Where Have You Had Sex?

[Asayake]

2 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

So you think one will satisfy you?  Are you satisfied now?

 

Thinking more than one will satisfy you is an ego trap, its like a rich person thinking another million will make them happier. Id bet all my belongings on that almost everyone who wants 3 girlfriends/wives want this to feel powerful themselves, not because its in the best interest of those women, so thats already not love.

[Asayake]

1 minute ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@Asayake Grateful for your honest assessment here. And to be understood. I tried to stick to just what was happening through evidence and move away from any sort of psychological understanding/interpretation. 

I think the most common types of friction and arguments on the forum are when meaning is taken and a psychological interpretation is being applied to members when it is all based on inference and there isn't sufficient evidence.

Most of the time I end up clashing here because I go for the epistemology behind someone's argument rather than the argument itself "how does this person know this though" and it can look like evasion or be irritating for others who want direct engagement (especially when I look for assumptions inn their argument first). I just really enjoy getting into how others think - but this can feel invasive if they do not perceive I am charitable (which often happens through poor rhetoric from me).

I want you to know I sincerely apologise for the clashes we have had.

That’s all good, I apologize for my side of that too, I got overly triggered by something that wasnt as big a deal as I made it there.

[Ulax]

3 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Who the fuck is Valach anyway.  

 

Alright relax 50 cent 

[Inliytened1]

4 minutes ago, Asayake said:

Thinking more than one will satisfy you is an ego trap, its like a rich person thinking another million will make them happier. Id bet all my belongings on that almost everyone who wants 3 girlfriends/wives want this to feel powerful themselves, not because its in the best interest of those women, so thats already not love.

Well, I beg to differ, because I have had those threesomes.  And let me tell you it's wonderful to fuck both of them.  So if you can have that everyday, wouldn't you.  I'm telling you now to look yourself in the mirror.  If there could be two pieces of ass riding you, and they both love it, wouldn't you have that.  Shit.  I mean.

Edited 2 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Oppositionless]

1 hour ago, sda said:

Places where I had sex:

 

 

- In a public warehouse orgy.

 

 

Hell yeah , I've been researching the orgies in my area .

[Asayake]

2 minutes ago, LordFall said:

 

You went from calling alternative relationship formats an 'ego trip' straight to defaulting to racist exploitation tropes. Claiming you're protecting women while assuming they have zero agency to make their own relationship choices is peak hypocrisy.

Thats not a racist exploitation trope thats how a large amount of one man multiple women arrangements look in reality, powerless women becoming entirely dependant on a man with power, often from poor countries or too young to know better. 

[Inliytened1]

2 minutes ago, Ulax said:

Alright relax 50 cent 

Project Pat is my boy.  Heard of him?

[Ulax]

Just now, Inliytened1 said:

Project Pat is my boy.  Heard of him?

I have now  

 

[LordFall]

4 minutes ago, Asayake said:

Thats not a racist exploitation trope thats how a large amount of one man multiple women arrangements look in reality, powerless women becoming entirely dependant on a man with power, often from poor countries or too young to know better. 

Equating non-monogamous women to being helpless victims from a developing nation isn't an argument—it's just your own sheltered projection. Real-world relationship dynamics are far broader than your narrow moral panic.

Exploitation does happen but to default to that when the subject is brought up highlights your shadow and operating paradigm more than being a valid critique.

That's like someone saying they're gonna start a business and you default to accusing them of starting a sweatshop and dumping toxic waste in 3rd world countries. 

Relax Sherlock Holmes. 

Edited 1 hour ago by LordFall

[Inliytened1]

Just now, Ulax said:

I have now  

 

he's awesome. 3 six mafia great as well.

[Sugarcoat]

9 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

Bro got infinite horniness awakening, lmao.

It's crazy funny because he did talk some good things on God, I guess he was at the mountain and after the experience ended he went straight to below animal baseline state of consciousness. The only way I can explain this.

It's so much that if his boundaries dissolved it would radiate out and permeate the entire cosmos, replacing Shakti energy. 

[Asayake]

15 minutes ago, LordFall said:

@Natasha Tori Maru I appreciate your response and forgive you. I apologize as well for my aggressive attitude at times.

That's also what I like about them, true little tigers. I'm not really into helpless princesses, I want warrior queens at my side. 

 

The problem with calling my perspective a common red pill trope is that one it's not and 2nd you fall into the trope of being the small minded sheltered man.

Polyamory is a well practiced thing with multiple different variations in how people arrange their relationships

There are cases of one man dating 3 woman. Cases of one women dating 3 man. Cases of two couples dating each other. Cases of kitchen table polyamory where everyone is involved and cases of parallel polyamory where it's more of a kiss but don't tell type of thing. 

Feel free to read through the polyamory subreddit to familiarize yourself with alternative dating lifestyles because you stereotype me inaccurately. 

https://www.reddit.com/r/polyamory/

You are taking a bunch of different arrangements and lumping them into one category. Theres a big difference between two couples dating eachother and 1 guy having 3 wives. This is a big problem with these type of liberal ideologies, they greenwash purely ego driven behaviour under the guise of progressiveness by calling everything freedom.

[Ulax]

21 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

Bro got infinite horniness awakening, lmao.

