Peter Ralston On LOVE - Newsletter Response

[Inliytened1]

@Leo Gura if Infinity and Love are identical there wouldn't need to be two words. They would be the same word  He's not wrong.  He doesn't use it because love tends to point to an emotion or feeling 

Edited 1 hour ago by Inliytened1

[emil1234]

2 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

@Leo Gura if Infinity and Love are identical there wouldn't need to be two words. They would be the same word  He's not wrong.  He doesn't use it because love tends to point to an emotion or feeling 

this is one possible answer to the matter, I suspect sadhguru might reject the word Love for the same reason. 

Unconditional existential love should not even be in the same category as emotional love

[James123]

29 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

What the fuck does this prove? It proves nothing.

You are using the logic of a child.

Pain does not disprove Oneness/Unity.

If you put your hand in the fire it will hurt. Hurt is also you.

39 minutes ago, Terell Kirby said:

Bullshit. İf the hurt is also me, it wouldn't be hurt. İt would be Me.

When there is oneness and unity, forget even a word, a sound can't be a or b. 

Fuck all of your experiences.

Surrender them.

And be what You truly are.

Entire universe arises and falls within You, You are none.

[Inliytened1]

16 minutes ago, James123 said:

Bullshit. İf the hurt is also me, it wouldn't be hurt. İt would be Me.

 

You're not making any sense   if You are Everything than that includes pain too. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Inliytened1

[Inliytened1]

30 minutes ago, emil1234 said:

this is one possible answer to the matter, I suspect sadhguru might reject the word Love for the same reason. 

Unconditional existential love should not even be in the same category as emotional love

In his mind if you needed to use the word Love it would indicate the word Infinity is not all encompassing enough.  Which in that case it wouldn't be Infinity.

[Willy Phallicus]

Water can be a solid, a liquid or a gas.