Leo's Blog Discussion Mega-Thread

[Vynce]

8 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

@Husseinisdoingfine I study human pervertry.

What 3 courses of study would you add to classic university curricula if your were to decide on that? 

Maybe

Crocodilism = study of survival dynamics

Ratism = study of human „ratishness“.

Kangarooism = study of infinity

??

[Rafael Thundercat]

18 minutes ago, Vynce said:

What 3 courses of study would you add to classic university curricula if your were to decide on that? 

Maybe

Crocodilism = study of survival dynamics

Ratism = study of human „ratishness“.

Kangarooism = study of infinity

??

Make sense, Kangarros females have 2 vaginas, so two uterus, it means they can be permanetly pregnant. The small fetus climb to one of the tits inside the pouch and stay connected to the tit till reach maturity. Sometimes the baby is out the pouch and inside there is another kangoo in mini format. So kangoos are infinite. 

[Rafael Thundercat]

12 hours ago, Butters said:

Exactly. This is why I'm moving to Thailand to date a ladyboy, your blog post made me obsessed with this idea. 

You get the best of both worlds: the beauty of a woman with the sense of a man. 

And cock. 

New Kink stage opened, go ahead and have funnn hehe

[Vynce]

1 hour ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Make sense, Kangarros females have 2 vaginas, so two uterus, it means they can be permanetly pregnant. The small fetus climb to one of the tits inside the pouch and stay connected to the tit till reach maturity. Sometimes the baby is out the pouch and inside there is another kangoo in mini format. So kangoos are infinite. 

Wait till you find out how a human baby is the lower-dimensional fractal of its human mother. 

[Thought Art]

Saws post on Osho but it seems to have disappeared. 

[Butters]

1 hour ago, Thought Art said:

Saws post on Osho but it seems to have disappeared. 

I just got to watching this 

 

[Leo Gura]

20 hours ago, Butters said:

And cock. 

[Butters]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

That's ladyboyphobic. 

What's the difference between a large clitoris and a micropenis on a ladyboy? 

I admit that the ones in the documentary bragging about their giant cocks was offputting, which made it all the more odd that the guys dating them call themselves straight. The final giveaway was the dude saying "I'm top, she's bottom". Using that terminology is pretty gay tbh. 

Edited June 22, 2025 by Butters

[Rafael Thundercat]

Mormons and MLM

I thought every american knew that Utah is the Mecca of MLM

Years ago a uncle of mine told me about this big storage places of several MLMs, even Stephen Covey products, in his case his bussiness was about the 7 habits and sellimg agendas and jornals.etc.. 

I myself almost enter one via my mother, the brad was called Forever21, a brand of foods made with Aloe Vera. For me is easy to see why mormons love this schemes, they are about proseletizing and gathering new members for the church so just apply the same scheme of selling beliefs to sell products.

If MLM and Ideology and Survival goes hand to hand I would question, if monkeys would open an MLM among them how would work, imagine a MLM of banana products.

[Puer Aeternus]

8 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

If MLM and Ideology and Survival goes hand to hand I would question, if monkeys would open an MLM among them how would work, imagine a MLM of banana products.

Maaaaate. Shush. Don't give them ideas.

Don't tell the missionaries. I'd like go South America and experience the Amazon in pristine condition.

Macheteing through the underbrush into a society of banana cult pyramid scheming primates would soil my childhood dream. 

[Yeah Yeah]

Why do we have just the two part interview by Leo Gura such as Curt Jaimungal ... Like interviews like that is gold man and then you spill out truth and hypotheticals and all that stuff man idk can I pay for an interview one on own damn dude like for an hour to an hour and a half I'd have to come up with a list of questions probably but idk like I've watched a lot of your content and always waiting around the notification bell for the next vid just putting it out there ❤️

[RendHeaven]

On 6/22/2025 at 2:43 PM, Miguel1 said:

@Natasha Tori Maru You are just being a pervert 

literally 4D chess right here ugh

[Natasha Tori Maru]

1 hour ago, RendHeaven said:

literally 4D chess right here ugh

Has access to the tesseract, all chess moves exist simultaneously. The perfect move exists, just like all the ones that hit like a wet noodle. Drop the needle at the perfect point on the spinning record of existence

The witty banter on the forums is 90% of the entertainment!

Edited June 23, 2025 by Natasha Tori Maru
Apparently words are hard rn, pre-coffee

[MuadDib]

I wish myioko was here to comment on all the recent Mormon posts, lol. Sadly she stopped posting years ago because she couldn't handle the grating misogyny that courses through the veins of this place and didn't want any of her art assosciated with it. It's never going to change. Men are too self decieved and self biased.

[MuadDib]

Some of my musings on the Liver King post:
Notice the connection between pollution of the information ecosystem and massive profits. Contemplate why the two go together. How are they connected? Why does polluting the information ecosystem generate so much profit?

