Ninja_pig

@Dodo Nice work

Nah you right.

Wow, this is an interesting concept, and it partially lines up with my musings on the nature of time and space. Are you saying that the time component of the metric tensor being in the upper left corner means that it has some priority in the calculations? I didn't know that there was any real significance to the order in which the components of the tensor were arranged. Although I think it's interesting that time and space have opposite signs. Do you know why that is? I have often thought that there is no such thing as time, there is only the eternal present moment which is everchanging and continuous. That's just what my personal spiritual experiences have informed me of, and I have the suspicion that there is no real 4D spacetime manifold, but representing it that way mathematically gives us an elegant way to talk about relativistic dynamics. If there is no such thing as time then there may also be no such thing as space, although that's something that I have not thought about as much. Space may just be a relationship between discrete points in some abstract graph like Stephen Wolfram says. I have heard of symmetry principles in Norther's theorem and the Dirac equation, but I have never heard of vacuum oscillators. What is that? Is it something to do with string theory?

Yes! Spirituality is about embracing every aspect of the human experience. We can't be trying to throw out things that are distasteful to our own philosophies. We must live in the present, in the real world. Spirituality is about connecting to who we are, not deprecating our humanity. A master will be aware of every emotion and every mental happening and love it. They will enjoy the ride. They will dance to the symphony of life.

No life is mediocre. Only limited human notions of excitement and adventure can make it seem that way. Every life is extraordinary! There has never been a human experience the same as yours, and there never will be again. God chose to experience a life that seems mediocre to himself when he tricks himself into thinking that he is human. Think about how your life is part of the bigger picture of life and the universe. Everything matters. Find the beauty in every moment. You are beautiful. More beautiful than you can possible imagine! Just look inside for long enough and you will agree.

I wanted to share an interesting video I came across today. It's from Fred Davis, one of my favorite teachers. I think that this realization goes very deep, and it ties into the foundational point that the universe is a mind that is trying to understand itself. We as humans are consequences of the laws of physics playing themselves out. Given enough time, hydrogen in a vacuum will begin to develop language and ask questions such as "what is love". Humans are simply another emergent phenomenon from the laws of physics. We often see that as time goes on, love tends to increase. As our societies get more advanced we tend to have less cruelty and more acceptance. This is primarily because we become smart and we understand more about ourselves and the world around us. The universe has quantum fields so that it can have quantum particles. It has quantum particles so that it can create protons and neutrons. It has protons and neutrons so that it can create molecules. It has molecules so that it can create organic proteins. It has organic proteins so that it can create cells. It has cells so that it can create animal life. It has animal life so that it can create humans. It has humans (or another intelligent lifeform) so that it can understand itself. The laws of physics are set up to create greater understanding of the universe and thus greater self-love over time. Confusion decreases, love increases!

