Rape Academy Case

[Rafael Thundercat]

6 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Lions fight to the death all the time to see who's the alpha male who gets to mate with all the females.

When a stronger one comes along, he kills or drives out the previous male and kills the females' cubs so they'll breed his offspring, not that of its enemy. That's the way life is. It's no wonder humans have that inside too

Half Truths you say 

I got to fact check your epistemic pigetry

Here

Here's a breakdown of each claim:

✅ Mostly TRUE: New males kill existing cubs

When new male lions defeat and exile the previous males of a pride, the conquerors often kill existing young cubs fathered by the losers. As many as 80% of lion cubs die before they reach the age of two. (Wikipedia)

The incoming males tend to target cubs roughly nine months old or younger, since the mother is still nursing them. Lionesses will often attempt to hide or directly defend their cubs, and are generally more successful protecting older ones. (Africa Geographic)

⚠️ OVERSIMPLIFIED: "Fight to the death all the time"

Males do fight over pride control, and it can be brutal, but fights to the death are not the norm. Confrontations can last for hours, testing endurance and fighting skills, but the typical outcome is that the loser is defeated and driven out, not necessarily killed. (EWASH)

❌ INACCURATE: "One alpha male mates with all the females"

Lions don't follow a strict single-alpha model. Males typically operate in coalitions — small groups of brothers or allies — that jointly take over a pride, not a lone dominant male.

⚠️ SCIENTIFICALLY CONTESTED: "It's no wonder humans have that inside too"

This is the most important part to flag. A 1998 paper in American Anthropologist specifically argued that infanticide by male lions has been used as a flawed basis for research into human behavior, and that infanticide as an evolutionary mechanism is unlikely to apply to primates. (Wiley Online Library) Reasoning from animal behavior directly to human nature is a well-known logical error called the naturalistic fallacy — the idea that because something occurs in nature, it is natural or inevitable in humans. Human behavior is shaped by culture, law, psychology, and moral reasoning in ways that have no equivalent in lions.

Bottom line: The core lion biology (cub killing after takeovers) is real and well-documented. But "fights to the death all the time" and "one alpha male" are oversimplifications, and drawing a direct line to human nature is a contested and scientifically shaky conclusion.

[Breakingthewall]

2 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Anthropologist specifically argued that infanticide by male lions has been used as a flawed basis for research into human behavior,

I didn't mean precisely infanticide but violence in general 

I didn't say half truth but 95% truth because I mean that lions fight to death. Maybe they don't die but they try to kill, and about one male mating with the females of two brothers, that's the same in the point that we are talking

Edited 15 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Rafael Thundercat]

17 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

didn't mean precisely infanticide but violence in general 

Yes this is the topic here. Violence. More precisely Men who enter in a Telegram group after druging their partners and film the whole process and share. Understanding of this from various perspectives are welcomed. But this constant apprach of combative dont bring nothing to the table. You act as you are just having fun in a chat group with your friends. Makimg me need to go throughout all your interactions to see of a specific mood here of is a constant pattern in your interactions in the Forum. 

When a Devil fart it use to let traces of its smell whereever its passes.

Edited 15 hours ago by Rafael Thundercat

[Breakingthewall]

12 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

You act as you are just having fun in a chat group with your friends. Makimg me need to go throughout all your interactions to see of a specific mood here of is a constant pattern in your interactions in the Forum. 

I just observe how humans act and I try to understand how it works. Being angry about it is an hindrance. It's like if we talk about Gengis kahn and we need to be very angry with Gengis because he kills millons of people. 

Edited 15 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Rafael Thundercat]

2 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

I just observe how humans act and I try to understand how it works. Being angry about it is an hindrance. It's like if we talk about Gengis kahn and we need to be very angry with Gengis because he kills millons of people. 

No you dont talk, you just be a gadfly. 

[Breakingthewall]

Just now, Rafael Thundercat said:

No you dont talk, you just be a gadfly. 

I talk to try to make conversation with intelligent and open minded people to share ideas

[Leo Gura]

Male dominance is simply a function of males handling conflict and war, since they are physically and psychologically better at it.

Women cannot wage wars. So they cannot be dominant. Nor do women want to be dominant. That is not their survival niche physiologically nor psychologically.

You can look across all cultures and eras, and women are never the ones fighting war.

Edited 14 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Raze]

15 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Male dominance is simply a function of males handing conflict and war, since they are physically and psychologically better at it.

Women cannot wage wars. So they cannot be dominant. Nor do women want to be dominant. That is not their survival niche physiologically nor psychologically.

You can look across all cultures and eras, and women are never the ones fighting war.

How does waging war make men dominant as a group? The men who fight the wars just do so to serve the people in power, those people could be women.

Its not like the soldier comes home and somehow uses his military knowledge to conquer his woman. In reality women are the ones who demand he take the lead and go toil at the factory and be the breadwinner or she’ll drop him like a hot potato. 

