enchanted

Kindness is the #1 global partner preference

24 posts in this topic

Kindness ranks #1 in global long-term partner preferences: 117,293 people from 175 countries allocate a fixed 30 "importance points" across traits (2025 study) | PeakD https://share.google/aeY2BecUxei3EoNyq

Looks like nice guys finish first. 

image-1768719144929.png

Edited by enchanted

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kindness is more about being trustworthy I think. Treating the other person's interests as your own.

And nice guys aren't kind. They act conditionally with the expectation that being nice will get them pussy. They can be very entitled and lash out if you don't give them what they want. They are low energy and low self-esteem.

Edited by Basman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A nice guy is someone who can't express what they want directly, so they try to get things indirectly through manipulation. They see themselves as fundamentally unlovable (and thus tend to act like such).

Boogie is a very severe case of being a nice guy. This guy pretends he's Mr. Rogers while being a total cu** in private.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/1/2026 at 9:01 PM, enchanted said:

Long-term partnership and attraction are two different things, almost opposites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After they are attracted to you.

Kindness without attraction is called the friendzone.


I welcome you to come see and support my latest Art Piece on Instagram. It is beautifully emotional and majestic, with its writing:

My Latest Art Piece

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with self reported data is sometimes what people think they like isn’t what they actually respond to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are also studies that show that a vast gap between what women say and who they choose. They select for looks just as much as men if not more. I think OP is a sad attempt at changing a narrative that doesn't stand up to much scrutiny. I don't know why it is uncomfortable for people to admit that women care about looks and status and will overlook red flags, character flaws to become involved with their type. It says more about you OP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Tenebroso said:

There are also studies that show that a vast gap between what women say and who they choose. They select for looks just as much as men if not more. I think OP is a sad attempt at changing a narrative that doesn't stand up to much scrutiny. I don't know why it is uncomfortable for people to admit that women care about looks and status and will overlook red flags, character flaws to become involved with their type. It says more about you OP.

This sounds like manosphere Tristan Tate stuff. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, enchanted said:

This sounds like manosphere Tristan Tate stuff. 

I do not like the manosphere or the Tate Brothers. You can observe the harsh truths about women without being a part of the manosphere. Women actually expose themselves the more they talk, you don't need a silly podcast to show you the reality of female nature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was another study somewhere where it said covertly the number 1 trait that people look for in a partner is them being good at sex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Tenebroso This would really be useful to you, if you take the moment to try to understand attachment theory:

 


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@Tenebroso This would really be useful to you, if you take the moment to try to understand attachment theory:

 

I am not sure I understand how redpill is connect to attachment theory?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Valach I assume you watched the video?


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What people say they want and what people respond to are different things.


There is no failure, only feedback

One small step at a time. No one climbs a mountain in one go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Ulax said:

What people say they want and what people respond to are different things.

Very true. Similar with attraction. What we are attracted to is often not what we need - or what is good for us.

I think maturity plays a huge factor as this can be the operating mechanism of inhibition.


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Very true. Similar with attraction. What we are attracted to is often not what we need - or what is good for us.

I think maturity plays a huge factor as this can be the operating mechanism of inhibition.

Fr lol, I be getting attracted the Regina George regens


There is no failure, only feedback

One small step at a time. No one climbs a mountain in one go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Ulax said:

Fr lol, I be getting attracted the Regina George regens

Gosh, this is a feel O.oxD 


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@Valach I assume you watched the video?

Okay, I rewatched and get it now. Yeah, redpill stems out of insecutiry obviously. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Valach said:

Okay, I rewatched and get it now. Yeah, redpill stems out of insecutiry obviously. 

Its sorta weird cos I feel like red pill isn't even used as a term anymore. But the idea behind it persists. 

In a simplified way it appears it's just - broken people attract broken people. Both aren't able to recognize secure healthy love and approach it with their own beliefs (and loaded expectations) regarding what love is.

The again, these days, who actually gets raised right to KNOW secure love? There are many who claim there are only around 20% of people with healthy attachment styles. And those people typically do not use dating apps, and pair up relatively quickly. 

I've already been through my own healing from a lot of the wrong ideas of what love is.


It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now