Women are attracted to relativity

[StaraX]

I'd like to know your opinion on this perspective. Let me be clear: this is not a manosphere argument.

Male attractiveness is much more relative than female attractiveness. Ya'll often talk about a "high-value man," and for men that usually means status, wealth, fame, leadership etc.  In other words, a man's attractiveness is heavily dependent on how much he possesses these qualities relative to other men.

For example, to have high status, there must be many men with lower status. To be wealthy, there must be a poor person. To be a leader, there must be followers. Women's attraction to these traits seems to be based largely on this relativity.

Female attractiveness is  looks.  Men can find a woman attractive within seconds, without comparing her to other women. In other words, her attractiveness is not DEPENDENT on the existence of less attractive, older, overweight, or less desirable women. A woman can be considered attractive on her own merits, whereas a man's attractiveness appears to depend much more on how he ranks compared to other men.

[Schizophonia]

It's a believe system that you project 

Edited 4 hours ago by Schizophonia

[Sugarcoat]

You forgot the “energies and presence” , you are picking up on it and it is influencing you, even if you are not aware of it, unless you’re ultra idenfied being, then yes you will be able to isolate looks like that, or the woman that just looks at the “status” etc

Yall really be revealing a lot about your own minds with these posts 

Edited 4 hours ago by Sugarcoat

[StaraX]

Okay. What is the truth, then? 

[aurum]

1 hour ago, StaraX said:

In other words, her attractiveness is not DEPENDENT on the existence of less attractive, older, overweight, or less desirable women

I think this is too far.

Physical beauty is still a relative notion. If every woman looked equally beautiful, you would not find it as meaningful.

[StaraX]

1 hour ago, aurum said:

I think this is too far.

Physical beauty is still a relative notion. If every woman looked equally beautiful, you would not find it as meaningful.

There are two main components of relativity. In this context, I'm referring to the dependency component. For example, for someone to be considered tall, there must be someone who is shorter. If everyone were the same height, then concepts like "tall" and "short" wouldn't exist.

[gettoefl]

This is correct. A woman is pass or fail. A man is a work in progress. One day good, next day bad. While if she is fine, she is fine like a good wine.

[aurum]

26 minutes ago, StaraX said:

There are two main components of relativity. In this context, I'm referring to the dependency component. For example, for someone to be considered tall, there must be someone who is shorter. If everyone were the same height, then concepts like "tall" and "short" wouldn't exist.

Yes I understood that.

Physical beauty doesn't happen in a vacuum. It still depends on a relative component.

[LordFall]

I think you're spot on. The core of male sexuality is based on female fertility and the core of female sexuality is based on male provisioning and security which are relative to the environment that they're in. Which is why in today's environment which is quite safe but heavily status based, 80% of men are deemed unattractive if a woman is swiping on Tinder and going to the club. 

Knowing this as a man your best strategy is to use your unique strengths to overcome your weaknesses and be basically more competitive than the men in your local environment.