Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

[Twentyfirst]

6 hours ago, AION said:

She is a paradox on high heels trying to make a living off sad guys in the manosphere.

Women like Sadia or naturally low testosterone guys will never understand the regular guy. Because they don’t know how it feels to have high testosterone rushing through the veins. 

It is like explaining how it is to be an eagle to a chicken. 

I like those reels of the "she finally understands men" women who crack the code on the simplicity of men. It's always an older woman too like she took her entire life to get it lol. There are a bunch of them I see but here is one I was watching earlier 

https://x.com/TheGriftReport/status/1935700415477129445

 

[AION]

2 hours ago, Twentyfirst said:

I like those reels of the "she finally understands men" women who crack the code on the simplicity of men. It's always an older woman too like she took her entire life to get it lol. There are a bunch of them I see but here is one I was watching earlier 

https://x.com/TheGriftReport/status/1935700415477129445

 

Most of them get it when it is too late while the ordeal is to get it before that. It is cat women egoism on a grand scale. We should all take lessons from it. 

Edited June 20, 2025 by AION

[Twentyfirst]

11 minutes ago, AION said:

Most of them get it when it is too late while the ordeal is to get it before that. It is cat women egoism on a grand scale. We should all take lessons from it. 

I wonder if high testosterone is more mysterious than the feminine. Like you said even the low test guys don't get it and give friction

I think Allison Armstrong who has pretty high consciousness teachings far from the gender debates said that actually women are simple and men are confusing 

[AION]

@Twentyfirst I don’t know that woman but I would take it with a grain of salt. 
 

Edited June 20, 2025 by AION

[Puer Aeternus]

1 hour ago, Twentyfirst said:

I think Allison Armstrong who has pretty high consciousness teachings far from the gender debates said that actually women are simple and men are confusing 

Sounds like more gender games to me.

Ohhhh women are so confusing, men are simple. Nooo it's the men that are confusing!

It's a tired perspective game boss.

Edited June 20, 2025 by Puer Aeternus

[Nemra]

9 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I didn't say it was.

@Leo Gura, then I misread. Sorry.

[Leo Gura]

5 hours ago, Mada_ said:

and you popularised your recent work with SEO.

I did not say that.

Quote

what approach should you have taken to start and grow Actualized.org instead of the route you took?

I don't have an answer for you.

As I said, truth is not about serving survival or popularity.

Survival often forces you to do things you don't want to do. I made certain painful sacrifices to achieve creative autonomy because I needed it to serve the world.

Edited June 20, 2025 by Leo Gura

[Rafael Thundercat]

This one is about  a connection I did days ago. Leo keep talking about Materialism Ideology,How science have deep epistemic errors etc..

Well, risking bias here as well I share something from the works of Rudolf Steiner. Was from him I head first about Ahriman, or what we would call Satan. Far from pointing it as an entity I would like to bring awareness about the thing with materialistic worldview, because second to the description in this link, Ahrimanic Spirit fits exactly on what a materialistic view of reality is.

https://en.anthro.wiki/Ahriman

Quote - " Anthroposophy sees in Ahriman a being who, in harmful exaggeration of the materialistic-technical mind, forms the antithesis of the intoxicatingly indulgent, world-fugitive Lucifer. With Christ's help, man must hold the middle ground between the two beings and their qualities.

Ahriman is a spirit gifted with a penetrating but cold intelligence that exceeds human comprehension, but which he eagerly closes within himself. In contrast to Lucifer, he therefore appears as the spirit of darkness and opposing powers, who wants to darken and block the human soul's access to the soul-spiritual world, in order to increasingly chain and restrict its consciousness to physical corporeality" 

Edited June 20, 2025 by Rafael Thundercat

[Husseinisdoingfine]

To what extent were the scandals and sexual abuse at Rajneeshpuram the result of Osho’s teachings and leadership, versus the actions of his deputies, such as Ma Anand Sheela? Given that Osho faced no charges while Sheela did, was the commune’s downfall due more to his ideology or its management?

 https://sambodhiprem.com/Osho-talks-about-sex.html

https://www.osho.com/highlights-of-oshos-world/osho-on-sex-quotes

 

 

Edited June 20, 2025 by Husseinisdoingfine

[Leo Gura]

@Husseinisdoingfine They were certainly his leadership. He lead and built the entire structure.

[Davino]

Regarding your post on Osho's cult, I find it particularly distressing when there is a legit mystic that fucks it up when trying to build a group. I'm reminded of Adi Da, such a serious legit mystic and also fucked it up trying to make a commune.

This is just to say how different leading people from being a metaphysic genius can be. 

I think that strong personal development hand in hand with Awakening is the way to avoid these types of situations. First to not create them and second to have the responsibility to build the skills and safety nets in case you do create them.

