John Anthony's channel taken down

[Schizophonia]

9 minutes ago, Happy Lizard said:

When you say attractive you mean just physically attractive or personality charisma attractive etc as well? 
Because this is confusing me when thinking about your content on dating and developing one’s game if it just boils down to “women sleep with hot men”. I don’t mean to say you were confusing, I just mean its not clear to me where the intersection is between what you say about dating and my experience and observation of women that you  mentioned in this post.

I do agree that no woman choose a monk over a celebrity or good looking dude btw that’s obvious to me. 

Most men who sleep around a lot aren't particularly attractive; they're mostly dogs.

 

[Leo Gura]

34 minutes ago, Happy Lizard said:

if it just boils down to “women sleep with hot men”

Women sleep with whoever is convenient. Just being near women is enough to get laid.

90% of game is just being near women consistently. The rest is minutia.

Notice that guys who whine about not getting laid are not around women consistently. They whine but are never around to fuck. She is not going to hunt you down to fuck.

Attractive means all factors factored in.

Edited Tuesday at 01:29 PM by Leo Gura

[Jodistrict]

5 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Women sleep with whoever is convenient. Just being near women is enough to get laid.

90% of game is just being near women consistently. The rest is minutia.

Notice that guys who whine about not getting laid are not around women consistently. They whine but are never around to fuck. She is not going to hunt you down to fuck.

Attractive means all factors factored in.

As an enthusiastic yogin, I can verify that.   And yoga has huge health benefits you don’t get standing in a nightclub developing tinnitus.  I think John Anthony is great exposing all his fellow grifters.  Why would anyone be against this?  The more the better.

Here is a link were is going to explain his departure from youtube.

https://rumble.com/v71h4e0-i-got-banned-on-youtube...heres-why..html?e9s=src_v1_cw&playlist_id=watch-history

[Raze]

His backup channel just got taken down.

I also reported his Instagram account. 

[Leo Gura]

@Raze Your eager participation in cancellation is disturbing.

[Raze]

32 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

@Raze Your eager participation in cancellation is disturbing.

This guy is a potentially dangerous scammer who has destroyed countless lives 

[AION]

@Raze I watched his backup account videos and I saw nothing disturbing or dangerous. 

[Emerald]

On 11/8/2025 at 3:05 AM, Natasha Tori Maru said:

@Emerald I too am slightly confused with your take here. There may be a nuance or context you are operating from that hasn't been stated.

If a woman consensually sleeps with a man - she must perceive him as attractive. Unconscious or conscious.

Whether that be looks, social status, intellect, wit, charm, humor. Something in his character is attracting her.

Whether it is low consciousness (she has anxious attachment and is attracted to avoidant men, she has had trauma and mistakes love for adrenaline, she has low self esteem and negging makes her approval seeking) attraction or high consciousness does not matter.

There is still something there attracting her. That she is matching to within the man.

Unless you are referring to the sort of axis relating solely to the physical - IE a woman will sleep with a man who she finds physically unappealing due to his humor, intellect etc. But this is still attraction to the man. 

My perspective comes from a woman who has never slept with a man I found unattractive. And I have experienced no sexual assault. And my frame is one of enthusiastic consent with the above. 

I can only think of outlier cases being exclusions. IE a woman feeling she owes it to the man but doesn't like/feel attracted to him. Or feeling guilted into sex. 

What I'm saying is that I have known plenty of unattractive men who have had plenty of sex just because they were social and persistent. I experienced this in my hometown that there were plenty of unattractive guys (physically and/or personality-wise) hooking up and getting laid, just because they're social.

So, if a guy has a low body count or high body count, it doesn't mean much about his level of attractiveness.

But that was social circle "game".

But even moreso with pick-up, to me, it means far more about his level of pushiness and audacity than it does about his level of attractiveness.

When I was 20 years old, I had a period of time where my sexual boundaries were awful because I'd experienced a lot of recent traumas and I had a poor social support system where I really didn't have anyone in my life... neither friends or family. And I had just gotten out of a terrible relationship. 

It was a time where I was very alone in the world.

So, during that period of time, it happened several times that a guy would invite me to hang out.. and I found myself not being able to turn down the company because of the position that I was in, despite knowing what his intentions were. I would just rationalize that "I can hang out because I'll say no to his advances." And then, he'd make advances towards me and I'd either cave right away because I wanted to feel close to someone... or (with pushy guys) I'd say no the first few times he'd ask but cave because of the position that I had put myself in... and preferring to feel more agency in the situation if he continued not taking no for an answer.

