yetineti

Member
  • Content count

    1,046
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by yetineti

  1. Leo, mentioned be weary of people who speak for a living, at one point. I would like to dive into this a bit deeper. Initially I thought ‘Doesn’t Leo speak for a living?’ I realize I am probably ignorant. And the word ‘living’ does a lot of work here. Leo sells courses, makes video games and probably a lot more I do not know about. Nonetheless, speaking is a big part of Actualized.org and how many of us ended up here. Almost being 25, I still do not have the direction with my life I thought I would. But I love speaking, debates, learning from people, etc. I see all of the issues with that and wonder where the line could be. Leo seems to have a good job balancing his public discourse, whether it’s on the forum, videos, interviews, etc. I do not think it is anywhere near his main focus, however. That probably helps. There is also the issue of AI, general safety concerns and more for anyone who wants to be a journalist, podcaster and/or interviewer, etc. I get the impression many people do not feel comfortable speaking out. Many people do not refer to people or conversations, like they used to, etc. There is a lot here I know. As much as I’d love to figure out the future, career paths, etc. — I am mainly curious how everyone views public speaking, different formats, etc.? What is career worthy vs. automatic cringe?
  2. @Joseph Maynor And what do you say?
  3. @Joseph Maynor If to you, that is speaking, what is it I am to make of your own words?
  4. A goal of yours or general advice? Or maybe a joke. @Leo Gura
  5. @SOUL You have it backwards. You create the physical world with your mind. Not your brain. Your brain is a apart of your mind too.
  6. @Leo Gura Fucking hell. You’re great man. Loop closed. Thanks.
  7. In one of Leo’s videos, he knocked on his head and said something to the effect of ‘Haha-right now. Yes. Hello. Right now. You’re dreaming. Wakey. Wakey.’ and I about shit myself. Also, the concept of a limit needing a limiter. And that EVERYTHING cannot be limited because you would need a limiter. And if that limiter is not unlimited it needs a limiter and so on. Infinite regression. The amount of power needed to limit an endless stream of limiters is less rational than there just being one unlimited limiter that can do what it wants and accounts for everything. Then, you realize everything is the same thing and you’re listening to a YouTube video you made, sitting on yourself, thinking about yourself, being yourself, doing yourself, as yourself, in yourself, around yourself and you take a break for awhile, not seeing quite the same use in watching the videos.
  8. @SOUL which has 0 meaningful consequences to you if you're just hallucinating...
  9. You don't even need your computer anymore. I don't even own a computer anymore. And I definitely never coded beyond mandatory robotics basics, in 8th grade (I don’t remember anything I could put to use). I have about an additional 2 weeks experience vibe coding on my phone now lol. GitHub will take an html from Claude (the regular phone app - it has to be called ’index.html’) and let you save the data to your local browser storage so it persists. You just make a free GitHub account, start a new repository, upload the HTML to main branch, settings, pages, click website link - bingo. Or you can just run it through the Claude app itself, if it's more of a once and done sort of usage app. There's a bunch of other platforming apps that can run things that I'm not familiar with, and some of them have private links and a bunch of stuff. I know there's Vercel. I have preferred Claude over anything, even close for the actual vibe coding. That's about as far as I've come. I just talk to my phone, and it builds things for me.
  10. @Sugarcoat dudes, just be thinking about the what ifs and what they would do and how it could work out, and nobody's even considering that this girl sounds boring as hell. 🤣
  11. I don't know how to code, but I've been using Claude for fun. Currently, I have a minigame called ChoreCraft, which is basically my chores list ripping off a version of Minecraft aesthetic and mini Ender Dragon battle sequence. That's basically me just checking chores off of a list, but I get XP and achievements and stuff. It's fun. And then I also have an app that shows me how much time I have left to live based off of when I was born and the average life expectancy. Great stuff, really! 🤣
  12. The left sucks because they're stuck in game theory while the right just endlessly appeases their own survival beyond reason.
  13. You mean what does it take to become powerful? God is already everything.
  14. Love may imply two. But it is really self referencing; not connection.
  15. @LordFall You live a in a physical world, from your perspective, so of course a monopoly on violence is all world peace is to you. There is so much more to this it would make your brain explode. Seriously, imagine war without violence. I find it fairly easy. How do you plan on avoiding that? You can’t even debate without it becoming confrontational. You think the world will be peaceful because systems merge and physical violence may drop? That is not peace. You do not know peace and you do not understand that you do not know it. You tell me to acknowledge your points or I have none of my own because you would have to understand my points to rebut them. I stand by what I said initially. If the world is not peaceful for you now — it may never be.
  16. It requires a rare craftiness to bridge them. So rare, I wouldn't hurt yourself trying.
  17. The real problem is going back and redoing them all 😁
  18. The gap between experience and language is a legitimate problem.
  19. @LordFall Spiritual bypassing is making a post about world peace and fantasies of how it will happen. World peace does not exist. But peace does. No use in explaining that to you.
  20. Depends on the child and the parent’s level of development. There is no other answer. Its really a question of nature vs. nurture. What percentage of children removed from or prevented from being in religious environments see notable improvement. What is the improvement, though? What’s the control in the study?