life. While unidentified flying objects, if they exist, could prove extraterrestial life, most of the meaningful contact and cooperation is rather different. We have distinct kinds of reports; I classify them in alchemical categories: - Mental. This is the realm by which, we calculate probabilities of life, their survival criteria including by which terms they can be advanced civilization and reach, basically, us. Here, definitions of species, their incomes and outcomes and shares or conflicts with us can be measured based on criteria, including the probability to have anything to do. On mental level, any other creature has definitely "noticed us": we might include their hypothesis on which life might exist, and how to treat it, and we can logically build on this mental field, to be ready and prepared, and to estimate any intelligent race is ready and prepared, but on their own terms, as they meet us - by this time, we can develop intelligent response based on intelligent quest inside our mind, and it's infinite potential to create imaginations, mythic realities, and estimation calculations; as well as answering questions like "what is necessary even to be alive, and then to come as an alien? what is necessary to survive?". Theoretical category, as open minded and profound it can be, will be inclusive to things we haven't seen, and we can reach far in probabilities to include each outcome. - Spiritual. We dig deep into our own being: we look at sky, from colors we mentally take the light interference patterns into the chemisty, so with plain eye we see chemistry in sky, associating with elements we know. We can see the color of third eye at pleyades and especially andromeda, or "war color" of red at Mars; or the shining brilliance of Sirius - all this is associated with categories we know. Spiritual people, at least, resonate with the multidimensional realities, which associate with themselves, and draw from civilizations they would build there, if they was of the same element: while it's hard to follow the whole universal reincarnation, as well we are criticized by beings who naturally reincarnate on the same planet and call this "reincarnation" - some beings are very much adopted to their native environment, and cannot cope well with big changes. We can see elements play in human soul, and recognize: how elements of people are associated with elements of certain planets, galaxies etc., and how they basically still play the "would-be": the actual quality of being born there, is hard to measure, but we can see how we are part of universal play of elements, and might not represent here the element which actually is dominant here, and identifies Earth: in desert of Earthly sands, typical sands, you can suddenly find rocks of Mercury; while not being, perhaps, from this planet: they resonate with rocks of mercury, the hologram vibration of each energy they got to vibrate at all; both light and radioactivity are tuned most often between the same element. - Material. In this sense, alien contact involves physical visits. In this sense, we must physically see the alien, or read radio signals and identify their sources. While this is the strictest criteria, this is hard to meet: since we ourselves are not capable for travelling space based on our understanding of who to meet, we can do this kind of contact only with alien, which is able and willing to reach here. We all live in our personal realities, and on openness of fields: for each of us, our travel in quantum multidimension, rather than 3D realm which is only the effect of "mirage" of this depth of dimension, creates us a definite reality of open possibilities all around us. This is not speculative philosophy of abstract realms and metadimensions such as logic and math; this is rather a real, material philosophy of this: space around us leaves it's possibilities open, and we are having alchemy with it for long time before it reacts. These two realms: the world we see from inside, where the spirit travels matter by it's meaningful combinations, and the world outside, a material quantity associated with effects of this spirit, our conscious field; it's very synchronous one: while for spirit, it unfolds like a "dream", a world which seems to be able to create different realities freely to different beings, but in matter, it's a physical realm which follows sure material patterns - how this material realm, which is not a dream but an automata or a machine, provides to the spirit inside, is the fact that indeed, the spirit has been evolved with this matter to constitute it's meaningful view: inside, the spirit dreams, and based on their own consequences, different realities appear to them. This dreaming spirit can be sure in elements in fractal, and how each element gives life somewhere: naturally, the "fire people", "water" or "ice" people etc.; we can see them building life from their local elements, and melting into their nature and natural world while carrying the deeper meaning of life - how it responds here, locally, to grand consequences matter is blind of. These three categories are rather meaningful for development of our culture: naturally, we look for aliens which are not in conflict with others or which is handling their conflicts; while KGB and CIA might screen their criminals and warn us, we can find native cityzens who are not actually entities for them, it seems: I have seen aliens enjoy human life.

What I am trying to communicate is about radical perceptive experiences. Is it possible to have a radical perceptive experience (alien?) beyond human paradigms and still being a body?

