aurum

Member
  • Content count

    3,670
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by aurum


  1. 19 minutes ago, martins name said:

    I'm talking about this kind of guy: 

     

    I see your point. He is straw-manning both sides and making them seem ridiculous, then proposing what he sees as a more reasonable, middle of the road perspective. This could lead to false equivalencies between both sides, rather than seeing how one could be more correct than the other. That’s a valid insight.

    At the same time, to always take the side of progressives or conservatives is also incorrect. We need to be able to see how both sides may be getting it wrong, while simultaneously holding the bigger picture of how modern progressives tend to be more evolved than conservatives. This is not some kind of false centrism, this is deeply necessary for intelligent Tier 2 politics.

     

    34 minutes ago, martins name said:

    @aurum You are wrong on all accounts.
    I'm not talking about moral relativism.

    Spiral dynamics is about belief systems, not emotional maturity. There is no model for emotional and character maturity quite yet so many misuse SD in its place. Lex Friedman clearly has a yellow belief system. That's how he talks to people on all sides of politics.

    I am also not speaking about just moral relativism, although of course that is part of it. I am speaking about the operating system of the Green psyche and its tendency to relativize everything.

    Spiral Dynamics speaks on emotional maturity in the sense that it models ego development, which includes emotional maturity to a degree. People lower down the Spiral often act less emotionally mature than those higher up the Spiral, although not always. Belief systems often reflect someone’s emotional maturity. 

    Also, Lex being able to talk to all sides of the political spectrum does not necessitate solidly Yellow development. One of the hallmarks of Green is Pluralism and seeking new perspectives. Lex may have some Yellow, but I’m not sure he is solidly there. I could be wrong. I have not done a thorough investigation of his work so I don’t have a strong opinion on this. I am just going off the few videos I have seen of him.


  2. @martins name

    You may be conflating excessive relativism that often happens at SD Green with Yellow meta, multi-perspectivalism.

    Remember, it’s really post-modern deconstruction that seeks to argue that there is no objective truth and that therefore nothing can be said to be better or worse than anything else.

    Your grievances therefore really seem to be with Green postmodernism more than anything else. Part of what breaks you out of excessive relativism and brings you into Tier 2 is understanding deeply the trap you are talking about, while also not demonizing relativism.

    Also, remember that very few people are genuinely solid in Tier 2. If you think you are listening to someone who is solidly Tier 2, the likelyhood is they are not. Personally, I see Lex Friedman as more Green than Yellow.


  3. @Carl-Richard

    You’re definitely on the right track.

    Unless your actual goal is to be a competitive marathon runner, forget standard cardio. Waste of time.

    I prefer to get my cardio via activities like variable resistance training, walking, sauna or cold exposure.

    If someone insists on during more traditional cardio like biking / swimming / running, than the tier list goes like this:

    1) REHIT

    2) HIIT

    3) Zone 2 

    The challenge with REHIT is that it tends to be difficult to actually correctly implement. Thus HIIT becomes the pragmatic winner. But I still prefer REHIT if I can get it.


  4. 8 hours ago, NoSelfSelf said:

    I was on one speedreading workshop, what they made us do is to look in the middle of the 2 pages and then with corner of your eyes you glanse the pages it will be blury ofc, then you turn pages for example 20 pages fast.(this is for like your subconcious taking in the information when you read those pages it will be like you read it somewhere).

    Then you go back and there is another technique called snake, you go with finger in snake like movement towards the bottom of the page seeing the key words and getting the point of the paragraph, key words are enough to give you sense of whats going on...

    Sounds like Photoreading.

    Did you have success with this method?


  5. 6 hours ago, Ima Freeman said:

    How do I explain symptoms of brain and gut inflammation, tinnitus, metallic taste and emotional disturbances from taking chelators (DMPS, ALA, cilantro juice), if  there are no material mechanisms like atoms, in this case heavy metal ions, behind life?

    It’s not contradictory at all.

    Life is what God imagines it to be. God (you) imagines a brain, chelators, heavy metals, symptoms, atoms, Leo’s advice, a forum, etc. And so it is.


  6. 30 minutes ago, toasty7718 said:

    Diet B covers almost all nutrients but you need supplements. Intensive long term research says that this diet decreases your risk for auto immune diseases and makes you live longer.

