Drama Alert! Another YTber is calling us a cult! 😈☦️

[Schizophonia]

@Unborn Tao Why are you not a mod anymore ?

[Joseph Maynor]

8 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

@Unborn Tao Why are you not a mod anymore ?

Being a regular member is not that bad.  

[Wilhelm44]

Just now, Joseph Maynor said:

Being a regular member is not that bad.  

LOL

[Schizophonia]

1 hour ago, Carl-Richard said:

The smartest and most spiritually attuned people on the forum eventually end up getting banned. That's the pattern.

No because if one were truly "more conscious" they’d simply go do some gardening, get a dog, eat some Häagen-Dazs etc.

Whether it’s Leo or Nahm the old bald guy doing the banning they are merely a "reflection" (what i say is dual but it’s for communicate) of yourself, or a "part of yourself" you could say, and the very reason you aren't on the ideal "frequency."

Stop being bald.

Edited 3 hours ago by Schizophonia

[Schizophonia]

9 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

Being a regular member is not that bad.  

I wanted to know if he had been unmodded for some reason or if he had requested it.

[Carl-Richard]

14 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Stop being bald.

Easy for you to say, frenchie.

[Schizophonia]

13 minutes ago, Carl-Richard said:

Easy for you to say, frenchie.

Every morning I take 20 grams of butter: 10 to spread on my delicious French bread, soft on the inside and crusty on the outside, and another 10 to spread on my hair roots.

I go into the bathroom stark naked and I part my hair into three rows of roots and spread that Breton gold over them. Sometimes I treat myself and slather lots of butter all over my bod, then I open a can of soda and admire my powerful celtic warrior muscles, glistening under fat.

 

Here is the secret to my thick hair.

Edited 3 hours ago by Schizophonia

[Elliott]

1 hour ago, Schizophonia said:

@Unborn Tao Why are you not a mod anymore ?

 

[Natasha Tori Maru]

7 hours ago, Someone here said:

Don’t even get me started . I can be rough . Keep your illusions to yourself if you don’t want them shattered . lol . But you are a good person overall . 😂

Thinking you can achieve any sort of shattering of anything, is a type of magical thinking rooted in codependence 

[Someone here]

19 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Thinking you can achieve any sort of shattering of anything, is a type of magical thinking rooted in codependence 

Assuming the moon is available for feedback is a trauma response based in laminated intentions..

[Sugarcoat]

2 hours ago, Wilhelm44 said:

Not sure I understand the connection between your question and what I said there ?

Oh I accidentally quoted you instead of “someone here” user that’s why 

I wanted to respond to you too, hence the accident. I was gonna say something about how this place has become a community that some feel very connected to, so I think it’s not too uncommon to go through a phase of being a little excessively drawn here and to expressing oneself in this place (as it can feel very free, until one is banned lol). 
I think it’s something that will balance itself out after a while for most

[UnbornTao]

2 hours ago, Schizophonia said:

@Unborn Tao Why are you not a mod anymore ?

I'm a party pooper. Not enough of an acolyte. I kept confronting Leo on his claims and pointing out certain hypocrisy and denials - in my characteristically annoying way.

[Sugarcoat]

3 hours ago, Someone here said:

This question about control is really not so advanced. There is no spiritual teacher or spiritual teaching that doesn’t address this issue of control . And more importantly the answer is readily obvious in your experience.

For whom is there control or there’s not control ? For you .. isn’t it ? The claim is that this “you “ is an illusion. 

If the separate self is an illusion then free will belongs to no one.  So the question itself is based on a false premise . It’s impossible to answer whether you have  control or no control if there isn’t a you in the first place .

When I say “there is no you “ it’s more accurate to say “there is no separate you “. You exist but not as a separate entity separate from the rest of reality making choices independently. 
 

regarding your question about spiritual teachers. All the famous ones ..dead and alive . Rupert Spira ..Eckhart Tolle ..Osho ..Nisargadatta Maharaj..Ramana Maharshi..Robert Adams..Jim Newman ..Adi Shankara etc

 

What difference does it make if something is an illusion if from your POV it seems to be real? 

[Wilhelm44]

5 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Oh I accidentally quoted you instead of “someone here” user that’s why 

I wanted to respond to you too, hence the accident. I was gonna say something about how this place has become a community that some feel very connected to, so I think it’s not too uncommon to go through a phase of being a little excessively drawn here and to expressing oneself in this place (as it can feel very free, until one is banned lol). 
I think it’s something that will balance itself out after a while for most

Totally agree

[Schizophonia]

9 minutes ago, UnbornTao said:

I'm a party pooper. Not enough of an acolyte. I kept confronting Leo on his claims and pointing out certain hypocrisy and denials - in my characteristically annoying way.

Did you insult him or did he just not like you didn't lick his testicles enough.

 

Edited 1 hour ago by Schizophonia

[Someone here]

16 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

What difference does it make if something is an illusion if from your POV it seems to be real? 

Please rephrase the question and expand on it . I feel like you are playing dumb pretending you don’t get what I’m saying when you actually do .

[Schizophonia]

54 minutes ago, Elliott said:

 

Normally Leo is nice so I don't know; but I also know that many people can't stand having their position challenged. I think it's a mistake to be like that because it sacrifices better paradigms.

[UnbornTao]

11 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

Did you insult him or did he just not like you didn't lick his testicles enough.

Testicles.

 

[Sugarcoat]

10 minutes ago, Someone here said:

Please rephrase the question and expand on it . I feel like you are playing dumb pretending you don’t get what I’m saying when you actually do .

Interesting, I had suspicion you would be “speechless” 

I notice the trend, I (or someone else) could write in a very literal and precise manner, and we are still misunderstood or not understood at all

Almost as if the person only understands the topic at hand if it’s in the specific style they were taught it, showing they actually don’t understand it on deeper level, because if they would, deviations in the language would still be understandable 

Edited 1 hour ago by Sugarcoat

[Someone here]

6 minutes ago, Sugarcoat said:

Interesting, I had suspicion you would be “speechless” 

I notice the trend, I (or someone else) could write in a very literal and precise manner, and we are still misunderstood or not understood at all

Almost as if the person only understands the topic at hand if it’s in the specific style they were taught it, showing they actually don’t understand it on deeper level, because if they would, deviations in the language would still be understandable 

Sorry if what I said came off as that . 
you asked about maybe there is a little control we can act on in our lives but that doesn’t mean we don’t have control at all ..isn’t that what you asked ?

my answer was as accurate as knife . I told you it’s not that you have a little control or no control at all.  I told you there is no separate self who has either little control or no control at all . So the question “ do we have no control at all or just a little control?” Is based upon a false assumption. And the answer to it is both are false (little control or zero control ).

Edited 1 hour ago by Someone here