Objectively, Australia is the best country

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

I don't personally really see any benefits tbh and that seems to be the point of contention anyway; differences in personalities and priorities. Where you see giant coastal cities with large populations and social opportunities I only see a ton of annoyance and polution, where you see plethora of animal species I only see the creepy and dangerous ones; where you see nature I see deserts and weak excuse of a greenery compared to that of Europe; where you see warm climate I see blazing heat and scorched earth. Also most certainly not safer than central Europe for example

[MarkKol]

2 hours ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

I don't personally really see any benefits tbh and that seems to be the point of contention anyway; differences in personalities and priorities. Where you see giant coastal cities with large populations and social opportunities I only see a ton of annoyance and polution, where you see plethora of animal species I only see the creepy and dangerous ones; where you see nature I see deserts and weak excuse of a greenery compared to that of Europe; where you see warm climate I see blazing heat and scorched earth. Also most certainly not safer than central Europe for example

You can look at Melbourne and Sydney from a plane, and you'll see tons of greenery; it looks very tropical.

You can see here how the ocean penetrates deep into Sydney like a river

Central Europe doesn't even have sandy beaches; the only one I'm aware of is in the Netherlands, which looks terrible.

If Central Europe means Germany, Slovakia, Czechia, and Poland, it doesn't even compare; most of these are very gothic/soviet style countries, I'm personally not the biggest fan of it, some of it is genuinely old and crooked like Budapest and Prague. I don't understand how people can look at those black bricks in Prague and think it's nice looking, maybe historic, definitely not pretty. Nobody actually wants to go outside and feel like they're living in medieval times.

Germany can be nice, but definitely not tropical or exciting.

I went to Tokyo last month, and the best part of the city, called Odaiba, was the one part most similar to Sydney and Melbourne. I'd call it a life-changing experience. Insanely livable, fashion and car scene unmatched, walking around at 2 am, super late night restoraunts and convenience stores.

I would actually rate the US and UK the worst in livability, with some US exceptions. Amsterdam is perhaps at Australia's level. It's hard to even think of how a place where everyone is armed to the teeth with guns and knives could be livable.

To each their own

Edited 2 hours ago by MarkKol

[Yimpa]

On 1/27/2026 at 10:27 PM, MarkKol said:

Australia is IT.

[Natasha Tori Maru]

3 hours ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

I don't personally really see any benefits tbh and that seems to be the point of contention anyway; differences in personalities and priorities. Where you see giant coastal cities with large populations and social opportunities I only see a ton of annoyance and polution, where you see plethora of animal species I only see the creepy and dangerous ones; where you see nature I see deserts and weak excuse of a greenery compared to that of Europe; where you see warm climate I see blazing heat and scorched earth. Also most certainly not safer than central Europe for example

While I agree we all have personal subjective perspectives and needs - and these evolve through our lives as we change - the title was 'objectively'  

I mean, I like Australia mostly for quality of life & balance. But I was born and raised here - so I suffer from SIGNIFICANT bias. Which makes this totally subjective for me also lol

What would be your pick of best country/s, objectively?