Terell Kirby

Those others don’t really exist though

Yet this is a feature, not a bug

@Leo Gura would you argue that reality is constantly moving towards something greater Unity and Wholeness? Seems all movement in the Universe is orchestrated with divine intelligence, which grounds logic .. this of logic transcends laws of physics or any other material system, which is an offshoot or subsegment of divine intelligence. I find this is fundamental to most of your proofs. 'A' being Existence itself, in all of its forms. Question for me to contemplate: what is Existence up to? Like .. really, what is it up to? If it's not bound by the laws of physics, its self determining-doing whatever the hell it wants, when it wants -- Existence creates logic serves to serve its agenda.

Lmaoo

Damn .. just did the spiritual exercise posted on the blog. I am corrupt AF .. never mind

But we can’t ever not “be alive”. Seems more fair to say that some states of consciousness are more evil / corrupt than others relative to the closeness of one’s Mind to Infinite consciousness.

Makes the path more complex..as it should be

I recall vividly when my state shift happened. This was after a solid 6-8 months of contemplating Leo’s works and trying to bake insights, it was tiring .. I was doing the entire thing manually. One day at a nightclub near the dance floor it just happened. At the time I couldn’t tell what it was but something about my perception changed, something deep. It’s the sharp and immediate feeling of everything making sense … what’s funny is it made me recontextualize all the Actualized teachings I had absorbed over those 6-8 months, though I can’t definitively say my intense contemplation of such things is what caused the breakthrough- maybe it did, maybe it didn’t. Once a state is achieved, it only deepens (in my experience). It’s a baseline from which all thoughts generate. I am at times insecure about my Awakening because it was done without psychedelics. Some meditation was involved, but not anything super hardcore- I’m not so insecure about it anymore, because I’ve also realized no one can validate/invalidate it. My direct experience speaks for itself —never to be shared or talked about to anyone but myself because I’m imagining everything

crazy .. but true

Thanks for sharing that- takes courage and vulnerability, also helps me understand your experience with men and their sexual taste. Only thing I would ask is that working in these environments, can it skew one's perspective on men? It is a limited sample size. Also what is behind referring the term "male species?" seems to dehumanize men. I don't care to be right or to debate/make a point. This kind of dialogue helps broaden my perspective.

What is foundational in making religion problematic? Here is my list: 1. God as a separate entity, which makes God limited 2. Idol worship: Jesus, Muhammed, Buddha (among many). 3. Is not construct aware, does not understand social construction. 4. Misses laws of relativity, post modernism 5. Prioritizes religion as tool for human survival over addressing deep questions Consciousness

1. We can take our opinions as absolute. Stating something as opinion does not absolve it from being take as superior to other perspectives, opinions and worldviews. 2. You base what is true off of media/advertisement- but how many personal conversations (deep conversations) have you had with men on sexuality and what they value? What about the diversity of men from different cultures, backgrounds, etc? Not saying you haven’t done this, but stressing the importance of what is necessary to come up with a truth claim of any kind.

You seem to be saying two opposed things. One sentence you make absolutist statement about what men value, then say not all of them value it. I’m skeptical of your position on this because your statements seem to come from a place of taking absolutist positions on what men value as important when selecting sexual mates- this discredits men who have high standards that go beyond just physical attractiveness and wanting to use women for sex and nothing else. My question now is- what holds you from questioning your assumptions and generalizations about men on this topic?

Hmm .. but how can you be so certain? That’s my main question. Unless you surveyed/experienced every man in existence, this could possibly be a generalization on your part.

Maybe. But you have to remember most people voted for Trump ideological grounds, economic variables are often secondary. Hallmark of low perspective: