LordFall

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    1,991

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by LordFall

  1. Posted

    Personally I'm very happy that you're trying out the Reels on Instagram. I'm building a podcast, perhaps I can have you on eventually. I consume the reels here and there and they are good thoughts, I wouldn't pay for a vault of them though. At this point in my self-development journey I personally am interested mostly in specific outcomes and I'd save up a higher ticket price for that like 1-5$k. 

  3. Posted

    On 5/12/2026 at 1:05 PM, Hojo said:

    @Rhythmic Entity 

    You dont have a face.

    You are looking through a ball of light.

    When a person comes into frame you arent in the frame.

    When you talk its not you talking.

    When you move its not you moving.

    You are outside the universe (which is like a crystal ball)

    Looking into the crystal ball thinking you are existing inside the crystal ball.

    But you are just looking at it, everything is happening by itself.

    Its solipsism but not the persons pov inside the crystal ball you have you are the whole crystal ball.

    Its the crystal balls solipsism.

     

    If the universe was inside the crystal ball when you identify the crystal ball with itself its like the big bang didnt happen, the universe is in one ball.

    Then you can look at the ball and pretend you are in it and make differences between objects and its like the big bang happened inside the crystal ball.

    The crystal ball contains no quality besides light.

    You arent the only one, you dont even exist.

    Seems like bad epistemology. By definition if you can experience things you exist. Whether you exist as a subset of a universal consciousness doesn't invalidate that. 

  5. Posted

    On 5/12/2026 at 4:23 AM, Olaf said:

    @LordFall Sure, that is why I said to do it for money or purpose. Having attention can still be valuable in business or in terms of purpose. There are also ways to make money without fame, so it isn’t necessarily true that you have to chase fame to make money. Saying it’s phenomenal is dragging it; it’s useful. If you say it’s amazing, that mainly comes from some narcissistic tendency, loving being the center of attention and in the spotlight more than being happy. In my opinion and experience its better to chase purpose or money, if you are gonna chase anything at all. Stage green isn't too bad, too many people are stuck in stage orange or lower. If you want to bring people up, you should bring them up to stage yellow.

    Not at all, I think you're carrying anxiety into the statement. Fame means people being aware of you. Meaning you can have an impact. Doesn't have anything to do with narcissism. If you're afraid of having an impact I'd call that low self-esteem. The more people know about your mission and your work the more positive(hopefully) impact you'll have on the human race. 

  6. Posted

    14 hours ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

    There can never be "stable" "economics", that's just a pure fantasy. Can you provide me with examples of "stable" economies? There's never ever been such a thing in an entire human history

    And what has this got to do with Africa and Latin America? Please enlighten me since you seem to be such an expert on the topic of "economics"

    Economy has always been manipulated. Nobody owes anyone opportunities. I thought this topic was posted into a career/life purpose section and not in a society/politics section. Yall can go talk about your commie stuff there LOL

    Sure you owe it to your fellow human being to cooperate with them if you can. Most western economies have been stable and growing since WW2, only now experiencing major contractions. Africa and Latin America have less rigid rule of law where a certain percentage of young men go into organized crime instead of legitimate career options. 

    There are plenty of anti competitive practices that once take hold at scale prevent people from making a living even if they can provide enough value. The days before labor laws are a good example where the average worker had to work 12 hour days to survive and children were a part of the economy as well. Doesn't take a communist to be pro people and pro worker. 

  7. Posted

    What is your MBTI personality type? That has a lot to do with which style of game will resonate most with you. I'm an INTP so social circle and social media are really good for me as I like to think and build systems. If you're a hard extrovert that likes to express emotion then cold approach is gonna work particularly well. 

    You must socialize/go out at least 2-3 times a week to see quick results though but if you're consistent you should start to notice drastic improvements within 3-6 months. As in going on dates and sleeping with women regularly. Also depends on your baseline skill level of course. 

  10. Posted · Edited by LordFall

    Being antisocial and bad with social skills is not a reason to never being able to get a girlfriend. It's a learnable skill.

    I have a video here on male dating strategy, I would definitely familiarialize myself with social circle game if I were you as that's the most realiable way to date for a neurodivergent I believe.

    Have you watched the 3 part series by Leo on how to get laid? I think it'll get rid of most of your limiting beliefs. 

  14. Posted

    Just hosted my last photoshoot in Calgary this Saturday. Good turnout we got about 30 people that showed up. Highly recommend hosting your own events especially if you're an introvert, the conversation level and just alignment of the people is way higher than at a club or any other venue.

    Going to be moving to Montreal this Thursday to enjoy the summer over there and scale my events and brand. I didn't think I would enjoy the creatives and fashion industry so much as an INTP but it's surprisingly just as logical as it's artistic due to the technicality of it and the complexity of the business ecosystem around it. I meet a lot of models that are super cool and feminine and they wanna see the world and do cool stuff but they just don't know how to. So for me who sits inside all day researching business and marketing it's a good mix of polarities. 

