OBEler

Can AI Have Its Own Subjective Experience If Consciousness Is Fundamental?

211 posts in this topic

1 minute ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@Wilhelm44 I think you might be unintentionally incorrectly inferring a lot from what Leo is stating.

Please elaborate ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@Wilhelm44 I think you might be unintentionally incorrectly inferring a lot from what Leo is stating.

Looks to me like he is doing just fine

 


 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:
12 minutes ago, LastThursday said:

Woah... what happened to this thread? A man sleeps for eight hours...

Watch out. Next time you sleep we might all ascend into the Singularity and you will wake up all alone.

Terrifying. I'm never sleeping again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

The division is that you don't need QM to bake a cake.

I still feel there's some quantum shit happening with our brains.

My bet is that even mainstream science will come around to this conclusion pretty soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

I still feel there's some quantum shit happening with our brains.

Maybe, maybe.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Maybe, maybe.

@Wilhelm44 Don't wait for science.  I can only lean on Niels Bohr for so much.

Edited by Inliytened1

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

@Wilhelm44 Don't wait for science.  I can only lean on Niels Bohr for so much.

It's interesting, Leo really helped me to take science off it's pedestal.

But he still gives mainstream science it's proper dues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Wilhelm44 said:

Please elaborate ?

Replying to something he isn't directly saying, but that you take as an assumed truth behind the arguement required for it to be true.


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Replying to something he isn't directly saying, but that you take as an assumed truth behind the arguement required for it to be true.

That sounds like a Zen koan :) thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Wilhelm44 said:

That sounds like a Zen koan :) thank you

It is an interesting line of enquiry (quantum aspects). Enjoyed reading the back and forth! 💫 

Do you perceive a link?


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Do you perceive a link?

Intuitively it makes sense to me, but I could be wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now