Conservative activist, Charlie Kirk, has been shot and killed at University

[Inliytened1]

Just an FYI but look at the last section:

What’s NOT Allowed:

Self-promotion

Coming here to start your teaching/coaching/guru business by leeching off this audience

Multiple accounts. (If you are caught opening multiple accounts, both will be banned).

Posting in any language other than English

Sharing copyrighted material, including sharing of files, videos, music, etc. to which you do not have copyrights.

Discussing "group buys" or sharing of self-help products or courses.

Discussing torrenting, warez, or cracks

SPAM, including but not limited to: affiliate links, mass marketing, clandestine promotion, SEO, promotional PM

Harvesting member contact information

Links to pornography, graphic violence, religious/political propaganda, etc.

Viruses or malware of any kind

Recruiting members for chat-groups outside of this forum, including Skype, Discord, WhatsApp, chatrooms, etc.

Recruiting members to start local meetup groups in your city

Starting new spiritual communities, private groups, or cults

Mass-messaging or abuse of the PM system

PMing members with pitches or promotions or recruiting

PMing members to share copyrighted material or do "group buys" of self-help products

Posting AI-generate content like text, images, or video without disclosing that it was sourced from AI

Posting Deepfakes without disclosure

Verbal abuse

Verbally abusing moderators or administrators

Threatening or blackmailing other members, moderators, or administrators

Hijacking the community, mass manipulation of the community, sabotaging the community, leeching off the community

Excessive or repetitive posting

Hate speech: racism, sexism, homophobic slurs, threats, harassment, or excessive profanity

Ganging up on other members, starting factions that splinter the community

Sharing private logins to Actualized.org products or services with other users

Reproducing or posting content from Actualized.org paid products

Calling members names like: stupid, idiot, moron, asshole, retard, evil, etc.

Trash-talking, trolling, chronic criticism, blaming, or finger-pointing

Right-wing propaganda, nationalist ideologies

Religious activism or dogmatic promotion of any religious belief system

Threads about which religion is the best

Debates about whether enlightenment is real

Conspiracy theories (like Illuminati, Reptilians, 9/11 inside job, Flat Earth, Jews running the world, pedophilia rumors, etc)

Spreading rumors and gossip

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Joshe]

 

[ExploringReality]

19 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

Maybe i am wrong but I think his views on transgenders was one of the most distorted of them all.  Bless his soul.  But didn't he demonize it?  This shows the issues with Christianity.  His wife was willing to forgive his death but she would still condemn a transgender.  That to me demonstrates the sickness of religion.   Of course the Bible is open to interpretation. 

Dude, his debates were click bait and designed to appeal to gullible ideological fools that resonate with short heated arguments that went in circles and he dominated the debates with his ideas and radicalized religious dogma. The kids that he would debate with couldn't string a thought together and follow it to the point. He was arguing with mostly underdeveloped University kids that have been indoctrinated into ideologies and identities that they defended and people either rallied behind him or people just observed the absurdity. 

I'm sure there are good things in the Bible when you look at it from a meta-analysis or from a non-dual perspective, but he was certainly not at that level. Basically a rational ideological religious fanatic spreading political memes and viruses.

[Inliytened1]

28 minutes ago, Joshe said:

 

This is the left crying.   Thats all it is. Boo fucking hoo.

Edited 3 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Joshe]

2 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

This is the left crying.   Thats all it is. Boo fucking hoo.

lol. Bot farms are just something to keep in mind. We live in an age where they serve as a valuable tool for spreading ideas via emotional osmosis and mimetic desire. The wolves are always one step ahead of the sheep, it seems. 

[Inliytened1]

6 minutes ago, Joshe said:

lol. Bot farms are just something to keep in mind. We live in an age where they serve as a valuable tool for spreading ideas via emotional osmosis and mimetic desire. The wolves are always one step ahead of the sheep, it seems. 

I am sure the sheep are working on becoming wolves. 

.

