Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Hardkill

Is “Women only want the top 10 - 20%” actually true offline?

7 posts in this topic

I've been contemplating on the notion that “women only want the top 20%” meme and I now find that to be really misleading. It seems to mostly describe app dynamics (photo-first, inbox floods, safety filters, status amplification). Offline, in socially dense contexts (recurring mixed-gender scenes, warm introductions, real third places), the old forces still run the show: taste diversity, multi-factor attraction, repetition, vouching, assortative matching, and satisficing.

That’s why, historically, most men (not 100%) ended up with partners by mid-life. Also, paying for sex is a minority behavior, and even among men who’ve ever paid, most of their encounters are still unpaid.

For premodern settings, “most men had sex by mid-life”—typically ~90%+ in many regions—while ever partnered ranged roughly ~80–95% depending on marriage system (lowest where late marriage or polygyny left more men single).

For modern settings, like in the past, most men have had sex by mid-life (often ~90–97%), and most will have ever partnered—but the age it happens and the share who never marry vary more now by region and economy than ever before.

Two things seem true and in tension:

  1. App markets look extremely top-heavy; lots of men feel invisible.
  2. Historically and across many countries, most men eventually have sex and many partner by mid-life (even average/below-average guys).

How do you reconcile these? My current hypothesis: the 20% vibe is mostly platform structure (photo sorting, message overload, safety screening), while offline contexts (warm intros, repeated contact, assortative matching) broaden who gets chosen. If you disagree, what data (not anecdotes) best shows the 20% dynamic holds offline?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No in person the average woman dates the average man. If you want particularly attractive women then sure being in the top 10% yourself helps. 

 


Owner of creatives community all around Canada as well as a business mastermind 

Follow me on Instagram @Kylegfall <3

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What does it matter? Go in the top percent anyways just for yourself and then you'll see what happens with women by extension 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dating apps are so skewed because mostly men are on them anyways. It's just the path of least resistance so of course people will take them even less seriously.

Any pilled videos that reference dating apps honestly need to touch grass, it's giving a narrow perspective.

I think it becomes a toxic trap with guys that are chronically online. If they buy into the 20% narrative- then they've got a toxic idea imprinted in them before even going out into the world. They'll make assumptions off faulty data.

Edited by Puer Aeternus

Hi- Hiii..

I'm tadpole. I am absolute tadpole.

Infinite ponds in all directions. What sound does a tadpole make? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that offline, average women date average men, and that apps skew attention. The “top 20%” thing mostly describes app attention, not offline selection. Two truths can coexist:

Boosting your own package (health, style, social skills, purpose) helps a ton—do it for you.

In recurring, talk-friendly scenes with warm intros, assortative matching and mere exposure kick in, and most guys do fine without being “top 10%.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would put all these toxic cluts in the same category as Russian propoghanda. Its like fake ideas being put into the minds of young people maliciously to make them angry or feel worthless. All the 6 foot and over only posts all the other posts are all put in the minds of people on purpose in the same way Russia would use propaganda against an enemy country.


Sometimes it's the journey itself that teaches/ A lot about the destination not aware of/No matter how far/
How you go/How long it may last/Venture life, burn your dread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with other posts on especially apps and bias through them.

Another reason is the whole influencer stuff, the dating coaches, the relationship advice, the how to get laid videos etc etc. 

All this crap did not exist when I was young, before smartphone, YouTube, insta etc.  Channels, coaches and content as above did not or barely exist, and it was fine. Nobody needed all that advice, analysis, all this "this is how men and woman are and how to get them to love/fuck you"

When I was young, nobody was talking about this stuff much and all kind of girls and all kind of guys and girls got a relationship or other romantic stuff going on.

I bet a large percentage of users here doesn't know these times, they grew up with all this social media brain washing. It's creating more insecurities, anxiety like @hojo says.

You might think all this information helps you but no more often than not it just creates bullshit believes systems, puts you in your head too much and it's making things worse.

All this Dating content reminds me of this 

 

Advertising sells you things that that you don't need and can't afford, that are overpriced, and that don't work. And they do it by exploiting your fears and insecurities, and if you don't have any, they happily give you some.

Edited by theleelajoker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0