Search the Community

After a long period of soul searching i have found that i am deeply selfish and narcissistic. And i find that whatever i do about it is just shit im adding on and then suffering the fact that i essentially am my enviroment i grew up in. I grew up in a shitty abusive household with manipulation and narcissism and have found that i adopted these traits, yet these traits have serious consequences for my life. I have long tried reaching out, seeing some way to "fix" myself to stop being narcissistic yet the very self trying to stop being narcissistic is narcissism itself So i am essentially stuck in this vibrational energy field of being narcissistic and attracting other narcissistic people, its like a self serving loop i cant quite get out of. I have long pondered suicide but after deeper consideration, i know that i am essentially not different from my narcissism, and whatever actions i take will not bring about a real change, perhabs my next life will be just as dominated by narcissism and narcissistic tendencies, because the act of taking my own life is itself narcissism in action. My question is, how do i create a more pleasant experience? How can i improve my sense of myself, if at all? Thanks-

Nothing disappears. But you will experience it totally different. Don't think that this was simple or easy in any way. It took my whole life falling completely apart to be where I am now. The last step is Grace. You don't do it yourself. The whole world collapses in that moment, but nothing disappears. In my case only my room existed for a couple of days (no human contact, but not even human noises outside or when I went for a walk). It completely feels like dying on a deeply emotional level. And it is. You become aware of what always has been the case: You ARE dying, but you run around and do everything to keep it going—but now you can't run anymore. It took a situation where I literally gave up my whole life. I EVEN had to let go of my Life Purpose! And it came back to me as a part of reality itself, as if existence assimilated my whole energy and memory. Then I died. This is not my work now. We're all alone in this together. Oh and by the way, important reminder: I am still fully human, too! I feel and experience everything exactly the same! Except that there is now a constant opening, which you could call....death. That's why all the time characters and egos appear (also from past lives and also from other's lives as well.. which is supremely weird) but they immediately begin to desintegrate when I abide in that awareness. This is even possible while I'm in public or even while talking to someone. You could say Death is now my modus operandi. It has become the fundament instead of the ego. Surprisingly this opens a connection to Divine Intelligence, which I very much enjoy. This is also what this world (Humanity) needs the most right now. We're not very intelligent creatures, but the good news is that connection to a higher form of Intelligence is possible. In this way that process will now still go on for quite a while (characters appearing, dying, integrating) until I'm really ready to step into the public, which I definitely plan to do at some point. You could call it True Suicide. Because what we call death is merely a process of recycling.

Sure, sure, there are no proofs about the Nord stream. Sorry, those arguments are compelling. If I told you that Hitler didn't like Jews, you could provide a huge pile of outraged data claiming that Hitler loved Jews, but that they wanted to commit suicide, and Hitler hospitalized them to prevent such suicides. He would personally sing them Hebrew songs before they went to sleep, but the ungrateful ones still committed suicide.

@Raze Okay, anyway, Palestinians generally think like you. They get caught up in hatred and occasionally commit massacres. You can argue all you want about the past, but the future is more important. What future do Palestinians hope to achieve with more massacres and rapes like the one on October 7th? Don't you understand that life is more valuable than such nonsense? The Jews give them the opportunity to evolve, to become a living society, with proyection, to escape misery. Why choose suicide? It's mentally retarded. The same one you demonstrate in every AI message. As Golda Meyer said, this shit will end when Arabs love their children more than they hate Jews, which is to say, never. Why? Because Islamic idiosyncrasy revolves around honor. Not about what's right, but honor. It's different. Right is internal; honor is external. It's how you're perceived, self-image, how Allah perceives you. Pure narcissism.