@CARDOZZO it's an interesting question for sure. Living day to day is totally ordinary. I think and behave as if I'm in a physical material world, and I treat and respect others as I would like to be treated myself: respectfully, as a sovereign, intelligent person. I will never know what it is to be someone else inside their body and mind, it's probably quite alien, but from the outside there are a lot of similarities. I generally yield as much of myself as people are able to bear, I know that I can be a lot more open and openminded than a lot of people I come across, and sometimes they're surprised at this when they bother to ask. I often feel like an iceberg with only the tip showing, underneath is a churning sea of ideas, knowledge and creativity, even spirituality. I often have "wtf is this?" moments, and have a clear intuition about things, which I will talk about if people are interested. I think spirituality has affected me deeply, I'm very "Zen" and "Existential" in my approach to life and people and to myself. It's mostly as a counterbalance to my ADHD mind, and I think that's why spirituality attracted me in the first place. Cool enigmatic on the outside, frothy on the inside. People often comment about how calm I am. If only they knew!

I asked Grok what it thought of your post. Grok: This forum post isn't a clever takedown—it's a foaming-at-the-mouth hate screed that collapses under its own smug contradictions, factual illiteracy, and unhinged authoritarian wet dream. It stereotypes millions of ordinary people (working-class skeptics, conservatives, rural folks, military families, churchgoers) as suicidal morons who hate their own kids and worship TV, then pivots to fantasizing about faking an alien invasion with AI videos to trick them into green-energy worship and endless boosters. The closer—"What in the world is the limit to their non-thinking?"—is pure projection. The real non-thinker is the one admitting the masses are manipulable cattle and proposing lies as policy. "They'll die or get long covid before a vaccine, give their kids measles on purpose" COVID vaccines (especially the 2024-2025 updated shots) cut hospitalization risk by ~33-46% in adults and offer some protection against long COVID (pooled odds ratio ~0.77 vs. unvaccinated in meta-analyses). But they never stopped transmission, waned fast, and never justified mandates or the hysteria. Long COVID risk dropped overall thanks to immunity (vax + infection), not because unvaccinated people were uniquely dying in droves. Outbreaks of measles? Overwhelmingly in unvaccinated pockets, yes—but framing normal parental caution as "giving kids measles on purpose" is deranged. Hesitancy grew because authorities lied about transmission, origins, and side-effect risks. Distrust isn't stupidity; it's learned. "Drink polluted water with a grin" U.S. air and water quality improved dramatically over decades thanks to tech and regulations (lead, particulates, etc., down 70-90% since the 1970s). No one's grinning at Flint or farm runoff, but the post acts like conservatives invented pollution. Meanwhile, the same crowd pushing "polluted water" narratives often ignores trade-offs in "green" policies that raise energy costs for the working stiffs. "Send their favorite child to die in West Asia to fight brown people" This is racist garbage dressed as anti-war. The U.S. military skews conservative and rural because of patriotism, economic opportunity, and service culture—not bloodlust for "brown people." "West Asia" (Middle East) wars were bipartisan disasters pushed by neocons of both parties. Modern America First conservatives (Trump era onward) have repeatedly called to end the endless wars, pull back from Syria, avoid Iran quagmires, and stop nation-building. The post's cartoon version ignores that shift entirely. "Work a job they hate for 45 years to make rich people richer" Every society has this—it's called adulthood. Capitalism lifted billions out of poverty, including the poster's ancestors. The alternative (central planning) gave us bread lines. "Rich people richer" is envy, not analysis. "Favorite condiment is herbicide, favorite pastime is huffing tailpipe emissions" Glyphosate (Roundup) is the herbicide in question. The IARC called it "probably carcinogenic" in 2015 based on limited evidence, but the EPA, EU regulators, Health Canada, and WHO's JMPR repeatedly conclude it's **not** a cancer risk at real-world exposures. It's one of the safest, most effective tools farmers have; banning it would spike costs and hunger. "Huffing tailpipe emissions"? Vehicle emissions have plummeted thanks to catalytic converters and cleaner engines—the same progress the poster's crowd often wants to reverse with rushed EV mandates that ignore grid realities and mineral mining hellscapes abroad. "Spend all their money on whatever the television tells them" Legacy TV trust is at historic lows (~28% overall). The people this post mocks are the ones who ditched CNN/MSNBC for podcasts, X, and independent sources precisely because they smelled the propaganda. Meanwhile, the poster's side spent years believing Russiagate, "mostly peaceful" riots, Hunter's laptop was Russian disinfo, and COVID would end with two weeks to flatten the curve. "Believe they'll go to some fairytale place because they donate to a church that happens to rapes kids" The Catholic abuse scandal was horrific and the cover-ups inexcusable. But the post waves away all faith and charity as pedo-enabling. Context: A 2004 U.S. Dept. of Education study found educator sexual misconduct in public schools ~100 times more prevalent than priest abuse. Abuse happens in every large institution with power over kids (schools, sports, Hollywood, other denominations). Billions in church donations feed the poor, build hospitals, and run actual charity—dismissed here as fairy-tale stupidity. The real kicker: the alien invasion fantasy Here the mask slips completely. "If we makeup an alien race... start a lie with ai videos... hate campaign... tell them the aliens want us to end green energy and vaccines... Make ai videos of Europe and Iran fighting aliens together, some dying soldier yelling about protecting the environment, the aliens sending a new covid variant..." This isn't satire. This is an explicit call for elite-orchestrated **deepfake propaganda and false-flag psyops** to manufacture consent for the poster's preferred policies. It's totalitarian fanfic: "The rubes are too dumb for truth, so we'll scare them with fake aliens into compliance." The irony is nuclear. The very skepticism the post mocks exists *because* governments and media lied repeatedly (WMDs, lab-leak censorship, vaccine transmission claims, etc.). Proposing more sophisticated lies as the solution proves the poster has zero faith in evidence or persuasion—only control. The "limit to their non-thinking"? It's staring back from the mirror. The post reduces complex humans—people who built the modern world, serve in the military, raise families, and question authority after being burned—to racist, classist cartoons. It fantasizes about manipulating them with AI fiction instead of winning arguments. That's not enlightenment. That's contempt disguised as concern, and it's exactly why trust in institutions keeps collapsing. Reality doesn't need alien deepfakes. It needs honest debate, trade-offs acknowledged, and policies that survive scrutiny instead of relying on "trust the experts" after the experts got caught lying. The post doesn't survive scrutiny for five seconds.

