Solipsism->nonduality ->Ontological Nihilism

[Davino]

57 minutes ago, Someone here said:

For me personally and honestly..I just enjoy cracking my mind over metaphysical mumbo-jumbo.  It's one of the things im passionate about in life .

You are the ultimate arm chair philosopher then. I think I understood you better now

 

[Osaid]

1 minute ago, Davino said:

You are the ultimate arm chair philosopher then.

CEO of mental masturbation 

Edited February 7 by Osaid

[Someone here]

4 minutes ago, Osaid said:

CEO of mental masturbation 

What about you then?  CEO of physical masturbation?  

How many times you coomed today?  Must been 4 bare minimum. 

[Davino]

JesusChrist on Solipsism:

Quote

One of the teachers of the law came and heard them debating. Noticing that Jesus had given them a good answer, he asked him:

'Of all the commandments, which is the most important?'

'The most important one,' answered Jesus, ' is this:

'Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one. Love the Lord your God with all your Heart and with all your Soul and with all your Mind and with all your Strength.'

The second is this:

'Love your neighbor as yourelf.'

There is no commandment greater than these

(Mark 12:28-31)

 

Edited February 7 by Davino

[Osaid]

22 minutes ago, Someone here said:

What about you then?  CEO of physical masturbation?  

How many times you coomed today?  Must been 4 bare minimum. 

Jokes aside, I really do think it is a serious issue, for you.

Doesn't hurt to be real with yourself and others once in a while. Maybe there are benefits?

[Someone here]

25 minutes ago, Osaid said:

Jokes aside, I really do think it is a serious issue, for you.

Doesn't hurt to be real with yourself and others once in a while. Maybe there are benefits?

Sorry but that is just utter nonsense. I'm really not baby-sitting anyone on here. I'm a hardcore Truth seeker. I identify as that. And I ask you to respect this. If you don't like me and my threads simply ignore them . Simple ..right  ? A piece of cake .

 

[Osaid]

18 minutes ago, Someone here said:

Sorry but that is just utter nonsense. I'm really not baby-sitting anyone on here. I'm a hardcore Truth seeker. I identify as that. And I ask you to respect this. If you don't like me and my threads simply ignore them . Simple ..right  ? A piece of cake .

 

I didn't say it because I don't like you. I'm saying it because I care about you.

You obviously enjoy making these topics, I don't mean to necessarily take that away from you, but it is worth questioning why it is enjoyable for you. What does it do for you?

[Someone here]

13 minutes ago, Osaid said:

I'm saying it because I care about you.

What are you my mom or something jk 😂? 

13 minutes ago, Osaid said:

but it is worth questioning why it is enjoyable for you. What does it do for you?

Learning to an extent is NOT about applicability or pragmatic value  philosophy transplantation is literally love of wisdom for its own sake.

Also ... learning itself is also about making a person better than they were before. It’s not just about how it can apply to the real world..that’s boring..It’s like a mental exercise. 

And come on ..you as well indulge in philosophical discourse often on here .so don't play the innocent angel .

 

[Osaid]

2 minutes ago, Someone here said:

What are you my mom or something jk 😂? 

Learning to an extent is NOT about applicability or pragmatic value  philosophy transplantation is literally love of wisdom for its own sake.

Also ... learning itself is also about making a person better than they were before. It’s not just about how it can apply to the real world..that’s boring..It’s like a mental exercise. 

And come on ..you as well indulge in philosophical discourse often on here .so don't play the innocent angel .

 

Whatever makes you happy.

[Rafael Thundercat]

On 04/02/2024 at 11:48 PM, Someone here said:

Answer me this please .

why is there something rather than nothing? 

Not a single answer can be provided coherently other than that there simply isn't. 

There isn't! Tada!! 

So supposedly  that's the universe's ultimate question. Let's dig into it. And prove that reality doesn't actually exist lol 

Ponder this : how is it possible that a physical universe made of physical actual "real" matter can exist at all in God's earth?  Yeah its impossible. Notice that your experience right now is an impossible phenomenon. Infinity is the impossible made possible as Leo calls it. 

Yup..it's absolutely nuts when ya get it .

Dude do more psycadelics. People think psycadelics activate the whole brain but some studies suggest that actualy it work well because it shut down this useless intelectualization. Even I a moderate dose of mushrooms you would not need or even be able to construct all this house of cards. Existence is all there is, Infinite existence

[Rafael Thundercat]

This section of this Forum is the worst section ever. 

[Princess Arabia]

8 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

This section of this Forum is the worst section ever. 

