Something Funny

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    3,425

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Something Funny

  5. Posted

    Focus and Calm Stack (6–8 weeks):

    • L-Theanine: Daily (optional on rest days).
    • Lion’s Mane: Daily.
    • Bacopa Monnieri: Daily.
    • Ashwagandha: Daily or 5 days on, 2 days off.
    • Optional Psilocybin Microdosing: Every 2–3 days (e.g., Mon, Wed, Fri).

    Rest Period (2 weeks):

    • Stop all adaptogens (Ashwagandha, Bacopa Monnieri).
    • Continue Lion’s Mane and L-Theanine if desired (these don’t require cycling).
    • Pause psilocybin microdosing during this period to further reset.

    Rhodiola Rosea Stack (4–6 weeks):

    • Rhodiola Rosea: Daily or 5 days on, 2 days off.
    • L-Theanine: Daily (optional on rest days).
    • Lion’s Mane: Daily (optional for synergy).
    • Optional Psilocybin Microdosing: Every 2–3 days (alternate with Rhodiola-free days if overstimulation is an issue).

    Rest Period (2 weeks)
    Repeat Cycle: Return to Stack 1.

  7. Posted

    It can't be used as a currency because it's changing so much.

    Is the only reason it's valuable is because people can make money from it? People keep mining it and buying it because they hope they will make a profit if its value increases and so its value increases because people keep buying it. While it doesn't have any actual value (at least I don't see any?). It is kind of strange-loopey, lol.

  8. Posted

    5 minutes ago, Something Funny said:

    So? Let him take it. Let whoever wants to fight - fight and whoever doesn't want to fight - not fight.

    Like I've said. Putin is not going to last forever. 

    @BlueOak if you value consciousness more than anything and war is psychopathic than this is the most conscious option.

    This is what Ukraine would do if it was a country of enlightened stage turquoise monks.

  9. Posted · Edited by Something Funny

    @BlueOak Sorry if I was too harsh. Like I said, I get too emotional about it sometimes.

    I am not saying that you should go to war.

     

    7 minutes ago, BlueOak said:

    Giving up land to Putin is just going to encourage him to do more, as he has done again and again. Because nothing has changed about the world. Another foreigner who can't shoot a gun dying there will make no difference whatsoever.

    So? Let him take it. Let whoever wants to fight - fight and whoever doesn't want to fight - not fight.

    Like I've said. Putin is not going to last forever. 
     

    12 minutes ago, Bobby_2021 said:

    @Something Funny It's accepted in western circles to sell off weapons to Ukraine because Americans are not dying. Apparently they are making use the weapons that would have otherwise had to be maintained and Stored which is expensive compared to shipping them off to Ukraine for debt.

    It's one giant scam of epic proportions.

    I don't mind it as long as it's a simple deal based on mutual consent.

    What I mind is other countries / people pushing Ukraine to keep fighting, pushing them to keep recruiting more soldiers, lowering conscription age, etc.

    All the while giving Ukraine just enough weapons and ability to fire them to keep dragging this war along, but not enough to ever finish it.

    Just look at what Biden administration is doing right now with trying to send extra weapons to Ukraine and allowing Ukraine to use long range missiles AFTER they lost the election. It just tells me that all those excuses about ww3, and nukes, and escalation are bullshit. Nobody is seriously afraid of this. They just enjoy how things are going right now.

  11. Posted

    1 hour ago, BlueOak said:

    You are incapable of realising all people want the same thing: safety. There is no twist of the words, it is two perspectives looking at the same problem with different solutions. 

    You are incapable of realising my point, which is that while all people want safety, some people are audacious enough to exploit others for their own safety, like you.

    1 hour ago, BlueOak said:

    You are a coward for wanting to give an aggressive tyrant more land, and trying to sacrifice all these lives for nothing.

    I am not sacrificing any lives. I am advocating for the war to stop, thus saving as many lives as possible. Ever heard of a sunken costs fallacy?

    It's not my fault that you value a chunk of land belonging to one country over another more than a human life.

    1 hour ago, BlueOak said:

    Your perspective must be proved 'right' to make your ego feel good, and those who disagree must be proven to be the 'bad guy' so someone else can come along and tell you how great you are.

    Not sure how this rambling about good, and bad, and ego connects with what I am saying? Are you incapable of thinking on your own instead of just parroting the same spiritual keywords whether they fit or not?

    You are not a bad guy because you disagree with me, I simply think that people who use the lives of others in this kind of cold blooded politics game are pathetic, and you happen to be one of those people. Nowhere did I say that I want to be great or anything like that, I simply find people like you repulsive and get emotional about it. You make me want to throw up. It's that simple.

  12. Posted

    @BlueOak love how you twist my words to suit your convenience. I am the one arguing against the war here. My defintion of a selfish coward is - gambling other people's lives for your own personal gain and safety.

    5 hours ago, BlueOak said:

    I've endless proof as i've been debating and talking about this for years, but I won't waste another word on someone like yourself

    Oh I am sorry, I didn't know that have a phd worth of of arguing with people on online forums. Of course you must have the clearest perspective of us all then.