Before flying home from my month-long stay at Shunyamurti’s ashram in Costa Rica, I found a guy who was offering Bufo Alvarius retreats: 100g of Changa on the first day, 70g of Bufo Alvarius (roughly 5-10mg of 5-MeO) on the second, and a little over 4g of magic mushrooms, a mixture of roughly 1.5g Mazatapec and 2.5g of Tidal Wave, on the third day. I had never used any of these substances before, although I had a phase of taking moderate (100-250 microgram) doses of LSD whilst I was at university many years ago. Having reached a point in life where I felt like I had nothing left to lose, I thought I would see if there is anything there… We did Rapé, which helped me purge energy that was stuck in my lower body, and Sananga before the first two sessions. After being sick multiple times from the Rapé, my Changa experience was like the unconditional love of the Mother which I have always longed for. I felt totally innocent and pure like an infant. We did the session late in the evening and apparently the birds started singing! My Bufo experience was love in the form of total empathy: in the space of about fifteen minutes, I became many people in my life who have meant something to me; I totally left my own frame of reference and inhabited their own. It became fascinatingly apparent that all of this is just one consciousness masquerading in so many different forms. I have always been overly sensitive to other people so I suppose Bufo cranked this aspect of my character up! However, I must confess that these first two experiences left me slightly disappointed and in agreement with the spiritual teaching that psychedelics are still within the realm of illusion… Both experiences were very beautiful and profound but some deeper part of me still found it trivial in some way. Having said that, I did come away from Bufo with a strong feeling of reverence and a sense that it had much more to teach me. I look forward to returning to it once I have recovered from and assimilated the last experiences. Although I didn’t really enjoy the first half of the psilocybin trip because it was just too weird, childish and overwhelming, the most profound part of the retreat was the latter half of the psilocybin trip. The cartoonish and evanescent hallucinations of psilocybin wore off and I went into a space which was much closer to the 5-MeO experience the night before. I was still hallucinating but now perfect unfolding triangular fractals and divine geometry, illogical tunnels leading to spiritual revelations, myself and other devotees prostrating ourselves in awe before God as a giant orb of light. I felt highly in tune with myself, authentic and natural. I was laughing and crying in a way which felt totally genuine and which I have never done before: my laughter normally feels slightly contrived and, although I do cry a lot anyway, these were different tears of self-forgiveness and spiritual mercy. Loads of mucus was coming out of my nose as well, it was a very purging and relieving experience and I still feel very different days afterwards. There was a genuine sense of devotion and awe at the supreme majesty of God which I have only felt rarely in my life. There are a lot of other things I could talk about - a lot of my psilocybin trip centred around how awful modern life seems to me, a sense of apocalyptic glee around the number 444, “4:44, the clock is ticking!”, the kinky and sexual aspect of “playing a role” which became apparent on Bufo, various personal psychological insights, a fortunately short-lived desire to commit suicide on mushrooms for no negative reason but just out of a feeling of completeness and an apathy regarding the modern world, and so on. In the end, though, I couldn’t stop laughing at the absurdity of it all... It’s all a joke! At one point in the psilocybin trip I thought I was going to die because I had swallowed some tiny flecks of wool from my jumper! This became so funny to me. I was telling my guide how I was conceived in Vienna - he told me that his mother was a wealthy Jew from Vienna who had to flee because of the Nazi’s - because my parents had sex on a holiday in Vienna which my Dad won on the game show Wheel of Fortune. He said: “So you were born because of a wheel of fortune?” This became so funny to me. The lesson that I want to integrate from this is that it’s all a big joke! I also felt a renewed appreciation for and affinity with Actualized.org and Leo’s teachings. These substances are very powerful in revealing the ways in which the mind constructs reality… At one point on mushrooms I literally watched my mind creating reality in slow motion, as if it was made out of building blocks like Lego! Very strange… We are such stuff as dreams are made of.

@zazen By the way, using the example of the Spanish colonies demonstrates a childlike level of understanding. Those who rebelled were descendants of Spaniards, just like in the American War of Independence. Not the Aztecs; they no longer existed. Do you understand the difference? The Bulgarians were colonized by the ottomans for centuries. Did they teach their children suicide?

Then you don't justify, just you see that has a cause (legitimate) that are the conditions that give rise it. Is being bit liar right? Yes anyone who believes in Muhammad, paradise and hell is stupid by definition. Christians also believe in dogma, but nowadays they are minority who really believe, and also are stupid. Anyway Jesus weren't a warlord pedophile. It adds a plus of stupidity. And cause this: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPeEJL_DSAG/?igsh=NGJkbTNieWE5dGQx Anyway, what would you think about a country ruled by fanatic Bishops that forbidden women showing legs under death condemn? Well, as you are a liar, if it's in your side you would justify it Look liar, it's the Muslim voice NOW, after realizing that Israel is impossible to erase. Before, liar, the voice was total war against Israel. Can you understand the difference, liar? The Jews and south America never built is identity focused in hate, liar. They had independence wars, like the Indians, but even the American natives, who were really exterminated, never teach hate and suicide to their children. As you are a liar, for you it's the same, but it isn't Yes, and they rule Palestine, that's the problem, as you know, liar. I'm done with both of you, you are just liars that are defending your position because your origins, family, anything, is closer than this position than the other. If you were a Jew you would defend Israel with the same lies. No integrity. Zero value. Anyone who can see would be that obvious reality that regardless of the thousands of nuances and injustices committed, a society based on the cult of death, which teaches suicide as an essential value to its children, has no future. It must change of its own free will or be forced to do so. The Japanese were forced, the Aztecs too, and the Islamists will be. Watch those educative videos https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMc7LXbuKZ8/?igsh=MWN6bXdjZW8yNWgybQ== https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOlO27PE96c/?igsh=Z3ozYng1dnlodjQ= One final question: Do you think it was positive or negative for humanity that Buddhism existed or not? And Christianity? And advaita Vedanta? And the Aztec religion? And Islam? And Japanese empire? And Nazism? And Spanish expansion? And democracy? And American culture? And communism? Roman empire? Gengis peace? Are all the same? No one absolutely positive, but some more that others, and some of them quite negative . And nowadays Islamism...well. Islam has the chance of stopping being politic and become personal, Sufi. Let's see if they achieve it or become islamist, and that's a plague

A whole list of comedians, including Dave Chappelle, seemingly just chose to do a semi suicide on their careers by performing in Arabia. Heckling won't stop for quite a while.