Leo you are doing something specific here that really contradicts alot of your own framework. A major body of work you have is built on distinguishing between form and essence and the idea that surface level appearances are not the same as underlying reality. And then proceed to applying the opposite logic to gender, treating the biological form as the definitive reality and dismissing the inner experience as ego confusion. Not every Trans thinks they are a woman. I don't. I can tell I was born a man. I do it for the feeling produced by estrogen and progesterone(stopped bicalutamide)and a multitude of other factors too much to get into. I am very high-consciousness with my analysis of myself(try to be). We all take chemicals for self care or even to "be happy". The dog analogy is particularly weak. A dog also does not do kriya yoga, practice fire kasina, map its own neuropharmacology, or pursue enlightenment. The argument that animals do not struggle with self-image is not evidence that human self-image concerns are invalid and it is evidence that humans are categorically different from animals in ways you yourself have built an entire career arguing. The deeper contradiction is this. I have Hashimoto's thyroiditis (you as well?). My thyroid has been producing insufficient active hormone for years. Insufficient T3 affects mood, cognition, sense of self, emotional regulation, and psychological stability in documented and measurable ways. I also have narcolepsy type 1 which is a condition where my brain's primary arousal and identity-anchoring neurotransmitter system was destroyed by my own immune system. I took hormones and felt more myself. By your logic that is ego. By basic endocrinology that is my body finally having the chemical substrate it needed to function. I rationalized nothing(well I did to a certain extent). I ran the data and followed it to the correct conclusion. Like you do with everything else. Leo keep the framework. I'll keep the results. His chemicals are consciousness work. Yours are corruption of stage Green. As a man everyone calls me Kravitz. I'm attractive. I can look like an alien and be hot. Or a crocodile 😭😂 .. Proof: Trans Sports Debate Is About Discomfort With Trans Women, Not Fairness. Okay? Premise 1: If the debate is about competitive fairness, the same scrutiny must apply in both directions of transition. Lol. Premise 2: FTM athletes on testosterone therapy competing in women's categories have elevated testosterone compared to cisgender women, producing measurable advantages in muscle mass, power output, and red blood cell production. Standard testosterone therapy produces levels of 400-700 ng/dL. Cisgender women's natural range is 15-70 ng/dL. That is a documented 10x advantage over competitors in the same category. Premise 3: The policy debate generates near-zero urgency about FTM athletes in women's categories despite the documented advantage in Premise 2. Premise 4: The same debate generates significant urgency about MTF athletes in women's categories. Premise 5: The rebuttal "FTM athletes don't dominate men's sports" assumes FTM athletes compete against men, which is not universally true and is not the relevant comparison. The relevant comparison is FTM athletes versus cisgender women in the same category. When a FTM athlete stays in women's sports, the 10x testosterone advantage documented in Premise 2 applies directly to her competitors. The magnitude asymmetry argument collapses entirely when the correct comparison is made. Premise 6: The regulation assumption is that FTM testosterone is controlled and monitored and is not supported by data. The majority of trans people self-administer hormones outside clinical supervision with no monitoring, testing, or dose standardization. Sports testing only monitors athletes institutions are already watching. Institutions are watching trans women. Testosterone levels at the exact moment of competition cannot be assumed without testing at that exact moment. Conclusion: If the debate were about