Rape Academy Case

[Lila9]

Quote

"When men rush to announce their non-rapist status, they are centering their own ego instead of confronting the crisis that is currently staring them in the face and their social life.

The real risk sits in the weight distributed across the “good men” who stay quiet. It runs on the silence of the locker room.

When men are more agitated by the precision of the traffic stats than the existence of the “rape academy,” they are performing a specific type of social tax—a deflection that ensures the infrastructure of abuse remains unexamined. Abuse is not just committed but it is taught, normalized, and sustained in communities that enforce it to feel ordinary. The culture of male violence cannot survive without the rule of male silence.

Being a “good man” means taking accountability for the world we live in, regardless of personal actions. It means recognizing that over 99 percent of rape is perpetrated by men, and that statistics are not just numbers—they are the recorded history of women’s fear.

If you stay quiet when a friend makes a rape joke, or if you consume the very porn that degrades and objectifies the women you claim to respect, you are part of the problem.

You are the tolerance that allows the monsters to thrive. The question is not whether you personally would inflict violence, but whether you are disrupting the environment that protects those who do."

Full:

https://lettersfromafeminist.substack.com/p/the-good-men-behind-the-online-rape

The "Good Men" behind the Online Rape Academy

Men, you think you aren't upholding the rape culture. But most of you are passive enforcers of the patriarchy.

You have heard how the story goes. A porn website called “Motherless” had been viewed by 62.7 million pairs of eyes in the shortest month of the year. 80 million visits in March.

That’s 140 million instances of men consuming porn that depicts the literal violation of women’s bodies in every possible dehumanising angle.

Millions of video and images categorized by tags like #passedout and #eyecheck. The “eyecheck” tag, where men film themselves lifting the closed eyelids of sedated women to prove they are unconscious, has videos surpassing 50,000 views.

And this website is still not down. It remains up on the internet, where any young boys with wifi and unrestricted access can access.

It is protected by legal shields like Section 230, which allows platforms to remain “moral free” while the men who scroll past the “crying”, the “execution,” and the “strangled” tags convince themselves that their consumption is victimless. Women’s bodies are turned into “slaughterhouse meat,” as survivor Valentina described it. Her husband of 20 years had filmed him abusing her after he had drugged her with alcohol and sedatives.

Then there’s the online rape academy. A telegram channel called “Zzz” with 1,000 active members. Drugging their wives. Stripping them off their rights and bodily autonomy. Their husbands then record them raping their spouses, as their wedding band’s shine at the camera mockingly.

This is a global brotherhood where men find a sense of belonging. It is a world where a man based in West Africa or Poland can reach out to a digital community to validate the drugging of his sleeping wife, finding “brotherhood” in the collective violation of women’s autonomy.

In these groups, “video is king.” Husbands livestream the abuse of their drugged wives in real-time for $20 a viewer, taking direction from paying participants on what to do next. “They told me what to do and I did it,” one user told CNN.

I read the CNN report again and again and tried to blink back the tears.

Maybe this was how you felt too. Nauseous. Stick to your stomach and your sweaty palms and rising stress levels don’t help.

Women are not safe. I wish I could say I was shocked to read this. But I wasn't. It only solidified the truth women have been carrying their whole lives as they try to survive the patriarchy– that the men we devoted our lives to and sworn vows to is statistically more likely to end up defiling us into inanimate objects.

Sex is a conquest to be won over by men. And our bodies are mere trophies to bear witness that ugly path to victory. Winning for men is not to merely have consensual sex with their spouses. It’s not even turning a deaf ear when we plead ‘no’ until our sanity shatters into a million pieces.

Now, winning over women looks like turning us into a lifeless doll. We no longer have the mouth to plead for mercy. Women are left with a sore body and bruises they swear they don’t remember seeing yesterday.

The question that was left ringing in our heads after learning of this appalling crime was why. What is the motive? Men already have access to our bodies because it is our husbands, fiancees, boyfriends behind this.

How in the world will we recover from yet another revelation that male violence will continue to thrive in the rape culture we live in today?

The answer is not simple. We can’t just tell men to be more accountable because as a society, ‘good men’ continue to uphold rape culture. Continue to consume porn that degrades and objectifies women’s bodies.

The Rape Culture that thrives today

Let me paint you an image.

At this very moment, a group of boys are sitting in a classroom, watching a game, in the restaurant or in a locker room talking about women. Their conversation is not a “good” one.

It’s not polite. It’s not wholesome. It’s not a respectful one.

It’s a conversation that dehumanizes girls so that they are mere bodies; they do not have to go about assessing the mutuality of their attractions and then their desired behaviors. Consent isn’t the standard. Consent isn’t expected of them. Power, domination, and control by any means necessary are the learned lessons that are far too often taken into sexual interactions.

It’s true that not all men are predators.

Some are sympathizers. Some are apologists. Some are victim-blamers. Some suddenly become investigators the moment a woman speaks, demanding unattainable “evidence” before they’ll believe her. Others are more concerned about a man’s reputation than a survivor’s reality.

Many men just simply stay quiet. They won’t challenge the friend who makes rape jokes. They won’t distance themselves from the guy with multiple allegations. They won’t risk their social life to confront harmful behavior.

And then there are those who just don’t care as long as it doesn’t affect them directly.

So before you reach for “not all men,” ask yourself: Are you actively holding predatory men in your life accountable?

Do you challenge misogynistic language in real time?

Do you support survivors even when it’s inconvenient?

If the answer is no, then you’re directly contributing to a culture that allows male violence to thrive.

So the issue isn’t whether you personally would inflict unspeakable sexual violence to someone. The question is whether you’re disrupting an environment that protects the ones who do.

The “Not All Men” Defense

The reflex to these horrific accounts of rape is predictably, exhaustingly: “Not all men.”

But the category of “good men” is not what is in dispute here. We are tracking how organized social infrastructure sustains the behavior of the predators.

When men rush to announce their non-rapist status, they are centering their own ego instead of confronting the crisis that is currently staring them in the face and their social life.

The real risk sits in the weight distributed across the “good men” who stay quiet. It runs on the silence of the locker room.

When men are more agitated by the precision of the traffic stats than the existence of the “rape academy,” they are performing a specific type of social tax—a deflection that ensures the infrastructure of abuse remains unexamined. Abuse is not just committed but it is taught, normalized, and sustained in communities that enforce it to feel ordinary. The culture of male violence cannot survive without the rule of male silence.

Being a “good man” means taking accountability for the world we live in, regardless of personal actions. It means recognizing that over 99 percent of rape is perpetrated by men, and that statistics are not just numbers—they are the recorded history of women’s fear.

If you stay quiet when a friend makes a rape joke, or if you consume the very porn that degrades and objectifies the women you claim to respect, you are part of the problem.

You are the tolerance that allows the monsters to thrive. The question is not whether you personally would inflict violence, but whether you are disrupting the environment that protects those who do.

Shame Must Finally Change Sides

We are watching the moral fabric of our society tear under the weight of systemic misogyny.

This pattern is visible in the news items we try to ignore: the murders of Nancy Metayer and Cerina Fairfax by their husbands, the resignations of congressmen over sexual assault, and the sneers of powerful men at the survivors of the Epstein files.

In one week, the evidence of systemic rot is everywhere, and yet the reflex is still to protect the male ego from discomfort. Survivors are called “psyops” or dismissed, while public sympathy is wasted on the men who kill. We are treating women like slaughterhouse meat in both our digital spaces and our judicial ones.

The solution is not for women to map more escape routes, carry more mace, or do more emotional labor to “explain” their humanity to men. It is for men to do the work. To refuse the joke. To refuse the shrug. To refuse the content. Shame must finally change sides. We must decide whether we will continue to watch the consequences of this collective failure, or whether men will finally choose to be better than the systems that protect them. The question is no longer “are you a good man?” The question is: What do you refuse to carry?

[No1Here2c]

3 hours ago, Lila9 said:

There are also adults whose frontal cortex development and the impulse control hasn't been fully developed due to factors such as genetics, socialization, or trauma.

This may be able to be corrected through delicate treatment, medicine, and individual efforts.

The correction of such would hinge upon many factors. Too many to list.

Genetics is a main one.

