Jodistrict

Enlightenment is overrated. We already have a world full of assholes willing to take advantage of vulnerable people. If enlightenment just empowers more psychopaths then shouldn’t enlightenment be made illegal for the protection of society? What good is it, if it just increases suffering?

This is a charming myth propagated by economic schools. But the fruits go to the top who manipulate the financial system and provide no real value in return.

You don't know just how young you are.

You buy a tincture. The psycho active component is muscimol. These are the mushrooms used by Siberian Shamen for vision questions and spiritual rituals.

Amanita Muscara mushrooms are underrated. You take them before you go to bed. They put you into a deep state of relaxation and the mushrooms work through your dreams. I have had vivid mystical dreams with downloads of spiritual knowledge. The best way to get access to your unconscious mind where the trauma lives is with dreamwork. The mushrooms are legal so you can get them anywhere. You can buy a tincture or gummies.

As an American, its an irrelevant question I don't have to answer. I just don't want the wealth and blood of my country to pay for it. Israel is just another foreign nation that can do what they want.

You are kind of proving my point. How effective it is to use legitimate movements to steer the conversation away from the corruption of big money in politics.

Sure, they may be genuine. Opposing wealth inequality is also genuine but its not allowed. But the identity politics IS allowed. It wouldnt be in politics if it wasn't useful to the Epstein class.

No. It’s slight-of-hand. The real issue for the left is class conflict. But big money supports things like feminism and men vs women because now you have men and women fighting each other instead of fighting the rich. The same for all the other identity politics concerns. The democrats focus on these issues because if they addressed the real economic issues their donations would dry up. The money in politics is a huge issue.

The word “left” should be reserved to economic issues only. That is, directly confronting a society rigged to make a few people rich while everyone else gets the leftovers, even though those few people are rent seekers who produce nothing useful. This isn’t discussed in America because all the politicians are corrupt and serve big money. That is why the American people are continuously frustrated that nothing changes when they vote. The Iran war is highly unpopular, but the congress is all bought out by big donors who support foreign interests. It’s their money that counts. The trends of “gender” and “identity politics” are favored by big money because it creates a distraction and pits the workers against each other so they never focus attention on the real issue – massive wealth injustice.

The nightmare scenario is taking too much psychedelics, calling 911, and having the police be your facilitators.

I wonder how this will affect the Ibogaine clinics in Mexico.

This video features a discussion with Douglas Macgregor regarding the current escalation between the United States and Iran. Macgregor argues that the conflict is driven by an 'Israel-first' agenda and that the U.S. administration is misled by advisors who believe air power alone can secure a decisive victory (21:37, 24:33). According to Douglas Macgregor, the rest of the Islamic world and much of the global community increasingly view Israel as a "menace" or "virus" that threatens their survival. This opposition stems from several factors: Expansionist Concerns: Macgregor points to the map of "Greater Israel," which allegedly includes significant portions of neighboring nations such as Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon. He argues that this geopolitical vision is viewed as an existential threat by populations in the region. (6:42 - 7:42) Alienation: Macgregor claims that Israel is increasingly perceived as a "foreign" or "alien" entity within the region. He suggests that any previous opportunities for accommodation have vanished, exacerbated by rhetoric from figures like Ben-Gvir and Netanyahu. (26:53 - 27:46) Global Sentiment: Macgregor asserts that the entire region, and indeed most of the world, is turning decisively against both the U.S. and Israel, partly because the U.S. is perceived as trying to solve Israel's strategic problems through military force, which he argues is ineffective and damaging to international stability. (16:48 - 17:05)

In this video, economist Jeffrey Sachs provides a sharp critique of US foreign policy, specifically regarding the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. He characterizes the war as a "joint venture" driven by the megalomania and incompetence of Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu rather than legitimate strategic necessity (1:02 - 1:32). Key takeaways from the discussion: Collapse of US Institutions: Sachs argues that the US government lacks functional systematic processes and that Congress is effectively non-existent in its oversight of the executive branch, leading to one-man rule and erratic decision-making (3:42 - 4:04). The Iran Conflict: He places current tensions in a historical context, linking them to the 1953 US-backed coup in Iran. He asserts that the US views the region through a lens of control and views Iran’s independence as a challenge to American imperial dominance (10:06 - 11:44). Israeli Actions: Sachs describes the current Israeli government's approach as "fascistic" and offensive, alleging a systematic attempt to expropriate land and harm the Palestinian population, actions he claims are carried out under the watchful eye of the US (6:57 - 8:24). Critique of NATO and Europe: He suggests that the US is essentially "occupying" Europe through its military bases and that NATO is a tool of American power that has outlived its purpose. He claims European leaders have been conditioned to exhibit "rousophobia" and are currently out of touch with their own publics (13:12 - 15:43). Outlook: Sachs predicts that the war will not result in a decisive victory but will instead lead to prolonged instability and mutual destruction, noting that Iran is a resilient ancient civilization that will not simply disappear due to external pressure (16:06 - 16:46).

The other thing to keep in mind is that if you need some healing, why do you believe that licensed psychotherapists are the only option? They don’t have a monopoly. It’s a billion dollar business and you are a consumer. Ask yourself if you are paying a lot of money – are you receiving anything of value? Are their “skills” worth paying for? I personally have a spiritual teacher. She is much better than any psychotherapist I have ever known.

Easier said than done.

As a practical matter, finding a competent human therapist is like looking for a needle in a haystack. The AI does a pretty good job. It’s readily available and free.