Hush

[Carl-Richard]

18 hours ago, Princess Arabia said:

Can you explain the sameness in these two sentences. You said God experiences every experience and that God is every experience. So, God is experiencing experiences?

In the first sentence, God is anthropomorphized. In the second, God is objectified. Whichever you prefer. I thought about making the sentences the same, but I just left it like that for some reason. Maybe it happened because God "thought" this was a lesson that was needed (that God can be made both being-like and object-like and still be God) 😉

By the way, I usually prefer objectifying God, as there is to my knowledge little evidence that God thinks and feels like a human "by itself" so to speak, although I won't discard such a possibility. God as "an empty field which's excitations are experiences" is a description I like.

Edited February 8 by Carl-Richard

[Princess Arabia]

33 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

In the first sentence, God is anthropomorphized. In the second, God is objectified. Whichever you prefer. I thought about making the sentences the same, but I just left it like that for some reason. Maybe it happened because God "thought" this was a lesson that was needed (that God can be both be made being-like and object-like and still be God) 😉

By the way, I usually prefer objectifying God, as there is to my knowledge little evidence that God thinks and feels like a human "by itself" so to speak, although I won't discard such a possibility. God as "an empty field which's excitations are experiences" is a description I like.

Ok, thank you.

[Razard86]

5 hours ago, Carl-Richard said:

In the first sentence, God is anthropomorphized. In the second, God is objectified. Whichever you prefer. I thought about making the sentences the same, but I just left it like that for some reason. Maybe it happened because God "thought" this was a lesson that was needed (that God can be both be made being-like and object-like and still be God) 😉

By the way, I usually prefer objectifying God, as there is to my knowledge little evidence that God thinks and feels like a human "by itself" so to speak, although I won't discard such a possibility. God as "an empty field which's excitations are experiences" is a description I like.

Humans don't have emotions, God imagining itself as a human has emotions. Humans take credit for what God is doing. So yes God has emotions because it imagines emotions. What should be asked is why did God create emotions and what purpose do they serve.

This will explain why there is no problem anthropomorphizing God. Maybe just maybe it makes sense to do it because God created emotions so it could experience and discover anew what Love is.

That's my 2 cents anyway.

Edited February 8 by Razard86

[Davino]

Facets into the jewell of Solipsism.

The minute is tuned in the video for you. Leo has answered all these questions in strenuous detail in his work. Here is an example:

Division vs Unity for more on this. 

Edited February 8 by Davino

[Carl-Richard]

3 hours ago, Razard86 said:

Humans don't have emotions, God imagining itself as a human has emotions. Humans take credit for what God is doing. So yes God has emotions because it imagines emotions. What should be asked is why did God create emotions and what purpose do they serve.

This will explain why there is no problem anthropomorphizing God. Maybe just maybe it makes sense to do it because God created emotions so it could experience and discover anew what Love is.

That's my 2 cents anyway.

Everything exists within God. But if emotions can be said to exist and humans can be said to exist, then human emotions can be said to exist within human egoic bubbles. The question is whether human-like thoughts and emotions only exist within these human egoic bubbles or whether they exist outside of them as well, sort of like a white bearded man in the clouds looking down on Earth.

Edited February 8 by Carl-Richard

[Razard86]

54 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

Everything exists within God. But if emotions can be said to exist and humans can be said to exist, then human emotions can be said to exist within human egoic bubbles. The question is whether human-like thoughts and emotions only exist within these human egoic bubbles or whether they exist outside of them as well, sort of like a white bearded man in the clouds looking down on Earth.

I don't think you can equivocate God having emotions to a bearded man in the sky. But yes God has emotions that is the point I am making. You aren't actually human, you are God cosplaying as a human. As such it isn't the human having the emotions, it is God.

Edited February 8 by Razard86

[Breakingthewall]

Solipsism is: only I exist and the people I talk to are imaginary and have no experience of their own. Reality is a set built by me as a god to deceive myself and play a game, out of love, boredom or whatever.

How to define this idea?

[OBEler]

On 6.2.2024 at 4:49 PM, Princess Arabia said:

Idk who or what you're referring to. I was simply stating how a shared video made me feel and why I couldn't watch it. Then a few comments were made regarding that. I don't know who is seeking attention.

I am referring to you.

You posted here in this thread 6 low quality low content posts in a row. That's a new record. 

How does it contribute to this topic how you feel about the voice of a video? The voice doesn't matter just listen to the content. No one here is interested in how you feel about the voice of a video.

The following posts were also not contributing to anything for the readers here but for your attention seeking. So please stop that in the future. Thanks

 

Edited February 8 by OBEler