Leo's DemystifySci Podcast Appearance

[Leo Gura]

2 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

The fact that you call an insight into Maya (multiplicity, boundaries) "awakening" is a huge disservice to many people

You do not understand what I communicated.

You are arguing with a straw man.

Edited 17 hours ago by Leo Gura

[zurew]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

You are arguing with a straw man.

If you actually cared about people not misinterpreting you, then it would be very easy  for you to clear up the confusion: Is it the case that things can exist outside of your consciousness or not or in other words specifically related to the video are there Gods that can exist without you imagining them?

If the answer is no, then that whole thing in that infinity of Gods video was very misleading in how you framed it and how you walked people through your awakening; if the answer is yes, then the video has more gravity and less misleading; if the answer is "I dont know,because im epistemically limited to answer that qeustion, how would I know?" then that leaves the question open which is fine, but at least we know what your actual stance is on the issue without you being ambigous.

[Leo Gura]

12 minutes ago, zurew said:

Is it the case that things can exist outside of your consciousness

They can't. Until you imagine that they can.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Edited 14 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Joseph Maynor]

Could it be that both the solipsism video and the infinity of gods videos were creations?

[zurew]

52 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Until you imagine that they can.

The implication there being that you can imagine things outside of your consciousness.

[Leo Gura]

32 minutes ago, zurew said:

The implication there being that you can imagine things outside of your consciousness.

Obviously you can. That's what every human does by default.

Edited 13 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Girzo]

52 minutes ago, zurew said:

The implication there being that you can imagine things outside of your consciousness.

That's what atoms are. Or other people.

[zurew]

30 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Obviously you can. That's what every human does by default.

Let me rephrase it then. Under your view -  the inside-outside consciousness distinction is irrelevant, what you imagine is only whats relevant when it comes to things existing.

Going with that - in the context of the infinity of Gods video, those Gods only exist in so far as you imagine them to exist and none of them have a seperate existence from what you imagine.

[zurew]

3 minutes ago, Girzo said:

That's what atoms are. Or other people.

He said things like "nothing exists outside of your consciousness" in the past, so we are clearing up where he is at and what he means by certain statements.

[Girzo]

55 minutes ago, zurew said:

the inside-outside consciousness distinction is irrelevant

There is nothing outside consciousness, apart from more consciousness. That's the "multiplicity of Gods."

Quote

He said things like "nothing exists outside of your consciousness" in the past,

Why in the past? I don't see anyone saying anything different now. Atoms and other people are only imagined to be outside your consciousness, they don't exist outside of consciousness, although consciousness (Infinity) always has the "potential" of "morphing" into them, so in a sense they do exist, but being of consciousness, not outside it, and actualizing these potentials would cease your current experience as this-and-not-other human. (It would get "hidden" as a "potential." )

[Leo Gura]

1 hour ago, zurew said:

those Gods only exist in so far as you imagine them to exist and none of them have a seperate existence from what you imagine.

It becomes a profound mystical oscillation between Self and Other.

Infinity recognizes its impossible, paradoxical nature.

[zurew]

4 minutes ago, Girzo said:

I don't see anyone saying anything different now

He did say a different thing.

The answer to my original question: "Is it the case that things can exist outside of your consciousness?" Wasnt a "no", it was a conditional answer.

Your answer isn't responding to that question you are only answering a question that I didnt explicitly ask "is it the case that you can imagine that things can be outside of your consciousness" - but thats substanstially different from the claim that things actually exist outside of your consciousness.

[Davino]

17 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

The Awakening I explain in the Infinity Of Gods videos is completely beyond normal Awakening. You can't even imagine it. It is so profound you would literally shit yourself.

Be careful underestimating what was communicated.

I find it hard enough to realise God, can't imagine the Meta of Infinite Gods.

It must be alike to realising Infinity and then Infinite Infinities. That's my intuition. Like a fractal finding it's complete self in a part of itself and then finding Infinitely complete replicas of itself within itself. I've done that with Infinity but that looks a decade ahead to do with God.

[Leo Gura]

15 minutes ago, Davino said:

It must be alike to realising Infinity and then Infinite Infinities. That's my intuition. Like a fractal finding it's complete self in a part of itself and then finding Infinitely complete replicas of itself within itself.

Yes.

Infinity keeps discovering more of Itself.

That's the wonder of Infinity.

God is so vast that God keeps discovering more of Itself, ever greater Love.

Edited 11 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Terell Kirby]

49 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

It becomes a profound mystical oscillation between Self and Other.

In your summation-what is the purpose of Other in regards to it’s construction in Gods Mind?

Why does God break singularity without any recollection that it was the one that did it?

[Leo Gura]

1 minute ago, Terell Kirby said:

In your summation-what is the purpose of Other in regards to it’s construction in Gods Mind?

The purpose is always maximization of Love.

1 minute ago, Terell Kirby said:

Why does God break singularity without any recollection that it was the one that did it?

Not sure.

[vibv]

28 minutes ago, Terell Kirby said:

Why does God break singularity without any recollection that it was the one that did it?

To experience not knowing anything.

It's like Michael Jackson who paid actors to play as peasants in a supermarket to be able to have the experience of shopping like every other human that's not super famous. Hilarious stuff:

It's actually amazing how on point his description is for why he does it. You really can feel that longing to have that experience.

Edited 10 hours ago by vibv

[woohoo123]

I was watching the podcast today, was like cool discussion, maybe this is a candidate to share with my friends/family since it’s a convo with normal people so should be more approachable for them to listen to….

Then Leo is like ‘I have an Iraqi torture manual that I read to further my spirituality.’

’I have pools of shit on my carpet from awakening’ 

I was just like … bloody hell can you imagine how that sounds to a normal person hahaha  😂 

Thanks for your work Leo and looking forward to seeing you on more podcasts in future! 

[Ulax]

I liked the podcast

I think its good to remember that quite a few of us have been watching Leo for years. Whereas the podcasters haven't probably watched much of Leo at all. So, what might seem surface level actualized.org to us, is quite intense for them. Is like playing a new video game for the first time lol

[Yimpa]

On 2/24/2026 at 7:47 PM, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Accidents are all good though. Shit happens (literally).