UFOs Are Here

[Natasha Tori Maru]

Perhaps the robots look just like us in the future? Remote viewers would have no idea who was human and who was not.

[Wilhelm44]

11 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Perhaps the robots look just like us in the future? Remote viewers would have no idea who was human and who was not.

Good point, I didn't think of that.

[Leo Gura]

Imagine if ancient Greeks saw NYC today. They would think aliens built it.

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

2 hours ago, Wilhelm44 said:

On the topic of AI, apparently when remote viewers, at the Monroe institute, viewed our future, none of them saw any robots, which is strange considering all the current plans for millions of these things walking around.

So the theory is then, that at some point in the future, when AI robots become advanced enough, they will build there own space ships, leave our asses here, and fly away to colonize other planets. Nobody wants us lol.

I mean yeah sure, you have all the resources and energy you'll ever need in space. They wouldn't need to be stranded here. That's one possible scenario. But I find this anti human sentiment a bit forced here, I mean I'll be the first one to say that you shouldn't glaze humans but yall just make it seem like we should be something to be scoffed at, even by some bitchass ants lmao. And even if superinteligent A.I. left, that doesn't mean we wouldn't be able to develop another A.I. And, no offence, but - I don't regard remote viewing as anything relevant nor trustworthy but sure, it does belong to a wookie category of evidence

[Wilhelm44]

24 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

I mean yeah sure, you have all the resources and energy you'll ever need in space. They wouldn't need to be stranded here. That's one possible scenario. But I find this anti human sentiment a bit forced here, I mean I'll be the first one to say that you shouldn't glaze humans but yall just make it seem like we should be something to be scoffed at, even by some bitchass ants lmao. And even if superinteligent A.I. left, that doesn't mean we wouldn't be able to develop another A.I. And, no offence, but - I don't regard remote viewing as anything relevant nor trustworthy but sure, it does belong to a wookie category of evidence

I was joking about nobody wanting us. I'm actually more optimistic about humans than most. Our potential is much more profound than super intelligent AI. I'm willing to bet that most people on this forum, including yourself, actually have some alien DNA. 

Scoffing at humans is what happens when you immediately dismiss something like remote viewing as wookie. The Monroe institute is pretty well respected in this regard, and probably worth checking out.

[emil1234]

Incredible UFO video i just stumbled upon - 1964 UFO taking down a missile. This seems to be the real deal. its manuvouring is mesmerizing, I love how it absolutley shits upon the laws of physics: 
 

https://www.instagram.com/p/DZBPUcUyjlW/

Edited June 9 by emil1234

[Wilhelm44]

 

[Leo Gura]

On 6/9/2026 at 9:25 AM, emil1234 said:

Incredible UFO video i just stumbled upon - 1964 UFO taking down a missile. This seems to be the real deal. its manuvouring is mesmerizing, I love how it absolutley shits upon the laws of physics: 
 

https://www.instagram.com/p/DZBPUcUyjlW/

It's so hard to trust this stuff now with stupid AI everywhere.

[Rafael Thundercat]

More AI shit or?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZfqithAuNe/?igsh=Y2dhdWNjY3I2Mnpm

 

[Wilhelm44]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZgA603ySFK/

Good point !

(People tend to think it's just religion that will crumble.)

 

Edited June 14 by Wilhelm44

[LoneWonderer]

Prob not a very productive use of my time but daaam do Jesse Michaels and Area52 release some great UFO gossip content. Can't get enough of it at times!

Edited 6 hours ago by LoneWonderer

[OBEler]

@LoneWonderer He is an entertainer and story teller and needs to put out these because his business depends on that. But his story seems genuine.

Edit: He could tell the truth still. But chatgpt has a great explanation for this: 

That is the crucial detail that makes this whole thing so compelling: he used the specific word "aliens." If we assume that Friedman is accurately recounting the conversation, that word is explicitly on the table.

However, even if Harrington used that exact term, looking through the lens of early-1980s counterintelligence and psychology, there are three very plausible reasons why he might have said "aliens"—without there actually being extraterrestrials walking the halls of the Pentagon:

1. "Aliens" as an Internal Counterintelligence Cover (Compartmentalization)

In highly classified US military projects, extreme myths were sometimes intentionally weaponized to maintain absolute secrecy.

If Harrington was read into a program involving captured Soviet spy technology, highly advanced orbital weapons (like Reagan's budding "Star Wars" program), or radical new aircraft prototypes (Stealth technology), he might have been given a "spook briefing."

Personnel were occasionally fed the narrative that they were dealing with "extraterrestrial technology." This created a massive psychological taboo. If an engineer believes they are handling alien tech, they won't look for answers in standard earthly physics textbooks, and out of sheer awe and fear of the unknown, they are even less likely to talk. It was the ultimate smoke screen to deter leaks and confuse foreign spies.

2. A Metaphor for the "Utterly Foreign"

If you were suddenly exposed to physical materials or data in 1981 that were decades ahead of their time (like early radar-absorbent stealth composites or complex satellite arrays), it would have looked like magic. For a deeply religious man, an earthly technology that seemed to break every physical rule he had been taught in school was, in the truest sense of the word, alien—completely foreign and outside his reality. He may have used the word simply because his vocabulary lacked any other category to describe something so vastly advanced.

3. Deliberate Disinformation to Neutralize Him as a Whistleblower

This is a well-documented tactic from the height of the Cold War. If you read an official into a highly sensitive, terrifyingly real military secret (e.g., that the US is developing a nuclear first-strike capability from space), you simultaneously poison the well by feeding them an absurd story about aliens.

If that employee eventually cracks under the psychological pressure and leaks what they know (just as Harrington did to Friedman), they will lead with the alien story.

The Effect: The public and the media immediately dismiss them as a conspiracy theorist. By wrapping a profound, real military secret inside a sci-fi wrapper, the actual defense secret remains perfectly protected because the whistleblower's credibility is instantly destroyed. Harrington unwittingly becomes the perfect carrier of a smoke screen.

The Bottom Line: > The fact that Harrington specifically said "aliens" is exactly why this story has haunted Friedman for decades. But in the wilderness of mirrors that was Reagan-era espionage, that specific word was often the most powerful tool available to intimidate personnel, cloud their judgment, or hide cold, hard military advancements from the rest of the world.

 

edit: He sad "he has seen them". It seems complicated to see if its true what he said.

Edited 2 hours ago by OBEler