Edited 14 hours ago by Raze

[Leo Gura]

5 minutes ago, Raze said:

those people could be women.

No they couldn't.

Men are not going to follow a woman into war. And a woman is not going to lead men into war.

War requires brutal coldblooded leadership.

Feminism has rotted peoples' sense of these realities.

When a woman gets in danger she calls a man to save her.

Edited 14 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Raze]

6 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

No they couldn't.

Men are not going to follow a woman into war. And a woman is not going to lead men into war.

War requires brutal coldblooded leadership.

Feminism has rotted peoples' sense of these realities.

When a woman gets in danger she calls a man to save her.

There have been multiple Queens and Empresses in history who have waged war.

If women decided they’ll only have sex with men who go to war we’d be in world war 3 within 24 hours. 

[Leo Gura]

1 minute ago, Raze said:

There have been multiple Queens and Empresses in history who have waged war.

They have not waged war. They merely gave some orders thanks to a regime men built and executed.

Edited 13 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Raze]

Just now, Leo Gura said:

They have not waged war. They merely gave some orders thanks to a regime men built and executed.

That’s what I’m saying. Different groups can use the labor of other groups to express their own power despite said group doing the actual heavy lifting. Those could be women.

[Leo Gura]

19 minutes ago, Raze said:

That’s what I’m saying. Different groups can use the labor of other groups to express their own power despite said group doing the actual heavy lifting. Those could be women.

Perhaps today it could be, but it couldn't be for 10,000 year prior. And even today it is dubious that a woman would win a serious war that was life or death.

The US doesn't really fight wars, it just bombs pittiful forces. This isn't a serious war. A real war is two equally matched armies where everything is on the line and the leadership will all be executed if they lose.

Edited 13 hours ago by Leo Gura

[trenton]

[Opulence]

Sometimes we fight imaginary wars.

[Rafael Thundercat]

23 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

When a woman gets in danger she calls a man to save her.

Well what we see in the news are woman and children in danger because of men.

[Leo Gura]

7 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

Well what we see in the news are woman and children in danger because of men.

These are rare exceptions. Don't lose sight of the big picture. 90%+ of men don't rape or abuse anyone.

Edited 13 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Rafael Thundercat]

17 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

These are rare exceptions. Don't lose sight of the big picture. 90%+ of men don't rape or abuse anyone.

So we have around 3.753 billion. Non  abusers/rapers worldwide vs 417 million. Rapers. Sounds like a good amount to make take the situation + the other half of Woman population that mainly certainly dotn want to be raped and killed. 

Someone bring a Expert in Statistic on the thread. We have a case of minimization of something big. In the Actualized Big Picture there is actually nobody being raped isn't Mr Gura? 

Femicide Rates by Country 2026 https://share.google/HBX8qpenzWpq4MTOT

rape per year

Reported rape statistics show hundreds of thousands of cases annually worldwide, with underreporting making true figures higher. In the U.S., roughly 140,000 to 460,000 cases occur annually depending on reported vs. estimated surveys. Brazil recorded 83,988 cases in 2023, while UK data suggests high annual prevalence. 

Rape Statistics by Location and Context:

United States: Roughly 139,815 rapes were reported to law enforcement in 2019. Sexual violence impacts 463,634 victims (age 12+) annually on average.

Brazil: In 2023, 83,988 cases of rape and statutory rape were recorded, marking a 6.5% increase from 2022, with a rape occurring approximately every six minutes.

Global & Regional Trends:

An estimated 739,000 women are raped or sexually assaulted every year in the UK.

In 2026, projected rape cases included 81,603 in Brazil, 41,652 in France, and 24,600 in Mexico.

Perpetrator Context: 60% of rapes are committed by someone known to the victim, while 31% are committed by strangers.

Prison Violence: An estimated 80,600 inmates experience sexual violence while in prison or jail annually. 

These figures are often derived from reported statistics and the actual number of victims is likely higher due to the sensitive nature of these crimes, which leads to high rates of non-reporting

 

Edited 13 hours ago by Rafael Thundercat

[Leo Gura]

21 minutes ago, Rafael Thundercat said:

In the Actualized Big Picture there is actually nobody being raped isn't Mr Gura? 

Get off your high horse.

I'm not denying rape is a widespread problem and crime.

I posted a bunch of videos lately on my blog about sexual abuse issues.

Edited 13 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Rafael Thundercat]

1 minute ago, Leo Gura said:

Get off your high horse.

I'm not denying rape is a widespread problem and crime.

Come to give a ride with my in my Horse Mr Gura, I need to remind that the exceptions are simply doing the bare minimum. Do I deserve  a prize for not raping? No? Do recognizing that 90% of man dont rape helps at all to change the system that creates and allow men to drug and rape their wifes? NO. my point is that this calls to see that the situation is not that bad dont change the fact that a lot harm is being caused for a lot of children and woman. Awareness about the situation we have lot. We need are intelligent solutions. Is not your work about Intelligence?