CARDOZZO

Peter Ralston On LOVE - Newsletter Response

Started by CARDOZZO,

150 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

How are Truth and Love the same or different?

Edited by Joseph Maynor

YouTube

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

3 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

You're not making any sense   if You are Everything than that includes pain too. 

You are not everything 

"It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows."

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Love someone romantically , you bunch of singles. 😂

 

 "When you get very serious about truth you accept your life situation exactly as it is. So much so that you aren't childishly sitting around wishing it were otherwise.If you were confined to a wheelchair you would just accept it as how reality is. Just as you now just accept that you are not a bird who can fly."

-Leo Gura. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

@Joseph Maynor Love isn’t dual . 

 "When you get very serious about truth you accept your life situation exactly as it is. So much so that you aren't childishly sitting around wishing it were otherwise.If you were confined to a wheelchair you would just accept it as how reality is. Just as you now just accept that you are not a bird who can fly."

-Leo Gura. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

2 minutes ago, Someone here said:

@Joseph Maynor Love isn’t dual . 

Truth is singular.

I am the looker but it is not I

There are never any answers, only ever more questions. But is that the answer may I ask?

Only diamond edge can cut diamond.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

44 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

What i am asking you is Love better described  as feeling,  a warm feeling of connection and well.love!  If that's not the case than what makes it different from raw oneness? 

Love is an ontological matter. If you regard it as a feeling that means you don't understand what it really is.

That is analogous to the mistake of saying that truth is just an idea.

Imagine if Ralston was teaching about Truth and I stood up and said, "But truth is just an idea man! It's just a word in your head."

Edited by Leo Gura

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

6 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Love is an ontological matter

That doesn't sound very loving 😕

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

14 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Love is an ontological matter. If you regard it as a feeling that means you don't understand what it really is.

 

 

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

15 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

That doesn't sound very loving 😕

Only to the blind.

You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

5 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Only to the blind.

You don't wanna take the feeling out either.  

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Maybe Ralston's mind has ossified with age. It happens to the best of us. Only human. 

Can't transend biology.... 

I perceive he wants a clean distinction between love and infinity due to the human, relative perception of love, and it's loaded connotations. 

It's all nameless in the end.

Anyway LOVE you all!!! Girly giggles of love! Thanks for existing :x

It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Speculating, but I wonder if Ralston has gotten trapped in his own survival paradigm.

If you regard everything as survival or ego-agenda, it's easy to conclude love is just a human feeling. If that was the case, Ralston would be right to dismiss it as not Truth or ontological.

The problem is that's not the case. It turns out love is not just human feelings.

Edited by aurum

"Finding your reason can be so deceiving, a subliminal place. 

I will not break, 'cause I've been riding the curves of these infinity words and so I'll be on my way. I will not stay.

 And it goes On and On, On and On"

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

15 minutes ago, aurum said:

Speculating, but I wonder if Ralston has gotten trapped in his own survival paradigm.

If you regard everything as survival or ego-agenda, it's easy to conclude love is just a human feeling. If that was the case, Ralston would be right to dismiss it as not Truth or ontological.

The problem is that's not the case. It turns out love is not just human feelings.

Yet no one can describe it.  Saying its merely the realization that there is no difference between anything is incomplete in my opinion and lacks nuance. There is no reason to use the word if that's your ontological definition. 

Edited by Inliytened1

 

Wisdom.  Truth.  Love.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

Just now, Inliytened1 said:

Yet no one can describe it.  Saying its merely the realization that there is no difference between anything is is incomplete in my opinion and lacks nuance. There is no reason to you the word if that's your ontological definition. 

Nothing will seem like a satisfying description without an awakening.

"Finding your reason can be so deceiving, a subliminal place. 

I will not break, 'cause I've been riding the curves of these infinity words and so I'll be on my way. I will not stay.

 And it goes On and On, On and On"

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

6 minutes ago, aurum said:

Nothing will seem like a satisfying description without an awakening.

Upon awakening all need for description ceases.

I am the looker but it is not I

There are never any answers, only ever more questions. But is that the answer may I ask?

Only diamond edge can cut diamond.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

3 minutes ago, No1Here2c said:

Upon awakening all need for description ceases.

I wouldn't go that far.

You should be able to describe. It just usually won't satisfy others.

Edited by aurum

"Finding your reason can be so deceiving, a subliminal place. 

I will not break, 'cause I've been riding the curves of these infinity words and so I'll be on my way. I will not stay.

 And it goes On and On, On and On"

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

3 minutes ago, No1Here2c said:

Upon awakening all need for description ceases.

I stand by my word.

You will never describe it.

Though I do agree there is value in the attempts.

I am the looker but it is not I

There are never any answers, only ever more questions. But is that the answer may I ask?

Only diamond edge can cut diamond.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted

4 minutes ago, No1Here2c said:

Upon awakening all need for description ceases.

One pointer I use is you're still going to create spiritual narratives, but you're conscious that those are creations.

YouTube

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Best describe for me Awakening.

@aurum

@aurum

@aurum

Distracted are we?

Edited by No1Here2c

I am the looker but it is not I

There are never any answers, only ever more questions. But is that the answer may I ask?

Only diamond edge can cut diamond.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Go To Topic Listing Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God