Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

[YIDIRYIDIR]

Quote

A dog simply doesn’t understand mathematics. Likewise, a human simply does not understand that human life is imaginary.

If the gap between humans and this understanding is like the gap between a dog and mathematics, then I'm curious why bother with criticizing humans, making explanations and convincing and debating and ranting against rationalists, and going on podcasts and stuff? 

I get that truth has to be said and expressed, by why bother with convincing and holding people accountable for the limitation of not getting it (scientists specifically)? 

 

[Leo Gura]

11 minutes ago, YIDIRYIDIR said:

why bother with convincing and holding people accountable for the limitation of not getting it (scientists specifically)?

Ultimately there is no reason to do anything.

However, unlike a dog, a scientist can realize that science is a human construction, a scientist can open his mind to things I say, and eventually I will get some scientist to realize he is God. And that will be the point.

The point is, at least a few people will realize God from the things I teach. It won't be thousands or millions, but dozens. And that's good enough for me.

All of my work is done for a small number of very serious people who will eventually realize God. But larger numbers of more casual folk will also benefit along the way without going all the way to God.

It is good for scientists and academics to understand epistemology and the limits of their fields. This will help their fields advance. I don't just criticize them for entertainment or clicks, I explain how to think deeper and better.

Edited yesterday at 03:11 AM by Leo Gura

[integral]

They're going to fake AGI good enough to replace most workers.

If the AI bubble bursts it's going to be minimum 6+ years from now.

And I'm not sure what bursting really means, we already cannot go back to a society without AI, we're already dependent on it.

I know you have a different opinion but software as it is now every single developer needs to have an AI subscription and if they don't it's because they're in such a poor country they can't afford it. It is completely changed software forever and no one is ever going back.

Edited 22 hours ago by integral

[No1Here2c]

16 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Ultimately there is no reason to do anything.

~

few people will realize God

very serious people

Doesn't it also apply that there is no reason not to do anything?

~

God comes to realize me. Isn't that the trick?

For me to realize God, I need first recognize that God is already in immediate realization\recogniton of me.

That is how I exist as Conscious, this very second. Through the Awareness of God's Vision. 

~♤~

What exactly is the difference between love & hate? How do these reconcile & unify in direct experience?

~♤~

If a dog could suddenly understand architecture, he could draft incredible blueprints which a human would not have the perspective to imagine. Dog would become a world renowned architect. Unfortunately for the dog, he only understands how to leave pawprints, & the only blueprint he reads is survival instinct. Although, the very structure & dna of the dog is an expressed blueprint of God's perfect Imagination.

[No1Here2c]

Anybody ever hear of State Blindness?

I came across it in my notes & I cannot for the life of me figure out where I picked it up.

It's a concept in regard to consciousness work. Maybe I made it up in a daze? Idk lol :}

State Blindness

Consciousness in a state of consciousness, which does not recognize that everything within it, is dependent upon state of consciousness.

Highly relevant to our work here. This is the default state for 95% of humans. & even the 5% are liable to letting this slip their minds.

Edited 19 hours ago by No1Here2c

[Adrian colby]

@Leo Gura 

Love and hate are distinctions that arise at the relative level from an originally undifferentiated unity. In that sense, hate is not separate from the absolute, but a conditioned expression emerging within multiplicity. Love can be understood as the absolute itself when resting simply in being, whereas hate appears when consciousness moves from pure being into identification, division, and reactive doing contrasting against itself. 

i watch people come back from trips. Their ego Co opts the experience, then they struggle to hold both absolute and relative  simultaneously mistaking their ‘I’ for the absolute. 

Edited 17 hours ago by Adrian colby

[Rafael Thundercat]

This video point out to the existence of Matriarchy or in better term Matrilinear Cultures. So for now on I would like the dismissive ones open up to the value of such cultures. Of course we came up with what we have today by many factors, some explained in this video

 

So for the curious one I recomend go make deeped research in this topic. You can Check the History of Crete and the Minoans for example, there is a clue there. 

[lostingenosmaze]

https://www.actualized.org/insights/women-will-never-satisfy-men

In a nutshell:

 

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

51 minutes ago, lostingenosmaze said:

https://www.actualized.org/insights/women-will-never-satisfy-men

In a nutshell:

 

But @Leo Gura, wouldn't hot witch girlfriend be the exception?

Edited 7 hours ago by NewKidOnTheBlock

[Leo Gura]

2 hours ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

But @Leo Gura, wouldn't hot witch girlfriend be the exception?

No way! She will never give you the sex you want when you want it.

[Monster Energy]

@Leo Gura 

The games never end.

 

[Nemra]

@Leo Gura, do you identify as a human in your current state?

I understand that you're very limited in your current state, but I don't think that that should prevent you from identifying as God.

[Stick]

1 hour ago, Monster Energy said:

@Leo Gura 

The games never end.

 

You guys need a DNA test

[Leo Gura]

1 hour ago, Monster Energy said:

@Leo Gura 

The games never end.

The hotter they are the crazier they are.

[Leo Gura]

18 minutes ago, Nemra said:

@Leo Gura, do you identify as a human in your current state?

I understand that you're very limited in your current state, but I don't think that that should prevent you from identifying as God.

I am not a human. I am Infinity.

[Nemra]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

I am not a human. I am Infinity.

Back then, I didn't understand that one's own current state can get reinterpreted to that degree. 

That's the work.

Edited 2 hours ago by Nemra

[Greatnestwithin]

25 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

I am not a human. I am Infinity.

You are both @Leo Gura

[Nemra]

Imagine an infinitely-wide mirror noticing that it's the only thing and it's aware of its reflection. 

[Lila9]

12 hours ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

This video point out to the existence of Matriarchy or in better term Matrilinear Cultures. So for now on I would like the dismissive ones open up to the value of such cultures. Of course we came up with what we have today by many factors, some explained in this video

 

So for the curious one I recomend go make deeped research in this topic. You can Check the History of Crete and the Minoans for example, there is a clue there. 

This is a good series.

He described the transition from a more egalitarian society to a patriarchal and colonist one due to the shift to agriculture (due to desperation and survival necessities basically) and he also agreed that the former is more natural to humans than the latter, which creates many problems that we are facing today.

He believes that, moving forward, we will return to a more egalitarian system (which I believe is what feminists today describe as a more matriarchal society that is focused on life and care, similar to the egalitarian one) which is more socially and economically liberal and benefits everyone.

He covered things that we discuss here and that were dismissed, especially by people who believe that patriarchy, male dominance, and rigid gender roles are natural and inherent to human nature.

I also liked that he acknowledged that the manosphere did not come from nowhere and has roots in patriarchy which is basically like a cult to which both men and women introduced to from a young age without any reference to other possible social structures.

In another video, he stated that the manosphere is a backlash to feminism and to the Me Too movement (which is the part of the fourth wave of feminism that people love to say in such a conformist way that they do not agree with, only to look like a critical thinker, while in reality they have no clue what the fourth wave of feminism is even about).

I am looking forward to the remaining two videos in the series.