Edited 3 hours ago by Inliytened1

[zurew]

Those bots are pretty relevant. They can create and set the stage for narratives and new talking points. If you have enough bots and bait enough people you can set the new narrative and what people should be focused on and what they should be talking about.

A bunch of accounts on twitter are bots and a good chunk of the likes are coming from bots as well.

Twitter is exceptionally bad when it comes to this. Like really fucking bad.  A good chunk of the bots are very obviously just ragebaiting and trying to create more divison.

Edited 3 hours ago by zurew

[Inliytened1]

28 minutes ago, zurew said:

Those bots are pretty relevant. They can create and set the stage for narratives and new talking points. If you have enough bots and bait enough people you can set the new narrative and what people should be focused on and what they should be talking about.

A bunch of accounts on twitter are bots and a good chunk of the likes are coming from bots as well.

Twitter is exceptionally bad when it comes to this. Like really fucking bad.  A good chunk of the bots are very obviously just ragebaiting and trying to create more divison.

Ok but if the left is going to read a bot's message and then decide to change sides do you think they are really worth being on your side in the first place? If they are that spineless as you called me that they would have no real roots in the left.  

If you're saying this could influence someone who is just getting into politics who is looking to vote- yeah - but do you realistically think there are no leftist bots just because Musk owns Twitter or whatever it's called now? Trust me I'm sure there are resistance bots.   Typical one sided propaganda. 

Edited 2 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Leo Gura]

2 hours ago, Elliott said:

the bullet from a rifle would go through him like butter.

Yes, which is why it bounced.

Quote

I wouldn't believe he was wearing a plate, which would only really cover the heart and lung area anyway.

In slow-mo clips you can clearly see he was wearing a plate and the bullet bounced off its top edge. The bullet was not aimed at his neck but his upper chest. It bounced up into his neck, which is why the entrance wound was so large and bloodly. The bullet was tumbling sideways from bouncing off the plate.

You can see the plate under his thin t-shirt.

Quote

the shirt moving is a Shockwave from the fast bullet

No. Bullets do not cause a shockwave when traveling. That is Hollywood fiction. If a bullet flew right above your head not one hair on your head would move. There is zero shockwave from a flying bullet, only at the barrel. A bullet is not a rocket.

Quote

a rifle bullet goes straight through kevlar.

It was a metal plate, not kevlar. It bounced off the very top edge of the plate which was angled up.

Edited 2 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Leo Gura]

This video explains it:

 

[Inliytened1]

4 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

Yes, which is why it bounced.

In slow-mo clips you can clearly see he was wearing a plate and the bullet bounced off its top edge. The bullet was not aimed at his neck but his upper chest. It bounced up into his neck, which is why the entrance wound was so large and bloodly. The bullet was tumbling sideways from bouncing off the plate.

You can see the plate under shit thin t-shirt.

No. Bullets do not cause a shockwave when traveling. That is Hollywood fiction. If a bullet flew right above your head not one hair on your head would move. There is zero shockwave from a flying bullet, only at the barrel. A bullet is not a rocket.

It was a metal plate, not kevlar. It bounced off the every top edge of the plate which was angled up.

So he was wearing a bullet proof vest is that what you are saying?

This hasn't been confirmed by the FBI so you are initiating a conspiracy theory which is against your own guidelines.

Edited 2 hours ago by Inliytened1

[Leo Gura]

3 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

So he was wearing a bullet proof vest is that what you are saying?

Watch above video.

[Inliytened1]

13 minutes ago, Leo Gura said:

This video explains it:

 

How do you know the photo in the video wasn't photo shopped.  Did you slow motion the bullet projectile?  Do you have that footage.   Why hasn't the FBI denied or confirmed he was wearing body armor if he was. There would be no reason to hide something like this. 

Edited 2 hours ago by Inliytened1

[zurew]

16 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Ok but if the left is going to read a bot's message and then decide to change sides do you think they are really worth being on your side in the first place?