But I was only physically attracted to about half of those guys... and only mildly. And I didn't have any kind of deep attraction to any of them. They were just there in a time where I was alone and had just gone through a lot of things.

So, when I hear of a guy who's very successful at sleeping with women, I don't see it as meaning anything about the guy's level of attractiveness.

I just think that it stands to reason that there are plenty of women out there with poor sexual boundaries for a variety of reasons or simply more desire for varied sexual encounters. And audacious guys just try their hand at lot at figuring out who's willing.

It's kind of like if you're playing Jenga. You don't have to get particularly good at dislodging the stuck bricks (in this metaphor, that requires actual attractiveness). You just have to look for the loose bricks... which is easy if you're persistent and audacious at checking for them.

And having had a period of time where I was a loose brick, there were motives outside of attraction that were making me open to sleeping with those guys.

And probably a sizable minority women are either struggling with sexual boundaries like I was or are just very sexually motivated themselves towards hook-ups.

That's why I don't see a man's number of sexual partners as meaning anything about his level of attractiveness.

I've known very attractive men with just a few sexual partners. And I've known very unattractive men who are sleeping with everyone and their mother.

[Emerald]

17 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

Women sleep with whoever is convenient. Just being near women is enough to get laid.

90% of game is just being near women consistently. The rest is minutia.

Notice that guys who whine about not getting laid are not around women consistently. They whine but are never around to fuck. She is not going to hunt you down to fuck.

100%

If a man is socializing with women, he will have opportunities present themselves periodically to sleep with a woman.

[Raze]

2 hours ago, AION said:

@Raze I watched his backup account videos and I saw nothing disturbing or dangerous. 

Channel was removed for ban evasion, not the video content.

He’s dangerous because of behavior he does off-channel or in old videos that are long gone.

Edited 16 hours ago by Raze

[Ryan M]

9 hours ago, Raze said:

This guy is a potentially dangerous scammer who has destroyed countless lives 

Guy literally made my life better. About to set up a Gofundme for him 

[How to be wise]

On 11/11/2025 at 1:26 PM, Leo Gura said:

Women sleep with whoever is convenient. Just being near women is enough to get laid.

90% of game is just being near women consistently. The rest is minutia.

Notice that guys who whine about not getting laid are not around women consistently. They whine but are never around to fuck. She is not going to hunt you down to fuck.

Attractive means all factors factored in.

Does that mean that the cleaner at a women's clothing store is getting laid? lol

[Leo Gura]

5 minutes ago, How to be wise said:

Does that mean that the cleaner at a women's clothing store is getting laid? lol

Cleaners don't socialize with customers, so no.

But the sale's clerk is getting laid.

It is not enough to be near women, you have to socialize with them.

Edited 7 hours ago by Leo Gura

[How to be wise]

2 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Cleaners don't socialize with customers, so no.

But the sale's clerk is getting laid.

It is not enough to be near women, you have to socialize with them.

So are you admitting that '90% of game is just being near women consistently. The rest is minutia.' is wrong?

[Leo Gura]

8 minutes ago, How to be wise said:

So are you admitting that '90% of game is just being near women consistently. The rest is minutia.' is wrong?

Don't be a smartass.

Don't look at the finger, look at what the finger is pointing to.

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

Johny was a degenerate coomer drunk and I bet probably 3/4 of his lays or even more were from hookers, he's also been with a trans with a dick allegedly lmao

His wife is a prostitute too lmao

Edited 6 hours ago by NewKidOnTheBlock

[Leo Gura]

1 minute ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

Johny was a degenerate coomer drunk and I bet probably 3/4 of his lays or even more were from hookers, he's also been with a trans with a dick allegedly lmao

His wife is a prostitute too lmao

So what?

Not a reason to cancel him.

[NewKidOnTheBlock]

9 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

So what?

Not a reason to cancel him.

Idk, I don't really care about the cancelation part of this topic, let the offended people hold the pitchforks, I just wanted to highlight certain facts that I find kinda funny, in a typical provocative manner

[Butters]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

It is not enough to be near women, you have to socialize with them.

My neighbor flashed me.