The original rebuttal made a series of systematic, well-sourced arguments: that the portrayal of Palestinians as uniquely brainwashed is unsupported by comparative studies of Israeli and Palestinian education; that Israel’s conduct in Gaza violates international law; that “eliminating Hamas” is both strategically ineffective and morally disastrous; and that Israeli policy has long benefitted from Hamas’s continued existence. None of these arguments are addressed. Instead, the speaker offers a single, emotionally charged anecdote about a failed suicide bomber who received medical care in Israel and later attempted to carry out an attack. While the story of Wafa al-Bass is undeniably tragic and complex, the attempt to use it as a blanket indictment of Palestinian society is an egregious misuse of anecdote as argument. It’s a transparent attempt to derail a conversation about war crimes and systemic injustice by pointing to an individual act of violence—while ignoring the far broader, state-sanctioned violence occurring in parallel. This one-sided invocation of Palestinian extremism becomes even more hypocritical when set against Israel’s ongoing support for settler violence, which the speaker wholly ignores. If the goal is to discuss moral degradation, incitement, and the glorification of violence, then the conversation must include the 2015 Duma arson attack, in which Israeli settlers firebombed a Palestinian home, killing an 18-month-old baby, Ali Dawabsheh, and fatally wounding his parents. The response among segments of Israeli society was not universal condemnation. In fact, video footage later emerged of far-right Israelis at a wedding celebrating the attack—waving guns and stabbing a photo of the murdered toddler. This was not an isolated incident. Human rights organizations, including B’Tselem and Yesh Din, have extensively documented how the Israeli military routinely fails to prevent settler violence against Palestinians—and, in many cases, enables it. In 2023 and 2024 alone, there was a surge in settler pogroms in the West Bank, with masked men attacking villages, torching homes, and shooting civilians while Israeli forces either stood by or actively participated. The U.S. State Department, the EU, and even former Israeli security officials have acknowledged the increase in settler terrorism, often perpetrated with impunity and ideological encouragement from members of Israel’s ruling coalition. So when someone points to one horrific example of a Palestinian attempting to blow herself up and says, “this shows you what kind of people they are,” but simultaneously ignores decades of systematic Israeli settler violence, the double standard becomes indefensible. It is not moral clarity; it is selective outrage. It dehumanizes one side while sanitizing the other. The speaker’s reply is laced with violent imagery: “inserting a katana,” “burn alive your daughters,” “restart Gaza,” “infection.” This language is not just morally grotesque—it mirrors the very rhetoric they claim to oppose. Describing a population as an “infection” that needs to be “cleaned” echoes genocidal frameworks used throughout history to justify ethnic cleansing. It is disturbingly close to the language used by extremists on both sides, who devalue human life in pursuit of ideological purity. What the speaker fails to grasp—or intentionally ignores—is that violent extremism exists on both sides of the conflict, and both societies have elements that glorify it. If one is to condemn Wafa al-Bass (as one should), consistency demands equal condemnation of Israeli youth raised to sing genocidal songs at far-right marches, or settlers who believe it is divinely mandated to burn Palestinians alive. The celebration of murder at the so-called “wedding of hate” is not a fringe moment—it is a symptom of a society with its own incitement problem. The Israeli government has repeatedly failed to prosecute such acts seriously. In fact, members of Israel’s current far-right coalition have publicly defended, funded, or incited settler violence. Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s finance minister, once said the Palestinian village of Huwara “should be wiped out.” When someone condemns Palestinian violence as evidence of a failed society, while refusing to acknowledge the mirror image within their own favored side, it reflects a failure of intellectual honesty. The speaker clearly lacks any commitment to principled consistency. They cherry-pick data, rely on emotional appeals, and ignore systemic patterns that complicate their binary worldview. Moreover, the refusal to engage with well-documented critiques—like Israel’s role in perpetuating Hamas, or its deliberate use of starvation as a weapon—shows a mind more interested in vindication than in truth. That’s not serious geopolitical thinking. It’s reactionary posturing wrapped in a flag. The speaker’s reply is a textbook case of moral hypocrisy and ideological capture. They ignore every serious critique raised in the rebuttal, replace data with a single anecdote, use dehumanizing language to justify mass violence, and remain silent on the mountain of evidence documenting Israeli extremism and settler terrorism. If they believe that the story of Wafa al-Bass proves Palestinians are inherently violent, what do they think the Duma firebombing says about Israelis? Why do they ignore Israeli schools where Arabs are described as “snakes” or “demons”? Why do they not cite the countless acts of brutality committed by settlers, often with state backing? The speaker’s refusal to engage with specific, well-documented criticisms — and their lunge toward anecdotal sensationalism and grotesque metaphor — is not an accident. It’s a defense mechanism. When confronted with evidence that threatens the brittle scaffolding of their worldview, they don’t reevaluate their assumptions; they retreat into moral absolutism, cherry-picked horror stories, and emotional spectacle. This isn’t moral clarity — it’s intellectual cowardice dressed up as conviction. Let’s call it what it is: a desperate, almost pitiful, attempt to protect a dogma too fragile to survive scrutiny. They avoid addressing specific points — like Israel’s documented war crimes, the systemic violence of its settler population, or the cynical political calculus behind propping up Hamas — not because they haven’t seen the evidence, but because engaging with it would force them to confront the reality that their moral narrative is soaked in hypocrisy. So instead, they lash out. They spew graphic, violent hypotheticals, invoke one isolated case as though it speaks for an entire people, and ignore the fact that their own “side” harbors extremists who celebrate the burning of infants alive. This is not just weak — it’s morally bankrupt. It's the rhetorical equivalent of plugging one's ears and screaming "But look at them!" while pretending the blood on your own hands is someone else’s problem. It is the logic of a frightened ideologue who senses, somewhere deep in the recesses of their conscience, that their position can’t hold under the weight of reality. So they don’t debate — they deflect. They don’t argue — they moralize. And they sure as hell don’t think — they perform. Their version of righteousness is a hollow pantomime: outrage without empathy, analysis without evidence, and certainty without reflection. They want to believe in a world divided into saints and monsters because it lets them justify collective punishment, mass civilian deaths, and dehumanization — not as regrettable necessities, but as righteous purification. That’s not morality. That’s fanaticism hiding behind the fig leaf of patriotism.

