Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

[Rafael Thundercat]

17 hours ago, Adrian colby said:

im sure if I ignore it and just concentrate on creating in my own immediate sphere, it will be grand… but only for a while. Eventually with no pushback there will be an increasing corruption that spreads into spirituality. 

Same situation with me. I witnessed the corruption of some Cultural Appropriators of Ayahuasca in Europe. People using the drink for money making, playing shamans. If I would open my mouth to expose the scam they would gasligth me AF. So I just left the circles. Let them rot and discover soon or later that they are playing fool games. 

I decided stop arguing with stupidity. 

[Yimpa]

We call it Mean Green 

[Thought Art]

The blog quality has improved. More mature tone, with quality quotes of great thinkers making more regular appearances. 

[Yimpa]

@Thought Art Thank you for your feedback 

[Zigzag Idiot]

What would that be?

 

Edited Thursday at 03:43 AM by Zigzag Idiot
typo

[Yimpa]

@Zigzag Idiot

 

[moonawakening444]

@Leo Gura have you read the book Reality Transurfing? would you recommend it ?

[Leo Gura]

30 minutes ago, moonawakening444 said:

@Leo Gura have you read the book Reality Transurfing?

No

[Adrian colby]

On 11/08/2026 at 6:41 PM, Yimpa said:

 

I don’t know if I would conflate love with attachment identity. 
 

I know this is aimed at those who are liberally polarised but in here would it not be better point to preservation and adaptation as complementary check and balance as facets of ourselves individually as a holistic system that become fragmented and separate when we attach identity to one and consign the other to our unconscious shadow as though it is not a part of us?

 

I would presume that the issue is the inability to understand the two as a unity to be integrated back into the self.

Edited Thursday at 10:04 PM by Adrian colby
Forgot a word.

[Rafael Thundercat]

Profound Quotes #135 https://share.google/vBuqJkWfYrvILKPhh

What this Quote means? I dont get it

[enchanted]

31 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Profound Quotes #135 https://share.google/vBuqJkWfYrvILKPhh

What this Quote means? I dont get it

It an obvious commentary of the delusions of the patriarchy. Here we have two men, completely severed from the organic world. One sycophant worships a fragile, masculine deity that willfully ignores the womb of Mother Nature. The other acts as a literal agent of the state, aggressively disseminating colonial language and violent, written decrees while entirely erasing the intuitive, non-verbal communication of matriarchal ancestral tribes.

Their arrogance is so profoundly unchecked that they believe the raw thermodynamics of the universe will bow to their privilege. But the punchline, of course, is the subtextual erasure of their existence by a literal bolt of lightning. Nature, the ultimate matriarch, instantly incinerates them, providing a shocking reminder that the future is female.

Seriously though I don't get the quote either. 

Edited 15 hours ago by enchanted

[Human Mint]

@Rafael Thundercat @enchanted That death is imaginary, probably.

[emptiness dancing]

it's about bias.. maybe...
The preacher (supposedly a man of god)should not be afraid of any of God's action.
But the mailman was so bias, and think of him so highly (that he the mailman knows what God wants to do, not the preacher) that he even preached to the preacher.
Sort of.. maybe..

or something about Texas ... , I don't know 

[emptiness dancing]

after thinking about it a second,
maybe in the early 1900s both the job as a mailman and a preacher carries the same amount of importance... (for the society at that time)

That's why the post does not make sense to us...

My first inclination was to try to find the punchline (mailman... must be a joke somewhere)

Then it hits me, it's not a joke, it's just a post about changing social norms.