Elon Musk Twitter Trainwreck Mega-Thread

[Buck Edwards]

Here's news. 

Twitter replaces blue bird logo with doge meme. 

And we've officially entered the Apocalypse. 

 

[Danioover9000]

@Enlightement

8 hours ago, Enlightement said:

Here's news. 

Twitter replaces blue bird logo with doge meme. 

And we've officially entered the Apocalypse. 

 

   For fuck's sake, how did Twitter let themselves be bought by a Narcissistic hyper logical guy?

[Danioover9000]

   Actually I'm surprised how all of Twitter's employees are still remaining working in Twitter, I expected all of them to boycott Twitter.

[Tanz]

3 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

   For fuck's sake, how did Twitter let themselves be bought by a Narcissistic hyper logical guy?

It wasn't "let." The shareholders sold it to him at an insane price. When he tried to back out of the deal they chased him down and forced him to buy it in court.  They could not reject the money, every one of them.  If they really believed in their platform, they would not have sold. 
All the money people in silicon valley are libertarians; money is their real ideology.  The employees who don't have any power at all are liberal.   
Musk gets his way because people are greedy

2 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

   Actually I'm surprised how all of Twitter's employees are still remaining working in Twitter, I expected all of them to boycott Twitter.

They get paid incredibly well that's why.  

Edited April 6, 2023 by Tanz

[Danioover9000]

@Tanz

49 minutes ago, Tanz said:

It wasn't "let." The shareholders sold it to him at an insane price. When he tried to back out of the deal they chased him down and forced him to buy it in court.  They could not reject the money, every one of them.  If they really believed in their platform, they would not have sold. 
All the money people in silicon valley are libertarians; money is their real ideology.  The employees who don't have any power at all are liberal.   
Musk gets his way because people are greedy

They get paid incredibly well that's why.  

   So, basically because Twitter is near bankruptcy, they had to sell to Elon Musk?

   Bing paid incredibly well /=/ happiness when yo are forced to work overtime, some sleep at Twitter building and working overtime in figuring out how to make Twitter better than the older version. 

[Tanz]

 

1 hour ago, Danioover9000 said:

   So, basically because Twitter is near bankruptcy, they had to sell to Elon Musk?

 

Not at all; they have users, lots of them, that's worth more than the actual income they earn from ads.  Even if they made a loss every year, they are mining so much valuable data, magnitudes more than the company is worth.  He gave an extreme highball offer based on the metrics we understand from what they tell us in revenue. Still, the data they acquire daily can produce valuable AI technology, for example.  

The shareholders knew the stock market would tank, so they sold the company while it was worth more.  They got a good deal and now are sitting on so much cash. Musk got what he wanted: control over a platform he loves and probably access to data that could make it more than he paid for the company in the next several years.  

They would not have sold to him if they were romantic over their morals and kept the company because of its influence over such a broad audience.  I am unsure if Musk believes in what he says about free speech, but I am sure he bought the company based on how much money he can make later on.  He may be many things, but he's no fool when it comes to making money. The liberals that claim to hate him so much bought tons of Tesla stocks. Tesla is valued much higher than automobile companies that produce 10x per year.  In other words, Tesla is overvalued but his ability to sell people and believe in him is astounding.  

It's like if someone convinces that in and out burger is so valuable that it becomes more valuable than Macdonalds, which have outlets worldwide.  

Edited April 6, 2023 by Tanz

[Israfil]

27 minutes ago, Tanz said:

In other words, Tesla is overvalued but his ability to sell people and believe in him is astounding.  

This is the summary of every Elon Musk venture.

[Danioover9000]

@Tanz

22 hours ago, Tanz said:

 

Not at all; they have users, lots of them, that's worth more than the actual income they earn from ads.  Even if they made a loss every year, they are mining so much valuable data, magnitudes more than the company is worth.  He gave an extreme highball offer based on the metrics we understand from what they tell us in revenue. Still, the data they acquire daily can produce valuable AI technology, for example.  

The shareholders knew the stock market would tank, so they sold the company while it was worth more.  They got a good deal and now are sitting on so much cash. Musk got what he wanted: control over a platform he loves and probably access to data that could make it more than he paid for the company in the next several years.  