The claim that Gaza's population has been "brainwashed from childhood with ideas of hatred and slaughter as essential human values" is not just misleading — it's a textbook case of projection masquerading as moral clarity. The 2004 JWeekly article debunks sensationalist Western and Israeli media narratives that falsely portray Palestinian children as being raised en masse to become suicide bombers. The article points out that claims of "incitement" were often grossly exaggerated, manipulated, or based on isolated anecdotes presented without context. But of course, for someone clinging to an image of Gaza as a hive of pure hatred, nuance is not only inconvenient — it’s incompatible with the worldview. Moreover, the 2013 NPR report on the U.S.-funded study analyzing Israeli and Palestinian textbooks shatters the premise of a uniquely hateful Palestinian curriculum. The study found that both Israeli and Palestinian educational systems fail to present each other's narratives accurately. There’s little empathy on either side, but the idea that Palestinian children are uniquely radicalized while Israeli youth are raised on pacifism and rainbows is fantasy-level delusion. In fact, The Guardian’s 2011 report documents rising levels of racism in Israeli schools, including explicit anti-Arab sentiment among both students and educators. But, predictably, critics like the one quoted turn a blind eye to this, reserving moral outrage exclusively for the "Other." If "brainwashing" is truly your concern, it's worth asking why you're silent about one side's erasure of Palestinian history and growing ethno-nationalism. But then again, that would require intellectual consistency — a resource seemingly in short supply. One of the more perversely surreal claims is that Israel is "cleaning up that infection" while "causing the fewest possible deaths." Aside from the nauseating biological metaphor — describing over 2 million people as a disease — this is a spectacular feat of self-deception. According to the December 2024 Human Rights Watch report, Israel’s actions in Gaza involve systematic deprivation of food, water, electricity, and medicine to civilians — in direct violation of international humanitarian law. The report explicitly states that these are not collateral consequences but deliberate policies: the use of starvation as a weapon of war. If this is someone's idea of restraint, one shudders to imagine what excess would look like. Similarly, the 2024 Amnesty International report documents numerous instances of indiscriminate bombing, targeting of civilian infrastructure, and mass displacement. One detailed case involves the bombing of a refugee shelter, killing dozens of civilians without any identified military target. When entire neighborhoods are flattened, medical convoys are bombed, and humanitarian aid is blocked, only the most ideologically blinkered would describe it as “minimizing casualties.” But this is the problem with people who reduce ethics to loyalty tests: if Israel does it, it must be “necessary,” no matter how brutal. If Palestinians die, it must be their own fault for being born in the wrong zip code. It’s not analysis — it’s apologia dressed up as moral clarity. The belief that the IDF should have "continued the war until Hamas was eliminated" is a military fantasy — the kind that could only be held by someone whose understanding of counterinsurgency is based on action movies and Twitter threads. According to the RAND Corporation's study "How Terrorist Groups End", only 7% of terrorist organizations are defeated through military force. The most successful strategies involve political integration or robust intelligence and law enforcement operations, not carpet bombing or siege warfare. Hamas is more than just a militia — it is also a governing body, a provider of social services, and, for many Gazans, a symbol of resistance to a brutal occupation. Even if the IDF were to dismantle Hamas’s military wing (at great human cost), the ideology — and more dangerously, the grievances that fuel it — would persist. Waging total war to “eliminate” Hamas without addressing the underlying occupation, economic blockade, and daily humiliations endured by Palestinians is like trying to kill a plant by clipping the leaves. The blind faith in total war as a path to peace is not only strategically illiterate but also morally bankrupt. It elevates military annihilation as a substitute for diplomacy, while treating civilians as acceptable collateral damage. That is not counterterrorism — it's state-sanctioned vengeance. The speaker's supposed concern about Hamas’s survival rings hollow in light of Haaretz’s 2025 report, which revealed that Israel replaced moderate Fatah prisoners with convicted Hamas operatives in a prisoner swap. Why? Because empowering Fatah — a more moderate, diplomatically engaged Palestinian faction — would undermine the “no partner for peace” narrative that justifies endless war. Supporting Israel under the pretense of opposing Hamas, while ignoring the fact that Israeli policy often strengthens Hamas for strategic convenience, is intellectual malpractice. This hypocrisy lays bare what’s really going on: Hamas is useful. It justifies war. It absolves Israel from making peace. And for people like the speaker, it simplifies the moral equation down to something they can understand: one side good, one side evil. Facts be damned. What does this worldview say about the person holding it? Frankly, not much that flatters their intellect or ethics. Their grasp of geopolitics appears to extend no further than whichever pundit last yelled the loudest on cable news. Their understanding of military affairs is laughably shallow — they repeat the phrase “eliminate Hamas” like it’s a cheat code, oblivious to how such strategies consistently fail across modern history. More disturbingly, the language used — “infection,” “pressure pot,” “restart Gaza,” “immolate themselves” — is dehumanizing in the extreme. It reflects a moral outlook that is at best indifferent to civilian life and at worst comfortable with collective punishment as policy. This is not the rhetoric of a principled observer — it is the language of someone who has become morally anesthetized, so long as the suffering is happening on the other side of the wall. Such views should be treated with deep skepticism. They are not expressions of moral clarity or strategic insight — they are symptoms of ideological capture. And while everyone is entitled to their opinion, not all opinions are entitled to respect — especially when they whitewash war crimes, demonize civilians, and promote endless war as a viable path to peace. The quoted analysis reflects a profoundly unserious and ethically compromised perspective — one that fails on factual, legal, strategic, and moral grounds. It misrepresents the nature of education in Gaza, falsely portrays Israel's conduct as restrained, clings to unrealistic military goals, and ignores Israel's own role in sustaining Hamas for political gain. The person advancing these arguments demonstrates a stunning lack of critical thinking, intellectual humility, and human empathy. If this is their idea of geopolitical analysis, they would be better off reading history books than writing manifestos. In summary, the speaker exhibits the moral absolutism and binary reasoning typical of a younger developmental stage, but without the openness to learning that youth often allows. Unlike a child, who might outgrow simplistic thinking, this person clings to it — not out of innocence, but out of fear, dogma, or a need to protect a brittle identity rooted in conflict.

