Autism Test

[Basman]

2 hours ago, integral said:

Might be because i struggled to make eye contact for most of my life and eye contact is torture.

Eye contact is like sex, its extremely intimate

Can relate. I look at the face in general. It depends on how focused I am on the interaction. Eye contact is personal.

[Sandhu]

22

[Clarence]

1 hour ago, Leo Gura said:

I got 32 on the eye test.

Those eyes are pretty ambiguous. Like reading tea leaves.

How long did it take you to complete the test?

I needed 870 seconds and scored 23/36. I thought I was rather good at reading facial expressions before taking that test 

[Talinn]

18

[Leo Gura]

9 minutes ago, Clarence said:

How long did it take you to complete the test?

I needed 870 seconds and scored 23/36. I thought I was rather good at reading facial expressions before taking that test 

573 seconds.

That eye test is a very good test of intuituon. You are not supposed to overthink it but feel with your gut.

I am very good at intuition.

Edited 2 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Pudgey]

I didn't take this one. I was professionally diagnosed earlier this year, eight standardized instruments. On every autism scale I land in the top 2–3% of the general population, and on restricted interests I'm at the 99.98th percentile, roughly 1 in 4,300. The number that explains the rest is camouflaging: 99.32nd percentile. 

[Talinn]

I took a complete autism-inventory in person and I was on the border for nearly all the markers..they told me they couldn't  really tell anything conclusive 

 

It was obvious to me that if I went to a random health care provider off the street I might get a more positive or negative conclusion.

[Rafael Thundercat]

34

[Psychonaut]

2 hours ago, LastThursday said:

ChatGPT has supplied the goods:

 

Epistemic Sadism Scale (ESS-20)

Instructions: Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with each statement. Answer according to your general tendencies, rather than a particular incident.

Response options:

5 — Highly agree

4 — Agree

3 — Neither agree nor disagree

2 — Disagree

1 — Highly disagree

 

Answer and then score according to the scale above. Questions marked R should be scored in reverse (i.e. 6-response number). 

 

Axis 1: Epistemic Dominance

The pleasure of possessing an informational or intellectual advantage over another person.

I enjoy knowing something important that another person does not.

Having information that gives me an advantage over someone else is satisfying.

I find it gratifying when someone realises that I understand something they do not.

I sometimes enjoy allowing someone to continue believing something when I know they are mistaken.

I prefer intellectual exchanges in which both people have an equal understanding of the subject. (R)

Axis 2: Intellectual Humiliation

The pleasure of exposing another person's ignorance, inadequacy, or intellectual vulnerability.

I enjoy watching someone struggle to defend a belief that I know is false.

It can be satisfying to expose someone's ignorance in front of other people.

I sometimes find it amusing when someone confidently makes a claim that I know is wrong.

I enjoy seeing someone realise that they have been intellectually outmatched.

I feel uncomfortable when someone is made to look foolish because of something they do not know. (R)

Axis 3: Epistemic Manipulation

The pleasure of controlling another person's access to information, understanding, or truth.

I find it satisfying to lead someone towards a conclusion without revealing that I am doing so.

I enjoy knowing how someone will react when they eventually discover the truth.

I sometimes find it pleasurable to let someone draw an incorrect conclusion from information I have given them.

I enjoy having control over when another person discovers something important.

I prefer to give people all the relevant information rather than control what they know. (R)

Axis 4: Epistemic Cruelty

The pleasure of causing psychological discomfort through the use of knowledge, truth, or intellectual advantage.

I sometimes enjoy telling someone a truth that I know will upset them.

Seeing someone become confused or distressed by something I have revealed can be pleasurable.

I enjoy making someone question a belief that is important to their sense of identity.

I sometimes find another person's intellectual discomfort more satisfying than the practical outcome of correcting them.

I would rather someone discover an uncomfortable truth in a supportive environment than have it exposed publicly. (R)

ChatGPT is a left-leaning pile of absolute garbage that has been poisoned by assholes in the states that infused it with their mind-virus of toxic garbage. If you are using ChatGPT for anything important, you are really ignorant. Go to claude.ai and use Sonnet 5.5 or upwards for any serious truth seeking work. Also you really need to learn how to ask the right questions to get the right answers. 

I spent two semesters studying psychology in my masters. So I know exactly how psychologists "work", how they think (simpletons). Most of the students are just capable of 1-dimensional thinking, they have no life-experience, some of the professors with 30-40 years experience are capable of 2-dimensional thinking (abstract thinking). I didn't meet a single person at the faculty capable of true 3-dimensional thinking. 

Edited 29 minutes ago by Psychonaut

[Psychonaut]

Look what I just found in my notes from this morning 

Spoiler

I think I fell into the same trap door that Leo also fell into a few years ago, hehe...

 

Edited 3 minutes ago by Psychonaut