TrustTheProcess

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    768

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TrustTheProcess

  5. Posted

    @Husseinisdoingfine 

    You can't just jump from capitalism to a truly egalitarian globalized economic system. It may be possible to have a democratic socialist system, but at the moment, we don't even have the material conditions to do so.

    Social democracy seems to be the most logical next step as we enter stage green. Personally, I think that we will never have a purely socialist system(the same way we have never seen a purely capitalist system). I think it is more likely to have a globalized soc democratic system with the floor of poverty being raised as technology and efficiency improves. 

    Marx is one of the most brilliant social philosophers in history... that said, I think it is best to take his insights with a grain of salt and to not hyper-idealize the ism attached to him. 

  11. Posted

    10 minutes ago, Consept said:

    He has some good nuggets ill give you that, but i think the test is really if people resonate with him on a higher level, which i dont think has been the case from our small sample here. I think hes a decent orange teacher but surely if you want higher level teaching hes not the first youd go to. 

     

    I think even stage green and yellow can find a lot of value in his material to get their finances in check... that said, I would not peg him above orange at all. 

  14. Posted · Edited by louhad

    @humanProcess .............. lol

    rule of thumb: anyone who doesn't understand the difference between sex/gender, anyone who uses the term "cultural marxism", anyone who uses the term "western civilization"... is a pseudo-intellectual. He has some valid understandings of psychology on an individual scale... he needs to stay in his lane and not say stupid shit all the time on things he doesn't understand. He just doesn't get how society functions on a macro scale. 

  15. Posted

    @Epikur From your article:

    "This research originally claimed that within the study's sample, more gender equality in a country is linked with a lower proportion of women studying STEM fields. The study and its results received significant coverage in non-academic media outlets.[6][7][8][9] However, separate Harvard researchers were unable to recreate the data reported in the study, and in December 2019, a correction was issued to the original paper.[10][11][12] The correction outlined that the authors had created a previously undisclosed and unvalidated method to measure "propensity" of women and men to attain a higher degree in STEM, as opposed to the originally claimed measurement of "women’s share of STEM degrees".[11][10][13] However, even incorporating the newly disclosed method, the investigating researchers could not recreate all the results presented."

    -From the first paragraph of your Wikipedia link

     

    Also, I just want to say that I am a pre medical student in america and a majority of my peers are women. lol

  17. Posted

    6 minutes ago, humanProcess said:

    @Opo i was being to kind. Your first video is at a glance already full of nonsense Jordan could easily debunk.

    He wasnt debating a child but one of the respected journalist, one of the best they had. all the nonsense that was circulating about Jordan was very quickly debunked. But of course when that gets debunked immediately loads more of that comes into life. Thats how the media works.

    do you not see that media has a big agenda and everything that goes counter gets vilified?

     

    Guarantee that Jordan Peterson could never stand in a debate against a serious academic... maybe he can get away with an sjw journalist or a college freshman who just took soc 101... 

  19. Posted

    9 hours ago, Gidiot said:

    Imagine listening to leo and then listening to Tim pool and acting like Tim pool has a leg to stand on.

    my imagination is not that flexible... Tim Pool is honestly the biggest joke on youtube at this point.... still trying to say he is liberal and making a living by triggering conservatives and feeding them their candy so they can justify their worldview lmao

  22. Posted · Edited by louhad

    21 minutes ago, DrewNows said:

    how do you know that? are you trying to say those are the words he used in this context? Have you even researched the conspiracy theories? What do you think of this little clip? 

     

    1. In that post, I was only clarifying gates's quote about how improving healthcare and reproductive services would inevitably lead to a slower growth and even decrease in population

    2. On this video... a. he said that if someone develops a biological weapon, they would pick a deadly one... He didn't say that he would pick it lmao. b. Given our current practices of animal cultivation, another disease is inevitable. All that Gates was saying was that the next time a pandemic happens, countries like america would follow New Zealand and South Korea's example and be quick and more proactive to contain the outbreak and not just try to sweep it under the rug and call it a liberal hoax like our current administration. Don't let the scary music fool you lmao. I have allowed myself to explore many clips like this and they are all garbage.