He understands well his society Shit you have the heart of a lion, You are right, if an alien society comes and says that this galactic sector is under their jurisdiction, but that I will continue to retain my properties, I will have citizen status and they will also bring technology that will make me immortal, I will say: no!!!!! in the name of Muhammad I will educate my children to commit suicide since nothing is more terrible than not being sovereign! I want to be subjected to an retarded Spanish dictator! Only he can sodomize me and put me in jail for 25 years for a comment on Instagram!! But they're not aliens. They're Jews who've lived in that land for 3,000 years. There's always been a Jewish presence, and when Israel was founded, there were half a million living there. They didn't oppress or steal. They brought wealth and prosperity, openness and vitality. Why don't collaborate and grow together as a society? Maybe because Muslims don't want to grow, just go to paradise? Listen this Muslim, he's smart https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNxiSB52NbW/?igsh=bG1qNm44ZG1oaGc4

This is a serious post that is seeking advice on how I can offer others help in dealing with the outstanding damage left behind in their lives by fools. Through my life I've been aware of my own foolishness and I basically thought that I was as foolish as it gets. No doubt I had more than one area of foolishness, but I was in for a rude awakening to the true scale of what proper foolishness can look like. It's become abundantly clear to me that fools exist not only as members of society, but leaders of society. All you have to do is look at Donald Trump. But even broader, the majority of society harbours massive amounts of foolishness. Drug epidemics, abysmal education systems, wars, etc. In my life I have witnessed the breathtaking foolishness of others and the ineffable damage they have caused people in my society. Foolishness that surpasses my own many, many times. We're not talking about a high school teenage bully. We're talking about leaders and authority figures who have absolutely crippled peoples entire lives. The only thing I can think of when I see this is how can I make it better. There are those in society who are commended for their work in annihilating young peoples lives, destroying families and causing people to commit suicide. They are commended, promoted and published as heros and offered pay rises for their dedication and focus on hurting people young and old. So much so that it even starts to make you think, "are these people even aware of how much damage their causing their own people?" It's kind of like that situation where you hear other people talking about how they can sing well but when they sing they sound like a screaming cat, then you think..."well I think I can sing reasonably well, do I sound like a screaming cat too?" It seems that certain people are just absolutely and unsalvageably clueless as to the real world. Back to the point, while the people they have destroyed, and I mean completely fucking destroyed, are told to go to counsellors or take up a new hobby which I've been told does a grand total of fuck all to help the crippled lives of young people who have fallen at the hands of these proclaimed heros. Part of my education process with spirituality has included what philosophers mention in that consciousness is infinite in its ability to create. Infinite in its ability to create happiness and peace and beauty as well as pain, destruction and devastation. Each with an ability to compound on itself and multiply the effect 2, 5, 10, 100 times for better or worse. Like imagine being in nazi Germany and you are just now being informed that you and your entire family are about to enter the new stage of your lives which will be prolonged torture and death by gas chamber. Or your an African American person in 1870 and you've been informed that your daughter has been hung on a tree by the KKK and the government thinks they're heros and if you react negatively at all, you'll simply be hung as well. Like how does a person deal with this calibre of utter stupidity? From my perspective there are no currently existent words that exist that appropriate the full gravity of the madness that exists even in the present world. My question is a