Why is Omnipotence harder to realize than Omnipresence and Omniscience?

[Yimpa]

4 hours ago, CARDOZZO said:

This thread seems a fanfic.

For fucks sake, do you guys even work or do something real with your life?

Damn..

 

[Carl-Richard]

3 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

I don't know what you are saying.

 

Quote

Flat Ontology is a way of thinking that treats all entities in reality as equally real, without privileging one type over another. 

https://philosophyball.miraheze.org/wiki/Flat_Ontology

 

Quote

Flat ontology is a model for reality that says that all object, even those that are imagined, have the same degree of being-ness as any other object.

https://scalar.usc.edu/works/material_philosophy/flat-ontology

 

It's like consciousness itself, AND sense perceptions, AND concepts, are equally imagined. You don't seem to have an own "reality category" for each, unlike say most idealists worth listening to (who are not pure subjective idealists, skeptics, solipsists) who have a distinction between for example Consciousness/Truth and Maya/illusion (referring to sense perceptions, and perhaps concepts). And there is a hierarchy there; one is more real than the other. You don't seem to have that. "Whatever you imagine, that's reality". It's like kinda you're just floating out there, not very grounded in the everyday reality of stuff or human things.

The reason I only have two categories of "awakening" is because one of them is consciousness, the other is "sense perceptions" (energy, phenomena, a.k.a. illusion, Maya), and then I of course distinguish that from conceptual understanding (which is not awakening, but rather indeed conceptual understanding of reality). On the other hand, the way you seem to multiply the kinds of awakenings to essentially infinity, it just seems like you've collapsed awakening into the conceptual. Any distinction you can make, you can "awaken" to. Even my stinky shoes.

And why are consciousness vs sense perceptions vs concepts salient distinctions? Because they are central to how humans operate. And of course they have been salient to how people have described awakenings up until today. Awakening to consciousness (pure "knowing", which is ultimately formless), vs awakening to energy/phenomena/form/bliss, etc., they are quite distinguishable. One of them is a very fundamental but also abstract one, the other is a more concrete and embodied one (you can literally track it as movements of energy in the body, or how you relate with objects, the love you feel for them, their feeling of fullness or depth of intelligibility).

Edited 6 minutes ago by Carl-Richard