A female version of Leo - Yeshuani

[Letho]

Limp, limp please get it through your head that I don't even read your posts. I scroll past. Thanks. Now I'm asking you politely, move on as requested. Appreciation. 

[Letho]

@Alex_R There's 26 other letters +. Your icon is just for artificial intellectual status, and it works. Somewhat. Until you speak that is. 

[Brittany]

On 5/4/2025 at 6:53 AM, PurpleTree said:

This is the female Leo? ♌️ 

Nah seems grifty

 

On 5/3/2025 at 9:15 PM, Princess Arabia said:

I checked her out; i like her. She kind of reminds me of and talks like a robot? I don't have a Tik Tok acc but I followed her on IG. All I see are shorts; does she have regular videos. Is she on YT. I'll check. Love the topics she talks about. I have never really heard them be talked about in the way she does. I can tell she'll broaden my perspectives on these topics. The way she speaks about collapsing in the short time watching her is surely unique.

Although, Youtube is many people's preferred platform, her content on Youtube is not the same content that is on Tiktok. 

Youtube is mostly Q&A's and I guess crystals? haha

While, Tiktok/Instagram are her epiphanies and downloads.

It's more advanced information on Tiktok/Instagram.

It's very different.

 

19 hours ago, Letho said:

Don't buy her book/system if you can't afford 

I agree with you.

Selling spiritual content is okay and necessary for people's survival.

But I disagree with [her] approach to money.

And I feel like books/system/courses are sometimes gatekeeping wisdom that should be freely shared.

 

On 5/3/2025 at 5:50 PM, aurum said:

I watched some of her videos. I’m sure she helps people, but she does not understand consciousness.

Watch at your own risk.

 

 

22 hours ago, Sugarcoat said:

I’m not a fan of people who speak as if they’re not even trying to be understood. Who are you even speaking to? What’s the point in speaking if it’s not to be understood? Or is the target audience only people who have already read into those things? Then it makes sense, but that would be an incredibly small audience. She’s not like Leo, Leo explains it in a way for it to be understood by anyone

 

20 hours ago, Nemra said:

She can say the most profound thing in the world, but that does not mean you must conclude that she knows what she is actually saying before examining her mental process.

Providing long, sophisticated answers does not make you authentic, let alone truthful by default, especially when you do not focus on revealing a bit about how you came up with those answers.

I agree with all of you, in some ways.

She has certain blocks, like everyone does.

And her language can be dumbed down a bit more. 

But she is creating brand new Maps within the Spiritual field, which I have never seen anyone venture into.

And deconstructing people's assumptions of reality but not parroting anyone else's work to do it.

So it's quite fascinating to see.

 

22 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Yesh-who-ni?

I think it is Yesh-who-anne-ee haha

Edited May 5 by Brittany

[Something Funny]

More like a female opposite of Leo. A tik toker vs a guy who makes 3 hour long youtube videos.

[aurum]

7 hours ago, Brittany said:

But she is creating brand new Maps within the Spiritual field, which I have never seen anyone venture into.

And deconstructing people's assumptions of reality but not parroting anyone else's work to do it.

But is she?

You're obviously a fan of hers. But from what I can tell, she's mostly just parroting new age things I've heard hundreds of times.

Even if she is using unique language or phrasing, that doesn't make it a unique idea. The essence is still standard new age.

[Synchronicity]

I have to agree with @aurum

I‘ve had a lot of the weird New Age-y types of experiences since I was a kid (among other things that started earlier). And so, I’ve been very familiar with a lot of the woo-woo stuff that New Age circles describe

I don’t necessarily believe in the ontological status of the experiences in the way I used to. But they’re still tangible experiences for me, whatever they are. I’m talking the full shebang; interdimensional consciousness, interdimensional beings, other densities, other frequencies, aura fields, sacred geometries, hidden civilizations, aliens, grays, reptilians, Pleiadians, Bigfoot, mythological creatures, Pantheons, polytheistic deities, God (“Source” in the New Age definition), etc. 

Those experiences led me to explore a lot of the online New Age communities since I was about 11. With that said, it’s been almost… 16 years now that I’ve had a heavy familiarity with the New Age section of spirituality 

Anyways, instead of bragging more than I intended, I’ll finally get to my point. I looked through Yeshuani’s website & a lot of her TikToks & other clips. And from what I can gather, her main focus is on this underlying “geometry” that she says is the essence or structure of everything. And her work seems to be centered around claiming to shift these “geometries” for the benefit of a better life 

And to be honest, it’s standard New Age metaphysics. Law of Attraction, even. People who experience underlying geometries & claim to work with them, are a dime-a-dozen in the spiritual community. In fact, I would almost suggest to you, that if you love Yeshuani’s work, then there’s hundreds of Discord servers you could explore, all full of people who will teach you the same stuff for free 

It’s just not really anything new… given my 16 years of experience in those types of communities. I’m sure it’s new for you, as this may be the first time you’re really encountering a person like that. But if we’re talking in the context of the whole wide world? There’s a colorful plethora of other people you can find who are offering the same content 

Her website also mentions 5-D Awakening & reality mechanics. 5-D themes are another common feature of New Age spirituality. It’s basically their favorite dimension. Or at least, one of their favorites (e.g. 7-D, 9-D, 12-D, 33-D, etc.) 

