Leo, You are Living Under a Rock When It Comes to AI

[something_else]

20 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

If what we had was truly intelligent and creative, then we wouldn't be calling it AI slop, we would be calling it AI genius, and people would be paying extra to view it.

Why isn't AI producing grand works of art that surpass human-made work? It's not even close.

Where is the AI Shakespeare?

Show me one book written by AI that I would want to read.

It's simple really: If AI was so great, then you could charge extra for AI work. But the opposite is the case. AI work is often nearly worthless.

If AI work so was great, everyone would be slapping "Made with AI" on their products and services. People would even be trying to pass off human work as made by AI.

It doesn't need to be able to do these things to have a significant impact on the world, though. The vast majority of the jobs in the world don't require much creativity.

You're comparing AI to the absolute peak of humanity, which of course it cannot compete with. If it could it would be ASI. But when comparing with the average human it's very capable in many fields.

[kavaris]

Oh plz no Ai @ Mcdonalds, Ahhhhhhh They are the only company that still operates somewhat reasonably (tho the toilets are, like, they got poop in em) Like they got that siq machine w/ the Mcdonalds OS on it, that imalways tryina see if theres a way to hack that bad boy when they arent lookin, so i can order myself like 17 burgers on the fly, Like weneed that Mcdonalds unscathed, atleast til im dead in like 10-20 years ya know. I cant eat there that often, but id def be there alot, if it was free, as thatd be auwesome.

Edited 2 hours ago by kavaris