    Except that's not what the long term research says about veganism. Nor are you likely to get "almost all" your nutrients. So your binary choice is false.


  7. 22 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

    You call GMO lab food vegan?

    Correct. It is vegan strictly in the sense that it is not an animal-product.

    If you have another definition of vegan, okay. But this is the most commonly used definition.

    22 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

    What is perfect lab food?

    We don’t know exactly because it hasn’t been invented yet. But we can imagine that with sufficient research, humans will eventually synthesize something in a laboratory that is far superior for human health than anything we are eating now, including meat.

    22 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

    We don't call robots human, why would we call man-made chemicals food. 

    That’s only because no one has GMO’d something well enough to be considered “food”. Yet.

    It should be obvious that what we consider “food” is completely relative and not objective at all. When the day comes that a company lab grows something that is superior for your health than traditional food, we will start to consider it “food”. Or we just will discard the idea of food altogether.


  8. 9 hours ago, ZenAlex said:

    Are you 100% sure it wasn't anything to do with your own decisions that made you feel this way?

    Yes, my decision to go vegan.

    My point wasn’t that theoretically you couldn’t be optimally healthy and vegan. It’s possible that in the far distant future we will GMO perfect lab food and all be vegan.

    But the reality for 99% people right now is that they will fail to do so. Even if they happen to be the minority that is extremely diligent. Optimal health is hard enough to achieve even when you do everything right, let alone when you handicap yourself with an inherently nutrient deficient diet like veganism.


  9. @MarkKol stop prioritizing RDAs and just get bloodwork done. Bloodwork with a competent functional medicine practitioner will answer the majority of questions you have about what to eat. RDAs are just basic guidelines at best.

    Key indicators to check as far as saturated fat: LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and ApoB. Get a lipro(a) test too, although that one is more just genetic luck.


  10. 6 hours ago, Insightful27 said:

    Yeah I have been thinking about not taking mine anymore. What is the process for getting bloodwork done? How much does it cost?

    Up to you really. You could go to a functional / integrative medicine practitioner or a naturopath and they would most likely do it. A standard General Practitioner might as well. You could probably get that covered under health insurance.

    You could also go a more non-traditional route like using InsideTracker or a LifeForce physician. Not going to be covered by insurance though.

    Do your research, figure out the pros and cons and then make a choice.


  11. 2 hours ago, Lila9 said:

    The best solution for modern society to meet dating and social needs is to transition to a more tribal or community-based structure.

    In the long-term, sure. More community living is probably a good thing so people are less lonely. But that transition is going to take decades to accomplish, if at all. In the mean time, people still need to date.


  12. She makes some good points but it’s a bit lacking as far as practical solutions.

    The reality is that society is not structured around tribal living and will probably not be in our lifetime. It’s not clear how that would even work given the complexity of the modern world.

    Unless you’re going to be a Green hippie living in an intentional community, you’re going to have to continue living in a non-tribal society. Which means you need modern, non-tribal solutions for your dating / social needs.

    The best approach is to figure out what your needs are and delegate them to all different kinds of people in your life. Don’t just rely on your partner for everything. Teal has another video on resourcing people that would be relevant here.


  13. 55 minutes ago, NightHawkBuzz said:

    What I am afraid of though is going into politics and being in one of those "what if situations" like for example if I became governor or mayor and another mass shooting happened. 

    You should be so lucky to have a career successful enough in politics that you even become governor or mayor.

    You are worrying about something that you are not even remotely close to achieving.

    This is an irrational fear.

    56 minutes ago, NightHawkBuzz said:

    I am able to trust my future judgement for voting on a criminal justice bill like that. 

    Then why can’t you apply that same logic to this scenario?

    And if you really can’t see yourself being able to handle such a situation, maybe you shouldn’t be governor or a mayor. Leave it to someone else who has the guts for it. Maybe you can clean their office instead and let that be your career in politics, sounds promising.

    1 hour ago, NightHawkBuzz said:

    Basically what I am scared of is if one of these situations might come up when I have a choice of advocating for the death penalty for victims of crimes I am scared that I might be advocating for bad victims and not good victims. By advocating for bad victims my passion and effort is going to the wrong people. This is what I am afraid of. 