Proper nourishment on all fronts being just as important.

Neurogenesis is possible.

[Willy Phallicus]

8 minutes ago, Lila9 said:

It’s true that not all men are predators.

Great, something we can agree on.

Leave me out of your guilt trip.

Edited 7 hours ago by Willy Phallicus

[Rafael Thundercat]

8 hours ago, Stick said:

Getting so enraged will only make you go crazy

@Lila9 and this message had to be brougth by a woman. Thank you for bringing it up. I am tired of trying to express here how serious is this, and to see the same being said by some is the quotes I quote up here. And down here

 

6 hours ago, Someone here said:

relax . It’s gotten into your head . Take a breather . You feel like you are being attacked by everyone .

 What to expect even from the Men who participate in this forum, created by man that Teach About Love, Goodness, Truth. 

🤮 🤮 🤮 

[Rafael Thundercat]

8 minutes ago, Willy Phallicus said:

Great, something we can agree on.

Leave me out of your guilt trip.

You can leave, you are not needed here. 

[Rafael Thundercat]

21 minutes ago, No1Here2c said:

This may be able to be corrected through delicate treatment, medicine, and individual efforts.

The correction of such would hinge upon many factors. Too many to list.

Genetics is a main one.

Proper nourishment on all fronts being just as important.

Neurogenesis is possible.

All your Solutions are not needed. Matriarchy would be enough. 

[Rafael Thundercat]

11 hours ago, Leo Gura said:

@Rafael Thundercat I have read and seen so much human depravity and corruption at the point that I am disillusioned. Little outrages me anymore. To still be outraged is kind of a 1st world problem. But, hey, you do you.

This is the outcome from doing all this work? Jesus. maybe lower the police cams dosage.  

Edited 4 hours ago by Rafael Thundercat

[Someone here]

36 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

What to expect even from the Men who participate in this forum, created by man that Teach About Love, Goodness, Truth. 

I told you try to be selfless as much as you can. Don’t take it personally.  People just puke their conditioning ..I mean get how human minds work by observing how your own mind works ?  You appear to lose control and argue endlessly. It’s not gonna work. What has arguing with people going to ever do though ?!

[Rafael Thundercat]

1 hour ago, Someone here said:

You appear to lose control

Bro, I was drinking coconut water and playing voley in the Beach after commenting today here. Dont assume I lose a nigth of sleep worried about how someone behaved here. For me is just ridiculois and a bore to remember people to simply stop derailing topics. Leo would  do a favor for this community recoding a 3 hours video on his whole expericence with the Forum and how make the expericence here more productive. Deconstructing Forum Behavior part 1. 

 

[Rafael Thundercat]

3 hours ago, Lila9 said:

We must decide whether we will continue to watch the consequences of this collective failure, or whether men will finally choose to be better than the systems that protect them. The question is no longer “are you a good man?” The question is: What do you refuse to carry?

https://www.instagram.com/p/DXVNbCsmk-a/?img_index=1&igsh=cHJ4ZTY4ODRza2xn

[Rafael Thundercat]

Yes is not only a Western Speciality. 

 

 

[Someone here]

1 hour ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Bro, I was drinking coconut water and playing voley in the Beach after commenting today here. Dont assume I lose a nigth of sleep worried about how someone behaved here. For me is just ridiculois and a bore to remember people to simply stop derailing topics. Leo would  do a favor for this community recoding a 3 hours video on his whole expericence with the Forum and how make the expericence here more productive. Deconstructing Forum Behavior part 1. 

 

You are a weird human being . I can’t detect a fixed style of your writing . Sometimes I feel like you are a sweetheart who makes ridiculous vocabulary mistakes then all the sudden you go “bro” on me lol?

You are wasting my time. Quit your hero mania mister Tarazan . Speaking out against rape is nice . Go speak against pornography or you’re totally joking .

 

[Rafael Thundercat]

12 minutes ago, Someone here said:

You are wasting my time.

Dont blame on me. I dont force you to enter in an online Forum. 

