Something Funny

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    3,776

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Something Funny

  2. Posted · Edited by Something Funny

    @Salvijus you can't expect me to watch 3 1 hour long videos to have a discussion with you.

    5 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    These people can disintegrate their body at will and appear again at will. (I know it sounds crazy you don't have to say it to me.)

    The gender change is beyond their power though.

    Why do souls even need gender? Do they procreate?

    5 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    Anyhow, my experience is similar to his actually. Different entities appear in different forms. Some may appear in dark siluete. Ascended souls appear as intense light or sometimes an orb.

    So what you've said before about how my grandma is still a woman as a spirit, therefore the gender is tied to the soul was not true?

    Then you don't have an argument and gender actually isn't tied to the soul or you have no way of knowing that since a soul can appear like any random thing?

    Why out bodies don't look as an orb if like you said, the body is shaped after the soul?

    Too many plot holes.

  5. Posted

    1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

    I have direct experience of communicating with dead spirits. These spirits have a gender even without a body

    How do you know that the opposite is not the case and that the soul is not shaped by the body it was in? Or that they are not shaped in both ways?

    Do you have any direct experience of that?

    How do you know that those spirits don't simply maintain the visual form they feel like maintaining / want you to see them in? How do you know that this is their true form? Maybe they are actually just some shapeless blobs?

    How do you know you spoke to actual spirits of those dead people and not some other entities that are bullshitting you?

    See, I don't even need to deny what you are telling. There are lots of logical leaps and loop holes in the conclusions you are making from it, even if it is true.

  6. Posted · Edited by Something Funny

    It's so sad that most of spirituality is just pulling random bullshit out of your ass and saying it as confidently as you can.

    I can also do that.

    Actually, souls are created from this matter, called soul mass. And there is a giant toad that needs to chew it to create a souls of specific shape. 

    In most cases it just does its job, making male and female souls. But sometimes it gets bored and tries to make something more creative. Hence all the transgender people, and other people with different quirks.

    It gets bored exactly 7.67% of the times.

    I know, this will be too esoteric and woo woo for you guys to believe, but that's how it actually is.

    The toad told me so.

  7. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    These esoteric things I can't prove easily

    But what makes you believe them? You just do because they sound cool?

    8 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    Because your soul determines what type of body you will have

    Why? What makes you think that's exactly how it works?

    9 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    Although there could be some weird exceptions like 1 in 10 billion where someone is born with weird deformities

    Again, why??? How can you know how rare those exceptions are? What are you basing those claims on? 

     

  8. Posted

    @Salvijus where's the proof?

    This having anything to do with souls is just their interpreration of what happened. 

    How am I supposed to have a dialogue with you if you don't even know what proof means?

    And even if we go along with your story. How do you know that it's not possible for a male soul to end up in a female body? Where's the proof of that?

    You think it's possible for two souls to appear in one body but not for one soul of a different gender? Why? 

    You guys struggle with basic logic but then think that you have a right to decide the whole life for somebody else.

  11. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    There are cases of criminal men saying they are women, they get relocated to a women's prison, then they rape women there. 

    Link?

    Nobody will send you to woman's prison just because you said so. To do that you would need to officialy change your gender on your documents. Is it possible to do that where you live? And are there cases of people officialy changing their gender to rape women?

    Would love for you to share some.

    Also, people rape each other in prison. Men rape men. Women rape women. Prison guards rape prisoners.

    Maybe we should get rid of prison guards? They are too unpractical.

    6 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    Idk bro. Military maybe would be an example.

    So what would be the difficulty?

    7 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    The point is, the practicality of such identity is questionable. And doesn't pass the test imo. 

    How convenient for you. I am sure this is an objective judgement and totally not just whatever suits your agenda.

    11 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    There are more problems with transgenderism from a more esoteric point of view. But I don't think people here could stomach such takes. It involves souls and energy bodies. It would probably be too woo woo for most. 

    Come on, show me what you got.

  12. Posted

    1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

    Also unpractical in prison

    How?

    1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

    unpractical when we need to identify people for certain types of jobs to do

    How? What types of jobs to do, lol? Are you building a concentration camp?

    2 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    Let me rephrase it then, transgenderism is as valid as me identifying as a tree. 

    You see, you are a hypocrite. It's not possible to honestly believe in how all identities are imaginary and also say this.

    You are just parroting Leo's words to sound cool. You don't actually embody any of those higher understandings.

  13. Posted

    1 minute ago, Salvijus said:

    Its practicality is a debatable matter I would say. It seems unpractical in sports. It seems unpractical in sensitive areas like nude beach and toilets etc. 

    How is it unpractical on the nude beach, lol?

    For toilets - it's really not. Nothing stops anyone from entering women's toilet and murdering everyone there. It's not some secure restricted area. This idea that some guy will pretend to be a woman and will go there to harass people so trans people should be banned is ridiculous. That guy can already do that. He doesn't need to dress as a woman for it. 

    For sports - yes it can be problematic.

    But you are here attacking the whole validity of idea of being trans not some minute points.

  15. Posted

    4 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    But if I start asking that a government give me the same rights that trees have, it will become ridiculous. See? 

    He/she is not identifying as a tree though? This is just false equivalency.

    What is so super unpractical about re-assigning a person from one ALREADY EXSTING imaginary category to another ALREADY EXISTING imaginary category?

    You've said yourself that they are imaginary so what is such a big hurdle? What special right do you think they will receive that are so unpractical? Considering how they are just the right that people already have. They not asking for a right to plant himself in someone's backyard and be a tree.

    You are contradicting yourself. If identity is imaginary, then what's the issue? How is them identifying as a woman any more ridiculous than them identifying as a guy?

    The answer is once again: you talk big, but your words are empty. Because you can only hold that contradictory position if you are still super attached to traditional gender identity.

  17. Posted

    2 minutes ago, Salvijus said:

    So if I were to put a tree costume. That would change my appearance. Would that mean I have become a tree? 

    I mean... tree or not, you seem to reserve an ability to define your identity. You've just defined yourself in this thread.

    What makes you say that she has no right to do the same?

    Maybe then you don't either. Maybe only other people should be allowed to define it for you?

    Maybe I want to define you as a weird forum transphobe. Should this be your new identity?

  23. Posted

    @Salvijus you are the one who was throwing loud words around about how transgenderism crumbles under scrutiny, lol. So I thought you had something to say.

    1 hour ago, Salvijus said:

    In this post you tried to give validity to transgenderism because his appearance is so like of a woman. So is appearance what determines person's gender?

    You are wording it in such a weird way. I didn't try to give it validity with this post, because it being somehow invalid never even crossed my mind. I was juat really impressed with the badass transformation and wanted to share it, lol.

    1 hour ago, Salvijus said:

    Do you have a better argument to support transgender philosophy? 

    I don't see how it is even necessary and how it is a philosophy.

    Dude didn't like being a guy so he decided to be a woman. Dude is now happy and looks amazing.

    That's it. What is there to argue about?