Drama Alert! Another YTber is calling us a cult! 😈☦️

[Sugarcoat]

47 minutes ago, Someone here said:

Sorry if what I said came off as that . 
you asked about maybe there is a little control we can act on in our lives but that doesn’t mean we don’t have control at all ..isn’t that what you asked ?

Before yea kinda

51 minutes ago, Someone here said:

my answer was as accurate as knife . I told you it’s not that you have a little control or no control at all.  I told you there is no separate self who has either little control or no control at all . So the question “ do we have no control at all or just a little control?” Is based upon a false assumption. And the answer to it is both are false (little control or zero control ).

 I have a sense of self, so thats just words for me

[UnbornTao]

5 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

Zurew knew the potential outcome, but sometimes integrity requires sacrifice.

Indeed.

[Eskilon]

Bro couldn't let the bone go  died for bullshit like most of humanity . He was smart though.

One must wonder why he cared so much on this place being a cult or not 

Edited 3 hours ago by Eskilon

[AerisVahnEphelia]

On 23/06/2026 at 6:19 PM, Carl-Richard said:

@zurew You know it's not a substantial engagement and just more persuasion when like with cult, he refuses to engage or go more into definitions than one layer. And in that post, he didn't even define narcissism.

And that's why I predict and why you should expect that he will never go into detail on what narcissism is because that will eventually prove he is one. And if he does, he will say "I care about other people" and then he will not engage with the examples brought up that argue against that fact.

And then perhaps he will try to wriggle himself out by saying "being an asshole doesn't mean you're a narcissist". Well, actually, if you think you're the best in the world (and you're delusional about that) and you're consistently an asshole (and it's directly tied to that reason, when people challenge you on being the best, you become an asshole), you are probably a narcissist.

It's so easy to argue against it because it's arguing against somebody who does not care about truth in this instance but their own ego. And even if he was somehow not an asshole and a saint through all this and people want to say it can't be a cult because everybody is having a good time, consider that being here wasting your time funneling your time and attention to entertain somebody's delusions like this, you're being exploited, treated like a joker at a clown show jigging for a self-proclaimed king for their leisure and pleasure. Consider that as a part of the reason why Leo has 65k posts on his own forum.

And as for "I took a self-assessment test and it showed I'm not a narcissist", laughable.

observation are infinite, if you look into anything enough you'll see what you're feeling the most.

if you come with love, you'll only see love, if you're full of seethe, you'll find a flaw.

the mind is just an infinite bullshit machine.

it's a fucking joke, stop using the mind to do more mind game, why all of you are still so unconscious on a forum based on consciousness.
 

[AerisVahnEphelia]

4 minutes ago, Eskilon said:

Bro couldn't let the bone go  died for bullshit like most of humanity . He was smart though.

One must wonder why he cared so much on this place being a cult or not 

we need to keep caring about stuff, caring about stuff, caring about stuff, caring about stuff, caring about stuff.
this is relevant, this isn't relevant,this is relevant, this isn't relevant,this is relevant, this isn't relevant,this is relevant, this isn't relevant.
this is right, this is false, this is right, this is false, this is right, this is false, this is right, this is false, this is right, this is false,this is right, this is false,

[Carl-Richard]

2 hours ago, AerisVahnEphelia said:

observation are infinite, if you look into anything enough you'll see what you're feeling the most.

if you come with love, you'll only see love, if you're full of seethe, you'll find a flaw.

the mind is just an infinite bullshit machine.

it's a fucking joke, stop using the mind to do more mind game, why all of you are still so unconscious on a forum based on consciousness.
 

This form of argumentation is called meta-argumentation and it never addresses any substantive points being made but only goes for describing general traits and characteristics that can apply in a thousand different situations. I don't engage with that because it's not engaging with the conversation in any meaningful way that I can learn more about this particular situation rather than hearing things I've heard a billion trillion times before.

[AerisVahnEphelia]

23 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

This form of argumentation is called meta-argumentation and it never addresses any substantive points being made but only goes for describing general traits and characteristics that can apply in a thousand different situations. I don't engage with that because it's not engaging with the conversation in any meaningful way that I can learn more about this particular situation rather than hearing things I've heard a billion trillion times before.

You cannot learn about a particular situation, drop the desire for it.
meta argumentation doesn't exist in a meaningful way, your division is futile and another ego plot twist to stay in lalaland.

[Carl-Richard]

3 minutes ago, AerisVahnEphelia said:

You cannot learn about a particular situation, drop the desire for it.
meta argumentation doesn't exist in a meaningful way, your division is futile and another ego plot twist to stay in lalaland.

"Yo ego is reacting to this post yo" ✌️🫱🫲🫰👏🙌🦆

[AerisVahnEphelia]

5 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

"Yo ego is reacting to this post yo" ✌️🫱🫲🫰👏🙌🦆

Right, run away from reality

[Natasha Tori Maru]

11 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

"Yo ego is reacting to this post yo" ✌️🫱🫲🫰👏🙌🦆

There's no attempt to engage with the arguments.

[Elliott]

46 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

This form of argumentation is called meta-argumentation and it never addresses any substantive points being made but only goes for describing general traits and characteristics that can apply in a thousand different situations. I don't engage with that because it's not engaging with the conversation in any meaningful way that I can learn more about this particular situation rather than hearing things I've heard a billion trillion times before.

The judgement is neurotic though, what matters about @zurews post, what would it matter either way? You can look.at the situation and see love or cult or hate, or evil, or comedy, or pity,.... You see something negative then just move away from it, you're identifying with something like it's part of you or is you.