At first glance, Stage Green's explicit focus on compassion—defined here as empathy combined with actions to alleviate suffering—might seem superior. Stage Green emphasizes communal harmony, equality, and empathy, often manifesting as a strong drive for social justice and anti-hierarchical values. In contrast, Stage Yellow focuses on systems thinking, integration, and flexibility, seeking to understand and harmonize diverse perspectives without rigid judgments. However, this essay argues that Stage Yellow embodies a deeper, more inclusive form of compassion because it accepts hierarchies as part of human development, leading to less divisive judgment and more effective, sustainable solutions. To explore this, we will examine the stages' approaches to hierarchies, their expressions of compassion, and the practical implications, while acknowledging the strengths and limitations of each. A key difference lies in how each stage views hierarchies, which directly influences their capacity for compassion. Stage Green often critiques hierarchies as socially constructed tools of oppression, viewing any ranking of people—such as labeling someone as "more advanced" in developmental terms—as a threat to equality. This perspective stems from a noble intent: to ensure all individuals are treated with equal dignity and to dismantle systems that perpetuate inequality. For instance, a Stage Green thinker might condemn a corporate hierarchy for exploiting workers, seeing it as inherently unjust and advocating for its complete deconstruction. In contrast, Stage Yellow recognizes hierarchies as natural, albeit imperfect, manifestations of human social evolution, serving as survival strategies in certain contexts. Rather than demonizing them, Yellow seeks to understand their functions and integrate them into broader systems. This acceptance does not equate to endorsement of oppression; instead, it fosters a non-judgmental stance that allows for empathy toward individuals operating within those hierarchies. By judging less harshly, Stage Yellow can extend compassion more broadly, engaging with people at various developmental stages without resentment. For example, where Stage Green might view a dictator solely as a symbol of evil, Yellow could see them as embodying a more primitive survival mode, opening pathways for dialogue and gradual reform rather than outright rejection. This non-judgmental approach clarifies the link between hierarchies and compassion: less judgment reduces emotional barriers, enabling a more holistic empathy that embraces reality as it is, rather than demanding conformity to an ideal. Stage Green's push for equality, while compassionate in intent, can sometimes create logical inconsistencies by imposing a uniform standard on a diverse world, potentially alienating those who do not align with its values. Yellow's integration, however, promotes compassion by bridging divides, though it is not without flaws—we will address these shortly. Building on this, Stage Yellow's compassion also manifests through greater strategic effectiveness in addressing real-world suffering. Stage Green excels in raising awareness and mobilizing for causes like environmental justice or human rights, often through grassroots movements that amplify marginalized voices. These efforts demonstrate genuine empathy and have driven significant social progress, such as advancements in civil rights and inclusivity. Yet, Green's idealistic drive to eliminate hierarchies can lead to utopian proposals that overlook practical complexities, sometimes resulting in short-term gains but long-term challenges. For instance, a Green-inspired policy might demand immediate wealth redistribution without considering economic incentives, potentially leading to unintended consequences like reduced innovation. Stage Yellow, by accepting the world's multifaceted nature, crafts more realistic, adaptive plans. It might analyze a capitalist system not as pure "money worship" but as an efficient engine for resource allocation, then propose incremental reforms—like universal basic income pilots—that evolve the system toward equity while minimizing disruption. In this way, Yellow's compassion is not just emotional but instrumental, achieving tangible reductions in suffering through systems-level interventions. To further illustrate Yellow's unique position, consider a comparison with Stage Orange, which also tolerates hierarchies but from a self-interested viewpoint. Orange sees hierarchies as opportunities for personal achievement, often indifferent to systemic oppression as long as rules appear fair. This lacks the integrative empathy of Yellow, which views hierarchies as interconnected parts of human function, not mere ladders to climb. Thus, while Orange may not judge hierarchies harshly, its compassion is limited by individualism, whereas Yellow's is enhanced by holistic understanding. Of course, no stage is perfect, and acknowledging limitations ensures a balanced view. Stage Green's strength in emotional empathy can inspire widespread solidarity, fostering communities where people feel seen and valued—something Yellow, with its intellectual detachment, might sometimes overlook, appearing aloof or overly analytical to Green. Yellow's acceptance of hierarchies could, in extreme cases, risk passivity toward injustice if not paired with active intervention. However, that Yellow's integrative approach generally allows for a more comprehensive compassion, incorporating Green's emotional insights while transcending its rigidities. In conclusion, while Stage Green's compassion shines through its passionate advocacy for equality, Stage Yellow offers a more profound form by accepting hierarchies without judgment, leading to broader empathy and effective action. This does not diminish Green's contributions but highlights how Yellow's systems-thinking builds upon them for greater impact. Ultimately, embracing Yellow's perspective will guide society toward compassionate, sustainable progress, reminding us that true empathy involves understanding the world in all its complexity. Written by me, revised with assistance from Grok.

Clubs.

https://youtu.be/OY_mJkgRxuM?si=PyoiX078Kdn6i6Ji

Here is an absolute gem of a YouTube video which explores the ethics of factory farming through an existential lens. It also has a very unique art style and is very entertaining. It is extremely insightful and provides great new perspectives on consciousness and life on earth.

