caelanb

Actualized.org on mediabiasfactcheck.com

32 posts in this topic

5 minutes ago, Buck Edwards said:

Pseudo Bald. 

There is some truth to that, actually…

https://www.womansday.com/life/news/a57748/bald-men-study/

“Bald Men Are More Intelligent, Successful, and Masculine, Says Science”

”And they're more attractive too, it seems.”


“I once tried to explain existential dread to my toaster, but it just popped up and said, "Same."“ -Gemini AI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Yimpa said:

There is some truth to that, actually…

https://www.womansday.com/life/news/a57748/bald-men-study/

“Bald Men Are More Intelligent, Successful, and Masculine, Says Science”

”And they're more attractive too, it seems.”

We should be rolling out the memes now.... Never read woman's day to know about men, women always lie. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Yimpa said:

There is some truth to that, actually…

https://www.womansday.com/life/news/a57748/bald-men-study/

“Bald Men Are More Intelligent, Successful, and Masculine, Says Science”

”And they're more attractive too, it seems.”

I've also seen studies that say, people that say "fuck" a lot, are highly intelligent and couples who fart together stay together. 


There is no beginning, there is no end. There is just Simply This. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Extreme Z7 said:

How does one factually gauge the credibility of mediabiasfactcheck.com on mediabiasfactcheck.com?
Circularity is a bitch.

Was thinking the same xD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe Leo should finally capture his alien mice transformation on camera to give them some proof lol

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/10/2023 at 0:25 PM, Carl-Richard said:

I mean, considering how metaphysics and spirituality aren't exactly science, Actualized.org is at least not very scientific. That said, Leo doesn't present his claims about metaphysics and spirituality as if they were scientific, so it's not pseudoscience. If we're strictly talking about misinformation and inaccurate reporting, that would certainly apply to the forum. As for Leo's videos and blog posts, maybe not so much.

This ^

Also, it should really be emphasized that healthy epistemic hygiene involves cultivating good heuristics for the specific domains in which a person or organization is credible / insightful, and where they should be taken with a grain of salt. 

I would hope that anyone who's gotten value out of Leo's work uses it as a launching pad to explore spirituality/philosophy/sociology on their own. For what it's worth, this isn't just true of Leo but I'd say the same of Ken Wilber, John Verveake, or anyone else whose work I've gotten value out of.

Edited by DocWatts

I'm writing a philosophy book! Check it out at : https://7provtruths.org/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of Leo’s content is chock-full of self-deception. 

And that right there, is Love.


“I once tried to explain existential dread to my toaster, but it just popped up and said, "Same."“ -Gemini AI

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly that's how people generally feel about Leo it seems , from my experience bringing him up.... Unfortunately they ain't gangster enough for dankLeo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love to give Leo grief, but this is some retarded bullshit.  This is clearly not a media/news website, so I don't know why these nosey-ass motherfuckers are rating it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The page is full of random and deceptive ads. Its design is confusing. It feels inauthentic.

Edited by Understander

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now