The White Belt

Does Contemplation Need To Be A Formal Process?

11 posts in this topic

Hello, everyone!

 

Basically, I feel like i've been contemplating for years and years, since i've been a teenager.

Contemplating my life purpose, contemplating society as a whole, culture and more recently, reality.

I mostly do this when i'm walking somewhere, occasionally i'll switch to mindfulness, I will also do this listening to music, 'watching' TV, etc.

Should good contemplation need to be sat in a chair twiddling your mustache, or can it be as powerful when it's this informal?

 

Thanks, 

;-)


“In the beginner’s mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert’s there are few” 
― Shunryu Suzuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i think it's equally powerful when it's informal. I personally do it both ways and most of the time good contemplation just happens on it's own, it doesn't really matter wheter if it's formal or not :) 


Having no destination, I'm never lost. - Ikkyu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I once asked Peter Ralston how long he's been contemplating. He said, 24/7, his entire life from toddlerhood.

Try to imagine 100,000 hours of contemplation.

Now you get a taste of the magnitude of the achievement of the highest masters. It's inhuman.


You are God. You are Truth. You are Love. You are Infinity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@BeginnerActualizer Hello ! 

Sure, try to contemplate in every instant, but in my opinion, some sort of formal sitting practice is necessary at the start, in addition to informal contemplation. But informal contemplation is way better than no contemplation at all  !:)

Hereunder is a conversation between a master and his student that seems to adress the point  : 

S :  But since most of our time is spent in movement,  why not use movement as a form of meditation ? 

TR  :  I think you can't do that. At this point I have to be very orthodox. (Because the student is not yet advanced enough). You can't do that because it would be very convenient and there would be no discipline. Fo example, you have to set a time for sitting practice that is especially allocated for that practice. Whereas with the approach you suggest, you could just say , "Well I'm going to visit my girlfriend and I have to drive, so on my way to my girlfriend's, I'll use driving as meditation." 

S: But as long as it's mindful, why couldn't it be done?

TR: That approach of mindfulness becomes too utilitarian, too pragmatic-killing two birds with one stone. "That way I meditate and I get a chance to see my girlfriend at the end too". But something has to be given up somewhere. Some renunciation somewhere is necessary. One stone kills one bird.

 

Bear in mind this is provisional teaching, and when you're peter ralston there is no more difference between formal meditation and informal meditation :) so this is a teaching of provisional meaning ;)

Edited by Guivs
Typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That Alan Watts essay was really good ^  wow. Thanks for sharing it @cetus56


How to get to infinity? Divide by zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@outlandish Thanks. That was one of the first things I read on spirituality and it always stuck with me. It opened that first door to something much bigger than my mind could ever imagine. I read it again every so often just to recharge my spiritual batteries.:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I've bookmarked it and plan on going back to it too. Watts was a really wise man, at least when he spoke publicly and wrote. It's too bad he destroyed himself with booze.


How to get to infinity? Divide by zero.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 26/01/2017 at 10:21 PM, Leo Gura said:

I once asked Peter Ralston how long he's been contemplating. He said, 24/7, his entire life from toddlerhood.

Try to imagine 100,000 hours of contemplation.

Now you get a taste of the magnitude of the achievement of the highest masters. It's inhuman.

This is slightly misleading though, because Ralston didn't start pursuing Enlightenment until he was 21 (according to the Enlightenment Intensive book). I was surprised to read that he reached Enlightenment (on the questions What Am I? and What is Life?) on the Enlightenment Intensives. My impression was that he did it all on his own in solo contemplation. I'm guessing the bulk of his deeper contemplation was done after that?


"Find what you love and let it kill you." - Charles Bukowski

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Reality but you can contemplate existence without actually committing yourself to 'pursuing' enlightenment. 


“In the beginner’s mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert’s there are few” 
― Shunryu Suzuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@BeginnerActualizer Everything can turn into a contemplative practice.
I used to contemplate through art and maths when I was a young lil cute child.
Contemplation in a sense goes beyond thoughts. The base from contemplation is coming out of the void, direct experience.


Follow me on Instagram for quantum and energetic healing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now