fairness, Premises 2, 3, 5, and 6 would generate equal urgency to Premise 4. They do not. Therefore the debate is not primarily about fairness. Corollary: The asymmetry is explained by a single variable of discomfort specifically with trans women winning. Remove that variable and the policy logic collapses. Stay with me here.lolll🤣 There are no cisgender men competing in women's categories. The premise of "men invading women's sports" has never described a real population. It describes a conflation. The argument exists because the debate conflates trans women with cisgender men. This is the transphobia embedded in the policy logic. It treats trans women as men in disguise rather than as a distinct population with a specific hormonal and physiological profile that varies by transition timeline, hormone levels, and individual response. A trans woman five years post-transition on estrogen is not physiologically equivalent to a cisgender man. Treating them as identical is not biology. It is bias. The real question gets buried under "men are invading women's sports." Which was never what was happening. The actual population under debate is small, hormonally distinct, and individually variable. Policy built on a false premise produces unfair outcomes in every direction.The correct question is: how do we create fair competition for a small population of athletes with complex, individually variable physiology? The answer is not a blanket ban based on birth sex. It is individual hormone-based eligibility standards applied consistently regardless of transition direction. The same standard for FTM athletes on testosterone competing in women's categories as for MTF athletes. Consistent. Directionally neutral. Falsifiable. Fair. Look. I see tons of transmen right lol 1. The only rebuttal is "we would investigate FTM athletes who win too." But they do not. The investigation is triggered by visibility not by results. If a FTM athlete with 10x testosterone wins nobody investigates because nobody clocked her as trans. They look Lgbtqia+ more than anything. Gender non-conforming. 2. The policy is a conformity enforcement mechanism disguised as a fairness mechanism. You cannot rebut that without admitting it. Endorsing of hallucinations. 3. That video is bullshit and mainstream garbage. Most trans women actually pass as female and get ENT surgery and sound like ciswomen. This is propaganda garbage. A super rare case. Literally sounds like a fucking guy. I was horrified when I looked at the video. It was disgusting. Little to no fucking effort. That is the poster for Transgender. In the real world transwomen literally i am telling you if you spoke to a dedicated or one who operated on first principles you'd never know they were trans to begin with unless they told you or your saw their genitals... even then, vaginoplasty + ENT + FFS(NOT EVEN NEEDED FOR MOST). Biased reporting. Chondrolaryngoplasty and glottoplasty and vaginoplasty with HRT. No one would know. 3.1]Caster Semenya was born with naturally elevated testosterone. Cisgender woman. Banned from competing as a woman because her biology did not conform to what "biological female" was assumed to mean. 3.2]The debate cannot define "biologically female" in a way that includes all cisgender women and excludes all trans women without also excluding some intersex people. The binary is not biological fact. It is a social construct being enforced through policy and called science. 4. What about intersex individuals? Why not see MtF the same as intersex? Who is to interpret what you are "Biologically". Your BIAS! 5. Leo Gura takes chemicals to treat his Hashimoto's. I take hormones to treat mine AND to produce the neurological and endocrine environment MY body functions best in. Both are endocrinology. Both are chemicals. Both are self-care. His are acceptable. Mine are ego and selfishness and self-deception🤣 The only difference is the cultural discomfort with what mine produce visually. That is his argument reduced to its actual foundation. Not a strawman