Hahahaha

[Natasha Tori Maru]

@LordFall I sort of like getting triggered by my interactions with you though, not gonna lie! I don't mean that in a bad way at all. More like "oh shit, im triggered! there's something there I need to look at!"

You were one of the biggest characters on the forum that made me realise one of my biggest triggers is being misunderstood. Probably my largest trigger.

Because when you look at our interactions and debating style - you are really direct in how I see your argument style: Claim > counterclaim > evidence > defend position > challenge opponents reasoning > interprets opponents objection. Pure logical and clean analysis.

I think I do more of Claim > underlying assumption > epistemic standard assessment > relational dynamic > assess how the interaction is functioning. Also - I have a tendancy to make a broad claim that isn't accurate to my meaning - I then narrow it to my intentional meaning. This can look like I am sidestepping. It's me just not being precise the first time.

So when that happens between us, I think I am maddening for you to speak to because I go for everything underneath the argument and then look at how that is known - while also attending to how I personally relate. So I am often not sticking with analytical logic only. I think this ends up in arguments dissolving into being misunderstood or looking like aversion. Combine that with me often not wanting to push my assessment onto the other person (sometimes I don't want to state my opinion as I don't want to influence someones thinking in a negative way - which is egoic in itself)  - I want them to inspect their thinking in a rather pedagogical way/method. This style simply fails in some engagements  

Anyway I am glad this clears some air - in a sex thread of all things! Sorry for any clashes and reactions I may have had with you. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[Inliytened1]

Man this thread is hot!

[Oppositionless]

I had a homeless lady try to fuck me for a place to stay , was hard to say no to that. Actually have had two homeless gals try to crash with me but I'm unsure of the second one's intentions.

Edited 1 hour ago by Oppositionless

[Jordan of the Shire]

22 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

I'm not gonna stop being a guy, if that's what you are asking.  I have one aim.  And i think you know what that is.

Is that sad? yeah, but it is who I am.  I will keep doing it until I'm dead.  We're just anmials.

It's a silly frame.

Guy, woman, who you are is governed by your intention, and action, not some involuntary gender bias, unless the person is unconscious, people with spiritual development are capable of controlling their speech. Watching their mind, and seeing the beginning of a thought, and the proliferating of ideas, until it becomes action. And choosing what to act on. Until that is possible, decency is an approach. If decency is not possible, then you have external feedback from people or events around you that try to nudge you back onto decency. 

What you're saying reads to me like - I am not responsible for my conduct because I have testosterone. Which is negligence rather than empowerment.

And men don't want sex, they want freedom. Lust and the expression of lust is at its core is a spiritual desire for oneness. If one is full, content, at peace, then sex isn't an overpowering drive. It can be managed, channeled, transmuted, expressed in different ways.

Edited 1 hour ago by Jordan of the Shire

[Sugarcoat]

Just now, Oppositionless said:

I had a homeless lady try to fuck me for a place to stay , was hard to say no to that.

So, did you say no or....?

[Oppositionless]

3 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

So, did you say no or....?

Yeah I said no . Ended up just giving her a ride to shelter .

Edited 1 hour ago by Oppositionless

[LordFall]

I feel like this thread has been very cathartic for the forum. As I assumed being direct and going direct for the jugular with topics like sex, money and power unveils a lot of shadows. I hope we can all unite sexually platonically in this. The point of sex is to love not fight. 

 

3 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@LordFall I sort of like getting triggered by my interactions with you though, not gonna lie! I don't mean that in a bad way at all. More like "oh shit, im triggered! there's something there I need to look at!"

You were one of the biggest characters on the forum that made me realise one of my biggest triggers is being misunderstood. Probably my biggest.

Because when you look at our interactions and debating style - you are really direct in how I see your argument style: Claim > counterclaim > evidence > defend position > challenge opponents reasoning > interprets opponents objection. Pure logical and clean analysis.

I think I do more of Claim > underlying assumption > epistemic standard assessment > relational dynamic > assess how the interaction is functioning

So when that happens between us, I think I am maddening for you to speak to because I go for everything underneath the argument and then look at how that is known - while also attending to how I personally relate. So I am often not sticking with analytical logic only. I think this ends up in arguments dissolving into being misunderstood or looking like aversion.

Anyway I am glad this clears some air - in a sex thread of all things! Sorry for any clashes and reactions I may have had with you. 

Interesting, I'm happy you put some thought into it. It's basically impossible to win an argument against me because I'm both honestly seeking the truth and will admit being wrong but I also am very competitive and aggressive and will eviscerate someone logically if they offend me.

I hadn't spent as much time on this forum before the last 2 months but I'm glad I put more time and effort into it. I learned a lot from everyone I discussed with and I am more confident in sharing some of my more risque ideas more publicly on my own public channels like my Instagram and my Youtube Channel.

I do appreciate all the debates we've had and honestly don't care that much for being the one that's right as long as there is some value gained by people involved. I do believe in infinite scaling and I think we have infinite potential so we should be obsessed with value and how to cultivate it in ourselves and others. Just social cohesion for the sake of it has a lot of flaws in my view.

Sorry back to our AI conversations but we live in the best times humanity has ever experience and we will live through the glorious ascend of the human race towards post scarcity and overall becoming superhuman. I'm having more fun each passing day.