serious one. How on god's green earth do we heal a person who has been broken. Not just hurt, but completely bent out of shape seemingly permanently. i mean I already know the answer, there is nothing anyone can do to fix it. But there has to be something in the toolbox of life that can at least offer a slight improvement to some who has brushed shoulders with, let's call them...ultra-morons. People who legitimately believe they are good in their minds for hanging black people on trees, gassing Jews and crippling the lives of young people...sometimes to the point of suicide. How does one go about even starting to try and help someone who has experienced this level of collosal stupidity?

Well, no one is asking you to commit suicide by badminton.

Getting Rich Blueprint Ahh man i've been struggling to get rich for so fucking long now .. Lets fucking go 1. Inner Game, Mental & Psychological Side : Similar to dating, yeah you have to work hard and earn your wealth but thats not enough, everyone works fucking hard man. No, War mentality I'm leaning a lot more towards darkness, stepping on people, zero empathy and affection (thats reserved for all my girlfirends thanks) Fucking ruthlessness, lie manipulate, hunger, be a snake be a dog animal bark bark energy fire. Promise shit, collect cash, get amazing at bullshit, marketing. Outreach. Make money get employees for delegation manipulate them get rich quick quick quick GET FUCKING RICH Dont give a f*ck what anyone thinks, piss people the fuck off, call 400 people a day, harass people, never let a lead go until they block you, demand more payment, if they cheap clients collect their money and fuck off and focus on the gold, no refunds. MASTER the fuck out of social psychology and manipulation and frame management, value perception, master my mannerisms my communication for business sales calls everything, master social media if needed i hate getting online attention but if i have to do it, i have to do it. Darkness makes money. Have to become a villain to get rich. ^^ So many people milked me of my money time attention before, i dont owe the world fucking nothing, i'm here to take back. IM GETTING RICH NIGGAAAAAAAAAAAAAA IM GETTING FUCK RICH OR I'LL DIE INTHE PROCESS NIGGGAAA SUICIDE MENTALITY MFFFFF

Cold Approach & Womaniser Blueprint Style Need more fresh clothes - Tailored Pants *3-5, mix of color range - $60- $120 Fresh Sneakers - $60-$130 Club button Shirts - big weakness, I normally just wear fitted white t shirt, which can still work fine, I do see all these guys in the club wearing those shirts thinknig where the fuck do I get these, good to have as an option Inner Game & Drive No Fap Visualization/Affirmations/Self Talk (Probably most overlooked) Final Boss - Remember that this isn't merely to fuck loads of girls (it is but) I'm going to fall for beautiful young exotic ultra feminine 19 year olds (or even younger ;)) , its gona happen, ive got the looks i've got the charisma, just have to max it out, my ultimae cieling is extremely high, I've got Owen cooks sex drive + James Bond looks (when im stylemaxed/looksmaxed) + Vincent Cassels charisma. But that doesnt mean shit until I get the fucking money and the consistent logistics and I go to fucking war and never stop. Brute Force War & Warrior Mentality, WW2 Suicide Mentality & Nihilism Avoid lazy & passive men like the plague Both Day game & Night game (but have to be strategic about night game - choice of when to go out, which events - logistics venue context can make the juice not worth the squeeze, since you're sacrificing sleep and health, has to be worth it ... Also cut off by 1-2AM, no regular fucking 4-6am nights, maybe once a month max. Leo and others thinking this is sustainable is completely nuts, it destroys fucking everything, sleeping at 5AM even once ruins the entire week Approach women of any age older or younger if i feel attraction doesn't matter Never need validation and laugh at rejection Be willing to go out alone, do things alone, and do things in optimal conditions Still approach if broke, approach when high body fat, approach without tailored pants, the momentum is sacred

@theoneandnone Well i cant reply to you if you keep threatening suicide because i don't want to be the one to trigger someone into suicide. If you need help you can ask.