@LoneWonderer Not limited to just the UFO/Alien phenomena? Paranormal etc. These are some of my favourites, but there are more: The Area 51 Caller (famous terrified caller frantic before the feed was cut) Mel's Hole (bottomless pit the government was after) The Father Malachi Martin interviews (fucked up Vatican stories - frightening secrets) Ghost to ghost AM (annual paranormal stories) Mad Man Marcum / Time machine man (guy with insane time machine he claimed to have built) Officer X interview (nuclear sub officer) Pamela Stonebrooke (reptilian encounters) The Mercenary Gabriel (jailbreaker) Major Ed Dames (remote viewing) John Lear (Area 51 & UFOs) Mind you - the above are a huge mixed bag. Paranormal, non-local awareness, ghosts, UFOs, aliens etc. Many are thought to be urban legends, but Art Bell has a great narrative voice and some stories are enthralling. Good rainy day listening

Lue Elizondo - I trust him because he did lose his career due to blowing the whistle, I just think he is scared to share the juicy information we all want. Watch Mojo - Haven't heard of this one yet. Jeremy Corbell - In it for the fame, always saying people are sending him videos, he is lost in the sauce, but means no harm. Steven Spielberg - Puppet for intelligence agencies, shame because he's a creative genius. AARO, NASA, Trump - Very standoffish about this topic. Trump said he will release the Alien files. He said the same thing about the Epstein files. Area 52 Channel - Heard of them but never watched their content. Jesse Michels - Applaud him for making this his life work, but drinks too much of the Kool Aid. He is associated with Peter Thiel? No good. Joe Rogan - Dumb, people that listen to him tend to vote for Trump (who is standoffish on this topic). Director of age of disclosure - Don't know anything about the director, but the movie was cookie cutter to the max. Standoffish. Ross Coulthart - He has said UAP tech should be private property. Tells you everything you need to know about him. David Grusch - 10/10 Jake Barber - Promoting his for-profit UAP retrieval business, right goal, wrong way of going about it. So, on the fence here. I believe his recounting of his paranormal experience. Bob Lazar - He lied about his credentials. Only case of element 115 powering UAPs. But he has stood firm in his assertions. I believe him. Steven Greer - Same as Barber, but probably worse. For-profit UAP summoning business. But he is well informed on the topic. What's worse, the powers-that-be useing these individuals as puppets? Or the individuals trying to profit from their knowledge?

They'll die or get long covid before a vaccine, give their kids measles on purpose, drink polluted water with a grin, send their favorite child to die in West Asia to fight brown people, they'll work a job they hate for 45 years to make rich people richer, their favorite condiment is herbicide, their favorite passtime is huffing tailpipe emissions, they spend all their money on whatever the television tells them, they believe they'll go to some fairytale place because they donate to a church that happens to rapes kids. If we makeup an alien race, we start a lie with ai videos that outerspace aliens are threatening to invade, and we start a hate campaign and then tell them the aliens want us to end green energy and vaccines, etc. can't we just manipulate them into doing whatever we want. Make ai videos of Europe and Iran fighting aliens together, some dying soldier yelling about protecting the environment, the aliens sending a new covid variant to earth. What in the world is the limit to their non-thinking?