    5 hours ago, BlueOak said:

    All you've got is venom for someone with another perspective why the hell do you engage in conversation? Ridiculous.

    you are the one who tagged my week old comment and proposed to intentionally have other people keep dying because your strategic genius told you that it is the best option. I have a short temper when it comes to pathetic, petty worldviews like that.

    But you are right, we don't have to keep talking. We just have to wait and have time prove you wrong.

  13. Posted

    2 minutes ago, BlueOak said:

    Its precisely because I do not want a wider european war that I advocate for keeping the war as far away from Europe as possible. 

    So you are just a selfish coward, got it. Then stop pretending that you are arguing from some kind of strategic standpoint and just said that it benefits you more that Ukraine keep suffering as long as you ass is safe.

    3 minutes ago, BlueOak said:

    The situation does not need to 'turn around' or magically do anything. Once again: Its to contain the war in the east of Ukraine, that has been the strategy for about 2 years now, and that is exactly what is happening. Russia keeps running headfirst into it.

    Ukraine is losing its positions and people. You can speculate as much as you want about how Russia is running out of tanks, or how they are burning through their population, but it's Ukraine that has been losing pretty consistently as of late. All the rest is just you talking out of your ass, with no proof to back up your words.

     

  15. Posted

    @BlueOak okay, so if Russia keeps fighting this war, their arms will run out, and they will have no resources or country left. And if Ukraine continues fighting, they will be heavily invested by the EU, and hence have indefinite resources to keep fighting. 

    Amazing logic, especially considering how:

    - Ukraine is the one who lacking resources and proper support at the moment, and is losing territories because they don't have enough men and weapons.
    - Russia manufactures more weapons per year than all of EU combined.
    - Russia can send missiles all over Ukraine damaging its power stations, factories, roads, railroads, etc., while Ukraine can only attack a few hundred km into Russia. 

    But I guess if they just keep fighting forever the situation will somehow magically turn around /s

    And if the war gets placed on hold, Russia will have new troops, new equipment, new supply lines etc. Which won't apply to Ukraine for some reason. I guess they would just sit and do nothing. They wouldn't regroup, or rearm, or rebuild their infrastructure, or strengthen their borders, or make new deals with the west, and EU wouldn't use that chance to up its weapon's manufacturing so that it could actually be on par with Russia.

    That also makes perfect sense...

     

  16. Posted

    2 hours ago, Husseinisdoingfine said:

    This wouldn't be the first time South Korean impeached, or even imprisoned their own head of state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Park_Geun-hye

    Their former right wing nationalist and populist president, Park Geun-hye, was literally sentenced to 25 years in prison and fined ₩20 billion ($17.86 million USD) for abuses of power and coercion charges. 

    ap18236107866241-edit.jpg

    The police girl is so pretty though

  18. Posted

    8 hours ago, BlueOak said:

    Which will last until Russia invades again. For their 9th war into former USSR territories.

    They and the posters here will say: It's the wests fault, and list a few reasons they feel this way to justify the next war. I will say I must be a mind reader to have predicted this 5 years ago huh. Like I don't have 8 previous examples to look at, Russia repeatedly telling me it, and every previous condition for this war not only being still there but exaggerated on both sides.

    1. You don't know what will actually happen

    2. Even if Russia invades again, it's still better than non stop war.

    Time and stalling is on the Ukrainian side. Putin is not immortal.

  19. Posted

    8 minutes ago, AION said:

    Although Zelenskyy is the cause of the war. He doesn’t run away. And if he is a man he will do the necessary steps to establish peace. Which part of that you want clarification about?

    I didn't ask for a clarification.I am saying that this has nothing to do with your argument about duty.

    I also don't agree that Zelenskyi is the cause of war, this is just your nutjob opinion, but that's not the point..

     

  21. Posted · Edited by Something Funny

    4 minutes ago, AION said:

    I don't know what you are talking about

    I am talking about how in order to make an argument that "you have a duty towards your country, therefore you should go and fight in war", you should first prove thaat fighting in a war is what's best for your country.

    Maybe what's best for his country is for him to run away so that he can keep Ukrainian heritage alive.

    Maybe what's best for his country is to give up right now, survive under Russian occupation, and then gain independese once Putin's regime collapses. Saving hundreds of thousands of lives.

    But you hypocrites only use "duty" when it means sending someone to get their legs blown up, accomplishing nothing. Simply because it sounds very cool and patriotic, and movie like. Life is not holywood.

     

  22. Posted

    38 minutes ago, AION said:

    I believe in duty to your country.

    And I believe that you should be my slave. What makes you think that you can force your believes onto other people?

    Besides, you would also have to make an argument that fighting this war is what's best for Ukraine, which is yet to be proven. What you really are saying is that people have a duty to blindly follow your goverments orders.

    40 minutes ago, AION said:

    If everybody ran away from duty, tyranny would roam the world.

    Once again, if everyone ran away, there would be no war. I love how you use this argument only when it's convenient to you.

    43 minutes ago, AION said:

    Plain survival shouldn't be the greatest good, especially for men. It is different if you a child or a woman.

    Once gain, good for you, but what makes you think that you have a right to push your arbitraty, pulled out of ass values, onto other people?