    Then you will have made an honest mistake. No one is going to fault you for advocating for victims of mass shootings.

    And if you’re really still scared, then resolve to continually sharpen your judgment overtime. Work and work and work on discerning truth. That is the best safeguard against what you are describing. Not running away.


  14. 12 hours ago, NightHawkBuzz said:

    @aurum They are required to in certain cases. 

    Like for example President Biden asked that the death penalty be reinstated for the boston marathon bomber. Also, Ron Desantis changed the death penalty laws in Florida after the parkland shooter. They do deal with crime and punishment in that type of way. 

    I think you are psyching yourself out here.

    The kind of situations you are describing are pretty rare. In most cases, the most that will be asked of you will be to vote on a criminal justice bill. In which case you will weigh the pros and cons and come to the best decision you can, just like everyone else.

    Do you really think you can’t handle doing that?

    Do you really not trust your future judgment?

    Do you really think it’s worth throwing away a fruitful career you are passionate about and can make a difference in because of some potential vague “what if” scenario?

    What are you really afraid of here?


  15. 12 hours ago, Michael569 said:

    thank you, I will look into this. Would you suggest recommendig the book to them? I haven't read it myself but heard great things about it. 

    It might be worth a read if they are open to it and curious about trauma in general. It’s kind of a long read though, and the majority of it is not about EMDR.

    To get an experience of EMDR, they are likely better off just seeing a therapist or trying virtual EMDR (https://www.virtualemdr.com/)


  16. 17 hours ago, integral said:

    Not sure how much this is but doesn't testosterone injection cause muscle growth? Its not exactly "progress" to gain muscle when taking testosterone. Sure we can view it as an improvement but im thinking about this as if hes either taking more testosterone then his body can naturally produce or his body is struggling to produces testosterone so there is a underling problem that is not resolved that he masked with this patch.

    According their reports, it’s just enough to offset the hormone loss from the calorie restriction he is on. It’s not meant to push him above normal ranges, like with bodybuilders.

    I do think this could be an argument against the caloric restriction he is doing. But so far he seems to be managing fine. We will have to see if it crumbles on him.

    17 hours ago, integral said:

    Short term acute feed back tells you to stop taking it. B12 supplementation causes over stimulation, that you can feel immediately, it raises the stress burden on the body.

    This is a gross effect. Yes, gross effects can be felt. But you cannot feel extremely subtle effects, like the build up of atherosclerosis. Proof is that the vast majority of people who have atherosclerosis have no clue about it. They eat like trash and think everything is going well.

    If you claim you have an extra level of sensitivity beyond normal humans, fine. Good for you. But that is not 99.9% of people. 99.9% of people need testing and data.

    17 hours ago, integral said:

    It attracts a specific type of person who is systemic in there thinking not synergistic. We need engineers not technicians. A doctor is a glorified technician.

    That is true to a degree. But you can still find many doctors who are deeply systemic and evolved in the health industry. And even doctors who are overly reductionistic still understand quite a lot in their field.


  17. 5 hours ago, undeather said:

    People used to ingest toxic amounts of arsenic because it "made them feel better" in the short run but of course is highly carcinogenic.
    Ever taken an NSAID (Aspirin/Iburprofen)/Paracetamol or Cortison? You will feel noticabely better/healtier after taking those. Of course none of those meds are "healthy" per se in the long run.

    This is what I've been contemplating lately.

    Your body's feedback system is not really attuned for long-term, subtle effects on the system, like the slow build of atherosclerosis over 40 years. Hence why people drop dead of a heart attack and have no idea.

    But the feedback system IS highly tuned for acute situations, like stepping on a nail or breaking a bone. That you will definitely most likely feel.

    The problem becomes when we have long-term goals like longevity, but are relying on short-term, acute feedback. This cannot work.

    4 hours ago, Michael569 said:

    It probably is as long as he compensates with multi-nutrient formulas. I don't really think we know as much about the long-term effects of IF as we think we do. For longevity, less is probably preferable to more as long as he can keep his muscle and bone density from wasting. 

    Any long-term diet where a person is losing muscle mass and bone mass will be cutting lifespan drastically. 

     

    Undoubtably.

    So far it seems like he has actually been able to put on a ton of muscle and strength. Will be extremely interesting to see where he ends up in 30-40 years.