Viking

You don't have to trust what it says. You can ask it to find sources and summarize them. If you don't trust it you can verify the information by yourself via the links it gives you. (Important to point out that you need the advanced models for this like chatpgt o3, o4 mini or grok with thinking or perplexity)

I think you do need to experience knowing news first if you don't already know I'd start with your own country's news

I understand what you're saying and there may be ideas like these flowing in his head, but don't you think it oversimplifies him? From what I've seen he does have self awareness so I don't think he 100% buys into this ego trip. He does see it as a mission, but I don't think he really thinks humanity "needs" him to survive... Even if he might've said things along this direction of thinking, you can't really know what goes on inside his head, and considering the way he speaks and his autism it's really easy to misinterpret what he says. I've known personally quite a few people with Asperger's/autism, and you can never rely on what you "feel" from their speech. You need to take what they say as literally as possible.

Is that so far from the truth though? He has a tremendous amount of power and influence, without him the world would definitely look different. "Different" in what way? - we can never say, but we can't say with certainty that the alternatives wouldn't bring humanity to its doom in the near future. It's not black or white..

Aha ok. Let's infer the quality of the policies of the government using the body language of a person with autism.

That doesn't prove that the person who wasn't elected runs the government but ok. What specific established systems did he tear down so far? And what was the reasoning behind them? And why is it benefitting only him and why is it bad for the whole of america?

The person who was elected assigned another person to do government work. How is that a bad thing?

@Shodburrito what examples of things Trump did do you feel guilty about? I feel maybe most of your guilt is the people around you. All the libtards (including in this forum) are ABSOLUTELY EXAGGERATING saying how bad this, so if you internalize it of course you will feel bad. What do YOU actually think? What was done which is bad?

The issue is that "offensive" is subjective. A principal in an elementary school could say that teachers shouldn't tell children that there are more than 2 genders in order to not confuse them and then that principal could get cancelled and replaced. He didn't intend to say anything wrong, he just cared about the children, yet some teachers could find that "offensive". I think people who fight for free speech want to avoid edge cases like this. I agree that some just want to say offensive things, but not all.

Saying "retarded" without consequence is the same free speech

Both have peaks and valleys. The lowest point of sex isn't better than the peak of masturbation, but masturbation is a simulation of sex afterall. After a while of masturbation without sex it feels empty.

Welcome to the middle east. If you claim to be stage yellow the solution is to incorporate those aspects and talk to them on the same level. Don't show any feminine qualities. If you're unable to do it you're stuck in green.

Try taking a free online course in programming and see if you like it. Who knows, maybe along with making money you will enjoy it.

Interesting. So you're saying by sharing, women express their yin energy? Their passive energy?

Interesting point, it may be true that my question asking is a way to express that energy. So in continuation of this energy expression lol - why do men then express emotions with solution oriented expression of emotion yet women with just stopping at the problem and sharing only it?