Drama Alert! Another YTber is calling us a cult! 😈☦️

[Carl-Richard]

On 4.6.2026 at 5:54 AM, Carl-Richard said:

What do you mean by "quietly" dismissed? Secretly banned, kicked out?

Is a doomsday cult not a cult if you don't get kicked out for disagreeing on a selection of issues?

@Inliytened1 plz anser boss 👆👆👆 ty

[integral]

On 6/3/2026 at 9:20 PM, Yimpa said:

Aww, thank you. That means the world to me 

I thought about it more what you could do is ASMR to practice that voice, but also push it to social media and then you could start a business that way.

So you could turn practice into a business

Edited Monday at 11:04 PM by integral

[Yimpa]

23 minutes ago, integral said:

I thought about it more what you could do is ASMR to practice that voice, but also push it to social media and then you could start a business that way.

So you could turn practice into a business

i am studying and getting some inspiration right now 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYcEkk0CcQ6/?igsh=MXhnZ2VudnV4OHFiOA==

[Inliytened1]

On 6/7/2026 at 10:03 AM, Carl-Richard said:

@Inliytened1 plz anser boss 👆👆👆 ty

I was being funny about the quietly part.  You know how in those types of groups anyone who disagrees with the leader suddenly disappears.  But if one of us left because of a disagreement with Leo I'm sure he wouldn't try and hide it. He hasn't done so in the past.

And on the doomsday cult yes just being able to leave does not negate that there are other qualities that would still classify it as a cult. But that's apples to oranges with regards to the Actualized community.   I mean ultimately what you want to call a cult is subjective and relative.. we can just state our opinions and intuitions on the matter.  There are forms of mind control and manipulation in the corporate world too....so where are you going to draw the line on what is and isn't a cult.  How stringent should it be?  To Leo's point if you start watering it down you help the communities that are much more cultish.

It's like having the same sentence for a drunk driver that gets a DUI for being in a parking lot vs someone who goes the wrong way and kills a family. Both committed a crime by driving drunk but should both get the same consequences.  You would be diminishing the impact on the victims in the second case if there were no contrast between them.

 

Edited 10 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Carl-Richard]

10 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

There are forms of mind control and manipulation in the corporate world too....so where are you going to draw the line on what is and isn't a cult.

Is it a social group with deviant beliefs compared to the surrounding society (often religious in nature).

 

10 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

How stringent should it be?  To Leo's point if you start watering it down you help the communities that are much more cultish.

And to have a stringent definition means that it creates a false sense of security about one's own community and one is less wary about the fact that the existing dynamics could in themselves be problematic and if were they to be cranked up a little, could develop into the full-blown cult you're so keen distancing yourself from.

 

10 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

It's like having the same sentence for a drunk driver that gets a DUI for being in a parking lot vs someone who goes the wrong way and kills a family. Both committed a crime by driving drunk but should both get the same consequences.  You would be diminishing the impact on the victims in the second case if there were no contrast between them.

The analogy is to have the same sentence from someone who is stopped with a barely illegal BAC vs someone with a definitely illegal BAC who crashes into a lightpole and kills someone. Maybe you shouldn't have the same sentence, but maybe you should call both DUI (and the difference is in the degree, not categorical).

Edited 7 minutes ago by Carl-Richard