[Leo Gura]

@Davino Running a community is a very different skill-set than mysticism. Almost the opposite skill-set. Running a community involves politics. Few mystics have a good grasp of politics, social dynamics, and how corruption works.

Edited June 20, 2025 by Leo Gura

[Miguel1]

@integral They (Sadia) was talking about giving great sex as an asset from the female’s POV. She wasn’t talking from both gender’s POV.

[Miguel1]

12 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

It's easy to agree with it if one is good-looking.

The less attractive one is, the harder it is the accept the realities of mating.

This puts things into perspective for me.

Easy to not care about the harsh realities of dating, when you are not the one on the suffering end. Rather the opposite.

[integral]

14 minutes ago, Miguel1 said:

@integral They (Sadia) was talking about giving great sex as an asset from the female’s POV. She wasn’t talking from both gender’s POV.

Yes i miss understood her. My mistake lol

16:00

Sadie: Do you think men are more loyal to beautiful women or sexually good women?

Orion: oh depends on the loyalty

Sadie: I would say they're always loyal to whoever gives them the best sex.

 

In general she just goes on a killing spree being 99% rights on everything lol

Edited June 20, 2025 by integral

[Natasha Tori Maru]

13 minutes ago, Miguel1 said:

This puts things into perspective for me.

Easy to not care about the harsh realities of dating, when you are not the one on the suffering end. Rather the opposite.

I feel the same about Leo's statement.

I'm chopping veggies for dinner last night having my brain turned inside out by it. 

[Natasha Tori Maru]

3 minutes ago, integral said:

Yes i miss understood her. My mistake lol

16:00

Sadie: Do you think men are more loyal to beautiful women or sexually good women?

Orion: oh depends on the loyalty

Sadie: I would say they're always loyal to whoever gives them the best sex.

 

In general she just goes on a killing spree being 99% rights on everything lol

This is a WOOSH for a lot of women. 

I had a radical upbringing regarding openness and sex. It was baked in that I should get good at sex. I was given books on the topic when young, and taught this was a man's love language. You have to communicate love to the person in their language. 

These teachings were from men and women in my life, which really emphasised boundaries and balance 

[integral]

Sadia: Do you think men are more loyal to beautiful women or sexually good women? I would say they’re always loyal to whoever gives them the best sex.

Orion: I don’t know; I think it’s the attractiveness, because I think that a lot of men— guys who are still holding a candle for a woman with borderline personality disorder who treated him very badly, cheated on him, left him in the lurch—but she was the hottest woman that…

Sadia: But was she the hottest or was she the best sex?

Orion: I think it was the hottest.

Sadia: I’d imagine it was the best sex, because those crazy women do give the best sex.

Orion: They tend to, because they have a short-term mating strategy similar to men— they know they can’t sustain long-term, so they give it their all, and that extends to the bedroom. They almost fuck like they’ll never see the guy again. Whereas women with a long-term strategy think they’re going to be with you forever— there’ll be days they go to bed in a face mask and socks on. The woman who thinks it’s only short-term will bring it every single chance she gets. I have told women in consultations that you don’t have to be a borderline to fuck like a borderline, and it might be a really good strategy for some borderline women to get together and teach classes to other women about what to do in the bedroom—they would be unstoppable.

---

THIS IS SO Funny and TRUE. I laughed so hard, I dated 2 BPDs and its just the most insane possible sex and I was a dumbass being loyal to one that cheated on me + ghosted. 

Edited June 20, 2025 by integral

[integral]

21 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

This is a WOOSH for a lot of women. 

I had a radical upbringing regarding openness and sex. It was baked in that I should get good at sex. I was given books on the topic when young, and taught this was a man's love language. You have to communicate love to the person in their language. 

These teachings were from men and women in my life, which really emphasised boundaries and balance 

BOOKS?? Where did you grow up? 

But it's unclear if a woman can truly understand what great sex is to a man?

They might confuse it for like doing certain sexual things or positions and all that, and all of that is wrong.

Great sex for a man is how emotionally invested the woman is during sex.

The more emotionally invested she is the better the sex is.

She has to have sex in that moment as if that was the best sex of her life, that there's no way she could ever be touched that good by a man again, that the hand of God touched her.

The woman has to be crying, like this is the last day of her life. lmfao and she will tell you "that was the best sex i ever had" and she will say that everytime you have sex, and she means it.

And thats BPD sex

Edited June 20, 2025 by integral

[Santiago Ram]

Quote

Unconscious and undeveloped people cannot be trusted with freedom. Which is why conservatism is such a powerful and omnipresent force.

Hmmm. That is a dangerous idea. Many people get locked up simply for being perceived weird or 'potentially' dangerous while not doing anything really.

Conservativism is complete Bollocks.

Edited June 20, 2025 by Santiago Ram