yetineti

Member
  • Content count

    982
  • Joined

  • Last visited

4 Followers

About yetineti

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

3,961 profile views
  1. FYI episode #404 says ‘unlisted’ and is not shown on their YT channel for me as of this moment. I am not sure if this is a glitch or if it was not meant to be shared yet. @Leo Gura
  2. If the only thing stopping you from investing is the US market right now, invest more in Europe. I had the same worries. I did not want to let my money sit and I wanted to literally have some stock in companies and industries I am interested in. Everyone, up until recently, recommended broad index funds, ETFs, bonds, etc. Things that capture the whole market instead of just a few companies. Honestly, despite the US being essentially just 7 companies, the S&P is still a seemingly good investment. Gold, silver, battery industries, etc. You can look up basic portfolio percentages and gauge risk. That’s what I did, but I bet I little bit more on Europe, thanks to the ‘Pivot’ podcast and the ‘Prof G’ podcasts. They predicted their broad funds would benefit from the US’s tariffs and the uncertainty, 1-2 years ago. They were right and it made sense, so I started investing. It gave me a different outlook on investing, actually made me realize I wish I did have the faith to just invest everything into the US, because it is ‘my country’— but that ignores true investing and is myopic. It was clouding my view. (I’m not even a Super Patriot™️ or anything. I just grew up in America and have been told and seen us run the global economy more or less my whole life.) — hope that gives a little perspective. I have been jumping into this world myself, recently.
  3. @thierry This post was the sacrifice. Imagine if you left that all inside of you. Good job.
  4. @Someone here I have a random guess that: there is something you have been meaning to do and have not or you do not have a definite routine(?)
  5. Figure out why you seek Truth until it is the only thing that makes sense to do. If you are unable to do that; figure out why. If you are unable to do that; figure out why • ♾️ You are always going to wish you had better sleep, money, food, relationships, hobbies, crafts, etc. Never stop pursuing those, simultaneously. It will be true regardless of ego perception. Only an ego can pursue Truth, anyhow— these things are not separate. You need to survive in this body to pursue God. It is the whole point. If either pursuit clashes, you are doing it wrong.
  6. @Hojo I took it down because I realized I inherently ignored the ‘anonymous’ part, conveniently, lol, oops.
  7. @Uddi it’s really not lol.
  8. Awesome
  9. @Cred Reality only needs consciousness. Consciousness creates, interprets and provides the sense of interaction, all in one swift act.
  10. @Alexop My survival is aligned with Truth. There are no negative effects there. It seems like the debate with how far to go with the Truth is personal to you and one you are debating with. It can be easy to project it off on to others, especially when we see them react negatively to one of Leo’s videos or simple notions of Truth. However, I’d argue you wouldn’t be focused on this if you weren’t regretting or debating how far you should be going or have gone with Truth yourself. I asked a similar question for myself in a thread, recently. ’To live for Truth or by it,’ essentially. Tricky decisions.
  11. It’s going to blow your mind when you realize there’s only one mode of anything lol.
  12. @Cred It slightly even more ironic. Your model is almost like the psychology ‘models of models.’ The model acknowledges different modes of being, some modes being a mode of modeling itself. Modeling is inherently indirect, yet the better the model—the more direct. So, if you are modeling a model of direct experience • mode of modeling • etc. Just those two modes inherently describe the irony. You cannot experience the mode of modeling through any mode but the mode of experience. It is definitionally impossible/logically incongruent.