- No, I just repeatedly point out to you the expulsions began before the 1948 invasions, this is the sixth time I am saying this. Even during an invasion, that doesn’t justify war crimes. Just because you’re fighting a war doesn’t mean you are no allowed to do whatever you want to civilians. They didn’t need to go from village to village slaughtering civilians and driving out thousands by force from their homes because at the same time they were fighting Arab armies. (Again, they were already doing this before any Arab army invaded) - because you’re ignoring the context of the Arab riots, this was in response to active colonization of their land. The hebron massacre you keep pointing out for example happened after zionists were marching with weapons chanting the country is there’s. The nebu masa riot escalated from a Jewish milita shooting at an Arab militia that was in a Jewish area searching for French soldiers. - you can’t seem to process that entire populations are not collectively responsible for actions by some of them, and that doesn’t justify crimes committed years later. Imagine there is a race riot in New York between blacks and whites, let’s some it’s started by black rioters, so a year later whites form a armed militia who begins carrying out bombings, the blacks start forming their own militias and also attacking, then the whites start killing thousands of blacks and expel hundreds of thousands of blacks from the city. The original race riot does not justify carrying out terrorist attacks against other people, the fight between militias does not justify mass ethnic cleansing of hundreds of thousands of people who are not involved just because they’re the same race. You never apply this logic to the other side, do you think Hamas is justified in suicide bombings because Palestinians faced settler attacks for years? Do you think the Arab states that expelled their Jews were justified because they had fought a war?

They aren't resentful of what was done to them, but of being Jews in Palestine. The Tutsis are less resentful of the Hutus than the Palestinians with the Jews, and this was a real genocide. They are coexisting and improving Ruanda now. Crimea was populated by Tatars for centuries; Stalin deported them, then they returned, and now they're there as a minority, and they're not immolating themselves every two days. The Sahrawis feel oppressed by Morocco, and they're not stabbing Moroccans as their primary goal in life The Chechens were crushed by Putin, and they haven't spent 100 years educating their 3-year-olds to commit suicide. In fact they are Putin's friends now. This is a purely religious conflict, and if you don't see it, you're blind, with all your tons of information. Why turkey or Iran and so concerned by Israel? Why they are not concerned about the tartars in Crimea, or Chechenia, or about the Sahara?

@ivankiss 🤦bruhh..you're turning it into a huuuuuuge ego game . Just discuss the motherfucking topic. Discuss solipsism. Address what I said .answer to it . If you are not interested in that then why in this godforsaken existence make this thread ? Timed out ? Be grateful that Leo and Mods didn't outright lock the thread for that troll of a title . Also sky is the limit go become the best musician ever even more legendary than Beethoven ..literally no one cares or gives two flying straps of Spaghetti. Success and fame don't make a human happy . There are millionaires who commit suicide. Because they have everything they wish for instantly like a fucking Aladdin ghost granting you a wish . Wheres the sweetness of struggle? That poor labor worker who sweats his whole fucking body everyday to just to eat a piece of bread is more happy than Elon Musk and Bill Gates.

@Sugarcoat I have figured out another reason not to kill yourself. It is a framework that acknowledges the reality of suicide without moralizing against you. Basically, if you are suicidal, then most likely you are dealing with circumstances that no human being should have to cope with. In this sense it is not really about you, but rather something deeply unfair and difficult that overwhelms your ability to cope. What this means is that you need help coping with an impossible situation. The problem is that our current system is often dysfunctional and fails people who reach out for help by prescribing pills that make things worse. Therefore, if I feel suicidal, then I want help coping with something extremely difficult. However, the reason people do kill themselves is if they feel that they cannot be helped. From this point of view, if I am suicidal then I want to reach out to every possible source I can imagine in the hopes of finding one person who cares, as this is what it takes to start making things at least a little bit better. It makes sense to approach suicidal thoughts in this way if you are approaching the ultimate final decision to take your own life.