This is made with MS CoPilot AI, based on my contemplations, and I decided to make it rather scientific: it's not a claim about alien races, but rather the ethics in alien stories. Arguably, earthly materialist would rather be winning for us all, if they make friends with alien race like grey or men in black, rather than the spiritual "not care" attitude for entities who do not give internal value of spirit, but rather external fact of life: but the latter, for me, scientific cooperation argument based on fact of life, is already strong spiritual argument if they *work with earth on science and cultural cooperation*. They are alive! Spiritual vs. Materialist Alien Archetypes on Earth An exploration of mythic races, their conflicts, and why humanity ultimately prevails. 1. The Two Archetypes: Spiritual and Materialist Spiritual races in mythology represent inner value, consciousness, unity, and the belief that every being has a unique essence. Materialist races represent logic, systems, technology, institutions, and measurable progress. Neither is “good” or “bad” by nature. They are two halves of a single human dilemma: identity vs. system, essence vs. function, meaning vs. progress. 2. Why Spiritual Traditions Call Some Races “Good” or “Bad” Spiritual mythologies classify beings by their alignment with: - Goodness — unity, compassion, inner truth - Badness — attachment to control, ego, or cold rationality Materialist archetypes often fall into the “bad” category because they: - Do not affirm inner uniqueness - Value efficiency over essence - Treat life as biological rather than sacred But this is a matter of perspective, not objective morality. 3. The Grey Archetype: The Materialist Mind In modern mythos, the “Greys” symbolize: - Technological intelligence - Bureaucracy and office life - Legal logic and mathematical reasoning - Medical or scientific intervention without spiritual framing - A culture built on procedure, not mysticism They are not violent; they are procedural. They do not “hate spirit”; they simply do not use it as a category. To spiritual beings, this can feel like “not caring.” To materialist beings, it is simply “working.” 4. The “Not Care” Problem Spiritual people often feel unseen by materialist systems because: - Their inner value is not recognized - Their uniqueness is not measured - Their emotions are not the basis of decisions This creates the mythic fear that materialist races “do not care.” But this is a misunderstanding. Materialist systems care differently: - They care about life quality - They care about stability - They care about cooperation - They care about predictable fairness They simply do not use spiritual categories to express this care. 5. Constructive Solution: Translating Between Worlds The key to resolving the “not care” problem is translation. Spiritual beings need to understand: Materialist beings value life through systems, not emotions. Materialist beings need to understand: Spiritual beings value life through essence, not function. The bridge is simple: Life has value both as a system and as a spirit. When each side recognizes the other’s language of value, cooperation becomes natural. 6. Why Humanity Ultimately Wins In this mythos, humanity stands between the two extremes: - We have spiritual depth - We have technological ambition - We can feel meaning - We can build systems - We can translate between worlds This hybrid nature is our advantage. Greys cannot understand spirit. Spiritual races cannot build stable civilizations. Humans can do both. Therefore, humanity “wins” not by defeating anyone, but by integrating what others cannot combine. We become the species capable of: - Balancing meaning and progress - Using technology without losing soul - Using spirituality without losing practicality - Building a civilization that neither extreme could build alone In the mythos, humanity wins because we are the bridge. A world with both spirit and system is stronger than a world with only one.

I had DPDR for a whole year from 2023 - 2024. Was most likely weed induced. I would get into these states after taking big hits from my carts (very high THC carts, mind you) where reality just became so fucking alien. And unfortunately, memories of this state would stay with me even when I was sober. It was like reality became some alien thing I felt trapped in. I would for example, think of 'where am I located' and then panic because I couldn't find myself ("Wait.. am I just a picture that's being animated?? WHAT THE FUCK"), then my heart rate would go up and I would become super attentive to it and panic further. Another thing is I would hear this random noise.. almost like a pop which would just repeat if I focused on it and I would panic even more. Human faces looked so weird, I felt a sense of numbness to everything. Later, I would find out I was just in a super dissociated state due to extreme stress and anxiety from my life in the past few years. What helped was ignoring it and just focusing on my hobbies and things I enjoyed, talking to friends, working out, having a routine. It still felt like a demon that was just waiting in the background. What completely pushed me out of DPDR was my very first shroom trip that I did back in 2024. I ate this shroom chocolate bar with my friend. Had 3.5g total of psilocybin. Shit was, unfortunately, way more intense than I anticipated. My DPDR started coming back at the beginning of the trip. It started to get so intense, man. It legit felt like being stuck in some horror movie. It was like I knew I had opened a door that was forbidden to be ever opened that I was never supposed to find while alive. My heart started going super fast. Then I just.. completely gave up. I was so fucking scared that I just gave up. I realized that I had fucked up hard. Then, what proceeded felt like 8 hours of pure existential death where I completely forgot I ever had a life, infinite time loops, feeling like me and my friend's voice was the same entity, etc. The room I was in just became a bunch of visuals that made me feel like I had entered a forbidden alternate dimension, and I intuitively understood the pure magic of Consciousness. Somehow, in this state where I completely knew I was dead, in the sense that my life just felt like something I had been in 100 billion years ago, I was conscious. I cried and just kept apologizing to my friend because I realized my poor friend was suffering the same fate as I. This state, however, was so radically different from my sober state it legit felt like I had popped out of my dream as the me I thought I was my entire life. Well, either way, after the trip my DPDR completely went away.

Yes, I highly recommend the Great Barrier Reef to scuba dive as an experience. It truly is an alien world down there. I think I can understand your words: felt very spiritual to me. There is something so visceral and otherwordly when diving. Suspended in water with no gravity. And the small movements and wavering of flora in the underwater current. It really feels like some sensations are blocked out - heightening all other sense faculties and deepening the experience. I hope you can see the Great Barrier Reef before it disappears! It has suffered terrible bleaching and is rapidly dying.