That wasnt the point  , one  point is that bots can pretend to be unhinged leftists and then other bots can amplify the fuck out of their posts. Im not saying there arent any crazy leftist, im just saying this is one straightforward way to create more division (and pointing to bots that were created by nations that are interested in creating more divison - like Russia ).

18 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

but do you realistically think there are no left bots just because Musk owns Twitter or whatever it's called now?

There can be , but they sure arent for helping the left, they are pretending to be crazy leftists (if there are any leftist bots). The fact of the matter is that there are lthousands of bots (probably mostly russain) and they are trying to create more division . There are a bunch of maga and conservative bots that are  setting up new narratives and talkingpoints and they are ragebaiting.

 

 

 

30 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Typical one sided propaganda. 

No its not, its pretty much a fact and it is documented. This issue isnt a new thing at all. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-leads-efforts-among-federal-international-and-private-sector-partners | https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4ng24pxkelo

I will flag this again that your knee jerk reactions shows me again that you arent interested in engaging in a serious way with the answers and the info that is given to you. You are dismissing things based on feelings without doing any research or checking at all . This is not your first or second time doing this "inferring my way through politics, without doing research".

[Leo Gura]

6 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

How do you know the photo in the video wasn't photo shopped.  Did you slow motion the bullet projectile?  Do you have that footage.   Why hasn't the FBI denied or confirmed he was wearing body armor if he was. There would be no reason to hide something like this. 

I will not waste a minute of my life considering conspiracies for this incident.

Edited 2 hours ago by Leo Gura

[Inliytened1]

1 minute ago, Leo Gura said:

I am not wasting a minute of my life considering conspiracies for this incident.

Well it seems like that's what you're doing if you aren't leaving it to the FBI.  

[zurew]

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/maga-ai-bot-network-divided-trump-epstein-backlash-rcna219167

https://www.info-res.org/cir/articles/unmasking-the-fake-maga-accounts-stolen-photos-and-digital-lies/

[Nivsch]

Mass events from now on must be secured properly, no matter the political side.

[Inliytened1]

28 minutes ago, zurew said:

That wasnt the point  , one  point is that bots can pretend to be unhinged leftists and then other bots can amplify the fuck out of their posts. Im not saying there arent any crazy leftist, im just saying this is one straightforward way to create more division (and pointing to bots that were created by nations that are interested in creating more divison - like Russia ).

There can be , but they sure arent for helping the left, they are pretending to be crazy leftists (if there are any leftist bots). The fact of the matter is that there are lthousands of bots (probably mostly russain) and they are trying to create more division . There are a bunch of maga and conservative bots that are  setting up new narratives and talkingpoints and they are ragebaiting.

 

 

 

No its not, its pretty much a fact and it is documented. This issue isnt a new thing at all. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-leads-efforts-among-federal-international-and-private-sector-partners | https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4ng24pxkelo

I will flag this again that your knee jerk reactions shows me again that you arent interested in engaging in a serious way with the answers and the info that is given to you. You are dismissing things based on feelings without doing any research or checking at all . This is not your first or second time doing this "inferring my way through politics, without doing research".

Ok but again what is the left doing here other than crying boo hoo.  Do something about it.  If there are a bunch of right wing bots out there turning new voters then instead of sitting in your armchair crying about it get your people out there and do something about it. And if it's Russia then they would probably want Trump out not in.  The past democratic regimes were as weak as it gets so Russia would not take sides.

Edited 1 hour ago by Inliytened1

[Apparition of Jack]

9 minutes ago, Inliytened1 said:

Ok but again what is the left doing here other than crying boo hoo.  Do something about it.  If there are a bunch of right wing bots out there turning new voters then instead of sitting in your armchair crying about it get your people out there and do something about it. And if it's Russia then they would probably want Trump out not in.  The past democratic regimes were as weak as it gets so Russia would not take sides.

You’re delirious, man. The Trump-Russia connection is well established. Trump goes gaga over Putin the same way a little kid goes gaga over Michael Jordan.