Frylock

The latter. He's unable to focus on policy and rambles like an insane old jackass, so the more that the public gets reacquainted with Donald Trump, the worse off his chances for reelection are.

"They're eating their pets!" Moderator: No they're not. "I saw it on TV!"

This gives me major "If I make a topic about it, maybe I can convince myself it's true" vibes

Kamala is a perfect foil for this guy, she's perfectly exposed him as a complete loon. Well he does it on his own, but still. Better performance from her than I expected.

Elon Musk is a token eccentric, money worshipping, self-aggrandizing billionaire. He's definitely more annoying and obnoxious than other billionaires, quite petty and sensitive as well. But a con artist he is not. Trump, on the other hand, just reeks of being a felonious grifter. Anyone with a shred of common sense could see through his baloney. His only interests are his own selfish gain.

Walz is a good pick. Charismatic, yet plain midwestern man that Republicans are going to have a very difficult time attacking effectively, just like they have so far with Kamala.

He's almost 80 and out of shape. It's amazing he can even (somewhat) hold it together for 90 minute ramblings.

I really wonder what the future of the Republican party holds post-Trump. His VP pick Vance is just as socially awkward and out of touch as DeSantis. No one has proven that they can out-Trump Trump and reach his level of moxie and charisma. Aside from him who is unapologetically himself, Republicans leaders just come across as off-putting, delusional, and weird.

Man, these billionaires have no shame. Trump has crapped on Musk how many times? Musk re-enabled Trump's Twitter account hoping that he would post again and Trump gave him the finger.

Sorry, but no. I'll take the criminal prosecutor over the felon on the smarts scale. Don't confuse charm with intelligence.

Trump had the second most votes for a presidential candidate ever, problem for him is Biden had the most. Honestly, if a once in 100 years pandemic didn't happen during an election year, and Trump's horrible response to it and the civil unrest that followed the George Floyd murder, he would have been re-elected. But people have terrible memories and absence makes the heart grow fonder. We saw Biden decline in mental acuity during his presidency and Trump seemed like a stronger option in comparison, and he was well aware of that. Now he's going against someone much younger and mentally sharper than he is, so let's see how he reacts.

Does the devil ramble incoherently and at one point refer to Obama as being the current president? Definitely not as mentally sharp as he was 4, 8 years ago. He was always an impulsive manchild but now he's just an old, borderline senile manchild.

Now suddenly, Trump is looking like the old and senile one in this race. Props to Joe for being a good leader doing the right thing. Doesn't seem like Trump is so gung-ho on debating Kamala as he was the older man.

With how fast and hard Twitter is tanking in just two weeks after his ownership, a part of me wonders if it was his intention all along to destroy Twitter. Because the smart move would have been to just sit back and change nothing.

Being an idiot attempting to overthrow democracy is one thing and should end in a prison sentence in any halfway sane country. But stealing classified documents about weapons that can cause the end of the world? Should be a death sentence. But it won't. The cult will be allowed to continue to attempt to destroy the world.