molosku

Member
  • Content count

    626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by molosku


  1.  

    Just... wow. If you are not into nerding out over synths, watch the first minute and then skip to 6 minute mark. Mind, body, electricity and music are collapsing into unity and the result is... acid house? I'm not sure but I'm loving it. Is this the future of music?

    It's so funny to see how baffled he himself is on how effortless it is for him, how fluid his experience is. This made my day if nothing else... :P


  2. You say yourself you have never had a mystical experience, yet you have this elaborate chain of reasoning and logic that constructs your understanding of reality. It's good to recognize and be honest about that, so you can always ground your speculation and contemplation to that fact: I really don't know. That not-knowing is a fantastic tool with which you can contemplate deeper: "why do I hold all these beliefs and constructs, if I at the same time I aknowledge I have no first hand experience of these things? What is the force that holds them together?" 

    "From my perspective the world is too miserable for this reality to be a manifestation of pure goodness" 

    Exactly. Who is this "me" whos perspective is full of misery? This is a perspective you need to challenge, if you are really passionate about truth. Is the world really miserable, or is it you who projects that misery on the world? You need to be REALLY clear about this, there must be no error made here, otherwise all your inquiries on to suffering will be stained by a mistake in thought. 

    "If I was on ecstasy all day and believed myself to be invincible, and had infinite means of manifesting realities, I would most likely end up creating a fair variety of monstrosities along the way. How can you be sure your life isn't a manifestation of this sort? To me this seems to be a plausible explanation for life as I know it" 

    Have you applied an equal amount of scepticism to this worldview? I would be REALLY carefull to state that anything is plausible. Plausible only means "i dont know it, but i believe its believable". 

    Try not to mix your own perspective to be what reality really actually is, as all perspectives are limited. 100,000,000 years of torture would be HEAVEN to someone who enjoys pain, a masochist, and for that person it would be obvious why reality is made of Love. What a wondeful situation to be in! 

    In the end you have to be able to answer the ultimate question: who are you? If this is not clear you can never be sure where you are really grounding your understanding. Before that, everything you said is just speculation. Dont be afraid to throw everything into thw fire, after all, it's lighter to walk your path with less baggage. 

    Cheers! 

     


  3. @ardacigin

    How much time you are spending on average meditating per week nowadays? I remember reading your older posts where you said you were cloking (to me) crazy hours. Would you say that there is a personal, semi-definite "loss of returns" after some point? Also, nice post :) Nowadays I just come to the forum to check out what you and Leo are posting and what crazy shit is locked this time lol :D

     


  4. Time is like a book, your dog dies on page 100, you ask your question on page 130.

    On what page does the book itself exist? Nonsensical question, as the book is not bound by the limitations of the story contained within. You and your dog are in the book, and you will always be in the book at the same time, just not on the same page. The existence of the pages is the now, and that is why you and the dog exist NOW eventhough in the story the dog has died. 

    Further than that, you ARE the book, but right now the book's story is being perceived by the charecter sausagehead that gets born at page 10 and dies at page 500. 

    When you wake up, you realize your bookness and the fact that you cant die, as the real self, the book, has never even born to begin with. 


  5. 5 minutes ago, arlin said:

    For example if you consider an absolute that god is self conscious, does thay also mean that god is not self conscious? 

    Yes, the unconsciousness is YOU! You are god but you are unconscious of that, so in that way there is a duality to god's consciousness of itself. That is, in a way, the non-absolute. When you transcend that, you discover the real absolute, where there is no counter part to it's absoluteness. Watch leos video on dualism, it's a pretty good explanation.


  6. 3 hours ago, Shaun said:

    There seems to be one key difference between Leo and Rupert. Rupert doesn't view other people and himself as imaginary cardboard cutouts in my experience. He refutes this and instead points out that other people do have their own experience just like me. Anyone who comes to him with this worldview is politely and effectively corrected. 

    Just because he does not phrase it that way does not mean ultimately they don't agree. Leo continually dresses non-duality on provocative and radical clothes, it's a teaching style thing. "Imaginary cardboard cutouts" starts to smell like solipsism for me, has leo used that exact phrase somewhere?


  7. 2 hours ago, Scholar said:

    It's so funny how his entire personality is structured after the rationalist ideal that he is clinging to. Arrogance concealed as humility, dogma played up as reason.

    The way he speaks, the words he chooses, even the tone of his voice are all part of the act. Even his pose during the interview.

     

    The reason itself is not actually the problem with rationalists, it is the attachment to trying to come off as reasonable at all costs, even at the cost of truth. I can't believe how cliche this guy is, it's like they got him right out of the rationalists factory. :D

     

    This is the kind of person who would have been preaching catholicism during the "enlightenment" revolution, scoffing at the ignorance of the anti-churchlings. Exact same tone of voice, exact same pose, just that the story is a different one.

    Well put. I can't get over that tie, though. 


  8. 1 hour ago, Joel3102 said:

    Dawkins has just gone on Joe Rogan, might be worth a look to see how the materialistic mind thinks. Rogan asks him about psychedelics around the 8:00 mark, and around 11:00 he seems certain consciousness is the brain :P

    Are you conscious if consciousness is in the brain or not? Do you REALLY know? I would be careful approaching this work with too much certainty, if I'm not really sure to the guts-level. Surely Richard Dawkins is not merely an example of flawed thinking. 

    That DNA-tie is quite a statement :D Reminds me of Christians wearing cross-neclases. It is evident before 10-minute mark how utterly clueless he is about spirituality though(trying to fit punishing-the-body spiritual practises into some biological models).

     


  9. Imo the biggest hole in solipsism is that it does not reveal what you are. You are you all the time, so it must be possible to know what you are, but solipsism does not address this. Even if you believe in solipsism, you can still inquire on what you are, and if you are lucky the truth can be revealed to you, and at that instant the notion of solipsism dies. Until it is picked up by the ego again ;)


  10. @Rohit N

    In the same way you would not judge flowers for blooming, it's silly to judge the world for justin-biebering. Fundamentally you are not conscious of what you are and who Justin Bieber is, so judgemental attitude is possible. 

    I suggest you sit down with a pen and some paper and write as a contemplation topic: "why I fear being judged?" and ultimately, "what is fear?".

    If you haven't already watched Leos video on fear, do check it out. Also check out his video: All Criticism Is Untenable. 

    I feel it's one of the nicest milestones in early self-development when you start to notice how much better you feel after dropping some major judgements you keep making. Your mind won't like it, because judging is a form of entertainment for the ego. It's similar to dropping a TV habit.