They would not have sold to him if they were romantic over their morals and kept the company because of its influence over such a broad audience.  I am unsure if Musk believes in what he says about free speech, but I am sure he bought the company based on how much money he can make later on.  He may be many things, but he's no fool when it comes to making money. The liberals that claim to hate him so much bought tons of Tesla stocks. Tesla is valued much higher than automobile companies that produce 10x per year.  In other words, Tesla is overvalued but his ability to sell people and believe in him is astounding.  

It's like if someone convinces that in and out burger is so valuable that it becomes more valuable than Macdonalds, which have outlets worldwide.  

   So, because of the numerous users, income, valuable data is why Elon Musk wants Twitter? Then why did the original leader and Twitter board protect that much value being taken by Elon?

   The shareholders,, most likely stage orange value with logical and sequential cognition and limited morality, only for profits, clicks, views and outcomes orientated, because they're all that, they get to sell Titter to Elon? Why did they let ruthless business and shareholders sell Twitter, just for more cash?

   I do think Elon Musk is mostly lying in saying he believes in freedom of speech, given how much he had to censor and cancel most Twitter accounts, left wing and right wing opinions, and especially freedom of speech about how evil Elon Musk is, which ironically is truthful. To me he's a blatant narcissist, and hyper logical guy that he is misplacing himself as some leader of a social media platform, when he should be focused on Tesla and Space X. With this drama he brought on to himself he ain't going to Mars anytime soon, or making the latest invention, to me it's silly and evil.

   Can you elaborate on the in and out burger example?

Edited April 7, 2023 by Danioover9000

[Tanz]

23 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

The shareholders,, most likely stage orange value with logical and sequential cognition and limited morality, only for profits, clicks, views and outcomes orientated, because they're all that, they get to sell Titter to Elon? Why did they let ruthless business and shareholders sell Twitter, just for more cash?

Some of the shareholders are part of larger groups of people that invest in their companies, and then in turn, they invest in companies like Twitter.  The fiduciary responsibility is to make money for their clients.  If they don't take the sale while they can, their clients will lose money in other things, and their financial institution will have broken their #1 rule.  Always make money for your clients when you can.  This is a big reason why companies lobby and bring in politicians that will do policies that favor their companies.  We live in a dirty world, and it's not so cut and dry. However, if you think Elon Musk is "evil" or "bad", those people that allowed him to take over the company are at least as bad as him or even worst because they act anonymously.  
Lawyers get hired by miserable people, and their professional and moral professional responsibility is to help their clients win, even if they did the crime. If they do not defend their clients, the whole profession collapses, and no one would ever hire lawyers for anything; the economy would be jeopardized because the lawyer's responsibility is to protect rich people.  The entire ecosystem creates medicine, better cars, and whatever shit makes people's lives better.  

The ethical thing for a lawyer is not to work for big firms and help the little guy, but then they would make less money, and with less money, they would have less financial power to make a difference or to donate to a cause they believe in.  However, if you defend a wealthy pedophile, you can provide clean water for 500,000 people.  That, in turn, can save more children compared to the 100s of kids molested by that sick, rich mother fucker.  The same logic is used in medicine with animals getting tortured.  All our hands in covered in blood one way or the other.  

23 hours ago, Danioover9000 said:

   Can you elaborate on the in and out burger example?

In and Out Burger only has outlets in the west coast; they make significantly less money than macdonalds and yet everyone dumps money in In and Out, making them worth more than Macdonalds. Obviously that's not the reality, but if we were to use the analogy, that would happen.  Tesla sells 1 million cars worldwide, Toyota sells 12 million, yet Tesla is worth more; it makes no sense, but that's the reality.  In fact, Tesla is worth more than BMW, Mercedes, Ford, they are the most valuable auto manufacturer in the world, and it's not based on logic or reality, but rather speculation.      

 

Edited April 8, 2023 by Tanz

[integral]

Right after the doge meme replace twitter logo for 3 days tesla stock took a small hit. 

