actualizing25

Can you hallucinate objects/beings on psychedelics that can hurt you in "real life"?

85 posts in this topic

On 5/12/2020 at 3:52 PM, Serotoninluv said:

A mind contracted within “evidence”, “proof”, “definitions”, “agreement/disagreement” and “argumentation” is imprisoned.

It's amazing because a proponent of pseudoscience, dogma or quakery would say the same thing... (coming from a different place). A common stage blue Theist argument for Faith in God is that "Faith transcends evidence."

Ironically, this statement is correct in some ways... and yet the stage blue version of "Faith" usually boils down to unexamined bias.

Edited by RendHeaven

It's Love.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Someone here said:

Can anyone explain to me why a hallucination from a psychedelic drug can he taken as evidence against the materialism? 

Answer:

14 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

You guys are still looking at this all wrong. You are stuck in materialism and objectivity, which are nonsense.

Stop mentally masturbating and take a breakthrough dose. You will never get it otherwise. You are 1 million miles away from getting it. You think you are being clever and smart but you are just being foolish.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Someone here said:

What after the drug wears off?  You are back to the material paradigm!

Haha No.

10 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

The evidence is Awakening.

You will never get it without awakening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Red-White-Light said:

@Someone here I actually hallucinated and experiencing of my chakras aligning. I sat on the floor whilst on a psychedelic lotus position and felt each chakra align from my tail bone to top of my head. I then imagined a burst of energy moving from my Root chakra to my crown chakra, and I recorded it all on my phone. Reviewing the footage I realise I was just extending my spine and believing some energy was travelling through me. So it’s actually good to be skeptical. 

You are missing that you are watching that video in a lower stage of consciousness.

The same would happen if someone sober would watch you tripping. He will think you are just doing bullshit. But clarily if you are in higher state of consciousness your reality will be much different than to the one which is in a lower stage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/13/2020 at 0:26 AM, RendHeaven said:

It's amazing because a proponent of pseudoscience, dogma or quakery would say the same thing... (coming from a different place). A common stage blue Theist argument for Faith in God is that "Faith transcends evidence."

Ironically, this statement is correct in some ways... and yet the stage blue version of "Faith" usually boils down to unexamined bias.

Yes, this is were it gets tricky and thorny. And I can see how this appears. I spent many years immersed in evidence and rationale thinking. I loved watching the Atheist Experience, Street Epistemology and debates in which a rationale mind used evidence, logic and reason to overpower an irrational mind based on blind faith.

A couple things I’ve learned. . . Transcendence is not one over another. It is not rejecting one for another, it is incorporation. For example, if we climb to a mountain top and look down on the city, we see the whole city. All the buildings, people, animals, trash etc. We see everything and nothing is rejected. Similarly, a view transcendent to logic does not accept faith rather than logic - it includes both. 

Rather than “Faith transcends evidence”, I think it would be more accurate to say “ISness is prior to evidence”. Notice how “Faith transcends evidence” is a contextualization, followed by a whole dogma of contextualization. We know bring in ideas of god, spiritual literature, morality etc. . . . Yet I would say “ISness is prior to evidence” is different. Here there is no more contextualization after the statement. ISness is what ISness is. It’s Everything / Nothing. That’s it. . . . Technically. . .evidence, proof, argumentation, thought stories etc are all within what IS. In this respect, a mind engaged in logical concept construction is no different than a mind engaged in classical music. They are both the ISness of Now. A transcendent view can see this, yet some minds are contracted within the thought constructs and become immersed within the thought stories that their reality and identification becomes the thought stories - and there can be immense attachment and desire to thoughts and beliefs because for the survival of a self construct and a sense of grounding. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now