Husseinisdoingfine

BREAKING NEWS: ICE shoots and kills woman

168 posts in this topic

1 hour ago, Elliott said:

1. We can already mine greenland

 

Mining.com

https://www.mining.com

Greenland miner Amaroq soars on report of US gov't investment

6 days ago — Toronto-based Amaroq currently operates the Nalunaq gold mine in southern Greenland, a historic site that it brought back into production

 

 

2. The u.s. already has enough rare earth's available here. Rare earths are not actually rare, it's just intensive to process and extract(anywhere).

 

 

3.the u.s. does not steal oil, we control the oil market, that's all we care about(restricting supply).

It might be just about denying more access of it to China, one gold mine doesn't count as US having access to this resource in Greenland. But yeah, I'm not gonna lie and say that I know what's happening inside Trumps head or that I understand his logic, but if he wanted to bomb Canada he could already do so. So your explanation doesn't make sense either

The third point is basically just arguing semantics; it doesn't matter and doesn't refute what I said

Edited by NewKidOnTheBlock

Sybau🥀🥀

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, NewKidOnTheBlock said:

It might be just about denying more access of it to China, one gold mine doesn't count as US having access to this resource in Greenland. But yeah, I'm not gonna lie and say that I know what's happening inside Trumps head or that I understand his logic, but if he wanted to bomb Canada he could already do so. So your explanation doesn't make sense either

The third point is basically just arguing semantics; it doesn't matter and doesn't refute what I said

Taking easy greenland offers a lot of leverage against Canada, as it's completely surrounded by the u.s. at that point with no european allies. Taking greenland is so easy, this is the biggest factor.

Edited by Elliott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Elliott said:

By agreeing to trade deals and giving them peace prizes. Such formidable opposition Jannes! EUROPE HAS NUKES, GROW BALLS! No one will attack Europe. The only way is through intimidation, what Trumps doing.

 

CNN

https://www.cnn.com

Nobel Peace Prize awarded ...

Oct 10, 2025 — US Secretary of State Marco Rubio had nominated Machado for the Peace Prize 

 

https://www.spglobal.com

EU to buy $750 billion of US energy in trade agreement

Jul 28, 2025 — The EU has agreed to buy $750 billion worth of energy from the US as part of the two sides' trade agreement, which could focus on LNG, oil

 

Kyiv Post

https://www.kyivpost.com

France, Spain Increase Russian LNG Imports as EU Ranks Among Top ...

21 hours ago — Spain increased its Russian LNG imports by 27%, while France increased its imports by 18% in December, according to the Helsinki-based

 

 

 

NBC News

https://www.nbcnews.com

 oil tanker linked to Venezuela after weekslong ...

6 days ago — The U.K.'s defense ministry said in a statement that Britain had “provided enabling support” to intercept the Marinera, including “pre 

 

Pussies

The peace price committee didnt give Trump the peace price, it was the bullshit decision of one women. 

The thread of Russia exists though and without the US support Ukraine cant defend itself. Russia also has nukes and seems to be more desperate so thats a dangerous situation. So Europe has to keep being friends with the US as long as possible. 

That Europe still pays for Russian oil is pathetic, I can agree on that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Jannes said:

The peace price committee didnt give Trump the peace price, it was the bullshit decision of one women. 

The thread of Russia exists though and without the US support Ukraine cant defend itself. Russia also has nukes and seems to be more desperate so thats a dangerous situation. So Europe has to keep being friends with the US as long as possible. 

That Europe still pays for Russian oil is pathetic, I can agree on that. 

Europe can protect Ukraine alone

 

1.) Distancing from the U.S. ELIMINATES Russian fear that's driving the desire for Ukraine.

2.)Europe has nukes, send all of your missiles(non nukes) to Ukraine. Without u.s. entanglements, Russia will easily agree to treaty.

3.) Without u.s. entanglement with Europe, CHINA will pressure Russia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Elliott said:

Europe can protect Ukraine alone

 

1.) Distancing from the U.S. ELIMINATES Russian fear that's driving the desire for Ukraine.

2.)Europe has nukes, send all of your missiles(non nukes) to Ukraine. Without u.s. entanglements, Russia will easily agree to treaty.

3.) Without u.s. entanglement with Europe, CHINA will pressure Russia.

1) Thats a good point

2) The US alone sends most of the weapons. So I think Russia will see the chance to get more territory. The US will get back on track in a few years.

3) Why? China and Russia are cool with each other from what I know. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jannes said:

 

3) Why? China and Russia are cool with each other from what I know. 

They're only "cool" because they're afraid of the west. They're afraid of each other. China would not want Russia to consolidate Europe under Russian authoritarianism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Elliott said:

They're only "cool" because they're afraid of the west. They're afraid of each other. China would not want Russia to consolidate Europe under Russian authoritarianism.

China is authoritarian too .. well not as corrupt as Russia though. 

Well idk, very possible that you are right, I cant really tell as I havent contemplated this dynamic deeply enough. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Jannes said:

China is authoritarian too .. well not as corrupt as Russia though. 

Well idk, very possible that you are right, I cant really tell as I havent contemplated this dynamic deeply enough. 

Authoritarian regimes, although often cooperate with each other, do not trust each other. 

 

The Nazi-Soviet Pact (1939-1941)

Signed on August 23, 1939, by German Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop and Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov, the pact was a non-aggression agreement that secretly included protocols to divide Eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now