Edited April 8, 2023 by integral

[Danioover9000]

@integral

1 hour ago, integral said:

Right after the doge meme replace twitter logo for 3 days tesla stock took a small hit. 

   Over a dog meme? Is memetics really that dangerous? We really need an internet government system more than ever.

[Danioover9000]

@Tanz

1 hour ago, Tanz said:

Some of the shareholders are part of larger groups of people that invest in their companies, and then in turn, they invest in companies like Twitter.  The fiduciary responsibility is to make money for their clients.  If they don't take the sale while they can, their clients will lose money in other things, and their financial institution will have broken their #1 rule.  Always make money for your clients when you can.  This is a big reason why companies lobby and bring in politicians that will do policies that favor their companies.  We live in a dirty world, and it's not so cut and dry. However, if you think Elon Musk is "evil" or "bad", those people that allowed him to take over the company are at least as bad as him or even worst because they act anonymously.  
Lawyers get hired by miserable people, and their professional and moral professional responsibility is to help their clients win, even if they did the crime. If they do not defend their clients, the whole profession collapses, and no one would ever hire lawyers for anything; the economy would be jeopardized because the lawyer's responsibility is to protect rich people.  The entire ecosystem creates medicine, better cars, and whatever shit makes people's lives better.  

The ethical thing for a lawyer is not to work for big firms and help the little guy, but then they would make less money, and with less money, they would have less financial power to make a difference or to donate to a cause they believe in.  However, if you defend a wealthy pedophile, you can provide clean water for 500,000 people.  That, in turn, can save more children compared to the 100s of kids molested by that sick, rich mother fucker.  The same logic is used in medicine with animals getting tortured.  All our hands in covered in blood one way or the other.  

In and Out Burger only has outlets in the west coast; they make significantly less money than macdonalds and yet everyone dumps money in In and Out, making them worth more than Macdonalds. Obviously that's not the reality, but if we were to use the analogy, that would happen.  Tesla sells 1 million cars worldwide, Toyota sells 12 million, yet Tesla is worth more; it makes no sense, but that's the reality.  In fact, Tesla is worth more than BMW, Mercedes, Ford, they are the most valuable auto manufacturer in the world, and it's not based on logic or reality, but rather speculation.      

 

   But when we just have a society with this game A orientation, which only rewards more and more the fewer and fewer on the tops of these pyramids, namely psychopaths and sociopaths and other dark triad traits personalities, the multi millionaires and billionaires, this is like a self inversive system that is disproportionate to what the public wants versus what the elites want. We want more and more competent people in charge of leadership roles, yet the higher they climb, the higher the obligations and responsibilities, the fewer that remain until you have over achieving psychopaths that are high in conscientiousness, close mindedness, extroversion or introversion( think Bill Gates, Steve Jobs and Donald Trump), high neuroticism/narcissism,  

[Extreme Z7]

Is Elon Musk's Twitter Dying?
https://www.vox.com/technology/2023/4/15/23683554/twitter-dying-elon-musk-x-company

Edited April 15, 2023 by Extreme Z7

[Danioover9000]

@Extreme Z7

3 hours ago, Extreme Z7 said:

Is Elon Musk's Twitter Dying?
https://www.vox.com/technology/2023/4/15/23683554/twitter-dying-elon-musk-x-company

   Can we just arrest Elon Musk already? They're going after Trump, might as well go after Elon Musk and whoever is copying Trump's recklessness.

[Extreme Z7]

@Danioover9000 I don't think he's done anything illegal. . . yet.

[Extreme Z7]

More Recent Elon's Twitter News

[Extreme Z7]

 

Elon Musk's Twitter Algorithm Code Leaked! There's some juicy details on here.

[integral]

3 minutes ago, Extreme Z7 said:

 

Elon Musk's Twitter Algorithm Code Leaked! There's some juicy details on here.

All the major companys place a bounty for bugs, meaning they will pay you if you find a bug and report it. In elons case after the leak he made the best out of the situation. 

[Extreme Z7]

@integral The last thing Elon needs right now is to pay more money.

[Buck Edwards]

Musk threatens to sue Microsoft.