Is it Just Me or Has the Actualized.org Active User Community Shrunk of Late?

[integration journey]

I think also because Leo started posting less and less over the years  on YouTube 

Edited Sunday at 04:18 PM by integration journey

[LoneWonderer]

1 hour ago, integration journey said:

I think also because Leo started posting less and less over the years  on YouTube 

On the other hand blog content exploded! 

[LordFall]

Everything trends to 0 that is not marketed continuously. You would forget about coca-cola soon enough if they didn't have a $5 billion yearly marketing budget. 

Depends what Leo's goals are with the brand but he could launch a major marketing campaign to revitalize it. People complain about there being no women on the forum but he could easily make like pop culture which spiral dynamics stage are you quiz that leads to signing up for the site.

I think he previously disliked that angle but he has recently embraced short form content on his Instagram so perhaps he'll look into it. 

Edited yesterday at 02:14 AM by LordFall

[integration journey]

3 hours ago, LordFall said:

Everything trends to 0 that is not marketed continuously. You would forget about coca-cola soon enough if they didn't have a $5 billion yearly marketing budget. 

Depends what Leo's goals are with the brand but he could launch a major marketing campaign to revitalize it. People complain about there being no women on the forum but he could easily make like pop culture which spiral dynamics stage are you quiz that leads to signing up for the site.

I think he previously disliked that angle but he has recently embraced short form content on his Instagram so perhaps he'll look into it. 

What do you mean no women on the forum. One of the best moderators on here is a women 

[Basman]

We've effectively been in a content drought for half a decade now with Leo getting overall less views as well, which means the conversion into new forum users has lessened. A couple of dozen power users make up most of the community now and are seemingly unlikely to be replaced with new blood any time soon if they where to disappear. 

16 hours ago, integration journey said:

What do you mean no women on the forum. One of the best moderators on here is a women 

We only have about a handful of women, and they tend to be quiet atypical. You'd kinda have to be to stand this sausage party. Especially the PUA stuff. PUA tends to offend many women on some kind of quantum genetic level, like a cringe kryptonite. 

[Yimpa]

3 minutes ago, Basman said:

We only have about a handful of women, and they tend to be quiet atypical.

*quite

[LordFall]

17 hours ago, integration journey said:

What do you mean no women on the forum. One of the best moderators on here is a women 

Come on bro, is this first time? A good ratio is like 2-4 times more women than men. We need about 500 women for the amount of men that we have on this forum.

36 minutes ago, Yimpa said:

*quite

Special 

[Elliott]

I still say it's his charity toward shitposters that catalyzed the hostility toward the intellectuals he banned, friendly fire in the fog of war

[LordFall]

42 minutes ago, Elliott said:

I still say it's his charity toward shitposters that catalyzed the hostility toward the intellectuals he banned, friendly fire in the fog of war

Intellectuals were banned? 

[Elliott]

15 hours ago, LordFall said:

Intellectuals were banned? 

In my opinion a ton of great posters were banned, just recently @UnbornTao and @zurew

It's full on Lord of the Flies here now. Ironically, it's the incels that constantly post about being disenfranchised  that are a protected species here

Edited 5 hours ago by Elliott

[Carl-Richard]

They got banned.

 

On 23.8.2026 at 4:49 AM, LoneWonderer said:

Some years ago this was not the case.

2021 to be exact.

 

On 23.8.2026 at 4:49 AM, LoneWonderer said:

Just feels a little lonely and echo chambery to say the least 😥.

Lonely and echochambery... hmm... could there be a different word for this?

[Carl-Richard]

23 hours ago, Basman said:

We only have about a handful of women, and they tend to be quiet atypical. You'd kinda have to be to stand this sausage party. Especially the PUA stuff. PUA tends to offend many women on some kind of quantum genetic level, like a cringe kryptonite. 

PUA is 1. autism coping with being social not coming natural, or 2. antisocials coping with not having had experience socializing. Of course many women think that is creepy.

Edited 10 minutes ago by Carl-Richard

[LoneWonderer]

22 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

They got banned.

 

2021 to be exact.

 

Lonely and echochambery... hmm... could there be a different word for this?

Echochambery is not a real word 😁

[LordFall]

19 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

PUA is 1. autism coping with being social not coming natural or 2. antisocials coping with not having had experience socializing. Of course a lot of women think that is creepy.

That's a shallow view of it. Sounds more like a lazy stereotype than an accurate representation of the movement. 

[Elliott]

26 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

PUA is autism coping with being social not coming natural (or antisocials coping with not having had experience socializing). Of course a lot of women think that is creepy.

And all while a lot of women like the 'shy autistic' type.

The incels are brainwashed into hating themselves by people claiming to try to help them by telling them others hate them, making them undesireable to women because they're brainwashed into believing they're undesirable to women by the people supposedly helping them be desirable to women

Edited 4 minutes ago by Elliott