In this episode of Judging Freedom, host Judge Andrew Napolitano and guest Scott Ritter discuss the current geopolitical situation in the Middle East, focusing on the U.S.-led conflict with Iran, the concept of a blockade at the Strait of Hormuz, and the political state of the Trump administration. Key takeaways from the discussion: Military Realities in Hormuz: Ritter argues that the U.S. does not control the Strait of Hormuz and cannot effectively block it without significant consequences. He suggests that a blockade would be an act of war, highly porous, and would likely lead to severe global economic instability, potentially causing energy prices to soar (7:54-12:35). Critique of the U.S. Strategy: Ritter characterizes the ongoing conflict as a "war of choice" fought on behalf of Israel rather than for American national security interests. He claims the administration's goals of regime change and neutralizing Iranian capabilities have failed, noting that Iranian resilience has rendered current U.S. military tactics ineffective (3:54-8:28). The Trump Brand and Politics: Much of the conversation shifts to a critique of Donald Trump, whom Ritter describes as a "malignant narcissist" prioritizing his own "brand" and ego over coherent foreign or defense policy. Ritter alleges that Vice President JD Vance was set up to fail in negotiations to preserve Trump's political standing (4:57-7:14, 14:31-16:46). Faith and Morality: Ritter expresses strong disapproval of recent social media imagery posted by Trump, which depicts him in a Christ-like manner. He argues that this behavior mocks faith, violates the principle of separation of church and state, and highlights a lack of genuine moral or religious grounding (18:47-21:32, 29:55-30:23). The Need for Peace: Emphasizing the message that "blessed are the peacemakers," Ritter reflects on the human cost of war. He advocates for a diplomatic approach, asserting that real strength lies in peace rather than the destructive cycle of violence that the current administration is pursuing (25:40-29:20).

He gave a lucid description of cult dynamics. But Bakti yoga is a legitimate path to awakening. The beliefs are Buddha’s raft to be discarded once the river is crossed. It’s delusional to make an enemy of beliefs because then you tends to believe that you are the special one who doesn’t have any beliefs and those beliefs you aren’t aware of are your reality, making you no different than the cultist.

I have found cannabis to be most effective for doing shadow work. It magnifies my feelings and pulls into awareness repressed emotions, allowing me to explore them and get insights. In contrast, mushrooms construct a narrative with visions which tends to distract me from underlying emotions.

This video features a discussion between Alexander Mercouris and Professor John Mearsheimer regarding the current conflict in Iran, which they characterize as a dangerous quagmire for the United States (2:49). Key takeaways from the discussion: The Quagmire: Professor Mearsheimer argues that the United States is in a no-win situation. President Trump faces a scenario where he cannot successfully escalate the war due to Iranian capabilities, yet has no viable exit strategy without appearing defeated (2:53 - 3:51). Escalation Risks: The speakers discuss the risks of moving up the escalation ladder, which could lead to devastating consequences for global infrastructure, including the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, damage to oil production, and potential food shortages due to disruptions in fertilizer supplies (1:13:04 - 1:13:59, 43:28 - 44:42). Failed Military Operations: The participants address reports from alternative media suggesting a recent military operation to recover an F-15 pilot also involved a failed attempt to extract enriched uranium. They argue that such efforts are attempts to cover up broader strategic failures (1:16:18 - 1:17:21). International Relations: There is a significant focus on how European allies view this war as a massive diversion from Ukraine, leading to strained relations with Washington. The experts suggest that to resolve the conflict, the United States may eventually need to seek assistance from Russia and China to pressure Iran toward a ceasefire (15:46 - 16:21, 29:12 - 30:05). Desperation in Policy: Both analysts agree that recent rhetoric from the White House suggests a high level of frustration and desperation, as there is currently no clear path toward a negotiated resolution (50:12 - 51:48). The conversation concludes with a sober warning that, while they hope for an epiphany that leads away from further escalation, the situation remains dire and highly unpredictable (1:29:16 - 1:30:03).

"Almost 750 U.S. troops have been wounded or killed in the Middle East since October 2023, an analysis by The Intercept has found. But the Pentagon won’t acknowledge it. U.S. Central Command, or CENTCOM, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, appears to be engaged in what a defense official called a “casualty cover-up,” offering The Intercept low-ball and outdated figures and failing to provide clarifications on military deaths and injuries. At least 15 U.S. troops were wounded Friday in an Iranian attack on a Saudi air base that hosts American troops, according to two government officials who spoke with The Intercept. Hundreds of U.S. personnel have been killed or injured in the region since the U.S. launched a war on Iran just over a month ago." https://theintercept.com/2026/04/01/iran-war-us-casualty-numbers-trump-hegseth/#:~:text=The Pentagon has sent outdated,just over a month ago.

Trump is raving like a mad man showing that he is increasingly desperate that he is failing. Leaders in control are calm. He is also providing evidence that will be used against him in his impeachment and prosecution for multiple war crimes.

The war was started by Trump and Israel committing two war crimes: 1) unprovoked attack with no imminent threat, and 2) perfidity. These are the parties you can blame. Iran's actions are self defense and yes - the global economy is going to suffer. Perfidity is a war crime under international law. Iranian officials have characterized the initiation of strikes on February 28, 2026, as an "act of perfidy" because they occurred while nuclear negotiations were purportedly ongoing. They argue the U.S. invited their confidence in a diplomatic process only to use it as a cover for a surprise military campaign.