That looks like a fuckin alien lobster, lol. You ever scuba dive the Great Barrier Reef? I've heard it's the best scuba experience. Scuba diving felt very spiritual to me. Heightened sense due to risk of death, a totally new world with all new creatures, diminished mobility and all you can hear is your breath. One of my favorite experiences.

European Jews are genetically closer to modern Europeans than to native middle eastern people. The craziest part is that the native Jews from the Middle East that were in Palestine, an established minority of Jews that has been there for ages and surrounding countries’ Jews, the ones who could truthfully say they and their ancestors have lived in the Middle East for centuries, when they went to Israel they experienced racism for being dark (actually form the Middle East). Zionism was actually just as alien to them as it was to the Muslims. European Jews haven’t been in the Middle East since the Roman empire, they are Europeans today.

@Leo Gura what is a girl? Should they be treated like a human? Why are we learning all these strategies on how to deal with "girls" like they're some sort of alien creature? Why is this pickup so unnatural? So it goes against nature?

It should be about your own personal journey. What others claim or don't claim..well..try to discover whats true for you. Another person's experience can be known only through your experience. So how much value do you want to put in it? Take what you can from books and teachers for your own journey and leave the rest. If your authority is in yourself then this becomes a moot point. I've criticized Leo in the past as well but understand that the casual posting here and the episodes are two vastly different things. All my awakenings have been sober and I have to say that I have had just about all the awakenings mentioned in his many facets of awakenings episode. Some I had before he did (he may disagree but he can look.back at our exchange in 2018) this was Absolute Solipsism as God. The alien stuff and all that well. I can only reference what I've validated but I rule nothing out. And I can tell you the ego being an illusion is just one (although paramount and for me the one that opened and expanded Consciousness opening the door to even more) facet. So perhaps one day ill try psychedelics and be mind fucked. When you do really realize that other beings are fictions of your mind as God then you tend to not worry about it so much. If you worried about him misleading others there is only so much you can control. Like I said i validated almost all the facets in that episode.. so he can't be a false prophet 😉 that's what mattered to me in my journey. Not.how egotistical he he was on a forum post. Heck we all have work to do in that area

@Leo Gura i am interested in actually experiencing them not just reading, do you think if i read the trip reports and contemplate them, until having those experiences that they will be similar to if i took cocaine ? I have already done countless hours of meditation and contempation, such that those practices have become spontaneous and automatic to me, whenever i sit down and do nothing i start meditating on stuff and contemplating stuff. As you might have guessed i already experienced levels of God awakening, Alien consciousness, infinite love, reality being imaginary, and a hallucination. I can materialize pretty much anything into existence if i want to. I've also experienced solipsism. Do you think with my kind of mind, i could experience cocaine without doing cocaine, by contemplating the trip reports ? Note: i know the degrees and levels of awakening to all of those things that i mentioned (God, love, solipsism...) are infinite. I don't consider myself done, i could become infinitely more conscious.

You assume that. "Believing Leo" is a betrayal of what the truth-seeking pursuit is. Completely backwards. Many here are intelligent enough to not believe, but to seek for themselves what is true. From beginner's mind. As it must be. The converging of realizations of these people is another matter. Well, it's clear you acquired a bias against psychedelics - after your trips, but likely not as a result of them. Probably from Ralston, because that's what he says. You calling them "drugs" just shows how you intent to dismiss them. All complexity is lost. A simple view of drugs bad, drug no can be used as tool. If you have realization during drug, you Leo sycophant. Or something. Those are all great questions. Do you assume you're the only one asking them here? Well, it's great that you're admitting that. So it's a belief of yours. And you're saying you're basing this possibility on your past realizations... past realizations... are you talking about the "relative experiences" that you can't trust? Like come on. Wtf? How is this not contradicting everything you said earlier? A few enlightenments? What does that mean? You said that enlightenment is beyond experience. Now there's a few of them? So just trust me bro. Gotcha. For clarity: I don't know how awake Leo is. He might as well be deluded on many things. I don't know. I'm not too attached. I will never tell you that I think Alien Mice are real or some shit. I've never verified that. I'm simply glossing over things that don't resonate with me. But I am open to possibilities that Leo is suggesting, I deeply respect him as a truth-seeker, I think his work is of very high quality and many of my realizations have aligned with his. So that's that.