At first glance, it seems absurd how a falsehood can outearn accuracy when accuracy is what keeps societies, markets and science running. Digital platforms, advertising markets and human psychology are all wired in ways that let “dirty” information such rumour, hype, outrage, half-truth circulate more cheaply, rapidly and “stickily” than well sourced facts. Profit flows to the polluter as "truth" has structural disadvantages.

Truth here is pragmatic rather than metaphysical: a claim is “true” when it corresponds to observable reality and survives a good faith process of public checking (peer review, investigative reporting, replication, etc.). That process is resource intensive. (Slow editors, lab equipment, legal review, travel, cross-checking, as well as general education) Long-term damages are often offloaded onto others.

Informational health is the net capacity of a community to model reality accurately enough to make sound decisions and draw valid conclusions and extrapolate from the available information. A healthy ecosystem fosters feedback loops (critique, correction, transparency) that keep collective models aligned with the "real" world.

Short term, it is profitable for the polluter to bypass the friction of truth and hijack more primitive urges; however, long-term costs are severe, as over a long horizon, healthy information ecosystems do support higher aggregate wealth (functioning markets, public health, stable democracies, etc.).

Truth’s handicap is not inherent dullness; it is systemic mispricing. Digital markets currently treat attention as gold and veracity as sand. Until the external costs of polluted information are factored onto the polluter’s balance sheet, or until platforms and audiences reward epistemic hygiene, dirty content will continue to generate private fortunes while the collective bears the cost.

The question, then, is no longer why pollution pays, but whether we’re willing to pay the higher up front costs of a cleaner public sphere, or keep paying the hidden, compounded costs of letting the filth flow. Polluting the information ecosystem is NOT profitable in the end.

[Leo Gura]

@MuadDib Good.

30 minutes ago, MuadDib said:

Polluting the information ecosystem is NOT profitable in the end

Not profitable for who?

You're overlooking the relativity of the profit. It's very profitable for certain people at the expense of the collective. Just like chemical pollution.

Chemical pollution is profitable. Which is why it exists. But profit is relative to a who.

Edited June 24, 2025 by Leo Gura

[MuadDib]

I'm not overlooking the relativity of profit, as stated:
 

41 minutes ago, MuadDib said:

Short term, it is profitable for the polluter

You are overlooking the relativity of the definition of profit. 
The Liver King's millions aren't going to be worth much when the net effect of eroded public trust, international business relations, and a corroded political climate results in his ice lake and local bank being nuked by Iran. Loosely speaking, that's a loss.

[RendHeaven]

1 hour ago, MuadDib said:

The question, then, is no longer why pollution pays, but whether we’re willing to pay the higher up front costs of a cleaner public sphere

The answer is no.

They would rather sink the ship because they know they have first access to lifeboats.

17 minutes ago, MuadDib said:

The Liver King's millions aren't going to be worth much when the net effect of eroded public trust, international business relations, and a corroded political climate results in his ice lake and local bank being nuked by Iran. Loosely speaking, that's a loss.

They'll find a way to survive. And we won't. And they know that. So this trajectory will continue.

[ZhenZhenZhen]

Corruption is a low-hanging fruit

[Starlight321]

What I wrote down from my contemplation is mainly that it is very profitable for the audiance and the person who promotes it as well as the platform and advertisers because it panders to the biases of shallow , underdeveloped low conscious people who are often too lazy to put in the effort emotional and cognitiv to understand the real relationships of the subject and seeing that you're probable so wrong that you'd habe to create a basis of knowledge from scratch.

It sells unattainable pipe dreams while leaving out the real causes for the results which might include genetics, upbringing, socioeconomical matrix, manipulation and lying.

Other factors that play into it are that many people are low iq and/or uneducated so that they cannot differentiate between a scientist talking mumbo jumbo and  a crack pot spitballing scientific sounding words. 

Moreover people don't think about the things they hear or question it especially if it confirms their biases and because they love their phantasies and hate deconstruction of them. It also caters to the feeling of knowing stuff and the fear if one doesn't know.

It helps avoiding facing core issues like insecurity and traumas and deying their existance.

Also the growing distrust of mainstream media and trust of alternativ media plays into it.

For the streamer it is profitable because he can milk his audiance, reinforces his own phantasies of greatness and feeding his ego and ego needs. Especially our hype culture and the structure of social media plays into that where new exiting and shallow things are promoted while hindering access to more accurate and dry solutions, addicting the mind in the process.

It is profitible for the advertisors because they get eyeballs and find a pool of shallow, low developed target audiance whe is eager to buy stuff.

The media platform profits from it because its all designed to keep the viewer as long as possible behind the display and make money with the adds while polluting his mind.

What I noticed on a deeper level is how every mind must fit in its niche to work for all of it.

After reading the prior comments I add that it's also not profitable in the sense that it pollutes the knowledge ecosystem which makes our society more stupid and often hateful and it becomes harder to discern truth from falsehood. The polltion of our minds and the deeds originating from it are also destructive and promote selfishness

Truth is nessesary for real solutions like facing your real motives for wanting to be pumped up or for the mechanics of getting a mate, skills or how reality really works in general.

Have I missed other aspects?

Edited June 24, 2025 by Starlight321