[Someone here]

@Rafael Thundercat you said I won’t tag you anymore yet you don’t keep up your word .  And yeah let us as well get into the porno porny pornography territory since you are the messiah of divine light who will rescue those angelic creatures called women from being objectified and abused and treated like pieces of meat to get off to . Now I hope no one erases a single word from this post. 
there is multibillion industry who’s whole business is to portray women as sex objects . Perhaps that might make men who watch porn think of women as sex objects instead of human beings then go rape them ?  
why is porn even legal ? I’m not saying the industry itself or the producers. I mean the consumers .  Few Click away and you have access to endless naked sex objects . Why ? I watch it . A lot . Like a lot . Well it’s free? 
How is that connected to rape ? Figure it out . 

[Natasha Tori Maru]

The solution is to stop replying. Regardless of being tagged.

I simply don't engage if I do not want to. Tag prompt or no.

The only thing we are responsible for is our action.

[Rafael Thundercat]

Trying to communicate with some characters in this madhouse..ops Forum.. feels like this woman trying to talk with a redpill influencer

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXUe-FjDfUs/?igsh=bzF6b2o1aWZldDBt

For God Sake.

[Apparition of Jack]

What is even going on in this thread 

[lostingenosmaze]

@Natasha Tori Maru

[Natasha Tori Maru]

6 hours ago, enchanted said:

Yes and why this myth is harmful is because it implicitly tells women they can't be hypersexual if they chose to be, and it makes HYPOsexual men feel inadequate, invisible, and encourages hypersexual activity (in order to be perceived as a man and causes a whole other set of problems). Myths like these are damaging to both sexes.

This is a large point of the book "The Myth of Male Power" that I shared with you. This "myth" (which I'll grant is not a myth in every way) is equally harmful in the exact same way especially in history books where basically only powerful men are mentioned. The truth is the majority of men feel powerless (and thats why they kill themselves in greater numbers) and the average powerless man and woman contributed immensely to history. 

And before you say "feminism is the solution to everything" realize that the mens liberation movement is heavily aligned with feminism. They have the same goal and want both sexes to rise together. 

I have read that book - really good. Highly recommended! You have a really good balanced view on this topic, and I always appreciate the content you share regarding it. I see tons of men shamed for being low sex drive or asexual. I see women shamed for expressing open sexuality or high sex drive.

This topic is a difficult one because the domains of power do not pivot around a single axis - quite the contrary.

It is not as simple as physical strength vs weakness. Childbirth vs not. Logic vs feeling. Most of the troubles isolating the problems are domain and category issues. You can see it in this thread - it is getting messy and all over the place because of the multi-axis reality of the problem which is where analysis breaks.

If a real conversation is to proceed, a basic format needs to be:

 - Domain/Category

 - Cost/risk structure of domain?

 - What norms evolved or were posed around it?

 - Where are the constraints, and how?

With sexual violence specifically, the stakes skew heavily because of physical factors (vulnerability) and reproductive consequences. This is why (in principal) societies treat it as a severe violation. And even then there are blind spots. Male victims underreported. Female perpetrators underrecognised. Because the same rigid gender expectations distort perception. 

People treat dog violence with similar sorts of bias: a Rottweiler will be classed as dangerous and require the utmost diligence in training and temperament management, because it can rip your face off. A Chihuahua? Or small dog? They are typically the WORST trained and get away with a lot, biting/aggression is more common because it is ALLOWED. People laugh at a little toy dog jumping on you - a Great Dane jumping on an old person could seriously destroy their lives. Obviously this analogy doesn't stretch far and is a bit reductive. It just serves to highlight bias and is a capacity for harm example. With humans - perceived potential for harm is under stricter scrutiny.

@lostingenosmaze deadass 

Edited 2 hours ago by Natasha Tori Maru

[Someone here]

10 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Trying to communicate with some characters in this madhouse..ops Forum.. feels like this woman trying to talk with a redpill influencer

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXUe-FjDfUs/?igsh=bzF6b2o1aWZldDBt

For God Sake.

For god Sake ? For my ass sake.. trying to talk , you don’t talk your entire thread is AI generated posts . You are backing off like a wussy when I tackled the real issue. You thought this guy is easy to use like a boxing bag . You’re dead wrong. I rip you apart with a single paragraph .

see what you did