    It's more medium/long term than cold approach but it's giving me access to way hotter women that I was hanging with before and more authentic and enjoyable connections as well. 

     

    0D376921-2CBA-443E-A93E-C9DBEDBDB4E0 (1).jpg

    875E34B4-E54C-4DF8-8354-5CB518A317F5 (1).jpg

    DSC_0315 (1).png

    IMG_2140 (1).jpg

    Network & Collaborate (1).png

  17. Posted

    Fame is phenomenal. It's the impact you have on your community and the world as a whole. It takes a lot of skill or luck to market yourself to get a lot of attention to the point that you get recognized in your country.

    Fulfillment is different but that can be said for anything. Same thing for a great relationship, it's an important part of life but won't be enough for fulfillment. 

    I dislike these topics because this forum has a stage green shadow. Meaning that there aren't many successful people doing big things here. Let's get more famous if anything, we're already covering fulfillment i.e. self-actualization enough. 

  18. Posted

    On 5/9/2026 at 9:29 AM, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

    Nobody is owed a success. People should stay poor if they are not able to provide sufficient value. But this is something socwokies will never comprehend

    You don't seem to understand economics much. You need stable economics to provide value otherwise it devolves into more violent kinds of entrepreneurship like they do in Latin america and Africa. 

    The economy is rigged and manipulated so not everyone can make it and have a surplus of capital. It needs to be overhauled. 

  19. Posted

    I think his meta understanding of geopolitics is quite phenomenal. The video Leo linked had some great points but a lot of it is clipping 5 mins of stupid shit he said in like 200 hours of golden philosophy and analysis. 

    I've run a politics group chat and been educating myself on geopolitics for the past few years and I've learned some good paradigms from Jiang. Leo doesn't cover any of this and is more esoteric than actually examining what's going on with our politics and current events so it's a good mix for my intellectual content consumption.

    On 5/10/2026 at 9:08 AM, Uddi said:

    https://actualized.org/insights/problems-with-professor-jiang

    I would also like to know if the content or the structure is the problematic one. I am more focused on the root structure behind conspiracies rather than trying to worry about the content. Please have that clear distinction when reading conspiracies of any kind.

    Of course there is gonna be a content problem because the structure of geopolitics is a fog of war. We don't really know what's going on. We can just take public information, make analysis and try to make predictions from that and them improve on our previous past predictions. Jiang deserves to get fact checked but so does anybody else and I don't see very many other people posting quality geopolitical content online.

    Peter Zeihan is another good source of content but he's also gotten plenty of stuff wrong. Ryan McBeth as well if you guys are more into military analysis. 

  20. Posted

    12 hours ago, Never_give_up said:

    @CARDOZZOI can't be funny and learn social skills. I am autistic. I am sorry for being pessimistic but it's true.

    All I can do is become 10% body fat and it will take some time (years). It worked before, I hope it works now. Well I can become better at social stuff but there is not much improvement cause of autism, I definitely will try though, thank you! 

    You're a victim more than anything else. The founder of the biggest pickup company in the world was autistic(Owen Cook.)

    Plenty of short dudes doing well at game too.

    Go to events, host your own, make friends, talk to women  and rinse and repeat 

  23. Posted · Edited by LordFall

    I think all the current violent conflicts on earth will end and we will have world peace in the next 15 years through some form of global council AI police state. Perhaps through the UN or a new similar organization.

    The fundamental reason is because war is as a whole unprofitable for the human race. It is very profitable for a few invested deeply in the military industrial complexes of their regions but for other power centers in their countries don't benefit from it.

    Fundamentally if we look at it in terms of incentives we find ourselves with :

    - Moneymaxxing - Making a lot of money in a sustainable way. Requires certainty, markets dislike uncertainty. A few players benefit from it through the previously mentionned military industrial complex and insider trading but as a whole there is just less capita produced when wars are happening. 

    - Statusmaxxing - World leaders gaining power and prestige through wars. That era seems to be done mostly I believe through social media and the ease to dissiminate information and specifically the horrors and brutality of war. Hard for Netanyahu and Putin to look like glorious leaders of the human race when there is countless clips of their soldiers and missiles killing innocent people. Before social media is was much easier to keep information siloed and thus mostly the mainstream leaders had the status in society. Now we have a variety of other influencers and leaders that are able to obtain notoriety through peaceful means.

    The recent shooting attempts on Trump have also highlighted how vulnerable world leaders with a public presence are so I think being a cutthroat authoritarian is gonna fall out of style quite soon. 

    There is going to be a massive AI and surveillance war coming in the next decade but in my opinion it is already won by the people. What you might not know is the tech community is fundamentally anti-authoritarian and open source. 

    It's just a game theory exercise, most scenarios eventually fall into a nash equilibrium however unbalanced they are in the short term. The cold war and non-proliferation treaty are a good example of that with nuclear weapons. Concerning that there are talks of them being used again but I think ultimately the laws of mutual benefit and equilibrium will prevail.