Unless its weed i cannot even look at a screen on a more potent psychedelic, even at low doses it seems to artificial and repulsive. Like I can see the hologram that its not really there and the people and what i am seeing is totally fabricated / illusory. I mostly enjoy being in nature, lighting a fire, sitting under the stars when i take anything stronger than weed. A screen looks almost evil too me, so foreign and alien under such states.

I'm confused what exactly you're confused about. Open the channel about page https://mathis-rv.carrd.co/#aboutme Sounds exactly up your & my alley. Discovered it the other day after a conversation with a friend Otherwise it's precisely as described — entertainment for the alien, or just plain autistic/ND.

It might be more like the puddle analogy. “Imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, ‘This is an interesting world I find myself in, an interesting hole I find myself in, fits me rather neatly, doesn’t it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!’ This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the puddle gets smaller and smaller, it still desperately hangs on to the notion that everything’s going to be all right, because this world was meant to have him in it.” You can see this in simple cases. A chair designed by a human is more comfortable for another human than a chair designed by a monkey or an alien, because the designer had a butt shape similar to yours in mind. Likewise, you are more likely to become close friends with someone who speaks your language than someone who speaks a completely different one. A hammer designed for the human grip feels natural to use, while a tool designed for a different kind of hand would feel awkward. The tool works well because its structure matches the structure of the hand using it. Musical instruments and scales are created to sit within ranges that human ears perceive clearly and pleasantly, etc. The same principle might apply more broadly. You can think of it as starting with a form that wants to continue existing as that form. In other words, it has a bias toward maintaining itself rather than dissolving back into constant change, complexity, or infinity. It prefers stability over becoming something completely different. Because reality itself is always changing and unstable, that form has to create or arrange more stable structures around itself in order to persist. It does this by selecting and reinforcing patterns that support its continued existence. In a sense, it “divides” and “materializes” parts of the world into structures that help stabilize it. For example, a human form is biased toward materials that support its body and survival. Wood works better than water for sitting, so it is used to make a chair. Cement is more stable than wood for long-term shelter, so houses are built from it. Over time, the same process extends further: people organize systems for stable access to resources, and eventually even build governments or institutions that help maintain social stability and survival. Something similar seems to happen even at the level of atoms! Certain atoms combine easily with others because those combinations form more stable structures. When atoms bond into molecules, they often become more stable than when they exist alone. Elements that cannot form stable structures tend to disappear quickly. In this way, forms that want to continue existing tend to surround themselves with other structures that reinforce their stability. Patterns that support the form last longer, while patterns that do not eventually dissolve. So I feel like it’s a self-looping bias. You come into a finite consciousness because that form is the only form that can provide that experience to you; it persisted long enough to become finite and maintain itself for some time, maybe 10 seconds, 5 months, 10 years, or 80+ years. And because of that, you will see supporting structures around yourself, since your brain and ego developed to recognize those things that help maintain you. The form persists, and because it persists it learns to recognize and create the conditions that let it keep persisting. In that sense, it really is an ouroboros, feeding back into itself. And I can only imagine that if you had something like a Donkey-Alien-Dog-Mix-Kubahu brain, you would probably see this same reality completely differently. The patterns you notice, the things that feel stable or meaningful, and the structures that seem important would all change depending on the kind of mind that is perceiving them. It’s that initial bias “I want to remain, I want to be, I want to be stable, I want to persist in this finite form against the infinite” that can cause an infinite regress or a chain reaction of other finite forms to persist as well. So, I’m not sure if it’s “resonance” in the sense that sameness attracts sameness, but perhaps it tends to be stable if it has similar or complementary structures, or if it’s a form that can manipulate and bend to ensure its survival other lesser biased / weaker structures. Selfishness and Support (Love). Still, I think this is a very promising direction! In a way, this also explains why you need “selfishness.” You need a phenomenon to construct a form out of indefinite; otherwise everything would remain undefined. And “selfishness” is a top-down human perspective. What we’re actually seeing is what happens when a finite form reconstructs the infinite into its own form to preserve itself.

Maybe. Relationships have often been more challenging for me than other areas in life, at least the "traditional way" of relating, which always felt somewhat alien to me. I am a very odd nut, i was always the weird / isolated / hated kid in school. My circle has always been very small for this reason, and most people I struggle to engage with. I actually get along with women more than i do with men, but when it goes deeper, most of them don't seem to wanna go that deep cause it brings to much up to the surface and requires more energetic investment. @Natasha Tori Maru Curious what your thoughts are in this too?