Nightclubs are dying

[AION]

 

[Jannes]

Not in my experience. 

[Leo Gura]

There will always be places for young people to get liquored up, party, and listen to music.

You couldn't stop that with a nuclear war.

[AION]

Corona said hello. 
I think things changed after Corona. 
Now you have to know where it is lit if you live in a middle sized city. Big or touristic cities are still lit though. 

[something_else]

Club nights aren't as popular with my generation or younger anymore. They typically seem to prefer what I'd call a 'bar with a dance floor' over a traditional nightclub. But that's just a preference, it's not like clubs are going to go away anytime soon. And these bars are good places to party.

I will say this is very UK centred opinion as well. I have no idea what it's like elsewhere.

Edited yesterday at 12:41 PM by something_else

[Princess Arabia]

Most people will comment without watching the video or reading some of the YT comments. I did, and I see what you're saying. So many couldn't be saying the same thing if it weren't so. Lots of things have changed since social media and the internet got popular and seems like clubbing, for the most part, is one of them.

[Schizophonia]

If you still want to see things in a non-dual way, don't forget that you are the video, the people involved are your mirrors and reflect your own libidinal decadence (and mine too it seems, because I want to respond to your topic, because you are my mirror).

I'd say I'm reluctant to go to nightclubs because I don't want to be humiliated/seen as cringe or something like that, a fear of a pro-social/generous frequency in general.
I couldn't say why this is particularly prevalent these days.

Edited yesterday at 02:48 PM by Schizophonia

[Schizophonia]

That said i prefer spending an evening in an apartment with people I like rather than going to an expensive nightclub with random people

Edited yesterday at 02:56 PM by Schizophonia

[Princess Arabia]

28 minutes ago, Schizophonia said:

If you still want to see things in a non-dual way, don't forget that you are the video, the people involved are your mirrors

Seeing things in a non-dual way doesn't involve a mirror as that is duality. "Seeing things" is duality on it's own as that suggests separation - non-duality does not. "You are the video" also suggests duality. Non-duality cannot be seen as seen suggests subject/object relationship and that's duality also.

Edited yesterday at 03:17 PM by Princess Arabia

[Schizophonia]

6 minutes ago, Princess Arabia said:

Seeing things in a non-dual way doesn't involve a mirror as that is duality. "Seeing things" is duality on it's own as that suggests separation - non-duality does not. "You are the video" also suggests duality. Non-duality cannot be seen as seen suggests subject/object relationship and that's duality also.

Gnegnegne Yes i know, 

But we have to put things in a dual way to be able to communicate.

[Princess Arabia]

1 minute ago, Schizophonia said:

Gnegnegne Yes i know, 

But we have to put things in a dual way to be able to communicate.

Cop out. You said 'to see it in a non-dual way'....difference between that and just straight up dualistically communicating.

[MarkKol]

Come to Berlin, my friend