Being authentic as a neurodivergent person can be unattractive to others and oneself

[Schizophonia]

@eos_nyxia Oh you're a girl, I saw it on your profile.

Sucks loudly the saliva out of his braces*

Edited 20 hours ago by Schizophonia

[Carl-Richard]

1 hour ago, Schizophonia said:

@eos_nyxia Oh you're a girl, I saw it on your profile.

Sucks loudly the saliva out of his braces*

So this is that Ancient Egypt rizz they were talking about 3000 BC.

[Ramanujan]

learn some game

[Clarence]

On 02/10/2026 at 2:32 PM, Leo Gura said:

I do have a general contempt for mankind, but this is fully warranted since mankind is ignorant, toxic, and unteachable.

Is this general contempt something you'd see yourself moving beyond?

[Ima Freeman]

12 hours ago, Ramanujan said:

learn some game

I have a girlfriend and that would be risky, because what if I'm succesfull?

 

[Ulax]

18 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

@eos_nyxia Oh you're a girl, I saw it on your profile.

Sucks loudly the saliva out of his braces*

[Ulax]

Depends what you mean by authenticity

[Joshe]

On 10/2/2026 at 8:32 AM, Leo Gura said:

I do have a general contempt for mankind, but this is fully warranted since mankind is ignorant, toxic, and unteachable.

"My negative judgment is justified because my judgment is accurate" is exactly what every moralizer believes, lol.

[Leo Gura]

6 minutes ago, Joshe said:

"My negative judgment is justified because my judgment is accurate" is exactly what every moralizer believes, lol.

You think I am a moralizer?

[Elliott]

On 10/2/2026 at 6:30 AM, Ima Freeman said:

Let me ask it this way, cause I was kinda sloppy with my original question.

How to deal with the phenomenon, that most people are weirded out or outright dismissive about oneself, because  one is neurologically atypical?

Get alot of rejection in workplaces, socializing, etc. The ego wants to be accepted by its surroundings to feel safe Distrustful, weirded out looks, rejection, outright hostility is what I see often. I guess I communicate similar messages involuntary, because of being overstrained.

I got my handful of divergent friends btw, but I have to deal with workplace, education, social situations, society by and large.

I think.you should clarify what behaviors of yours you're asking about, "neurotic" is too broad. Normies have to deal with those problems too, a lot of people we have to deal with are anti-social.

[Joshe]

19 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

You think I am a moralizer?

I think you run the same psychological operation that moralizers do. 

Perceived deficiency → judgment → contempt/condemnation → "it's warranted because it's true."

Seems to be the same process, yet you're still able to understand things. So I don't get how you think "you can moralize, or you can understand, but not both". You're saying moralizing is the key error preventing leftists from understanding, but it's not. You think that a negative judgement prevents seeing, but your negative judgements don't prevent you from seeing, so negative judgment itself doesn't account for the error. It can, and often does, but there's more to it. The problem is when someone allows their judgments to terminate inquiry. You can 100% moralize and keep the inquiry open, and still deeply understand something. Moralizing does not equal cognitive closure the way you've been claiming. It's just very clearly not the case. 

Edited 4 minutes ago by Joshe

[Leo Gura]

5 minutes ago, Joshe said:

I think you run the same psychological operation that moralizers do. 

Perceived deficiency → judgment → contempt/condemnation → "it's warranted because it's true."

Seems to be the same process, yet you're still able to understand things. So I don't get how you think "you can moralize, or you can understand, but not both". You're saying moralizing is the key error preventing leftists from understanding, but it's not. You think that a negative judgement prevents seeing, but your negative judgements don't prevent you from seeing, so negative judgment itself doesn't account for the error. It can, and often does, but there's more to it. The problem is when someone allows their judgments to terminate inquiry. You can 100% moralize and keep the inquiry open, and still deeply understand something. Moralizing does not equal cognitive closure the way you've been claiming. It's just very clearly not the case. 

It depends on how deep you want understanding to be. For shallow forms of understanding, some judgment is acceptable. But not the highest levels that I am interested in.

And yes, my judgment does reduce my understanding. Which is why I am warning you guys.