I wouldn’t necessarily categorize her & Leo into the same sub-category of spirituality. She’s more New Age, 5-D, LOA, etc. while Leo is closer to being in-between sub-categories like integralism & pure consciousness-work (Ken Wilber would be one example of the former, while Peter Ralston would be one example of the latter) 

I’m not gonna make any arguments here about whether any of these people are right or wrong. I do have my own stances on whether they are, but I won’t get into that here, because that’s not the focus of my comment 

My main point is just that, Yeshuani & Leo have similarities to different types of spirituality & there’s quite a sizable number of people you can find in some of those sub-categories 

It’s still possible to be unique & there are definitely people who genuinely are. It’s just very difficult & I wouldn’t say this is an example of a person who takes the cake 

[aurum]

2 hours ago, Synchronicity said:

I have to agree with @aurum

Straight to hell 

[Aaron p]

I'm sure she's got good intentions, but something's up with her hair (front)...she seems like an uncalibrated looney. I'll stick with the calibrated loonies here 

[Yimpa]

4 minutes ago, Aaron p said:

I'll stick with the calibrated loonies here 

Sweet yourself!

[Max1993]

@Princess Arabia Leo is the best communicator... Ralston is pretentious, also most Guru's rarely show emotion, Leo shows his depth, his eyes have seen beautiful things.  

[Yimpa]

9 minutes ago, Max1993 said:

Ralston is pretentious, also most Guru's rarely show emotion

Ralston does. I would know. I listen to his podcasts while driving and it makes me want to let out a big FU honk to the entire galaxy!

 

Ralston:

Edited May 8 by Yimpa

[Aaron p]

54 minutes ago, Max1993 said:

Leo is the best communicator... 

Word. Although I think it would be slightly more accurate to say that Leo is the best *articulator. Sometimes I find his communications could be slightly better angled. See he's teaching from such a high level, he can't comprehend how low level some of us are at lol. But I mean he's pretty solid. Defo the best teacher/business combo I've ever seen.

I know we sort of jest (well I'm jesting) about Leo being the greatest teacher of all time. I think it's pretty safe to assume that in terms of depth, accuracy, power and communication, Leo's up there. It's a trade off, he trades carefulness for power. Good trade imo, someone needs to have the balls to do it

Edited May 8 by Aaron p

[Max1993]

@Aaron p Yeah... his best gems are completely free. So the generosity is a huge plus too. My only critique is I wish he was more open towards Dr. Joe Dispenza's work. Healing the body and even changing genetic expression is very possible in my opinion I have been to his retreat. 

[Brittany]

 

19 hours ago, Aaron p said:

Word. Although I think it would be slightly more accurate to say that Leo is the best *articulator. Sometimes I find his communications could be slightly better angled. See he's teaching from such a high level, he can't comprehend how low level some of us are at lol.

 

On 5/5/2025 at 8:35 PM, Synchronicity said:

It’s just not really anything new… given my 16 years of experience in those types of communities. I’m sure it’s new for you, as this may be the first time you’re really encountering a person like that. But if we’re talking in the context of the whole wide world? There’s a colorful plethora of other people you can find who are offering the same content 

Her website also mentions 5-D Awakening & reality mechanics. 5-D themes are another common feature of New Age spirituality. It’s basically their favorite dimension. Or at least, one of their favorites (e.g. 7-D, 9-D, 12-D, 33-D, etc.) 

I wouldn’t necessarily categorize her & Leo into the same sub-category of spirituality. She’s more New Age, 5-D, LOA, etc. while Leo is closer to being in-between sub-categories like integralism & pure consciousness-work (Ken Wilber would be one example of the former, while Peter Ralston would be one example of the latter) 

I think this is what it is, this type of teaching is very new to me. 

So it seems very advanced.

I have been in the Non-Duality, Neville Goddard and Shadow Work circles for a while now. 

But this "geometry", "fractal", "recursion" and "calibration" stuff is extremely new to me. haha

It sounds like robot speech.

She also cracks me up when she says stuff like this. haha