Posted 8 hours ago 1 minute ago, Natasha Tori Maru said: Absolutely. And some moderators have their ego corrupt by their role thinking their words have more gravity. I feel like it comes down to the extent one feels like they can speak for everyone. That tendency. The need to moot the other. This has nothing to do with anyone on here per se. Just a general observation. YouTube Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 8 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said: I feel like it comes down to the extent one feels like they can speak for everyone. That tendency. The need to moot the other. This has nothing to do with anyone on here per se. Just a general observation. Indeed. You must see some interesting dynamics working in law relating this. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 8 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said: Indeed. You must see some interesting dynamics working in law relating this. Most definitely. YouTube Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 7 hours ago 3 hours ago, James123 said: Yeah. Like jailer. Meanwhile moderators and leo are stuck in them's own jail. Therefore, keeping the place cohesive and constructive is impossible. Constructiveness is possible, Only, when mind is free or dead. And Constructiveness is not about external action, all within. "Constructiveness is possible only, when mind is dead.." We have mods because of rage bait foolery like this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 7 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Vynce said: "Constructiveness is possible only, when mind is dead.." We have mods because of rage bait foolery like this. With your little thought process or beliefs, you think you can be constructive? It just serves the body, and make it believe that good for others. Meanwhile, it never was, because it was your limited perspective. Therefore, death of mind is inevitable. But, most of you guys are still a pussy to be something, have an identity or protect your agenda. "It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 7 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, James123 said: This is a belief itself. Not necessarily, if the definition of constructiveness is cashed out in something purely descriptive and empirical, then there is a fact of the matter about what kind of outcome it generates once it is employed. You are confusing clashing subjective values with how a given particular value can be achieved. The how it can be achieved is not a value question, it is an empirical one. This question about moderation vs no moderation is just simply an empirical question. Your claim that no rule is better for achieving constructiveness than some rules is also just a belief, unless you can show empirically how no rules can achieve the desired outcome better than some rules. Edited 7 hours ago by zurew Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 6 hours ago 42 minutes ago, James123 said: But, most of you guys are still a pussy to be something, 😂 "When you get very serious about truth you accept your life situation exactly as it is. So much so that you aren't childishly sitting around wishing it were otherwise.If you were confined to a wheelchair you would just accept it as how reality is. Just as you now just accept that you are not a bird who can fly." -Leo Gura. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 6 hours ago 18 minutes ago, James123 said: With your little thought process or beliefs, you think you can be constructive? It just serves the body, and make it believe that good for others. Meanwhile, it never was, because it was your limited perspective. Therefore, death of mind is inevitable. But, most of you guys are still a pussy to be something, have an identity or protect your agenda. ... Mods tickle his feet! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 6 hours ago 55 minutes ago, zurew said: Your claim that no rule is better for achieving constructiveness than some rules is also just a belief, unless you can show empirically how no rules can achieve the desired outcome better than some rules. Achieving constructiveness is destroying every knowledge, every belief, every ideas, perspectives and experiences. "It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 9 minutes ago, James123 said: Achieving constructiveness is destroying every knowledge, every belief, every ideas, perspectives and experiences. Maybe you use a different definition for constructiveness maybe you dont. But look, even if you take it to be the case that being enlightened is the only and necessary way to achieve constructiveness that still doesnt really engage with the question surrounding the rule vs no rule. The reason why is because you need to deal with a bunch of us with here who are not enlightened. So the question is about how can you run a forum where a bunch of people are not enlightened. But I personally dont buy into the premise that enlightened people dont crash out time to time. Edited 6 hours ago by zurew Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 6 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Vynce said: ... Mods tickle his feet! Something upset him. Obviously, he still judges others for being a 'pussy' for not surrendering or following his path or advices. At the same time with James - there's a lot of claiming for no one being there to get upset. Theres also some 'I need to save others' hero complex mixed in, maybe? Overall, some oddities there. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 6 hours ago you know exactly what's going on with him and what he is all about. "When you get very serious about truth you accept your life situation exactly as it is. So much so that you aren't childishly sitting around wishing it were otherwise.If you were confined to a wheelchair you would just accept it as how reality is. Just as you now just accept that you are not a bird who can fly." -Leo Gura. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 hours ago 46 minutes ago, zurew said: Maybe you use a different definition for constructiveness maybe you dont. But look, even if you take it to be the case that being enlightened is the only and necessary way to achieve constructiveness that still doesnt really engage with the question surrounding the rule vs no rule. The reason why is because you need to deal with a bunch of us with here who are not enlightened. So the question is about how can you run a forum where a bunch of people are not enlightened. But I personally dont buy into the premise that enlightened people dont crash out time to time. It is not about enlightenment. Constructivity or creativity never comes through the thoughts. They only come trough as insight. And the door for insights are empty or silence mind. Answer appears within the moment. "It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 hours ago 40 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said: Something upset him. Obviously, he still judges others for being a 'pussy' for not surrendering or following his path or advices. At the same time with James - there's a lot of claiming for no one being there to get upset. Theres also some 'I need to save others' hero complex mixed in, maybe? Overall, some oddities there. See, how can you be a fucking mod or leo as moderator with based on beliefs. Bullshit. I am neither trying to save you or danger you. I have no I intention to do anything. Finger writes, eyes reads. That's all. And when understanding happens that these are only words, sounds, actually not even, interpretation ends. If you attached to interpretation, you are a or anyone is just a bullshitter. Still the pussy of mind. "It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 hours ago 4 minutes ago, James123 said: It is not about enlightenment. Constructivity or creativity never comes through the thoughts. They only come trough as insight. And the door for insights are empty or silence mind. Answer appears within the moment. Either way, the exact same issue applies to that as well. Not everyone is living from or acting from that empty/silent mind all the time. You need to provide an answer thats applicable to the types of people who are on this forum Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 hours ago 1 minute ago, James123 said: See, how can you be a fucking mod or leo as moderator with based on beliefs. Bullshit. I am neither trying to save you or danger you. I have no I intention to do anything. Finger writes, eyes reads. That's all. And when understanding happens that these are only words, sounds, actually not even, interpretation ends. If you attached to interpretation, you are a or anyone is just a bullshitter. Still the pussy of mind. If there is misunderstanding, then there is always the option to communicate better. Always the path to be greater. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 hours ago @James123 she's saying it's double standards . You have to apply the nondoership thing to others as well . Its not just your body that has no self inside of it.. but everyone are equally empty shelves. "When you get very serious about truth you accept your life situation exactly as it is. So much so that you aren't childishly sitting around wishing it were otherwise.If you were confined to a wheelchair you would just accept it as how reality is. Just as you now just accept that you are not a bird who can fly." -Leo Gura. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, zurew said: Either way, the exact same issue applies to that as well. Not everyone is living from or acting from that empty/silent mind all the time. You need to provide an answer thats applicable to the types of people who are on this forum I am telling, surrender, that's all. 13 minutes ago, Natasha Tori Maru said: If there is misunderstanding, then there is always the option to communicate better. Always the path to be greater. Path is always one. If you read the word pussy, and this is bad, this is an interpretation. However, you deeply see what is the word of pussy, therefore who is integrating, you never there. "It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 5 hours ago @James123 what is a moderator in your words? Do you think it is a spiritual leader of some sort? Just to be clear, that is certainly not how I define it. I could genuinely be here just for the personal development side of Actualized, as a user. So you could be projecting your ideas of 'shoulds' onto me. The word pussy is your word not mine. It is far easier to fool someone, than to convince them they have been fooled. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted 4 hours ago 7 minutes ago, James123 said: I am telling, surrender, that's all. Okay , that makes sense as a personal advice, but i dont see how that responds to this thread. This is the question - If you were the owner of this forum ,then what would you do with respect moderation (if anything) and why would you do that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