Im an American currently volunteering in an extremely impoverished part of the world and i would say the predominant stage is red. Its probably %10 purple, %60 red, %25 blue, and maybe %5 Orange. The country was pretty much entirely tribal until only about 100 years ago, so this distribution makes sense from that perspective. Some common socially accepted practices include: Having multiple wives Beating wives for disobedience or disloyalty (however disloyalty from the husband is okay) Beating children for disobedience, or to force them to learn prayers Discarding trash literally anywhere Scrolling tiktok in public with maximum volume on the phone Embezzling school or other public funds Demanding unnecessary fees from students A total disregard for traffic laws Burglary, pickpocketing, robbery A general lack of respect for laws except in fear of stronger authority I think that stage red is something that we usually only see in criminals in developed nations, but here it is the norm. It is something we largely left behind in western Europe and America by the 1800's. It is very interesting to me to see the stage acted out on a large scale. I think one common mistake that volunteer organisations make is that people are "inherently good", and that we just need to provide the proper assistance in order to rescue them from poverty. The truth is that people are inherently going to act out their current stage. They aren't going to be acting out whatever your stage's version of good is just because you educate them about it. The fact that we don't understand that makes %95 of foreign development efforts useless. Also, the predominant religion is Islam in this country, with a little bit of Christianity and anamism (a stage purple version of spirituality similar to paganism). Interestingly, i find more of the stage blue people to be Christian, while most muslims are stage red. I think that the christian religion lends itself more to a stage blue lifestyle, although christianity here is practiced in more of a stage red manner than in the US (stricter rules, fasting, different traditions for Christmas). I think the religeon of a nation may be one of the most important things determining its spiral dynamics stage. That is why islamic nations are normally not very developed. Also, i would venture to say that the concept of a nation, in terms of a national identity is only possible at a stage blue level of consciousness. The stage red people just see it as another system to exploited and menuvered for personal gain. Therefore, any stage red "nation" will always function more like a kindom than a country, which is what we see with most undeveloped nations. I work as a volunteer in education, and i believe a well run (stage blue) school, with order, strict rules, and committed, uncorrputed staff is probably the best way to further psychological development from stage red. Education is generally very effective for psychological development no matter the stage. This is why we should focus on education especially to make a healthy society in my opinion.

So are you saying that in order for quantum particles to interact then you need a conscious observer which somehow is responsible for the singular spacetime where they interact? We should remember that according to special relativity, the statement "two separate points in space at the same time" is erroneous. Effectively, simultaneity is a matter of reference frame and we can't say that two particles are the same age or what have you until the point where they actually interact. This is the genius of special relativity. It does away with the need for some kind of "true" or "unifying" perspective. The lorenze transformations tell us how to reconcile one reference frame with another even though they are totally separate yet totally correct.

@theleelajoker I definitely left a lot of things out for the sake of brevity. I am just trying to prevent others from falling into the same trap I fell into, which is to think that real understanding comes from simple explanations and that "if you can't explain it to a 5 year old you don't understand it yourself". For special relativity, I would recommend classical mechanics by Taylor for a textbook, and the YouTube channels Eugene kuthoransky, Dialect, and eigenchris. For quantum mechanics I would recommend David Griffiths quantum mechanics and PBS Space Time videos on the double slit experiment. I recommend these resources because they were what helped my personal understanding the most. There are indeed interpretations of physical theories which do not have a definite right or wrong according to any real experiments we can do. I just think that we have to tread lightly and not try to turn interpretations into conclusions. I guess I could have said "these statements are at best highly speculative and have no supporting imperial evidence even though imperial evidence ought to be possible if they were true" instead of just that they're wrong. I didn't take the time to explain why the statements were wrong because I didn't want that to take away from my main point, which is general caution. I would rather we not use physics at all to reason about spirituality or metaphysics. I have a bachelor's in physics which basically means I know the basics needed in order to understand the basics. I know from experience the dunning cruger effect and I know exactly how it feels at each point. So few have really gone through the effort of trying to grok quantum mechanics that they honestly believe simplified explanations with no math are as deep as the topic goes, or at least they think they have understood the just if it. To make a correct statement about the theory takes a lot more than to make an incorrect statement. I want people to dive deeper into the math so they can think more critically about the subject. I think people are uncomfortable with the fact that they do not understand the topic so they try to pretend they do. Just to satisfy you, let me try to debunk erroneous statement #2: Quantum mechanics tells us that small particles, instead of exhibiting classical behavior, have a probability of being in any certain state once they are measured. The term "measured" means any interaction with the particle that requires It to have a definite position or momentum. For example, an electron interacting with a photon. At this time, the wave function of both quantum particles 'collapse' into a single point and they now interact at that point. Notice that a conscious observer was in no way needed here in order to make the wave function collapse. In fact, the wave function itself tells us nothing about the actual state of these particles at any point in time, only the probability of them being at any one of those points. The idea of superposition is not trying to tell us the particles are literally in every possible state, but rather a convenient way to calculate the probability that they are in each state. Now, there is the fact of Bell's inequality, which tells us that there are no hidden variables, or in other words properties inherent to the particles deciding these states which we simply do not know causing this quantum behavior. This tells us that there is some inherent randomness to how quantum particles behave which is ultimately unpredictable. As far as the math goes, you should check out the stern Gerlach experiment, and understand how quantum particle states are represented in a hilbert space, and then use that knowledge to understand Belle's inequality. This is probably the minimum to fully comprehend the basics of superposition and quantum randomness in a way that may be metaphysically relevant.