I agree legal assisted suicide should be available in all 50 states

I am discouraging it, But in a nutshell I find suicide as valid if one is suffering immensely enough. Shit I think I’ll do it eventually and I would hate for someone tell say “oh don’t go we need you here” bla bla fck offf

Where is there to go? The common assumption behind suicide is that you'll go into this lovey dovey plane of existence where all your worries and problems will melt away, escaping the problems ur facing on earth. Is that guaranteed though? Is it true? For all I know, my life after death could be worse. Many people report hellish NDE experiences. After reading many NDE reports, I have this intuition that suicide in many cases is the too obvious answer. People get lectured in their life reviews telling them how much of a selfish asshole they were etc etc. I think if someone is truly suicidal, they should probably go balls to the wall in spirituality since they have nothing to lose either. My personal theory is that some form of kamma is real. We don't know what any of us did in our past lives but it might come boomeranging back relentlessly. What I think matters is intentions behind suicide. Are they pure? Since most things in the universe are cyclic in some kind of way, it's no wild assumption to also assume birth and death is also cyclic (rebirths). If one's intentions are relatively pure (eg. if one has attained a very high integrated spiritual state but is suffering a terminal illness) then suicide would be considered tbh. If I were to commit suicide, I would settle my business here on earth and repay my debts to society, my family and others who have helped me. And I would have attained a highly integrated spiritual state which even carries over to my daily life (like an arahant). For me that would be a blameless suicide. Point is, I don't think suicide is the escape most people think it is. Who can prove existence after suicide isn't more suffering than what one intended to escape? Im not some new ager "life is a school!" type either. The suffering is definitely there and it does seem senseless and meaningless for many. But I do think most suicides has some form of metaphysical consequences. For terminal illness and chronic unbearable physical pain, sure I can see why it would be done. For most people I think, mental problems can be worked on and overcome instead of going straight into the deep end and dying. But for many, it does get to that point unfortunately may they rest in peace. - me as a guy who's been suicidal for 5-6 years ever since being a teen actually. My suicidality lessened a lot when I realised my suicide isn't exactly the escape that I romanticised it to be. I have a lot of work to do. If you go hardcore into what buddhism teaches, you may find some satisfying conclusions and answers. Classic buddhism won't alleviate all suffering in this life but it will prevent future suffering from future rebirths.

🔹 1. What the Oslo Accords established Signed between Yitzhak Rabin (Israel) and Yasser Arafat (PLO) under U.S. mediation (Bill Clinton), the Oslo Accords (1993–1995) aimed to create a gradual path toward peace and a Palestinian state. They had three main pillars: Mutual recognition: The PLO recognized Israel’s right to exist. Israel recognized the PLO as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. Progressive Palestinian autonomy: Israel would gradually withdraw from parts of Gaza and the West Bank. The territories would be divided into three zones: Area A: full Palestinian civil and security control. Area B: Palestinian civil control, joint Israeli security control. Area C: full Israeli control. Final-status negotiations within five years (by 1999): To decide issues such as borders, Jerusalem, refugees, and security. 🔹 2. Why Israel did not fully comply Ongoing terrorism (1994–2001): After Oslo, suicide bombings by Hamas and Islamic Jihad increased sharply. More Israelis were killed in terror attacks in the five years after Oslo than in the five years before. This made much of Israeli society lose trust in the Palestinian leadership’s intentions. Domestic political change: In 1995, Rabin was assassinated by a Jewish extremist. In 1996, Netanyahu (Likud) came to power, opposed to Oslo’s approach. From then on, right-wing governments slowed or froze further withdrawals. Unresolved issues: Israel demanded full security guarantees before further concessions. The PLO failed to dismantle its armed factions. Key topics like Jerusalem and settlements were postponed indefinitely. 🔹 3. Why the Palestinians also failed to comply The PLO never formally recognized Israel as a Jewish state. Terrorist groups continued to operate —often tolerated or supported by the Palestinian Authority. The Palestinian Authority did not build democratic institutions; corruption and internal power struggles weakened it. 🔹 4. The outcome Between 1993 and 2000, there were economic improvements and some cooperation, but no political progress. In 2000, Arafat rejected the Camp David offer, which included a Palestinian state on about 92% of the West Bank and all of Gaza. Soon after, the Second Intifada broke out (2000–2005), killing more than 4,000 people. 🔹 5. Summary ActorWhat they failed to doReason IsraelComplete withdrawals, freeze settlementsTerrorism, political shifts, loss of trust Palestinian Authority (PLO)Stop terrorism, accept final peaceInternal divisions, Islamist pressure ResultCollapse of trust and of the peace process 💬 Conclusion: Israel partially complied (withdrawals from Gaza and Jericho, creation of the Palestinian Authority) but halted the process after waves of terrorism and political change. The PLO did not stop violence or build credible governance. Both sides broke the mutual trust that Oslo required —and the peace process collapsed.

I appreciate the sentiments, I know I’m clogging up this forum with this shit and I’m sorry but if solipsism is the ultimate end goal I refuse to do it. I refuse to stay in this dream talking to myself no matter how much I accept the synchronicities… the obvious proof etc I still reject it. I understand the complexity of solipsism etc. but I refuse to be god jerking off in his dream playing with himself. And I totally understand suicide discouragement etc obviously but if it’s my own self talking to me why the hell would I care. Has no weight to it it’s like a dream character saying “don’t leave us” Of course you guys don’t want me to leave because the fucking game and dream ends with me. This is not bashing Leo btw or anyone. (Or myself) lol.